this particular IP?
Thanks in advance,
Ray
We are load balancing our Postfix servers and as part of that there is a
connection test to ensure the services are running. So the logs fill with
connection checks. Is there a way to suppress those connections from the logs?
Thanks in advance,
Ray
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 7:26:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Is it possible to have different systems for sending email (send
> directly, relay host) configurable via tables?
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Ray"
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:27:01 PM
> Subject: Is it possible to have different systems for sending email (send
> directly, relay host) configurable via tables?
> Hello List,
&
destination domains. Which works, but It would be nice to have it
directly within postfix too, as not to relay on another piece of software.
Thank you
Best
Ray
--
parameter on it's own.
I thought it would be that popular but I guess I was wrong :-). Could you
consider implementing this feature, it would be more convenient than messing
with command filters.
Thank you,
Best
Ray
--
> DSNs are sent to the envelope sender, VERP changes the envelope
> sender, therefore VERP has effect for all DSNs.
> Wietse
OK, I will checkout VERP, sounds exactly like what I would need indeed. My
remaining question would be on how to activate the Success DSN reports?
Best
Ray
--
ass and some recipient parameter). 2Bounce is really
secondary for me, what I would like is the possibility to also receive the
Success DSN in some parameter defined email.
VERP would handle the bounces, but not the success deliveries, right?
Thanks
Best
Ray
sable sending DSN to the from (which
could be no-reply, etc.) and sending every DSN (including success) only to a
pre-defined email address .
I hope I did miss something in the documentation,
thank you,
Best
Ray
--
Hi,
I have a configuration change to make to our postfix relays and I want to
confirm it will work as intended (before I mis-route email for 1,000 people).
I think I have what is a fairly common Postfix environment -
Dual instances -
Instance 1 for inbound - AmavisD, Spamassassin, and some oth
>- Original Message -
>From: "Wietse Venema"
>To: "Postfix users"
>Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 1:26:29 PM
>Subject: Re: best approach to filtering one specific case?
>
>Mike Ray:
>> The basic condition I'm trying to deal with
;s listening interfaces? Since this
message will only be coming from Amavis directly, it would be a waste of time
to have the milter listen on the internet interface.
Thanks all,
Mike Ray
On 18. Sep 2014, at 19:01 Uhr, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ray Davis:
>> A customer wants a mail relay for testing to SAP applications. It should
>> take all relayed email and save it to a local mailbox (or forward it to
>> another email address) - but it should not act
be more than welcome!
Thanks,
Ray
re: Feature Discussion: Handling large numbers of IPv6 Remote Sessions
in Anvil
Wietse wrote:
Anvil currently does not consider whether IP addresses in the same
address range. There are plenty legitimate mail servers in the
same /24 block, and I expect that IPv6 will be no different.
When t
Hi. Long time user of postfix here wanting to discuss Anvil.
In IPv4, the max number of sessions per remote site is pretty much
limited by the scarcity of IPv4 together with 65535 source port numbers.
So individual remote sites were limited in what they could do by the
underlying infrastructur
E_TLS..." is the culprit, just not
sure how to fix.
On Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:54 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 02:39:15PM -0700, Edward Ray wrote:
> Apr 12 14:33:02 portus postfix/smtpd[10743]: initializing the
> server-side TLS engine
> Apr 12 14
using this account because my postfix gateway can no longer send or receive
mail.
upgraded from v2.10.1 to v2.10.3 this morning.
Since that time, unable to send or receive mail. If anyone can help me debug
this issue, much appreciated.
Errors seen:
Apr 12 14:33:02 portus postfix/smtpd[10743]:
Thanks Viktor.
I managed to get it working...
Not sure why recursive address rewriting is required but it seems to be
working now.
Thanks
Ray
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/regexp-using-virtual-alias-maps-does-not-work-tp64892p64894.html
Sent from the
t systems.
my main.cf looks like this:
virtual_alias_domain=regexp:/etc/postfix/valias
the valias file looks like this:
/ray@ourdomain\.com\.au/ @ourdomain.local
/.*/ mailtest/
mailtest is a local mailbox in the maildir format.
Any help is appreciated. I do not necessary need to use the
virtual
esystem. Maybe a test with the disk
> utility might be helpful as well (just because mapfile, mapfile.db mtime
> stuff).
Good point. Just made a fsck with Disk Utility and it was happy. But maybe
I'll re-postmap all the postfix db files - just in case.
