RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-16 Thread Tristan Leask
Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: > Oh dear. I've looked around the site, and apparently it's a PocketPC site that had posted a way to copy the look o

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-15 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: > Oh dear. I've looked around the site, and apparently it's a PocketPC site that had posted a way to copy the look of iPhone to a PocketPC. They weren't just showing pictures, but rather were copying the iPhone images. -- Ed Leafe -

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-15 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Tristan Leask wrote: > I wonder if Ed has had an email from Apple about this post? Why would they write to me? > http://www.modaco.com/index.php? > s=0cc2b08f572c749e2acefd4d30ef1f41&showt > opic=251112 > > "We represent Apple Computer, Inc. ("Apple") and ar

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-15 Thread Tristan Leask
tion with respect to the unauthorized dissemination of Apple's copyrighted material" Oh dear. Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Felton Posted At: 12 January 2007 01:16 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Co

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-12 Thread Chet Gardiner
I wonder if a deeper etimology would point to the Marquis of Queensbury rules for fisticuffs? http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Marquess+of+Queensberry+rules Although a Marquis is one step below a Duke... http://www.chinet.com/~laura/html/titles02.html Ed Leafe wrote: >On Jan 12, 2

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-12 Thread Hal Kaplan
=> Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! =>  => I think I spy an iPhoney => Jim =>  I've had one of the Microsoft phones for over a year now and I have mixed feelings. It is great as a PDA but rather poor as a phone. I like my old phone with real buttons I c

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-12 Thread Peter Cushing
Ed Leafe wrote: > Then I guess you'll have no trouble figuring out what someone means > if they say to you "Put up your dukes!". > Going a bit OT here but... Hope nobody says that to me at Easter when we visit LA/Vegas/Palm Springs and San Diego O:-) Looking forward to seeing the promi

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-12 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Peter Cushing wrote: >> Now the lawyers will duke it out. > Not heard that expression before, so looked it up: > > http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/duke+it+out > > > You learn something new every day :-) Then I guess you'll have no trouble figuring out

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-12 Thread Peter Cushing
Ed Leafe wrote: > Now the lawyers will duke it out. Not heard that expression before, so looked it up: http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/duke+it+out You learn something new every day :-) Peter ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscri

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Jim Felton
I think I spy an iPhoney Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:48 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject:RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! http://www.tleask.plus.com

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Stephen the Cook
Tristan Leask <> wrote: > Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access I Hate that register crap. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. ht

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Tristan Leask
5:46 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Doh, hang on Tristan -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Tristan Leask
Doh, hang on Tristan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:36 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! On 1/11/07

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 1/11/07, Tristan Leask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access "You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:" A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: P

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Tristan Leask
Or http://tinyurl.com/vofkq for easier access -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Posted At: 11 January 2007 15:04 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Tristan Leask
Here you go Dave, I now have an iPhone http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=32970&d=1168 464570 ROFL! -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwi

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread MB Software Solutions
Ed Leafe wrote: > Cisco owns the trademark to 'iPhone'. Apple had been in negotiations > with them to be allowed to use the name, but they didn't come to an > agreement before MacWorld. Jobs went ahead and announced the name as > 'iPhone' anyway. > > Now the lawyers will duke it o

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-11 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:27 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote: >> More interesting as to whether or not they'll be able to keep >> calling it >> the iphone. > > I give upwhy wouldn't they be allowed to continue calling it? Cisco owns the trademark to 'iPhone'. Apple had been in negotiat

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Chet Gardiner
Looks like the answer is one day... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6250511.stm Michael Oke, II wrote: >More interesting as to whether or not they'll be able to keep calling it >the iphone. > >-- >::michael >-- > >Ed Leafe wrote: > > >>On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Justin Darnell wrote: >

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread MB Software Solutions
Michael Oke, II wrote: > More interesting as to whether or not they'll be able to keep calling it > the iphone. > I give upwhy wouldn't they be allowed to continue calling it? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work sm

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Michael Oke, II
More interesting as to whether or not they'll be able to keep calling it the iphone. -- ::michael -- Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Justin Darnell wrote: > >> Should be interesting to see how Cingular exclusivity hinders adoption >> of that nifty looking iPhone. > > Well, he

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Man-wai CHANG
Ed Leafe wrote: > Long live Apple, Inc.! They just announced a toy called iPhone... -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. http://www.linux-sxs.org / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.10) Linux 2.6.19.1 ^ ^ 19:31:01 up 29 days 1

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Paul Newton
Dave Crozier wrote: > Tristan, > Bet you wouldn't send one back if it appeared on your desktop though! > > I think it looks really cool but unfortunately the bits I use on my PDA > phone Which is ? > aren't there (yet) which relate to appointments and notes/documents > off my PC so I'll suspend ju

