> On Apr 2, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> Sounds like between my starting to lean towards it, your preference, and the
> fact it would trigger a new mail notification for Paul’s workflow too, that a
> special command is the way to go. I will go ahead and implement that.
Ok! I ha
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Xavier Fernandez wrote:
>
> First of all, thanks a lot for all the work you've put in pip, especially
> lately.
>
> Like Paul, I rely mostly on mail notifications to follow new/updated
> issues/PR.
> I usually read everything and if I don't respond immediately, I
First of all, thanks a lot for all the work you've put in pip, especially
lately.
Like Paul, I rely mostly on mail notifications to follow new/updated
issues/PR.
I usually read everything and if I don't respond immediately, I'm used to
leaving the mail as unread to - hopefully - come back to it la
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-7, p.f.moore wrote:
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 14:18, Donald Stufft >
> wrote:
> > Ok cool. Let me play around with this some and see what I can come up
> with.
> > We can always adjust it if we decide the workflow isn’t working for us
> :D
>
> By the
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 14:18, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Ok cool. Let me play around with this some and see what I can come up with.
>> We can always adjust it if we decide the workflow isn’t working for us :D
>
> By the way, thanks for doing this i
On 2 April 2017 at 14:18, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Ok cool. Let me play around with this some and see what I can come up with.
> We can always adjust it if we decide the workflow isn’t working for us :D
By the way, thanks for doing this in the first place - regardless of
whether what you do directl
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 9:16 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 14:03, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> I was just about to ask if you thought if a daily or weekly email to
>> pypa-dev enumerating the contents of our review queue (where review queue ==
>> the list of PRs waiting for action from a
On 2 April 2017 at 14:03, Donald Stufft wrote:
> I was just about to ask if you thought if a daily or weekly email to
> pypa-dev enumerating the contents of our review queue (where review queue ==
> the list of PRs waiting for action from a core dev) would be useful in a
> purely email based workf
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 13:14, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Another case of this that happens to me is I’ll get an email for the PR, see
>> it, review it, think it’s a good idea, but the tests are still running (and
>> they take 30+ minutes to run) so I
On 2 April 2017 at 13:14, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Another case of this that happens to me is I’ll get an email for the PR, see
> it, review it, think it’s a good idea, but the tests are still running (and
> they take 30+ minutes to run) so I’ll wait for that and end up forgetting
> about the PR as
On 2 April 2017 at 13:07, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Thoughts?
Sounds reasonable - I didn't mean to say that I thought what you were
doing was wrong, just that the net effect on me was likely to be
minimal because I use a purely email-based workflow. And yes, you're
right that does mean that if I don
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 8:07 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> * Emails are a once and done communication mechanism. It is easy for a PR to
> languish waiting on one of us to review and merge it because we didn’t do it
> right when the initial email came in. Maybe we were busy and just
> archived/del
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 12:16, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> Correct. Although I’ve warmed up to the idea of (2) if I pair it with a
>> (once per PR) automated comment that occurs the first time someone marks a
>> PR as “Changes Requested” that tells the
On 2 April 2017 at 12:16, Donald Stufft wrote:
> Correct. Although I’ve warmed up to the idea of (2) if I pair it with a
> (once per PR) automated comment that occurs the first time someone marks a
> PR as “Changes Requested” that tells them the magic words to say to move
> their PR back into our
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 1 April 2017 at 23:27, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> To make it clearer, what I’m asking here is what do we want to do about
>> this? Do we want to just auto clear the requested changes thing whenever the
>> PR author pushes changes? I think so,
On 1 April 2017 at 23:27, Donald Stufft wrote:
> To make it clearer, what I’m asking here is what do we want to do about
> this? Do we want to just auto clear the requested changes thing whenever the
> PR author pushes changes? I think so, for what that looks like I have a demo
> at https://github
16 matches
Mail list logo
