Hi Karl,
Maybe someone else could help if reindexing is needed if we upgrade Schema
version. However, I guess, useDocValuesAsStored only impacts the query side
assuming docValues had already been stored during indexing. It's actually
easier to try querying the fields after enabling this parameter
Hey,
I’m going to bump our schema version from 1.5 to 1.6 to get the implicit
useDocValuesAsStored=true, would this require a reindex?
Thanks
Karl
This e-mail is sent on behalf of Auto Trader Group Plc, Registered Office: 1
Tony Wilson Place, Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in
Thanks.
Salman
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> What shalin says is solid and will work with solr 5.x as well as 3.x
> You could do a little poc if you want to be absolutely certain. Shouldn't
> take you very long.
> Your only concern will be that
Thanks guys for your responses.
@Shalin: Do you have a documentation that explains this? Moreover, is it
only for Solr 5+ or is it still applicable to Solr 3+? I am asking this as
I am working in a team and in some of our projects we are using old Solr
versions and I need to convince the guys
What shalin says is solid and will work with solr 5.x as well as 3.x
You could do a little poc if you want to be absolutely certain. Shouldn't
take you very long.
Your only concern will be that your old docs won't be matched against
queries matched against the newly added fields.
On Tue, 29 Dec
Hi,
I am facing an issue where I need to change Solr schema but I have crucial
data that I don't want to delete. Is there a way where I can change the
schema of the index while keeping the data intact?
Regards,
Salman
Is the schema change affects the data you want to keep?
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 29 December 2015 at 01:48, Salman Ansari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing an issue where I need to change Solr schema
All crucial data that you don't want to delete should be stored in a
non-Solr backing store, either flat files (e.g., CSV or Solr XML), an
RDBMS, or a NoSQL database. You should always be in a position to either
fully reindex or fully discard your Solr data. Solr is not a system of
record
You can say that we are not removing any fields (so the old data should not
get affected), however, we need to add new fields (which new data will
have). Does that answer your question?
Regards,
Salman
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Is the
Adding new fields is not a problem. You can continue to use your
existing index with the new schema.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Salman Ansari wrote:
> You can say that we are not removing any fields (so the old data should not
> get affected), however, we need to
: If I change the field type in my schema, do I need to rebuild the entire
: index? I'm at a point now where it takes over a day to do a full import due
: to the sheer size of my application and I would prefer not having to reindex
: just because I want to make a change somewhere.
it really
/
- Original Message
From: Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 11:53:27 AM
Subject: Changing the schema
If I change the field type in my schema, do I need to rebuild the entire
index? I'm at a point now where it takes over a day to do
/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Brian Lamb brian.l...@journalexperts.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 11:53:27 AM
Subject: Changing the schema
If I change the field type in my
Chamnap,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Chamnap Chhorn chamnapchh...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder what if I add new field in the schema, do i have to reindex?
If you're using that field within the DIH .. then of course yes, but
normally/otherwise: No :)
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Chamnap
If I change the field type in my schema, do I need to rebuild the entire
index? I'm at a point now where it takes over a day to do a full import due
to the sheer size of my application and I would prefer not having to reindex
just because I want to make a change somewhere.
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
Hi,
I'm using Solr now for a while and I'm feeling fine. Its much easier to use
as native Lucene.
Many thanks for the good job.
But one question cames up as the index goes bigger and bigger: is it
possible to add fields to the schema without a complete reindex ?
We are using Solr for a b2b
16 matches
Mail list logo