tor?
Kind regards,
Xavier Schepler
Yes thanks. This works fine :
log4j.rootLogger=INFO, SOLR
log4j.appender.SOLR=org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender
log4j.appender.SOLR.file=/home/quetelet_bdq/logs/bdq.log
log4j.appender.SOLR.datePattern='.'-MM-dd
log4j.appender.SOLR.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
log4j.appender.SO
I added it to /etc/default/tomcat6.
What happened is that the same error message appeared twice in
/var/log/tomcat6/catalina.out.
Like the same file was loaded twice.
--
Tous les courriers électroniques émis depuis la messag
A_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/classes/log4j.properties
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> On 10. feb. 2011, at 09.41, Xavier Schepler wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I added “slf4j-log4j12-1.5.5.jar” and “log4j-1.2.
Hi,
I added “slf4j-log4j12-1.5.5.jar” and “log4j-1.2.15.jar” to
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib ,
then deleted the library “slf4j-jdk14-1.5.5.jar” from
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib,
then created a directory $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/classes.
and created $CATALINA_H
Since it seems to be no voodoo available I did it on the client side.
I send a first request to get the facets and a second to get the documents and
their highlighting.
It works well but requires more processing.
>
> From: Xavier SCHEPLER
> Sent
ur examples! If you explain what you want to do, someone may
> be able to tell you how. From the hints in your last message, I suspect
> nested queries _might_ be helpful to you.
>
> On 1/19/2011 3:46 AM, Xavier SCHEPLER wrote:
> > Ok I was already at this point.
> >
Ok I was already at this point.
My facetting system use exactly what is described in this page. I read it from
the Solr 1.4 book. Otherwise I would'nt ask.
The problem is that the filter queries doesn't affect the relevance score of
the results so I want the terms in the main query.
> -
You're right the second query didn't result in an error but neither gave the
expected result.
I'm gone to have a look at the link you gave me.
Thanks !
>
> From: Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Tue Jan 18 21:31:52 CET 2011
> To:
> Subject: Re: Local param tag vood
Hey,
here are my needs :
- a query that has tagged and untagged contents
- facets that ignore the tagged contents
I tryed :
q=({!tag=toExclude} ignored) taken into account
q={tag=toExclude v='ignored'} take into account
Both resulted in a error.
Is this possible or do I have to try another
> query ... it's the same. In terms of the score of the results no,
> since, if you are using the first query, the documents that will match both
> the "a" and the "b" terms, will match higher then the ones matching just the
> "a" term.
>
> O
Hi,
with the Lucene query syntax, is :
a AND (a OR b)
equivalent to :
a
(absorption)
?
need to do it, but you can automatically
restart it once a day.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Xavier Schepler
wrote:
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of waiting, the solr server didn't respond to requests
that require a lot of proce
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of running well, the solr server stopped responding
to requests that require a lot of processing time, like this one :
wt=json&omitHeader=true&q=qiAndMSwFR%3A%28transport%29&q.op=AND&start=0&rows=5&fl=id,domainId
Hi,
We are in a beta testing phase, with several users a day.
After several days of waiting, the solr server didn't respond to
requests that require a lot of processing time.
I'm using Solr inside Tomcat.
This is the request that had no response from the server :
wt=json&omitHeader=true&q=q
On 04/10/2010 16:40, Robert Muir wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Xavier Schepler<
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hi,
does the more like this search uses terms positions information in the
score formula ?
no, it would be nice if it did use them though (base
Hi,
does the more like this search uses terms positions information in the
score formula ?
On 08/09/2010 12:21, Grijesh.singh wrote:
see the analysis.jsp with debug verbose and see what happens at index time
and search time during analysis with your data
Also u can use debugQuery=on for seeing what actually parsed query is.
-
Grijesh
I've found a first solution by myself, usi
t file :
...
PS,Parti socialiste
...
and here's the query :
"PS et".
It returns no result, whereas "Parti socialiste et" returns the results.
How can I have both queries working ? I'm thinking about different
configurations but I didn't found any solution at the moment.
Thx for reading,
Xavier Schepler
On 03/09/2010 15:31, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
no, jopsin isn't in the index.
