Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-27 Thread Nate Duehr
Jim wrote: > Al Wolfe wrote: >> Eric, >>Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade >> portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is >> only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz >> deviation and all seemed

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-27 Thread Jim
Al Wolfe wrote: > Eric, >Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade > portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is > only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz > deviation and all seemed low, that is, non

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Nate Duehr
Tony L. wrote: > I own a VX6 and regularly use a local Quantar repeater without any > problems. To the best of my knowledge, the Quantar is stock. I also know of at least two people using VX-6's through a digital-capable (set in dual-mode analog and P25, they're of course using analog!) Quanta

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Eric Lemmon
m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MCH Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:26 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL I doubt you would get far with Motorola since the problem is that Yaesu is not using good engineering practice by not fi

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread MCH
I doubt you would get far with Motorola since the problem is that Yaesu is not using good engineering practice by not filtering the TX audio to remove CTCSS components. I would start with Yaesu asking them why not. Joe M. Nate Duehr wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Al Wolfe wrote: > > >

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Nate Duehr
On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Al Wolfe wrote: > So the questions remain: Is the Quantar PL sensitivity > adjustable? Is it > a good thing to make it more sensitive? How do I convince some > users that > there may be a problem with their radio? Not trying to sound sarcastic here at all, ju

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Drop in a Com Spec Board in the repeater and solve your problem. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: "Al Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:09 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL > Eric, > Thanks for your quick response. It's tru

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Milt
Al, As far as I know the Quantar PL sensitivity is fixed. Do verify the programming of the repeater, but then verify the frequency and deviation of the user radios and fix the user radios; that's where the problem lies. Milt N3LTQ - Original Message - From: "Al Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTE