Hi guys and girls,
I'm running Samba-3.0.4 as a PDC for about 40 workstations. It's been running
perfectly for about 6 months. Suddenly in the last week two PCs have required
that they be 'rejoined' to the domain. This seems to be happening every couple
days or so. I've looked through the logs
Hmm looks like a mis-config,
'cannot get workgroup name'
'get_domain_master_name_node_status_fail'
i think you should be sure, you've got the right workgroup and ip
also maybe the resolving ain't right ?
one thing is sure, there is an problem using the workgroup/domain.
what i causes? dunno, there
hehehehe..
Try setting up your smb.conf for using mysql,
or try compiling samba with the expsam mysql,
or by sure mysql is configed the right way (importing the example
database from the samba dir)
basicly, my guesses is that samba did not find the mysql-passwd backend!
that's all.
Later
Collen
L
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:26:10PM -0700, Ben Gaide wrote:
>
> 3. print command is apairently being ignored completely. I attempted as
With printing=cups the print command is ignored. Please see the doc,
I think it says that you should use printing=sysv to be able to
specify a printing comm
Vincent Mikalinis wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone figured out why some people are not having a problem with
similar configurations, however some people require that we add the "lpq
command = /bin/true" line? It is a very good and simple solution.
Should all pdf printers be set with this option for futu
hi all,
i'm sending some messages via "smbclient -M " from my
solaris-system to my windows-pc and this fails now since i installed
3.0.12 (it also does with 3.0.13).
comparing the debug-output of 3.0.11 and 3.0.12 shows that it now tries
to open a connection to port 445 instead of 139!
why has
All Version Information and Print Section of cmb.conf at end of email.
Ok I have a Samba server set up and functioning as a Primary Domain
Controller with File and Print services, but there are a few glitches +
odds and ends not yet functional.
1. Printer Management. - I have a HP Laserjet 1200
Hi,
I'm running the Debian samba 3.0.10-1 package. I have 'log level = 0'.
However my logcheck is showing a lot of noise from samba. Are the
following messages normal, or do we have a misconfiguration? (We don't
seem to have any problems accessing the shared samba shares):
Mar 31 12:13:31 sd01
Hi all Samba OS/2 users. I've just added OS/2 style
extended attribute support into the SAMBA_3_0 subversion
branch code.
This depends on the underlying OS supporting EA's and
(on linux) the filesystem being mounted with the "user_xattr"
mount option and the parameter "ea support = yes" being set
Tom Schaefer wrote:
It is because you are using
security = share
which is emulating the old Win9x way of sharing where the username is
irrelevant, which is why XP just sets it to guest and greys it out, and
all that matters is knowing the password to the particular share.
Share a folder from Win9
Hello all,
Well, what about mysql? :o)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/samba/bin# ./pdbedit -i mysql
Connecting to database server, host: 192.168.4.36, user: samba, password:
X, database: samba, port: 3306
Connecting to database server, host: 192.168.4.36, user: samba, password:
X, dat
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:55:56AM +0200, Thomas Werner wrote:
> no, it doesnt work :( i tested it with:
>
> samba-3.0.11-acl (still broken, fails after some try's to save an excel
> file)
> samba-3.0.13-acl (still broken, same behavior )
> samba-3.0.13-noacl (seems to work)
>
> always the same
no, it doesnt work :( i tested it with:
samba-3.0.11-acl (still broken, fails after some try's to save an excel
file)
samba-3.0.13-acl (still broken, same behavior )
samba-3.0.13-noacl (seems to work)
always the same violation error thing in excel with acl's and filetimes
param.
cheers tom
On M
Hello,
I'm hoping someone may be able to steer me in the right direction, as
I've searched the archives with no joy.
Configuration:
Server: Fedora FC3, kernel 2.6.9-1.667, samba-3.0.13-1
Client: Mac OS X Panther 10.3.8
The Samba server works fine with a Windows 2000 client on the same LAN.
Wit
jonlists:
> question on pdbedit - when using it for a migration - existing data is
> stored in tdbsam.
>
> pbdedit -i tdbsam -e ldapsam
>
> It wants to take existing machine accounts and put them into an
> ou=Computers. I'd rather it put them in ou=People.
