On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like this is related to that OPT interface not having the
gateway specified on it. That interface is however working and sending
traffic out to my ISP's gateway.
At the risk of looking like the N00b that I am,
Hello,
I recently had to make some changes to one of my OPT interfaces and now I
cannot re-setup the load balancing. I ended up not setting a gateway on that
interface (which is used for a cable Internet connection) to get it to work
with my ISP. Before making any changes, I deleted out my load
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
At the risk of looking like the N00b that I am, I don't see how pfsense can
send traffic out on an interface that has no gateway. Respond, yes; initiate,
no. Can we have a look at your routing table?
db
The route for
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
The route for that OPT1 interface is showing up it is em2.
$ netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
default67.38.60.77UGS
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM, David Burgessapt@gmail.com wrote:
As expected, you have no gateway on em2. pfsense is able to route packets to
any host on that network, which means it can reply to any incoming packet,
or contact any machine on that network, but any traffic that doesn't
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM, David Burgessapt@gmail.com wrote:
I have entered the ISP's gateway (They actually have two due to us
using multiple subnets) and when I do, pfsense can only ping that
address.
Hello,
I have a load balancer with two web servers behind it. The web servers are to
be monitored via ICMP.
However, the servers frequently flap, and I see this message in the load
balancer log:
Apr 1 21:06:57 slbd[56826]: TCP poll succeeded for 192.168.20.61:80, marking
service UP
Apr 1
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
I have to admit it took me a bit to find it as well. For whatever reason,
when looking by category, it assumes you want to edit the category. I simply
had to change the url from
: [pfSense Support] Load balancer
Hiren Joshi wrote:
Hello all,
I'm using pfsense to firewall at the moment but pass all the http
traffic to an internal load balancer (nginx). My question
is, would it
be possible to replace nginx with pfsense and how would the two
compare in terms
A good start is here:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php?title=Category:Load_balancing
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Hiren Joshi j...@moonfruit.com wrote:
Where can I find details about the pfsense balancer? Things like how
a
request is handled
Thanks for the quick reply... I just couldn't find it on the wiki!
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel...@rockbochs.com]
Sent: 07 February 2009 15:32
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer
A good start is here:
http
I have to admit it took me a bit to find it as well. For whatever reason, when
looking by category, it assumes you want to edit the category. I simply had to
change the url from
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php?title=Category:Load_balancingaction=edit to
Hello all,
I'm using pfsense to firewall at the moment but pass all the http
traffic to an internal load balancer (nginx). My question is, would it
be possible to replace nginx with pfsense and how would the two compare
in terms of performance?
Many thanks,
Josh.
Hiren Joshi wrote:
Hello all,
I'm using pfsense to firewall at the moment but pass all the http
traffic to an internal load balancer (nginx). My question is, would it
be possible to replace nginx with pfsense and how would the two
compare in terms of performance?
Many thanks,
Josh.
We
Hi ALL!
I have a few questions about the load balancer function:
1. Can I round-robin udp packets? for instance I would like to setup
and internal(LAN side) VIP that will be in front of 2 dns servers.
2. Will it allow me to load balance internally? i.e not a on the WAN
side but on the
The documentation site is very helpful in this regard:
http://devwiki.pfsense.org/OutgoingLoadBalancing
or
http://devwiki.pfsense.org/IncomingLoadBalancing
choose your poison.
Joel Robison wrote:
Hi ALL!
I have a few questions about the load balancer function:
1. Can I round-robin udp
Hi Bill,
Same here, I even have the same thing working on 1.1 PFsense for another
customer. Is there a way to down grade from 1.2 RC2 to 1.1?
Thanks,
Lee
Bill Marquette wrote:
Strange, other than the sticky address (which should be more a
nuisance than anything) not getting set on the
Lee Hetherington wrote:
Hi Bill,
Same here, I even have the same thing working on 1.1 PFsense for
another customer. Is there a way to down grade from 1.2 RC2 to 1.1?
It would be MUCH better to help us figure out if there is indeed a
regression in this from 1.2 to 1.0.1. Going back to 1.0.1
Hi Chris,
Its two different systems, in the 1.1 system I have the hosts behind the
balancer being natted by the pfsense box, where as on the 1.2 they are
direct routed, and natted upstream using a PIX 515e.
