[sage-devel] Re: Problems building/installing on Fedora 32

Have you tried with gcc package. For me it works with an intel precessor. El lunes, 15 de junio de 2020, 11:13:49 (UTC+2), Robert Poole escribió: > > I've been trying to build and install Sage locally on a Fedora 32 system > (64-bit), running on a Ryzen 4700U APU with 8 GB of RAM. > > I have

[sage-devel] Re: Possible bug regarding the mod() method for multi-variable polynomials

HI, I think it is related with ticket #17638 . There is a mathematical origin in this situation. When considering a non local ordering, one is working in a localized ideal, where any polynomial whose leading term is a non-zero constant is invertible.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac] #29314: update GAP to version 4.11

There are also upgrades of gap packages. Should gap_packages be upgraded to? El miércoles, 11 de marzo de 2020, 12:13:43 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > new version of GAP, 4.11, is out, we should upgrade. Here is the ticket. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: sage-trac >

Re: [sage-devel] Poll: set online=True as the default for threejs viewer

It does affect also when using jupyterhub, (by the way, also to jsmol). El martes, 12 de febrero de 2019, 9:20:48 (UTC+1), Jeroen Demeyer escribió: > > > Why neither nbviewer nor binder are able to find > > (or serve or ?) these javascript files? > > The problem is these lines in

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

I tried your solution, it didn't work for me. In jupyter the kernel did not start, in jupyterlab there was also some style issues. El lunes, 5 de noviembre de 2018, 14:56:50 (UTC+1), Enrique Artal escribió: > > That's true. I just edit the kernel.json for each new release (I read it >

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

tysalo wrote: >> >> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Enrique Artal wrote: >> >> > For me it works adding "env": { "SAGE_ROOT": "where_SAGE_ROOT_is" } in >> > kernel.json >> >> Thanks, seems to be much better solution. > > > A

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

For me it works adding "env": { "SAGE_ROOT": "where_SAGE_ROOT_is" } in kernel.json El lunes, 5 de noviembre de 2018, 8:21:31 (UTC+1), François Bissey escribió: > > Didn’t we have that conversation a couple of months ago? > The message here comes from this section of code in sage-env > > # New

Re: [sage-devel] Note on building sagemath-8.2 with GCC 8.1.0

orno venerdì 18 maggio 2018 04:24:30 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik ha >> scritto: >>> >>> As I wrote - you need to backport the patch from >>> https://bugs.python.org/issue28503 >>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.python.org%2Fissue28503=D=1=A

Re: [sage-devel] Note on building sagemath-8.2 with GCC 8.1.0

F%2Fbugs.python.org%2Fissue28503=D=1=AFQjCNESigXVaeH_9SZmQSbKTb4LZ_KiFQ> >> Hopefully he opens a ticket with the fix soon (he just got his trac >> account fixed). >> >> On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 10:39:46 PM UTC+1, Enrique Artal wrote: >>> >>> I wo

Re: [sage-devel] Note on building sagemath-8.2 with GCC 8.1.0

I would be interested on how he solved the problem! El jueves, 17 de mayo de 2018, 21:04:15 (UTC+2), Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > On Fedora 28 (another gcc-8 system) Dario (my student) also had problem > with building python3, as we were getting a broken crypt module. > A remedy he found, after

[sage-devel] Error in the communication with singular

I have an issue with sage-8.1 (also with 8.0). This is my code: R.=PolynomialRing(QQ,order='neglex') f=(y^2-x^3)*(y^2-x^2*y-x^3) singular.lib("all.lib") f._singular_().bernstein().sage() f._singular_().bfct().sage() The two last functions are two different algorithms in order to compute

[sage-devel] Re: Import into sage nb causes internal error

Same problem here, I put the log in case it helps 2017-11-05T20:37:57+0100 [stdout#info] error uploading worksheet Could not build url for endpoint 'home' with values ['username']. Did you mean 'worksheet_listing.home' instead? Could not build url for endpoint 'home' with values ['username'].

[sage-devel] Re: From SageNB to jupyter

September 9, 2017 at 6:12:49 AM UTC-4, Enrique Artal wrote: >> >> It is quite useful, indeed. We have installed it in our servers. >> > > Could it be made "even easier" to deploy? Sagenb really just required > someone who knew how to give things a domain name a

[sage-devel] Re: From SageNB to jupyter

It is quite useful, indeed. We have installed it in our servers. El viernes, 8 de septiembre de 2017, 16:48:49 (UTC+2), kcrisman escribió: > > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:16:14 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> did you see this: >>

[sage-devel] Re: From SageNB to jupyter

And probably the ability of sharing worksheets, I did not find it in jupyter or jupyterhub; of course SMC would be OK but I see only the option of campus accounts or personal docker copies. El jueves, 7 de septiembre de 2017, 13:32:02 (UTC+2), Jori Mäntysalo escribió: > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017,

[sage-devel] Re: DeprecationWarning: OpenSSL.rand is deprecated (on sage 8.0)

