On Thursday 24 July 2008 10:27:42 pm mouss wrote:
> johnf wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >> if you have problems, please follow the directions documented in
> >>http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
> >> In particular:
> >> - explain clearly what problem you are trying to solve
> >> - show out
johnf wrote:
[snip]
if you have problems, please follow the directions documented in
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
In particular:
- explain clearly what problem you are trying to solve
- show output of 'postconf -n'
- show relevant log lines (full lines, do not truncate)
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:00:32PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
But it still accepts anonymous logins:
postfix/smtpd[29015]: Anonymous TLS connection established
and the delivery goes through.
Hold on a minute... Anonymous TLS connection does *not* imply
anonymous SASL auth
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:00:32PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> >But it still accepts anonymous logins:
> >postfix/smtpd[29015]: Anonymous TLS connection established
> >and the delivery goes through.
>
> Hold on a minute... Anonymous TLS connection does *not* imply
> anonymous SASL authentication
Rich Winkel wrote:
Hi, I'm setting up a mail server with dovecot-1.0.13 and
postfix-2.5.1 on freebsd 7.0. I'm a newbie to postfix, I almost
have it running but have two questions:
I'm using dovecot auth-client for sasl authentication. I want it to
reject mail from anonymous logins, but this is
kbajwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I deleted /var/log/maillog file, rebooted the system and tried to send the
> email from (using Win XP PC) the web site. Same error message.
What SMTP server are you using on the client? As Brian already told you,
that is probably the source of your err
Tero Tilus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I make postfix (2.3.7) defer, not bounce, on delivery command
> timeout? I've got dspam occasionally hitting "Command time limit
> exceeded" and it bounces.
This thread may help you understand your options:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/po
Wietse Venema:
> Rich Winkel:
> > Hi, I'm setting up a mail server with dovecot-1.0.13 and
> > postfix-2.5.1 on freebsd 7.0. I'm a newbie to postfix, I almost
> > have it running but have two questions:
> >
> > I'm using dovecot auth-client for sasl authentication. I want it to
> > reject mail f
Rich Winkel:
> Hi, I'm setting up a mail server with dovecot-1.0.13 and
> postfix-2.5.1 on freebsd 7.0. I'm a newbie to postfix, I almost
> have it running but have two questions:
>
> I'm using dovecot auth-client for sasl authentication. I want it to
> reject mail from anonymous logins, but thi
Hi, I'm setting up a mail server with dovecot-1.0.13 and
postfix-2.5.1 on freebsd 7.0. I'm a newbie to postfix, I almost
have it running but have two questions:
I'm using dovecot auth-client for sasl authentication. I want it to
reject mail from anonymous logins, but this isn't working.
"postco
Is there anyone out there willing to provide a hour of time. I will of course
pay for the aid. Please contact me off list.
jfabiani at yolo.com
--
John Fabiani
On Thursday 24 July 2008 02:25:04 pm johnf wrote:
Ok I can't send but I can recieve. I am suppose to setup a relay_host. And
that relay_host needs to be my normal smtp server in my case
mail.wavecable.com
--
John Fabiani
Mouss:
I deleted /var/log/maillog file, rebooted the system and tried to send the
email from (using Win XP PC) the web site. Same error message.
I checked the log file "/va/log/maillog", no error message logged (see
below). I assume this the log file where Postfix logs messages.
Then I check any
On Thursday 24 July 2008 01:35:31 pm mouss wrote:
> johnf wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:27:03 pm johnf wrote:
> >> On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:16:19 pm mouss wrote:
> >>> johnf wrote:
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> I just discovered a problem - I need to be able to send mail for the
> doma
kbajwa wrote:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 (comes packaged with OS)
Dovecot 1.1.1
Did a fresh install and created a new web site: http://www.imwell-usa.com.
The web site has an email address for 'Contact Us'. When I try to send an
email from the web page (from Win XP PC), I get the following error:
johnf wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:27:03 pm johnf wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:16:19 pm mouss wrote:
johnf wrote:
[snip]
I just discovered a problem - I need to be able to send mail for the
domain. How do I set that up??
what do you mean? you can send mail on behalf of any do
On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:37, Sven Schwyn wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just released the first version of Postwhite, a policy server for
> Postfix which implements whitelisting. These per-recipient whitelists
> are entirely managed by use of emails.
>
> http://www.bitcetera.com/products/postwhite
>
> Her
kbajwa wrote:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 (comes packaged with OS)
Dovecot 1.1.1
Did a fresh install and created a new web site: http://www.imwell-usa.com.
The web site has an email address for 'Contact Us'. When I try to send an
email from the web page (from Win XP PC), I get the following error:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:27:03 pm johnf wrote:
> On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:16:19 pm mouss wrote:
> > johnf wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I just discovered a problem - I need to be able to send mail for the
> > > domain. How do I set that up??
> >
> > what do you mean? you can send mail on be
On Thursday 24 July 2008 12:16:19 pm mouss wrote:
> johnf wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > I just discovered a problem - I need to be able to send mail for the
> > domain. How do I set that up??
>
> what do you mean? you can send mail on behalf of any domain.
>
> if they have SPF records, they need to upd
CentOS 5.2
Postfix 2.3.3 (comes packaged with OS)
Dovecot 1.1.1
Did a fresh install and created a new web site: http://www.imwell-usa.com.
The web site has an email address for 'Contact Us'. When I try to send an
email from the web page (from Win XP PC), I get the following error:
An erro
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:56:44PM +0200, mouss wrote:
johnf wrote:
I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were running
postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking I could
use my postfix server to deliver mail. This would save t
johnf wrote:
[snip]
I just discovered a problem - I need to be able to send mail for the domain.
