Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-14 Thread Slau Halatyn
The problem is that there are a bunch of out-of-date pages that people mistakenly view. The link I sent shows 10.8 as being supported. Just come back with the link I supplied. best, Slau On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Stefan Albertshauser wrote: > Hello Slau, > > Now I found the time to visit

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-14 Thread Stefan Albertshauser
Hello Slau, Now I found the time to visit the site, you mentioned. I found something confusing: If I click the link mentioned below and search for a heading "for Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion" or so and read along, I can click the following link for more information: http://avid.force.com/pkb/

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-14 Thread Chris Norman
m: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf > Of Chris Norman > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:16 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Apple's initial response > > > > Well, the reason I mention Avid is simple. If Apple st

RE: Apple's initial response

2012-11-14 Thread J. R. Westmoreland
ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Norman Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:16 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Well, the reason I mention Avid is simple. If Apple start looking at the flood of reports about the same bu

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
vid haven't changed >>>>>>> anything at their end. So far, I haven't seen the same behaviour in >>>>>>> any other app, so can't imagine what's causing the issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nektarios, no, they d

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
): 980-272-8570 - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:06 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Please, forget about Avid. As I said several times, this has nothing to do with them. Focus on

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Chris Norman
ave nothing to show for it (other than a sore head from >>>>>> all that repetition and cyber wall banging). Things should be >>>>>> different, but they're not. That's not down to a lack of effort on our >>>>>> part. >>>>>> &

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
>> >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> On 11/13/12, Yuma Antoine Decaux wrote: >>>>>> Hi, could you tell me what the issue with voice over is? I have access to >>>>>> the apple bug reporting system. If i can emula

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Chris Norman
;>>> one of the standard apps as well, i may be able to have a direct line with >>>>> the engineers. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Yuma >>>>> >>>>

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
- Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:45 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Don't mention that someone from Apple said to contact the accessibility team. That's irrelevant. It's here say as far as anybody is concer

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Antoine Decaux To: Pro Tools Accessibility Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Hey Scott, I think you guys should try to pinpoint the issue ui elements with the accessibility inspector that's bundled with x-code. At least you can see

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
e use sparingly): 980-272-8570 - Original Message - From: "Chris Norman" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Just out of interest, are Avid willing to disclose what kind of control they use? If we knew that, then we could

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Yuma Antoine Decaux
the engineers. >>>> >>>> Let me know >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Yuma >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Light has no value without da

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
nd a message to accessibility yet, cause I don't know how to >>> describe the problem exactly. >>> Is it enough to say the counters etc aren't spoken correctly under Mountain >>> Lion while with the same version of pro Tools under Snow Leopard or Lion >&

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
>> Twitter: >> @gilland_chris >> >> Facebook: >> http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland >> >> Skype: >> twinklesfriend2007 >> >> Send me a fax from any standard fax machine: >> 704-697-2069 >> >> Google Voice: (Pl

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Chris Norman
gt; >>> Yuma >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Light has no value without darkness" >>> Mob: +642102277190 >>> Skype: Shainobi1 >>> twitter: http://www.twitter.com/triple7 >>> &

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Yadsas Nektario. Ti kanaté? xi. Den ine calá. LOL! No, they don't, apparently. Write me off list if you have any more questions, or want further detail on what by that I mean. Irini tu Théu me sas. Xrístos, AKA: Chris.

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Yuma Antoine Decaux
ent. >> However, if any freakish circumstance such as ip sniffing, honey pot open >> relay servers or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please >> advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all >> illicit data retention. >> >>

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Nick Gawronski
tandard fax machine: > 704-697-2069 > > Google Voice: (Please use sparingly): > 980-272-8570 > > > - Original Message - > From: "Slau Halatyn" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:36 PM > Subject: Apple's initial response > > &

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
lland Skype: twinklesfriend2007 Send me a fax from any standard fax machine: 704-697-2069 Google Voice: (Please use sparingly): 980-272-8570 - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:36 PM Subject: Apple's initial response Apple&#

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Chris Norman
gt;> Lion while with the same version of pro Tools under Snow Leopard or Lion the >> items are spoken right? >> thanks, >> Ronald >> >> Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>> Apple's initial res

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
folks, Be prepared for a canned response from Apple. They will probably try to send you an outdated link to a page on Avid's web site that shows Pro Tools as not being compatible with Mountain Lion. Shoot back the following link: http://avid.force.com/pkb/articles/en_US/Download/Pro-Tools-10-3-2

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
e same version of pro Tools under Snow Leopard or Lion the > items are spoken right? > thanks, > Ronald > > Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn het > volgende geschreven: > >> Apple's initial response to me was as follows: >> Thank you for your emai

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Scott Chesworth
ou > don't have to worry about privacy issues if you are the intended recipient. > However, if any freakish circumstance such as ip sniffing, honey pot open > relay servers or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please > advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bub

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Ronald van Rhijn
on of pro Tools under Snow Leopard or Lion the items are spoken right? thanks, Ronald Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn het volgende geschreven: > Apple's initial response to me was as follows: > Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Yuma Antoine Decaux
ance such as ip sniffing, honey pot open relay servers or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > Apple's initial response to me

Re: Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Nektarios Mallas
Hello. With that response in context, I am wondering, does Apple follow their own guide lines to make Logic pro accessible with Voice over? Nektarios. On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > Apple's initial response to me was as follows: > Thank you for your email. A

Apple's initial response

2012-11-13 Thread Slau Halatyn
Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary components into their applications that allow VoiceOver to work correctly. Unfortunately AVID has not provided an update for ProTools