Thanks,
Ray
On 19. Aug 2011, at 16:22 Uhr, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse:
>>> Postfix does not use virtual aliases UNLESS if you configure it to do so.
>>>
>>> Please follow instructions in http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
>>> as requested in the maili
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:56 Uhr, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ray Davis :
>> On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:09 Uhr, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> * Ray Davis :
>>>
>>>> What would cause valid email addresses to be unknown periodically?
>>>> They
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:11 Uhr, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ray Davis:
>> What would cause valid email addresses to be unknown periodically?
>> They are valid before and after the following log entries and
>> nothing on the server was changed.
>>
>> This happens to
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:50 Uhr, Christian Roessner wrote:
> Am 19.08.2011 14:56, schrieb Ray Davis:
>> What would cause valid email addresses to be unknown periodically? They are
>> valid before and after the following log entries and nothing on the server
>> was changed.
&
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:09 Uhr, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ray Davis :
>
>> What would cause valid email addresses to be unknown periodically?
>> They are valid before and after the following log entries and nothing
>> on the server was changed.
>
> Is postmap
mf0.ffm0.de.carpe.net[212.96.133.20]: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient
address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
This is a Mac OS X Snow Leopard Server with no postfix config modifications.
Thanks,
Ray
x27;t start the second interface as I am already bound to port
25 on all 3 interfaces. I am assuming I am missing something silly here.
Thanks to all in advance.
Ray
### Primary INBound Instance ###
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
alternate_config_directories
On December 23, 2010 03:00:29 pm Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 2:08 PM, Ray wrote:
> > On December 23, 2010 10:48:07 am Noel Jones wrote:
> >> On 12/23/2010 11:33 AM, Ray wrote:
> >>> I believe that the message is being accepted by Postfix due to lines
> &
On December 23, 2010 10:48:07 am Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 11:33 AM, Ray wrote:
> > I believe that the message is being accepted by Postfix due to lines like
> > the following in the logs
> >
> > Dec 23 10:12:20 wserver amavis[15273]: (15273-12) Passed CLEAN,
Hello and sorry for the delay, I wanted to re-examine my logs and assumptions.
On December 21, 2010 03:00:02 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ray:
> > Hello,
> > I'm having an issue with email just disappearing.
> >
> > I have been looking at the documentation and log
logs or documentation on the next stages
of the process. I have done manual pop\smtp transactions over telnet before
and have no problem doing the equivilent, but I need some documentation.
Thanks,
Ray
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:24:03PM +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Is there maybe an even more simple approach to this using standard
> postfix functionality? The distribution lists are very static and do
> not require adjustments very often.
/etc/aliases? :)
Ray
h.
If I recall, however, there is an updated version in CentOS-extras (or
maybe it's centosplus, I forget).
You're other "RedHat'ish" option would be to rebuild the Fedora 13
SRPM's for CentOS. Could be a bit of a learning curve there though. :)
If possible, just stick with 2.3 unless there's some specific feature
you're missing.
Ray
On July 21, 2009 06:49:09 pm Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Ray wrote:
> > I have a solution, and It seems to work, just want to know if I'm going
> > to shoot myself in the foot.
> >
> > I'm running postfix 2.6 with a number of virtual domains, al
issues or is it real?
Thanks for your help.
Ray
On May 8, 2009 10:31:37 am Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ray:
> > Hello,
> >
> > System is FreeBSD 7.0, postfix 2.6.2, mysql storage of user info,
> > amvisd-new, and dovecot for authentication and pop/imap. postconf -n at
> > end of post.
> >
> > Just Yester
and the closest thing that I could find in the archives was "Postfix not
closing
mysql connections" back on 08/12/07, and it did help, but it didn't fully
answer my question.
Any help, including links to the docs appreciated.
Ray
Sample log lines:
May 7 13:46:35 wserver postfix
7;s a little intimidating.
Thanks everyone for your input. If I get a resolution, I'll post back.
Ray
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:49:57 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
> >>
> >> Ray w
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:10:22 Bill Weiss wrote:
> Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:46:21PM -0700:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > > On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 March 20
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > Ray wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) a
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
>
> Ray wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> > > Ray wrote:
> > > > Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Ema
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
> Ray wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping
> > that someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
> >
> > here's the situation
il somewhere or
...?
any suggestions including alternate mail lists or google search terms very
much appreciated.
Ray
45 matches
Mail list logo