>
> Samba version is 3.09
Why not? Who s
re
this is a patch against samba-2.2.12p0 and adds support
for updating utmp on bsds. code similarly ripped from
openbsd's ftpd (;
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
--- utmp.c Thu Aug 12 14:24:20 2004
+++ /home/mickey/utmp.c Wed Mar 30 15:
When exactly did the samba meaning/returns for "logon path" and "logon
home" change? (at which version?)
We used to have a system that appeared to be working well and it was as
follows
logon script = logon.bat
logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon drive = h:
logon home = \\%L\%U\.profile
domain l
It is because you are using
security = share
which is emulating the old Win9x way of sharing where the username is
irrelevant, which is why XP just sets it to guest and greys it out, and
all that matters is knowing the password to the particular share.
Share a folder from Win9x using the type o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/30/2005
02:54:54 PM:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:37, jonlists wrote:
> > question on pdbedit - when using it for a migration - existing data is
> > stored in tdbsam.
> >
> > pbdedit -i tdbsam -e ldapsam
> >
> > It wants to take existing machine accounts and put t
re
this is a patch against samba-2.2.12p0 and adds support
for updating utmp on bsds. code similarly ripped from
openbsd's ftpd (;
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
--- utmp.c Thu Aug 12 14:24:20 2004
+++ /home/mickey/utmp.c Wed Mar 30 15:
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:37, jonlists wrote:
> question on pdbedit - when using it for a migration - existing data is
> stored in tdbsam.
>
> pbdedit -i tdbsam -e ldapsam
>
> It wants to take existing machine accounts and put them into an
> ou=Computers. I'd rather it put them in ou=People.
O
Dave, check out chapter 10 of
http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/
It contained the missing step to getting mine to work as advertised.
Terry Poperszky
eric roseme wrote:
Dave Rutlidge wrote:
I posted a query re a problem I was having getting SAMBA to authenticate
using a Windows 2003 S
question on pdbedit - when using it for a migration - existing data is
stored in tdbsam.
pbdedit -i tdbsam -e ldapsam
It wants to take existing machine accounts and put them into an
ou=Computers. I'd rather it put them in ou=People.
Samba version is 3.09
Thanks...
Jon Johnston
Creativ
Still experiencing two issues here; we get smbd processes that seem hung-out
and climb to 99% CPU utilization... While there, the end-user's PC seems to
spawn a new smbd process and cannot access the MS Office file (sometimes
excel, sometimes word - even powerpoint this morning), stating it's locke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/29/2005
02:29:37 AM:
> Hi
>
> it's possible with wbinfo that get a information:
>
> 1- Get all users of one Active Directory Group
> 2- Get all groups of one username ?
>
>
> (i want create a small perl script for add automatiquely user into
> Squidguard,
Dave Rutlidge wrote:
I posted a query re a problem I was having getting SAMBA to authenticate
using a Windows 2003 Server ADS and got no reply. Also, I've searched
the web (before posting) and no one else had a reply to any similar
question.
Does SAMBA actually work with 2003 ADS at all or am I flo
Hi,
I running samba-3.0.13-1 on RH9
(openldap-2.0.27-8,krb5-1.2.7-10,nss_ldap-202-5) and configured as show
below, my intention is only to make IDMAP storage in LDAP using winbind.
I've looked on SAMBA3 by example book and relatives official guide on the
site.
First I have try to run samba and winb
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Jules Agee:
(replying to self again)
Update:
The Windows XP (SP2, BTW) client tries three times to log in to the
Samba server with the Windows username, which is different from the
Samba username. As one would expect, Samba replies to each of the three
requests with a "STATUS_
I'm seeing this problem as well, and while our Windows servers are using
Active Directory, my samba configuration is employing the "server =
domain" technique, and the password server is the one Windows AD DC
that's in NT emulation mode.
Authentications seem to work okay, and users can navigate
We could not authenticate from a Windws NT domain using Samba 3.0.10-1.4E.
It was because winbind would not work properly. The fix was to copy
winbindd from Samba 3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and voila!
Tom Naves
System Administrator
Orthodyne Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
may be OT but could you please have a look at this thread and make some
tests?
