Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: scanner

Don't use a smart phone camera for it a decent dedicated digital camera will correct for that optically in the lense, but you are right that is an issue for smart phone cameras due to the physical lense size.

Re: scanner

No it would not produce parallax that the is the point of using a photo copy stand. That is how Profesional photographers have been copying photographs without the negatives since the beginning of photography it's a rig designed to prevent exactly that.Now the down side is a good photo copy stand

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: scanner

On 10/12/2017 04:42 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Interestingly my father threw me for a loop on this now a days a low grade digital camera actually has higher resolution than most scanners so he uses one in a photo copy stand and then just copies the one file to his computer via a bluetooth en

Re: scanner

A single point of imaging would produce paralax -- if that matters. Otherwise , an efficient 'hack' . On the plus side , could 'scan' a non-flat object.       Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 5:42 PM From: "Paul Robert Marino" To: "Jason Bronner" , scientific-linux-users Subject: Re: scan

Re: scanner

Interestingly my father threw me for a loop on this now a days a low grade digital camera actually has higher resolution than most scanners so he uses one in a photo copy stand and then just copies the one file to his computer via a bluetooth enabled SD card which is faster than any scanner on th

Re: scanner

I'm currently using an older Epson Perfection with a reasonable degree of success. HP is probably going to be your best bet for any kind of stable use and long term support, though. It'll function correctly on about anything until the unit dies from mechanical failure.

Re: scanner

On 12/10/17 17:31, ToddAndMargo wrote: > Dear List, > >    Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly? I've only had MFPs the last 10 years or so, with printer and scanner integrated. These are my general experiences on a few brands - Canon Horrendous Linux support, network s

Re: scanner

I have an hp-envy 5534 which is a combination printer, scanner, copier. These are equipped with Wi-Fi and require no PC to function. They have a web server and can scan on request through a web page. No driver required for scanning to jpeg or PDF. The printer part is well supported by cups

Re: scanner

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:31:05AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: >Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly? Look at HP All-in-One devices. I've used several models with "HP OfficeJet Pro" in the model name. I only use the scan function and it's working fine with Xsane, also

Re: scanner

On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, ToddAndMargo wrote: Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly? I think SL scanner support is good enough that you can start by looking at the available scanners that do what you need for an acceptable price and *then* investigate linux support. For exa

Re: [EXTERNAL] scanner

I have an ancient HP SCSI scanner (from 1996 or so). If 300DPI hardware scan is sufficient, it's excellent. A bit slow, but great scans. The foam under the lid recently disintegrated; I need to decide whether to refurb or get something that does 600DPI (which I occasionally need). Nothing fanc

scanner

Dear List, Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly? Many thanks, -T

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] SL signing keys

> On 12 Oct 2017, at 14:53, Ken Teh wrote: > > On the first update of a newly installed system, there is SL signing keys > that have to be installed. Yum prompts for confirmation. > > Is there a way to install the keys before the first yum update? Are they in > an rpm somewhere? I do: /usr/b

SL signing keys

On the first update of a newly installed system, there is SL signing keys that have to be installed. Yum prompts for confirmation. Is there a way to install the keys before the first yum update? Are they in an rpm somewhere? Thanks.