[racket-users] RabbitMQ

Has anyone implemented a RabbitMQ client in racket? Is anyone working on it and partway there? I'm trying to set up a distributed task system like Celery in Python which needs the workers to be in Racket. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket

Re: [racket-users] Automatic dependency fixer

> On Sep 9, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Jack Firth wrote: > > I've written a web service that wraps a useful script Sam wrote for > automatically creating a Github pull request to fix a package's dependencies. > The web service is linked to a Github account named Racket Package

Re: [racket-users] RabbitMQ

On 09/10/2015 01:21 PM, Jack Firth wrote: > Has anyone implemented a RabbitMQ client in racket? Is anyone working > on it and partway there? I'm trying to set up a distributed task > system like Celery in Python which needs the workers to be in > Racket. I recommend implementing STOMP rather than

Re: [racket-users] Unexpected output from get-pure-port.

It might be that the server is giving a 30x Redirect response? Which wget automatically follows, but get-pure-port by default does not. Does it help if you supply a non-zero value like say 10 for the optional #:redirections argument to get-pure-port? If it still isn't working, you could try

[racket-users] Unexpected output from get-pure-port.

I'm trying to download a page using get-pure-port and I'm not getting the result I expected: $ cat d.rkt #lang racket (require net/url) (define library-url (string->url "http://example.com/search?/ftlist^bib18%2C1%2C0%2C2703/mode=2;)) (call/input-url library-url

Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

On 09/10/2015 04:27 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:10:27 -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote: >> This failed to >> build, I guess because of package mismatches, so I pulled and tried >> again, which failed. > > I'm a little curious about that failure, but many things can go wrong > at

Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

On 09/10/2015 08:40 PM, Anthony Carrico wrote: > I'll forward you a transcript of a failed build. FYI: Off list Matthew suggested that it ran out of memory, and indeed the build succeeds with more free memory. -- Anthony Carrico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[racket-users] Re: Unexpected output from get-pure-port.

Thanks for your reply to my message. It might be that the server is giving a 30x Redirect response? Which wget automatically follows, but get-pure-port by default does not. Does it help if you supply a non-zero value like say 10 for the optional #:redirections argument to get-pure-port?

Re: [racket-users] Unexpected output from get-pure-port.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:26 PM, R. Clayton wrote: > "HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:10:39 GMT > Server: III 100 > Pragma: no-cache > Content-Type: text/html; ISO-8859-1 > Expires: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:10:39 GMT > Cache-control: no-cache

Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

I did a 2 character change to Racket (see https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1045), and hit make. This failed to build, I guess because of package mismatches, so I pulled and tried again, which failed. Also, my laptop is very slow for this kind of thing, so I did a fresh clone and in place build

Re: [racket-users] Class constracts and equality

On 2015-09-02 08:41:21 +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > That would be great, but if that's not possible, the next-best option would > be to document the restriction. I now have a pull request that should address this: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1044 I've only found one issue with this so

Re: Make, in place build, was Re: [racket-users] Racket v6.2

At Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:10:27 -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote: > I did a 2 character change to Racket (see > https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1045), and hit make. For that case, I would use `raco setup` instead of `make` (since it's not a change to the runtime). Or I might use `make as-is`, which