I tryed this with other words and I had the
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first in place
of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin => jopsin, I
don't get any suggest
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first
in place of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin
=> jopsin, I don't get any suggestion from the spellchecker component.
I tryed the default algorithm and the Jaro Winkler Distance, with a
coef
On 01/09/2010 13:54, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component
On 01/09/2010 12:38, Markus Jelsma wrote:
I think you need to enable usePhraseHighlighter in order to use the
highlightMultiTerm parameter.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 12:12:11 Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them
Hi,
can the highlighting component highlight terms only if the distance
between them matches the query ?
I use those parameters :
hl=on&hl.fl=qFR,iFR,mFR,vlFR&hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false&hl.highlightMultiTerm=true&hl.simple.pre=&hl.simple.post=<%2Fb>&hl.mergeContiguous=false
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that were
: matched, without any surrounding text ?
I'm not a Highlighter expert, but this is somethign that certainly
*sounds* like it should be easy.
I took a shot at it and this is hte best i could c
Hi,
several documents from my index contain the phrase : "PS et".
However, PS is expanded to "parti socialiste" and a phrase search for
"PS et" fails.
A phrase search for "parti socialiste et" succeeds.
Can I have both queries working ?
Here's the field type :
Hi,
how could I have the highlighting component return only the terms that
were matched, without any surrounding text ?
Hi,
Here's a field type using synonyms :
synonyms="french-synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
Here are the contents of 'french-synonyms.txt' that I used for testing :
PC,parti co
7; in A and C
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific co
Le 17/05/2010 16:57, Xavier Schepler a écrit :
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific contents
- a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
Hey,
let's say I have :
- a field named A with specific contents
- a field named B with specific contents
- a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
- A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the lazy
From: Xavier Schepler
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 11:01:24 AM
Subject: What hardware do I need ?
Hi,
I'm working with Solr 1.4.
My schema has about 50 fields.
I'm
using full text search in short strings (~ 30-100 terms) and facet
Hi,
I'm working with Solr 1.4.
My schema has about 50 fields.
I'm using full text search in short strings (~ 30-100 terms) and
facetted search.
My index will have 100 000 documents.
The number of requests per second will be low. Let's say between 0 and
1000 because of auto-complete.
Is a st
Hey,
Is there a way to make the "more like this" feature build its queries
from a minimum number of interesting terms ?
It looks like this component fires query with only 1 term in them.
I got a lot of results that aren't similar at all with the parsed
document fields.
My parameters :
&mlt.
Hello,
this field would not be searched, but it would be used to display results.
A query could be :
q=table&hl=true&hl.fl=htmlfield&hl.fragsize=0
It would be tokenized with the HTMLStripStandardTokenizerFactory, then
analyzed the same way as the searcheable fields.
Could this result in hig
Xavier Schepler wrote:
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your feedback
the firewall rule for the trusted IP is not fessiable for us because the
application is open for public so we can not work through IP banning.
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for your feedback
the firewall rule for the trusted IP is not fessiable for us because the
application is open for public so we can not work through IP banning.
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr security.
For Making
Vijayant Kumar wrote:
Hi Group,
I need some feedback on solr security.
For Making by solr admin password protected,
I had used the Path Based Authentication form
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity.
In this way my admin area,search,delete,add to index is protected.But Now
when I make s
Hi,
there is an indexed field in my Solr's schema, in which one phrase is
stored per document.
I have to implement a feature that will allow users to have "more like
this" results, based on the contents of this field.
I think that the Solr's built in "more like this" feature requires too
many
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thi
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
"concept_user_*", and I will hav
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema,
for example, "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users
using this feature.
One user will send and retrieve values from its field. It will then be
used to filter result.
How w
Hey,
I have highlighting working with this field :
when I query the solr server this way :
/select/?q=election&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&hl=on&hl.fl=questionsLabelsFr&hl.fragsize=0
I got results like this :
Au second tour des élections législatives dimanche prochain,
avez
10 at 7:47 AM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has a
type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other fields
but not on this one.
Why ?
Thanks for your re
Hi,
I'm trying to highlight short text values. The field they came from has
a type shared with other fields. I have highlighting working on other
fields but not on this one.
Why ?
46 matches
Mail list logo
