You can use custom field options to support validation of this type.
Take a look at extending com.google.FieldOptions
You can create an option field like "max_inclusive" and then access it
at run-time from the FieldDescriptor and use the information for
validation.
Unfortunately this is still ju
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Wenbo Zhu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Pherl Liu wrote:
>
>> We also have another internal thread talking about the "restriction"
>> support for protobuf. Basically we think the restriction or value validation
>> function of protobuf should be implem
Comment #5 on issue 296 by sergei.s...@gmail.com: Deploy protobuf-java
2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296
Please have a look at the following guide:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
You may want to regi
Updates:
Cc: f...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 294 by liuj...@google.com: PyIter_Next returns a "New
Reference" so you must Py_DECREF it when done
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=294
Thanks for reporting this. Adding Frank to take a look.
--
You received this mes
Updates:
Owner: g...@google.com
Cc: liuj...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 296 by liuj...@google.com: Deploy protobuf-java 2.4.1
JAR to Maven Repository
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296
Gregory, would you please help deploy the 2.4.1 jar file into the mav
Comment #3 on issue 296 by sergei.s...@gmail.com: Deploy protobuf-java
2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296
Hardly surprising, given that maven ecosystem is systematically neglected
by protobuf team. Protoc maven plugin is effectively abandone
Comment #2 on issue 296 by george.c...@gmail.com: Deploy protobuf-java
2.4.1 JAR to Maven Repository
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=296
protobuf 2.4.1 came out at the end of April. Is there an issue with the
Java package that's holding up a corresponding Maven release? I
You can probably use sub-builders in this case: e.g.
myBuilder.getPriceBuilder().setValue(123);
See
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/java-generated.html#messagein
sub builders section.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:58 PM, veaven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the best practices
That one will parse from binary encoded data. Looks like your
sample_message.txt is in ASCII format. In short:
Binary format:
serialize: msg.writeTo() / msg.toByteArray()
parsing: MyMessage.parseFrom() / builder.mergeFrom()
ASCII format:
serialize: msg.toString() / TextFormat.printToString()
parsi
We also have another internal thread talking about the "restriction" support
for protobuf. Basically we think the restriction or value validation
function of protobuf should be implemented in the upper layer due to various
concerns..
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Marco Tedone wrote:
> Hi all,
Yes, you can. See:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html#generating
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:39 PM, jonason wrote:
> can I set multi proto_path?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To post to this
So are you using a 3rd party C protobuf plugin? Then my previous reply may
not be applicable for that implementation. You may want to contact the
plugin author directly for these questions.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:14 PM, AARADHANA SRIDHARAN
wrote:
> I am working on a C code base... INIT function
I am working on a C code base... INIT functions are used in this case
instead of a constructor in C++.
Thanks for your reply.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Pherl Liu wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, aara wrote:
>
>> I actually have 3 questions.
>>
>> 1.When we specify default va
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, aara wrote:
> I actually have 3 questions.
>
> 1.When we specify default values for optional fields,the default value
> gets assigned automatically when we ourselves dont assign it a value.
> But why doesnt the has_member field get set to 1??? It still remains
> ze
14 matches
Mail list logo