I also has this message; I did make ssl. Best, Enrique El lunes, 24 de julio de 2017, 21:46:15 (UTC+2), Eric Gourgoulhon escribió: > > Hi Vincent, > > I've installed Sage 8.0 on Ubuntu 16.04 from a fresh git clone and without > any optional package (i.e. just performing make after the git

[sage-devel] Re: new sagenb pre-release, please test

Is there any particular change to test? El miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2017, 16:12:26 (UTC+2), Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > Please test ​https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/tree/1.0.rc0 (copy of the > current master) before I go ahead with making a new Sage package. It works > for me following the

[sage-devel] Re: ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

d.mtm[14139]: #011 self.channel.loseConnection() Apr 24 14:10:08 sage-mtm saged.mtm[14139]: #011exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'loseConnection' Apr 24 14:10:08 sage-mtm saged.mtm[14139]: #011 El lunes, 24 de abril de 2017, 20:32:08 (UTC+2), Enrique Artal esc

[sage-devel] Re: ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

Not sure either, but I changed the file. Anyway, probably the issue had to do with the number of open files. I added the following lines in limits.conf: root soft nofile 655360 sage soft nofile 655360 root hard nofile 655360 sage hard nofile 655360 (sage is the user owning sage notebooks).

[sage-devel] Re: ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

Enrique. El lunes, 27 de marzo de 2017, 15:51:29 (UTC+2), Enrique Artal escribió: > > As expected, no change in 7.6. I thought about creating a ticket but > besides the fact that the upgrade of ipython seems to be responsible I have > no idea how. > > El miércoles, 15 de feb

Re: [sage-devel] Re: jsmol.js

Is there an easy way to make it work in jupyterhub? In jupyter, sage-7.6 works without any problem; for jupyterhub, threejs works but jsmol still doesn't. Thanks for the hard work. I can test any solution. Best, Enrique. El martes, 1 de noviembre de 2016, 20:03:52 (UTC+1), Volker Braun

[sage-devel] Re: ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

As expected, no change in 7.6. I thought about creating a ticket but besides the fact that the upgrade of ipython seems to be responsible I have no idea how. El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017, 14:26:35 (UTC+1), Enrique Artal escribió: > > The following may be related, I encountered it

[sage-devel] Re: what happened to ipython?

I tried to downgrade to ipython 4.x from Sage 7.5 but there is a problem with python module prompts El lunes, 20 de febrero de 2017, 16:30:53 (UTC+1), Sébastien Labbé escribió: > > @bennigoetz reported the same problem in December 2016 : >

[sage-devel] Re: SageNB -> Jupyter conversion needs testers

We have trying in my university some solutions usingy jupyterhub; we have some ideas about sharing and we still do not know how safe it is. El sábado, 25 de febrero de 2017, 15:01:38 (UTC+1), kcrisman escribió: > > > At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22433 there is a ticket implementing >> a

[sage-devel] Re: what happened to ipython?

I filed some issues in the thread "ulimit issues and IPython 5.0" in this list. El miércoles, 22 de febrero de 2017, 17:23:41 (UTC+1), kcrisman escribió: > > > > > Is it possible? It seems to cause problems to sagenb ... >> >>> >>> > Really? What sort of problems? Just not a new enough version

[sage-devel] Re: what happened to ipython?

Is it possible? It seems to cause problems to sagenb ... El lunes, 20 de febrero de 2017, 16:30:53 (UTC+1), Sébastien Labbé escribió: > > @bennigoetz reported the same problem in December 2016 : > https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/9816#issuecomment-258242213 > > For now, the only solution

[sage-devel] Re: ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

de febrero de 2017, 8:28:27 (UTC+1), Enrique Artal escribió: > > I start a new thread in this list as a continuation of "How to limit heavy > computations" in sage-support. I try to summarize the problem. In my > University, we have two servers to run math labs; it is done in

[sage-devel] ulimit issues and IPython 5.0

I start a new thread in this list as a continuation of "How to limit heavy computations" in sage-support. I try to summarize the problem. In my University, we have two servers to run math labs; it is done in several instances of sagenb using server_pool to enhance (at least a little bit)

[sage-devel] Several bugs

Hi all, I have found several small bugs. They are unrelated but since I am not really able to solve them I put everything in the same message, hoping someone smarter than me will find the solution. 1. For the first one, it was already reported, with an open ticket, but I am worried about

[sage-devel] Re: Several bugs

Hi Simon, Thanks for the feedback El jueves, 19 de febrero de 2015, 18:23:27 (UTC+1), Simon King escribió: Hi Enrique, On 2015-02-19, Enrique Artal enriqu...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: 1. For the first one, it was already reported, with an open ticket, but I am worried about

[sage-devel] Re: Several bugs

are different. In the example of ticket #10708, the ideal generated by 1-x is the unit ideal, i.e. the total local ring, and hence its Krull dimension is -1. El jueves, 19 de febrero de 2015, 18:35:51 (UTC+1), Nils Bruin escribió: On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 8:46:19 AM UTC-8, Enrique Artal

[sage-devel] Fraction field with local orderings

Hello, I recently sent this message https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/2ixMoSTzz20 to the support list. Following the advice of Miguel Marco I opened ticket #17638. Best, Enrique -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group.