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Dave Crozier
at, I love it. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: 10 January 2007 09:57 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! No I wouldn't send it back, and I probably wouldn't use

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Tristan Leask
age- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Posted At: 10 January 2007 09:37 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Tristan, Bet you wouldn't send one back if it appea

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Dave Crozier
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: 10 January 2007 08:50 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Oh Christ, give me strength! You lot aren't gonna be blowing their trumpet about the crappy iphone as well are you!? Tristan -O

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-10 Thread Tristan Leask
ation: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Subject: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! Long live Apple, Inc.! -- This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless otherwise a

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Chet Gardiner
And they sponsor Thom Hartmann! http://www.thomhartmann.com/ Thanks... Ted Roche wrote: >On 1/9/07, Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>No place to buy OSX or iMacs though... I guess Steve ordered them to >>look more "corporate" this year... >> >> >> > >Try http://www.smalldog

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ted Roche
On 1/9/07, Chet Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No place to buy OSX or iMacs though... I guess Steve ordered them to > look more "corporate" this year... > Try http://www.smalldog.com - they're one of the top 5 online Mac retailers. And they've got cute dogs, too. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Chet Gardiner
Got'cha :-) Ed Leafe wrote: >On Jan 9, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Chet Gardiner wrote: > > > >>We went there to buy OSX (pronounced Oz - Ex?) >> >> > > Oh - ess - ten > >-- Ed Leafe >-- http://leafe.com >-- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server]

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 9, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Chet Gardiner wrote: > We went there to buy OSX (pronounced Oz - Ex?) Oh - ess - ten -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://l

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead! [OT]

2007-01-09 Thread Pete Theisen
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 21:38, Chet Gardiner wrote: > AT&T and Verizon are evil. > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm > http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6071780.html > > I switched to Working Assets... > > http://www.workingassetswireless.com/ > > Working Assets good.

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Chet Gardiner
MacWorld in S.F. looked pretty lively today. Lots of Mac Geeks. HUGE Apple "display"... No place to buy OSX or iMacs though... I guess Steve ordered them to look more "corporate" this year... We went there to buy OSX (pronounced Oz - Ex?) and some memory. No joy! Ed Leafe wrote: >

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Chet Gardiner
AT&T and Verizon are evil. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6071780.html I switched to Working Assets... http://www.workingassetswireless.com/ Working Assets good. Ed Leafe wrote: >On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Stephen the Cook
Ed Leafe <> wrote: > On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote: > >> I thought that it was only me that the saw Cingular as the lame >> device company. > > Why do you say that? (Besides obviously not being a Cingular > customer). Besides, Cingular doesn't make the device; they prov

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote: > I thought that it was only me that the saw Cingular as the lame device > company. Why do you say that? (Besides obviously not being a Cingular customer). Besides, Cingular doesn't make the device; they provide the network.

RE: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Stephen the Cook
Justin Darnell <> wrote: > Should be interesting to see how Cingular exclusivity hinders > adoption of that nifty looking iPhone. I thought that it was only me that the saw Cingular as the lame device company. Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "Our scientific

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread MB Software Solutions
Ted Roche wrote: > On 1/9/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Long live Apple, Inc.! >> > > So, did they just rename the one company, instead of splitting off > Apple Media, Apple iPods, Apple Movies and Apple Computer? > Interesting. > > Since they sold 2 BILLION songs on

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ted Roche
On 1/9/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's not a video, but lots of photos: > > http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/live-from-macworld-2007-steve-jobs- > keynote/ > ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yyfb9f ) > Thanks! I had followed the keynot on the Macworld site: http://www.macworld

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Ted Roche wrote: > So, did they just rename the one company, instead of splitting off > Apple Media, Apple iPods, Apple Movies and Apple Computer? > Interesting. Just a rename. > Looking forward to seeing the keynote when it comes out. It's no

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ted Roche
On 1/9/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Long live Apple, Inc.! So, did they just rename the one company, instead of splitting off Apple Media, Apple iPods, Apple Movies and Apple Computer? Interesting. Since they sold 2 BILLION songs on iTunes, 500 million TV shows and 1.3 millio

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Justin Darnell wrote: > Should be interesting to see how Cingular exclusivity hinders adoption > of that nifty looking iPhone. Well, he said they're only shooting for a 1% market penetration by 2008, so I don't think it will be too much of a problem.

Re: [NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Justin Darnell
Should be interesting to see how Cingular exclusivity hinders adoption of that nifty looking iPhone. On 1/9/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Long live Apple, Inc.! > > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] __

[NF] Apple Computer, Inc., is dead!

2007-01-09 Thread Ed Leafe
Long live Apple, Inc.! -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/lis