Ive tried tcp dump on the secondary as discussed with Bill, I can see
the packets
Hi Bill,
The config was sync'd ok, I can see it on both boxes. Below is a ps -ax
from the secondary machine:
# ps -ax |grep slb
60083 ?? Ss 0:00.51 /usr/local/sbin/slbd -c/var/etc/slbd.conf -r5000
65097 p0 RV 0:00.00 grep slb (tcsh)
Looks to me like its running? I tried editing
Hmm, what does the output of pfctl -sn -aslb look like on both
boxes? The other obvious question is, are the virtual addresses that
front end your load balance pool CARP addresses? If they aren't, then
the secondary won't take them over on failover regardless of the load
balance config.
--Bill
Hi Bill,
All is carp, when the primary is off, I can ping the address still.
Primary:
# pfctl -sn -aslb
rdr inet proto tcp from any to 10.2.48.1 port = smtp - { 10.5.49.1,
10.5.49.2 } port 25 round-robin sticky-address
rdr inet proto tcp from any to 10.2.48.1 port = http - { 10.5.49.1,
Strange, other than the sticky address (which should be more a
nuisance than anything) not getting set on the secondary, I'm not
seeing anything obvious that would prevent the connection from
working.
The only other thing I can think to look at is whether the rulesets
(/tmp/rules.debug) are the
Hi There,
Im using 1.2 RC2 on Intel boxes. I have the load balancer setup and working,
the two machines are syncing settings and the carp is working properly.
However, if I reboot the primary firewall the secondary takes over pings, but
the load balancing doesnt work again until the primary
Inbound or outbound load balancing?
--Bill
On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
Im using 1.2 RC2 on Intel boxes. I have the load balancer setup and working,
the two machines are syncing settings and the carp is working properly.
However, if I reboot the
Hi Bill,
Sorry, inbound... we have 2x Web Servers behind the PFsense boxes so we are
load balancing 443 and 80 TCP
Lee
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:47:27 -0500, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inbound or outbound load balancing?
--Bill
On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you confirm that the load balancer config sync'd over to the
secondary? Also, assuming it did, can you do a 'ps -ax |grep slb'
from the shell? I suspect it never started slbd after sync (as an
interim workaround, you could try going to the load balancer page on
the secondary and
I'm trying to get the load balancer to work, but it causes the system to do
a hard lockup.
Hardware Compaq SFF P2 (400Mhz, 256MB ram)
I'm using the internal ethernet card plus two in the PCI slots. They come
up as fxp0, fxp1, fxp2. They are all on IRQ 11.
I know there's documentation
Try one of the 1.2.1 beta's. Many issues resolved, all around better
product.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Upgrade to 1.2-BETA-1
2. See http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/MultiWanVersion1.2
On 6/7/07, Dave Cabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get the load balancer to work, but it causes the system to do
a hard lockup.
Hardware Compaq SFF P2 (400Mhz, 256MB ram)
I'm using the internal
Scott (pfsense support),
please help me, when adding a load balancer pool I can't see the
interface name (WAN for example) preceding the |(Wan check ip). This
is a fresh install with the latest snapshot and I can't figure hot why
is going in this sense for me.
I tried recreating the pools, but
Message-
From: Quirino Santilli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:32 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour
Scott (pfsense support),
please help me, when adding a load balancer pool I can't see the
interface name (WAN
It doesn't worked for me.
Any ideas?
r3N0oV4
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerdì 20 aprile 2007 18.55
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?
Remove the members of the pool
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Quirino Santilli
Inviato: venerdì 20 aprile 2007 10.15
A: 'support@pfsense.com'
Oggetto: R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?
Ok, I updated and the issue solved, but now when adding a Load Balancer Pool in
the list field I see something strange: on my howto
r3N0oV4
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: giovedì 19 aprile 2007 19.35
A: support@pfsense.com
Oggetto: Re: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?
On 4/19/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was finally configuring pfSense
problem, It really doesn't fetch the
interfaces when adding a Load Balancer Pool.
10x in advance.
r3N0oV4
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Quirino Santilli
Inviato: venerdì 20 aprile 2007 10.15
A: 'support@pfsense.com'
Oggetto: R: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer Behaviour?
Ok, I updated
On 4/19/07, Quirino Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was finally configuring pfSense as a multi-wan / load-balancing /
fail-over firewall for my company when i found something strange.
