Recently I've been getting a ton of email for a new domain we've registered and
have begun receiving email for. Our users in this new domain are either
1. receiving email with a From address identical to their own, or
2. receiving email with a From address of one of our other three domains, non
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Recently I've been getting a ton of email for a new domain we've registered and
have begun receiving email for. Our users in this new domain are either
1. receiving email with a From address identical to their own, or
2. receiving email with a From address of one o
>> Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
>>
>> "operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
>
> The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
> anything. Wildcards are not allowed in dbm or other indexed
> files, and quotes should never be used.
I am almost
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
"operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
anything. Wildcards are not allowed in dbm or other indexed
files, and quotes should never be use
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
"operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
>>> The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
>>> anything. Wildcar
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
"operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
anything. Wil
On 14-May-2009, at 20:19, Noel Jones wrote:
You're right, that's a pcre construct and not universally supported
by regexp. A more portable expression would be:
/operator#[0-...@somephishingbanksite\.com$/ REJECT phishing
Now, just to double check, if postfix is compiled with PCRE then it
2009/5/15 LuKreme :
> Now, just to double check, if postfix is compiled with PCRE then it doesn't
> matter if the table is named regex or pcre, it uses and understands pcre,
> right?
A PCRE regex in a "regexp" table would still be incorrect. I've not
tested this, but I assume you'd get some failur
* Barney Desmond :
> 2009/5/15 LuKreme :
> > Now, just to double check, if postfix is compiled with PCRE then it doesn't
> > matter if the table is named regex or pcre, it uses and understands pcre,
> > right?
>
> A PCRE regex in a "regexp" table would still be incorrect.
Yes. But with simple stu
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:11:00AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 14-May-2009, at 20:19, Noel Jones wrote:
>> You're right, that's a pcre construct and not universally supported by
>> regexp. A more portable expression would be:
>>
>> /operator#[0-...@somephishingbanksite\.com$/ REJECT phishing
>
>
LuKreme wrote:
On 14-May-2009, at 20:19, Noel Jones wrote:
You're right, that's a pcre construct and not universally supported by
regexp. A more portable expression would be:
/operator#[0-...@somephishingbanksite\.com$/ REJECT phishing
Now, just to double check, if postfix is compiled with
On 15-May-2009, at 09:37, Noel Jones wrote:
(The situation is confused by some linux vendors that include an
enhanced regexp library with some of the pcre features. So \d may
work on SOME regexp libraries, but it certainly isn't widely
portable regexp syntax, and Viktor was right to point o
> From: Victor.Duchovni@
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
>
> "operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and wil
>> From: Victor.Duchovni@
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>>> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
>>
>> "operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com" REJECT
> The above line is the wrong synta
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
My problem was that my main.cf, although stating the aliases map with:
alias_database = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases
Was actually using /etc/aliases. Not sure why, I've just deleted the /etc one
and sym-linked the /etc/postfix/ali
> From: mich...@orlitzky.com
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: RESOLVED RE: Need To Reject Inbound From Addresses with My Own
> Domain/s
>
> wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> My problem was that my main.cf, although stating the aliases map with:
&
16 matches
Mail list logo