How do I set that up??
what do you mean? you can send mail on behalf of any domain.
if they have SPF records, they need to update them to authorize your
server so that the mail you send is n
On Thursday 24 July 2008 11:09:17 am Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:56:44PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> > johnf wrote:
> > >I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were running
> > >postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking I could
> > >use m
On Thursday 24 July 2008 11:13:52 am johnf wrote:
> On Thursday 24 July 2008 10:56:44 am mouss wrote:
> > johnf wrote:
> > > I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were
> > > running postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking
> > > I could use my postfix se
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:22:54PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> that said, I don't think this is important. I personally use things like
>
> maps_directory = ${config_directory}/maps
> cdb_prefis = cdb:${maps_directory}/db
> pcre_prefix = pcre:${maps_directory}/pcre
> sql_repfix = proxy:mysql:${maps_dir
Wietse Venema wrote:
mouss:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
[snip]
Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
a question here. is there a reason why proxymap wouldn't be the default
(so people
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:10:40PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> >It is not obious how proxy_read_maps will cove to have the right value
> >when people use custom tables. I don't know that it is safe to allow
> >proxymap() to be "promiscuous" and allow any table to be opened.
> >
>
> I meant something li
On Thursday 24 July 2008 10:56:44 am mouss wrote:
> johnf wrote:
> > I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were running
> > postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking I could
> > use my postfix server to deliver mail. This would save them the expense
> >
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:48:51PM +0200, mouss wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
[snip]
Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
a question here. is there a reason
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:56:44PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> johnf wrote:
> >I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were running
> >postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking I could
> >use my postfix server to deliver mail. This would save them the expense
mouss:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
> >
> > Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
> >
> > Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
> >
>
> a question here. is there a reason why proxymap wouldn't be the defaul
Brandon Keepers wrote:
I'm working on an application that is backed by Postfix 2.3.8 and
Dovecot 1.0.13, configured with virtual domains, for handling messaging.
I need to be able to send the notification (such as "You've received a
new message on SomeAwesomeService. Click here to check it out
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:48:51PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >[snip]
> >Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
> >
> >Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
> >
> >Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
>
> a question here. is there a rea
johnf wrote:
I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were running
postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking I could use
my postfix server to deliver mail. This would save them the expense of going
out and buying new hardware (their hardware is under wa
Victor Duchovni wrote:
[snip]
Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
a question here. is there a reason why proxymap wouldn't be the default
(so people would have to exclude maps i
I have a client that had a complete hardware failure. They were running
postfix and now need to get mail working again. I was thinking I could use
my postfix server to deliver mail. This would save them the expense of going
out and buying new hardware (their hardware is under warranty) and wo
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:12 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix run
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
> >servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if table
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
carefully defined to have identical values for connection-related
para
Hi
I've just released the first version of Postwhite, a policy server for
Postfix which implements whitelisting. These per-recipient whitelists
are entirely managed by use of emails.
http://www.bitcetera.com/products/postwhite
Here's a real-life example of what Postwhite does:
Arthur‘s ma
On Jul 24, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-24-2008 9:03 AM Brandon Keepers spake the following:
In my opinion (which is worth every penny you didn't pay for it) If
I want notices of my new messages on a phone or other mobile
device, I might as well just get the message sent or co
I'm working on an application that is backed by Postfix 2.3.8 and
Dovecot 1.0.13, configured with virtual domains, for handling messaging.
I need to be able to send the notification (such as "You've received a
new message on SomeAwesomeService. Click here to check it out", It's
evil, I know
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:29:27AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:35 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> >>We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, an
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:39 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> --On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:02 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We found that if we are using startTLS with pos
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
> postfix, that it Postfix stops working, even though the LDAP server
> continues to accept connections from other clients just fine using
> startTLS. He
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:35 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
postfix, that it Postfix stops working, even though the LDAP server
Wietse Venema wrote:
audit:
My server's been getting slammed all night with requests from
adsl-99-162-37-137.dsl.ipltin.sbcglobal.net[99.162.37.137] and I've been
trying to figure out to stop it.
That's what smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit is for.
I have put the above in and we
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:39 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:02 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
> postfix, that it Postf
audit:
> My server's been getting slammed all night with requests from
> adsl-99-162-37-137.dsl.ipltin.sbcglobal.net[99.162.37.137] and I've been
> trying to figure out to stop it.
That's what smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit is for.
> I've put the IP address in mx_access with REJECT and ran
audit:
> I have put the above in and we've blackholed that IP from connecting at
> the router now. Now I'm trying to figure what I'm missing to stop all
> the from=<> email's that keep hitting.
>
> Jul 24 10:27:52 flatlined postfix/smtpd[5121]: connect from
> unknown[200.81.211.94]
> Jul 24 10:
audit wrote:
My server's been getting slammed all night with requests from
adsl-99-162-37-137.dsl.ipltin.sbcglobal.net[99.162.37.137] and I've
been trying to figure out to stop it.
I've put the IP address in mx_access with REJECT and ran
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/postfix reload and it's still getti
My server's been getting slammed all night with requests from
adsl-99-162-37-137.dsl.ipltin.sbcglobal.net[99.162.37.137] and I've been
trying to figure out to stop it.
I've put the IP address in mx_access with REJECT and ran
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/postfix reload and it's still getting slammed.
Do
I have a somehow related problem.
My mail server uses lmtp:unix:/opt/insight/var/imap/socket/lmtp to transport
mails. I want postfix to forward or redirect a mail for a user in my domain
(e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] )to another user in test server am currently configuring
e.g [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the t
54 matches
Mail list logo
