Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
EE schrieb:
I can add a few more observations to the lists.
Hi,
thank you for info, I will add it soon.
Can you please add info concerning your test environemnt (OS, SM
version, UI language) and whether all these add-ons have been installed
for your latest SM? I reme
EE schrieb:
I can add a few more observations to the lists.
Hi,
thank you for info, I will add it soon.
Can you please add info concerning your test environemnt (OS, SM
version, UI language) and whether all these add-ons have been installed
for your latest SM? I remember that I already had
On 2015-03-31 00:14, EE wrote:
Lemon Juice wrote:
On 2015-03-29 21:20, EE wrote:
Can you not send your patched version to Mozdev? That is where version
1.3.21 is.
http://downloads.mozdev.org/flashblock/
Philip (the author) already has already made a patched version for
Firefox so I don&#
On 2015-03-31 00:14, EE wrote:
Lemon Juice wrote:
On 2015-03-29 21:20, EE wrote:
Can you not send your patched version to Mozdev? That is where version
1.3.21 is.
http://downloads.mozdev.org/flashblock/
Philip (the author) already has already made a patched version for
Firefox so I don&#
Lemon Juice wrote:
On 2015-03-29 21:20, EE wrote:
Can you not send your patched version to Mozdev? That is where version
1.3.21 is.
http://downloads.mozdev.org/flashblock/
Philip (the author) already has already made a patched version for
Firefox so I don't think it makes sense for
On 2015-03-29 21:20, EE wrote:
Lemon Juice wrote:
On 2015-03-28 19:11, EE wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
There is a version which had to be patched 3 times in order to work
Lemon Juice wrote:
On 2015-03-28 19:11, EE wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
There is a version which had to be patched 3 times in order to work
properly.
https
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
Thanks everyone.
I have 6 or 10 different ones to try now.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
On 2015-03-28 19:11, EE wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
There is a version which had to be patched 3 times in order to work
properly.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
There is a version which had to be patched 3 times in order to work
properly.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/13230070/flashblock1.3.21mod2.xpi
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/27/2015 7:06 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
Flashblock 1.3.20 from
<http://flashblock.mozdev.org/installation2.html#current> should work
with Sea
On 3/27/2015 7:06 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
> Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
> flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
>
Flashblock 1.3.20 from
<http://flashblock.mozdev.org/installation2.html#current> should work
with SeaMonkey 2
Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF
flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
EE wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/20/2014 03:11 PM, EE wrote:
Flashblock 1.3.21 was fixed up for SeaMonkey 2.31 as far as Flash and
HTML5 are concerned, but it is completely disabling Silverlight, just as
Flashblock 1.5.18 was doing. There must be some other way to prevent
HTML5 from starting
NoOp wrote:
On 12/20/2014 03:11 PM, EE wrote:
Flashblock 1.3.21 was fixed up for SeaMonkey 2.31 as far as Flash and
HTML5 are concerned, but it is completely disabling Silverlight, just as
Flashblock 1.5.18 was doing. There must be some other way to prevent
HTML5 from starting automatically if
On 12/20/2014 03:11 PM, EE wrote:
> Flashblock 1.3.21 was fixed up for SeaMonkey 2.31 as far as Flash and
> HTML5 are concerned, but it is completely disabling Silverlight, just as
> Flashblock 1.5.18 was doing. There must be some other way to prevent
> HTML5 from starting automat
Flashblock 1.3.21 was fixed up for SeaMonkey 2.31 as far as Flash and
HTML5 are concerned, but it is completely disabling Silverlight, just as
Flashblock 1.5.18 was doing. There must be some other way to prevent
HTML5 from starting automatically if it has no play button. The
question - what
> On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:41:25 PM UTC-5, David E. Ross wrote:
> I have the PrefBar extension. I created my own button to toggle the
> HTML5 preference, which is media.autoplay.enabled. That way, HTML5 is
> not tied to Flash.