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-March/101697.html
thanks in advance! please receive my best regards!
micha
Stephen A. Cochran wrote:
I've been trying to set up a server to fileshare to mac and windows
client
Hi
I am trying to implement a simple Samba server on a Slackware 10.1 machine
running for a bunch of Windows users that also have unix accounts on the
machine. Using webmin, I did convert the unix users to samba users (smbpasswd
is located in /etc/samba/private). A possible problem is that I h
Hello Samba-Members,
i use the samba version 3.0.11 and RedHat 8.0. There i have a VFS-Module which
shows files and folders from a database. There are also "import"-folders where
you can upload files to the server and then into the database.
And from an Mac-Client i get an error-message when
Hello,
I am running Samba 3.0.10 under Debian. I have the Samba server
running with security=ADS, and I can save files to Samba shares with
my windows credentials.
We now have some users that need to save files to a share using their
UNIX user permissions. To this end, I have set up an LDAP pas
Hamish,
Executing the command above at the client, result:
#
#
# net rpc join -S 10.80.100.62 -U Administrator -d2
[2005/03/30 13:53:02, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79)
added interface ip=10.80.100.98 bcast=10.80.100.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
[2005/03/30 13:53:02, 1] utils/net_rpc.c:run_rpc_
Hi all,
Has anyone figured out why some people are not having a problem with
similar configurations, however some people require that we add the "lpq
command = /bin/true" line? It is a very good and simple solution.
Should all pdf printers be set with this option for future reference?
Urs Rau
I would like to get IP adress from WINS (not from broadcast or LMHOSTS file)
for given NetBIOS name using Windows netbios API (functions) - however - I
can't understand what I should specifu into NBC structure - should I make
socket connection to WINS server and issue NCBFIND or should I use SEN
Hello Urs,
> So what you need is
>
> > [pdfprinter]
> > comment = Minolta Color PageWorks/Pro Ps
>
> printing = bsd
>
> > path = /samba/pdfprinter
> > print command = /samba/pdfprinter/pdfscript "%s"
> > printable = yes
> > public = yes
> > writeable
Hi!
It might be somewhat off-topic but hopefully some people here can help anyway.
SuSEfirewall2 drops packages and name resolution/browsing doesn't work:
Mar 28 13:57:14 tcn kernel: SFW2-INext-DROP-DEFLT IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=00:11:d8:31:4a:73:00:13:77:00:15:15:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.5 DST=192.168.0.2
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:11, stephane ancelot wrote:
> Hi,
> We defined folder redirection in registry, this works,but the Desktop is
> synchronised , why ?
> we tried to add csc policy = disable but did not help.
Please refer to section 6.3.1.3 of the book "Samba-3 by Example" available
fro
> > Have you joined the box the domain?
>
> Sorry. I didn't understand!
Have you run the following command?
net join -U Administrator
pgpkSmPiQdHnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
The question is: how to make so that only the using direction has
access to all the sharings and excessively only to its proper ones?
Use group security like:
[share1]
comment = Share1
path = /srv/samba/share1
valid users = @group1
write list = @group1
force
Hi,
We defined folder redirection in registry, this works,but the Desktop is
synchronised , why ?
we tried to add csc policy = disable but did not help.
Best Regards
Steph
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo
I already did that. When i type in a user that does not have root
permissions it says "Access is denied"
When you join the domain you need to create a user on the unix system to
hold the machine trust account, therefore you need a user with superuser
privileges. There is a way around this r
Urs Rau wrote:
>>I start to wonder what "dammage" it would do to set lpq to
>>lpq command =/bin/true
>>for my pdf printer? ;-)
>
>
>
> Well, wonder no more sir!! I set my lpq command = /bin/true
and
> ALL QUEUES CLEAR AND ACT PROPERLY I could kiss you!
That was all I did,
Excuse me, i am french
My SAMBA v3.0.13 (over a linux Redhat 7.3.1 With kernel 2.4.27-4) is
configured with " security = ADS " to communicate with Active directory
(2003 server).
The problem : When i modify the group of a user in the Active directory,
this modification is not completely tak
Hi guys/gals. I'm brand new to this list, been working with Linux for several
years, and have occasionally set up samba file servers before in a
"hi-i'm-wide-open-so-anyone-can-read/write-to-my-shares" mode for temporary
storage in data recovery scenarios. At the moment, I'm working on a proje
Hey all, might be a tad bit off topic to samba, but not entirely unlrelated.