Looking at the howto at this address
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-Wan/Load-Balancing i
found that
Hi, I have some questions concerning Load Balancer and Failover, hope
that someone can help.
1. I have configured the load balancer for 2 physical interfaces (WAN
OPT1). I monitor the states table and realized that the icmp packets for
monitoring purpose were fired only from the OPT1
services that run on both or prefer the one or other
connection.
Holger
Von: Kelvin Chiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2007 11:36
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
Hi, I have some questions concerning Load
: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:25 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
Regarding 1: we'll check this
Regarding 2: Yes, you are right. You typicall want to even create 3
pools for this: one loadbalanced (WAN+OPT1), one failover
Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:25 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
Regarding 1: we'll check this
Regarding 2: Yes, you are right. You typicall want to even create 3
pools for this: one loadbalanced (WAN
Hi Holger, we built it on 31st Jan 2007. Has there been significant
change since then?
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
1. What Version of pfSense
] Load Balancer Hi Holger, we
built it on 31st Jan 2007. Has there been significant change since then?
-Original Message- From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:42 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: AW:
[pfSense Support] Load Balancer 1. What
: Freitag, 9. März 2007 15:19
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
Hi Holger, we built it on 31st Jan 2007. Has there been significant change
since then?
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:42 PM
Ok, Thanks Holger
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:44 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Load Balancer
For sure. I remember that there has been a rule issue with pings that
also resulted in wan
@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a
little leary about updating to the
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/
I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look
like
On 9/19/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit.
README?! What's that!? Shouldn't I just be asking questions and not READING!?
-
To unsubscribe,
You guys crack me up! :)
Honestly, I'm surprised you have as much patience as you do!
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:46 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06
Conversation: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
If you run off a hdd full installation upload the full update file at
systemfirmware. It will apply the update and reboot after that. You won't
lose your configuration, just a downtime
: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:55:53 -0500
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a
little leary about updating to the
http://www.pfsense.com
I have settled the load balancer
section to use 2 isp connections.
For some reason the log looks like this:
Sep 19 03:10:13
slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status,
reloading filter policy
Sep 19 03:10:13
slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for
On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have settled the load balancer section to use 2 isp connections.
For some reason the log looks like this:
Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status,
reloading filter policy
Sep 19 03:10:13
On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v.1 R.C.2
Catalin
Please upgrade to
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ and see if
this solves the problems.
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
I have 2 Wan connections connected using load balancer. On the StatusLoad
Balancer screen it shows both online, but the color around WAN 2 changes
from green to yellow pretty often. Even when it is yellow, it is still up
and still says online. My question is, what does the color mean, if
On 7/18/06, Tunge2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Lan interface rules are:
TCP/UDP LAN net 22 (SSH) * * * SSH
LAN
* LAN net * * *Load Balance
Default LAN - any
Ive tryed to add rules to the WAN and OPT
It is not possible to build up any connection (except web traffic) evenwhen the WAN and OPT connection are connected to the Internet
When i start for example the program Putty i get the message unable to open connection to 192.168.1.1 (i try edseveral different ip address) Network error connection
the load balance option from PFsense
all traffic goes well (SSH, telnet) I don't get any messages in the log file
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Bill Marquette [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zaterdag 15 juli 2006 0:36
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense Support] load
hello,
We installed the load balancer on our PFsense RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT-07-09-2006 machine. The load balance seams to work great at web traffic (if we shutdown the WAN connection, OPT takes it over nicely:) that's a fantastic function, keep up the great work) But if i try to build up any SSHor
Fails in what way? You mean, when a WAN goes down you get
disconnected (to be expected)?
--Bill
On 7/14/06, Tunge2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
We installed the load balancer on our PFsense RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT-07-09-2006
machine. The load balance seams to work great at web traffic (if we
I have just upgrade from 73.12 to 77 on soekris 4801
Is load balancer for outbound connection too?
The bug of ssh not restarting after a configuration restore is still here.
regards
Rodolfo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Just looking for a quick blah on how the incoming load
balancer should work
You won't find one until that work is complete. How it should work is
not how it currently works - it's a functioning work in progress.
--Bill
On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looking for a quick blah on how the incoming load balancer should
work
63 matches
Mail list logo
