On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:51:32 -0500, Ben Russo wrote
> Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:56:44AM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Does all this discussion mean that no RH 8.1 will be released?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Correct. Please see
> >http://www.matrixlist.com/pipermail/lea
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:56:44AM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
Does all this discussion mean that no RH 8.1 will be released?
Correct. Please see
http://www.matrixlist.com/pipermail/leaplist/2003-March/029087.html
If one goes from 8.0 to 9.0 should it be from scratch (ar
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:09:11AM -0800, Jim Wilferling wrote:
> When you say update in place, does that mean rpm -U ?
Not really. I mean pop in the CD (or use one of the other installation
methods like NFS or FTP) and do an upgrade.
> Yes, I know i should just be getting a burner. But I'm lazy
It's not 9.0. It's 9.
>
> I believe that Red Hat is still supporting upgrades - i.e. you can
> upgrade in place from 8.0 to 9. The documentation will be out soon -
> it's always released at the same time as the product so in a week you
> can check for the definitive, supported approach.
>
> Ok,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:56:44AM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> Does all this discussion mean that no RH 8.1 will be released?
Correct. Please see
http://www.matrixlist.com/pipermail/leaplist/2003-March/029087.html
> If one goes from 8.0 to 9.0 should it be from scratch (argg...)? If not, will
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:36:02 -0800, Jim Wilferling wrote
> Alright, so I'm annoyed. Just learning linux, and I've gone
> through 7.2, 8.0, and was anticipating 8.1. so now there's 9.0, so
> whatI've tried to install 8.1 beta rpms, and there were worse
> problems than there were with 8.0.
mount -o loop -t iso9660 isofilename mountpoint
Jim Wilferling wrote:
Alright, so I'm annoyed. Just learning linux, and I've gone through 7.2, 8.0, and
was anticipating 8.1. so now there's 9.0, so whatI've tried to install 8.1 beta
rpms, and there were worse problems than there were with
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:12:39AM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> The biggest problem you might run into is some config files in your home
But these are not "binaries" and is true of almost any upgrade anyway...
> What you want to do - copy these files to a floppy:
> /etc/shadow
> /etc/group
>
The biggest problem you might run into is some config files in your home
directory that have changed spec, but that has only happened to me once
- I think when going from a pre 1 version of gnome to a much newer one.
If that happens - just delete the config file.
What you want to do - copy these
Not very fancy - but it works (attached shell script).
At some point I plan to add an option to specify the mount point if
/mnt/iso doesn't exist - but simple as it is, I never got around to it
;)
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 01:39, Willem van der Walt wrote:
> is there a way to mount a disc image withou
is there a way to mount a disc image without it being on a disc? (
I dont have a burner.)
mount -tiso9660 disk.iso /mnt/cdrom -o loop
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Alright, so I'm annoyed. Just learning linux, and I've gone through 7.2, 8.0, and
was anticipating 8.1. so now there's 9.0, so whatI've tried to install 8.1 beta
rpms, and there were worse problems than there were with 8.0.
So we copeI'm not about to switch distros so quickly, just
12 matches
Mail list logo
