-1: dislike
> On May 2, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
>
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
>
> Just reply
I'd very much like the feature, but not sure that the proposed change
is a good fit today.
-Rob
On 2 May 2018 at 22:13, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2018-05-02 11:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
>> On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "
On 02May2018 0249, Victor Stinner wrote:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -1: you dislike the PEP
I love the PEP, it's one of the better ones for sure. :) I just don't
like the proposed change.
-1
Cheers,
Steve
___
python-committers mailing list
python-co
On 5/2/2018 5:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
You asked two different questions, hence two answers.
1. The title asks "Do I like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions"?
Yes, at least +.5, and if forced, I might well round up to 1.
The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
2. However,
02.05.18 23:27, Serhiy Storchaka пише:
I will not use it if it's accepted, and likely will not make reviews
of patches that use it.
I meant that this feature looks so bad to me, that it will be painful to
me even to read a Python code that uses it.
02.05.18 12:49, Victor Stinner пише:
The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -1: you dislike the PEP
* 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
* don't reply to this poll :-)
Just reply to this email with "+1", "0", "-1". Please d
-1
--
Julien Palard
https://mdk.fr
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-1
-Stefan
> > On May 2, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> > Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> > talk at the Language Summit:
> >
> > https://www.python.org/
-1
--
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa
> On May 2, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
> https://www.python.o
-1
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
>
> The poll
+1
On 2 May, 2018, at 10:49, Victor Stinner
mailto:vstin...@redhat.com>> wrote:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -1: you dislike the PEP
* 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
* don't reply to this poll :-)
___
python-committers ma
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
+1
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/
+0.5
Stefan Krah
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-1
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:02 AM Eric Snow
wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> > The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
> >
> > * +1: you like the PEP
> > * -1: you dislike the PEP
> > * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opin
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
>
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
>
> Just reply to this email w
FWIW, -1 from me. At least with the PEP as it stands.
Paul
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
On 2 May 2018 at 19:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
>
> The poll is on the
-1 in the current form, since an expression such as
[y := f(x), x/y] ...
is confusing (I'd read this as [y := (f(x), x/y)]
Using explicit parens around it would resolve this issue:
[(y := f(x)), x/y] ...
but even with that, I'm not excited about the additional
line noise this adds - th
2018-05-02 11:49 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner :
> Just reply to this email with "+1", "0", "-1". Please don't elaborate
> here, it's just a quick poll, use python-dev if you want to talk :-)
FYI if you want don't to spam python-committers list, you may reply to
me in private. I will publish poll resul
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
>
> The poll is
0: this might be a handy feature, but I am not sure the dangers it
introduces are adequate for the problem it solves.
--
Ivan
On 2 May 2018 at 11:06, INADA Naoki wrote:
> 0: I will use it if it's accepted, but I'm not sure it's merit is enough
> for changing how Python code looks.
> _
0: I will use it if it's accepted, but I'm not sure it's merit is enough
for changing how Python code looks.
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https:
2018-05-02 11:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
> On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
>> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
>> talk at the Language Summit:
>
> Do we really need this spilling
On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
Do we really need this spilling over into yet another mailing list?
Paul
___
-1: dislike
Regards
Antoine.
Le 02/05/2018 à 11:49, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>https://www.python.org/dev/pe
-1: dislike
( my rationale:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-April/152991.html )
Victor
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://
Hi,
I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
talk at the Language Summit:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -
27 matches
Mail list logo