Anyhow, as I understand it, the task of a BDC is to process most if not all
of the domain logons before a PDC does so is it not? It has been my
understanding that the BDC generally accepts and processes domain logons
befo
I posted a query re a problem I was having getting SAMBA to authenticate
using a Windows 2003 Server ADS and got no reply. Also, I've searched
the web (before posting) and no one else had a reply to any similar
question.
Does SAMBA actually work with 2003 ADS at all or am I flogging a dead
horse?
Hi Folks,
I changed the local SID from our new samba server to the SID from our old
one with net setlocalsid.
When I ask for the localsid via net getlocalsid I get the korrekt one
back. But when I convert or create a new samba group the corespondig SID
is totally different to the SID I get bac
English version below.
Samba 3.0.13 ist veröffentlicht worden. RPM-Pakete für diverse SuSE und
Redhat-Versionen sowie für Debian GNU/Linux können von
ftp://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/
heruntergeladen werden. Pakete für S390 folgen in Kürze.
Dieses Samba-Release behebt einige Fehler, darunt
Jules Agee:
> (replying to self again)
> Update:
> The Windows XP (SP2, BTW) client tries three times to log in to the
> Samba server with the Windows username, which is different from the
> Samba username. As one would expect, Samba replies to each of the three
> requests with a "STATUS_WRONG_PAS
Meli Marco:
> I have download the latest version samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, and I have make
> followings changes: Rpm -i samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, so I have created the
> SPEC file.
> I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file.
This should be "--with-acl" according to my R
Jules Agee wrote:
(replying to self)
Jules Agee wrote:
Hi, we've been using Samba for a while, and are just now starting to
switch our desktop computers to Windows XP. We are having a problem
where connections to our Samba server fail, and the user is presented
with a password prompt asking for
Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> can I use the Lotus Domino LDAP Server as backend for Samba?
Yes
> Has anyone tried this, or some experiences in that?
Migrated to (Domino) LDAP in a small Samba 3.0 domain about half a year
ago. I'm currently working on my thesis which will cover Domino LDAP
i
Hansjörg Maurer wrote:
Hi
I have tried this patch, but the generated Makefile still contains the
-g CFFLAG.
(running Solaris8 with gcc)
Removing the -g manually from the Makefile works.
Did you run the source/autogen.sh script after you applied the patch?
quote from patch:
http://samba.org/~jerr
Hi
I have tried this patch, but the generated Makefile still contains the
-g CFFLAG.
(running Solaris8 with gcc)
Removing the -g manually from the Makefile works.
Thank you very much
Hansjörg
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
| Toni Verdu Carbo wrote:
| | Hi!
| |
| |
Bonjour,
Je cherche des binaires de smbd/nmbd pour PowerPC
Je souhaite les installer sur un récepteur satellite Dreambox (Linux sur
PowerPC, kernel 2.6)
Les versions proposées actuellement pour cet environnement n'exposent' pas
les fichiers > 2Gb
Mais je n'ai bien sûr pas de compilateur sur la Dr
Hi Jerry
I wonder if you can help, I came across one of your forums and thought you
can assist?
We have a server running Redhat ES 3 with samba 3.0.10 that is joined to our
Win2000 PDC. It's been working fine for the past year, but the problem we
having now is that the server can't see the domain
Stefan-Michael,
Stefan-Michael. Guenther (in-put GbR) wrote:
Hi,
I'm using some kind of pseudo printer on our samba server to automatically
produce PDF files. The smb.conf looks like this (the samba server is
successfully conteced to an ADS):
[global]
workgroup = ADS
netbios name
Hi to all. I setup a new samba pdc using samba version 3.0.11rc1 and openldap
2.2.23, I followed idealx's howto. It was almost successful I can create a user
account and use the account to logon using SSH, till I tested and was
unsuccessful to join an XP machine to the domain. The error that Im
Hello,
so as to migrate a NT4 domain to a another samba domain I need to know
one thing:
once the migration is done if I change the name of the domain
will it work, is there any problem with the SID
Thanks for reply
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instruction
Hi guys and girls,
I'm running Samba-3.0.4 as a PDC for about 40 workstations. It's been running
perfectly for about 6 months. Suddenly in the last week two PCs have required
that they be 'rejoined' to the domain. This seems to be happening every couple
days or so. I've looked through the logs
63 matches
Mail list logo
