Am 17.10.2014 um 07:49 schrieb Andre Rodier:
I have a few users who don't understand bounced messages, and consider
them as an error from our system. I won't even try to educate them.
I would like to know if there is a way to use HTML messages to send
"beautiful" bounces messages (internally) b
Hello,
the documentation states:
The milter_header_checks mechanism could also be used for
whitelisting. For example it could be used to skip heavy content
inspection for DKIM-signed mail from known friendly domains.
I want to do that for mail that passes DMARC checks (with 2.11.2 DMARC
became
Andre Rodier:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few users who don't understand bounced messages, and consider
> them as an error from our system. I won't even try to educate them.
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to use HTML messages to send
> "beautiful" bounces messages (internally) but continue t
Sebastian Wiesinger:
> Hello,
>
> the documentation states:
>
> The milter_header_checks mechanism could also be used for
> whitelisting. For example it could be used to skip heavy content
> inspection for DKIM-signed mail from known friendly domains.
>
> I want to do that for mail that passes D
John:
>
> On 14/10/2014 11:14 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014, John wrote:
> >> host MX.cogeco.ca[216.221.81.26] said: 451
> >> Postmaster
> >> Code 5 - #4.1.8 Domain of sender address does not
> >> resolve.
> > Try again, it's just a temporary error.
> >
> > BTW: cool
Wietse Venema:
> Sebastian Wiesinger:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the documentation states:
> >
> > The milter_header_checks mechanism could also be used for
> > whitelisting. For example it could be used to skip heavy content
> > inspection for DKIM-signed mail from known friendly domains.
> >
> > I wan
(This message is mostly of interest to Claus Assmann)
This week I fixed a problem or PREPEND actions in access maps or
policy server reponses that was giving problems with DMARC setups
that combine of SPF policy server with a DKIM Milter.
Meanwhile, Christian R??ner has pointed out that there sti
Am 17.10.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> (This message is mostly of interest to Claus Assmann)
>
> This week I fixed a problem or PREPEND actions in access maps or
> policy server reponses that was giving problems with DMARC setups
> that combine of SPF policy server with a DKIM Milter.
>
On 17 Oct 2014, at 04:51 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> The harder you try, the fewer people will read your bounce message.
Honestly, I do not think it is possible for there to be fewer people who read
bounces.
Customized LOCAL bounce messages would be nifty. I don't want HTML ones but
customizing t
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:49:15 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2014, at 04:51 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The harder you try, the fewer people will read your bounce message.
>
> Honestly, I do not think it is possible for there to be fewer people
> who read bounces.
>
> Customized LOCAL bounce m
On 10/17/2014 12:32 PM, jdebert wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:49:15 -0600
> LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 17 Oct 2014, at 04:51 , Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> The harder you try, the fewer people will read your bounce message.
>>
>> Honestly, I do not think it is possible for there to be fewer people
>>
On October 17, 2014 7:49:34 AM Andre Rodier wrote:
I have a few users who don't understand bounced messages, and consider
them as an error from our system. I won't even try to educate them.
So thay understand more if it was html ?, hmm
I would like to know if there is a way to use HTML mess
ignore
> the MTA's own received header when receiving Milter requests [...].
I have patches for evaluation:
Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.patch
ftp://ftp.porcupi
wietse:
I have patches for evaluation:
Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
just compiling ...
Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.11
A. Schulze:
>
> wietse:
>
> > I have patches for evaluation:
> > Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
> just compiling ...
>
> > Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918:
> > ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-releas
Wietse Venema:
> > To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to
> > implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own
> > received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore
> > the MTA's own received header when receiving Milter requests [...].
>
> I
Andreas Schulze:
> Wietse Venema:
> > > To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to
> > > implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own
> > > received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore
> > > the MTA's own received header when receiving Mi
17 matches
Mail list logo