>
AFAIK, this preference stopped working some time ago an
On 14/12/14 05:39, EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version
Daniel wrote:
On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for
SeaMonkey is
1.3.21
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 8:27 PM:
On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for
On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is
1.3.21, which should be
:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is
the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few
simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flashblock/
2. Copy the link to download Flashblock from
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
>>>>> Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaM
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
>>> Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
>>> version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
>
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org
On 12/10/2014 12:20 PM, EE wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
>>> Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
>>> version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
>>>
On 12/10/2014 03:18 PM, EE wrote:
Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US
Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flashblock/
2. Copy the
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org
ken the
> >>> functionality of Flashblock. It still blocks flash, when I go to
> >>> a youtube clip, I get just a black box. I don't get the icon in
> >>> the middle of it that allows the clip to proceed. It is just
> >>> completely blocked, with
On 10/12/2014 02:54, marksatt...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:49:01 PM UTC-6, Ed Mullen wrote:
>> msattler wrote on 12/9/2014 1:01 PM:
>>> Something that was changed from 2.30 to 2.31 has broken the
>>> functionality of Flashblock. It still
On 12/10/2014 8:07 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
>> Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
>> version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
>> steps:
>>
>> 1. g
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
> Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
> version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
> steps:
>
> 1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
>
> https://add
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flashblock/
2. Copy the link to download
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:49:01 PM UTC-6, Ed Mullen wrote:
> msattler wrote on 12/9/2014 1:01 PM:
> > Something that was changed from 2.30 to 2.31 has broken the functionality
> > of Flashblock. It still blocks flash, when I go to a youtube clip, I get
> > just a bl
msattler wrote:
Something that was changed from 2.30 to 2.31 has broken the functionality of
Flashblock. It still blocks flash, when I go to a youtube clip, I get just a
black box. I don't get the icon in the middle of it that allows the clip to
proceed. It is just completely blocked,
msattler wrote on 12/9/2014 1:01 PM:
Something that was changed from 2.30 to 2.31 has broken the functionality of
Flashblock. It still blocks flash, when I go to a youtube clip, I get just a
black box. I don't get the icon in the middle of it that allows the clip to
proceed. It is
msattler wrote:
Something that was changed from 2.30 to 2.31 has broken the functionality of
Flashblock. It still blocks flash, when I go to a youtube clip, I get just a
black box. I don't get the icon in the middle of it that allows the clip to
proceed. It is just completely blocked,
Something that was changed from 2.30 to 2.31 has broken the functionality of
Flashblock. It still blocks flash, when I go to a youtube clip, I get just a
black box. I don't get the icon in the middle of it that allows the clip to
proceed. It is just completely blocked, with no way to vi
On 6/3/10 8:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 05:01 PM, rob wrote:
>> Can't get Flashblock to install in 2.1a1. Added
>> extensions.checkCompatibility.2.1a and set to false. After clicking thru
>> lots of warnings, Web Developer, Form Manager, and Orbit3+1 installe
On 06/03/2010 05:01 PM, rob wrote:
> Can't get Flashblock to install in 2.1a1. Added
> extensions.checkCompatibility.2.1a and set to false. After clicking thru
> lots of warnings, Web Developer, Form Manager, and Orbit3+1 installed and
> work. Flashblock attempts to in
On 6/3/10 5:01 PM, rob wrote:
> Can't get Flashblock to install in 2.1a1. Added
> extensions.checkCompatibility.2.1a and set to false. After clicking thru
> lots of warnings, Web Developer, Form Manager, and Orbit3+1 installed and
> work. Flashblock attempts to install - down
Ant wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Ant wrote:
Hello.
I just installed the latest stable FlashBlock extension (v1.3.14) from
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/installation2.html into my clean and new
SeaMonkey (SM) v2.0 (not upgrade) in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3.
I noticed GUI options are
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Ant wrote:
Hello.
I just installed the latest stable FlashBlock extension (v1.3.14) from
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/installation2.html into my clean and new
SeaMonkey (SM) v2.0 (not upgrade) in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3.
I noticed GUI options are missing in my
Ant wrote:
Hello.
I just installed the latest stable FlashBlock extension (v1.3.14) from
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/installation2.html into my clean and new
SeaMonkey (SM) v2.0 (not upgrade) in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3.
I noticed GUI options are missing in my SM's toolbar (no F
Hello.
I just installed the latest stable FlashBlock extension (v1.3.14) from
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/installation2.html into my clean and new
SeaMonkey (SM) v2.0 (not upgrade) in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3.
I noticed GUI options are missing in my SM's toolbar (no F icon) a
Philip Chee:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:32:19 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Here are the currently used add-ons in my SM 2.1:
>> http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/ad091030.png (34 KB)
>>
>> But i have disabled the check for compatibilty. ;)
>> user_pref("extensions.checkCompatibility", false
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:32:19 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> D B Malmquist:
>>
>>I'm looking forward to using the Seamonkey 2, and I am hoping that my
>>favorite add-in is supported. Will FlashBlock work with Seamonkey 2?
>
> Here are the currently u
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:31:44 -0400, D B Malmquist wrote:
> I'm looking forward to using the Seamonkey 2, and I am hoping that my
> favorite add-in is supported. Will FlashBlock work with Seamonkey 2?
> And if so, do I use Flashblock 1.5.11 ("for Firefox 1.5 to 3.6a,
> Net
Leonidas Jones wrote:
>
> D B Malmquist wrote:
> >
> > I'm looking forward to using the Seamonkey 2, and I am hoping that my
> > favorite add-in is supported. Will FlashBlock work with Seamonkey 2?
> > And if so, do I use Flashblock 1.5.11 ("for Firefox 1.
D B Malmquist wrote:
I'm looking forward to using the Seamonkey 2, and I am hoping that my
favorite add-in is supported. Will FlashBlock work with Seamonkey 2?
And if so, do I use Flashblock 1.5.11 ("for Firefox 1.5 to 3.6a,
Netscape 9 and Flock") or 1.3.14, which is stated
D B Malmquist:
>
>I'm looking forward to using the Seamonkey 2, and I am hoping that my
>favorite add-in is supported. Will FlashBlock work with Seamonkey 2?
Here are the currently used add-ons in my SM 2.1:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/ad091030.png (34 KB)
But i hav
I'm looking forward to using the Seamonkey 2, and I am hoping that my
favorite add-in is supported. Will FlashBlock work with Seamonkey 2?
And if so, do I use Flashblock 1.5.11 ("for Firefox 1.5 to 3.6a,
Netscape 9 and Flock") or 1.3.14, which is stated as working with
"Se
It appears the issue is resolved. It was a resize code in JavaScript on
VS that confused FlashBlock. Weird.
--
"The world flatters the elephant and tramples on the ant." --Indian
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phil/Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
| |o o| |Ant
just clicked randomly on a video from
the main page of the site previously.) However, I just whitelisted
that site in flashblock and the links you gave above play just fine
again.
Yeah, I had to do that but I don't want to see the Flash areas right
away until I say so, especially when I ha
.com/video/Puttin-on-the-Ritz-Taco
>>> etc.? :(
>>
>> Okay, those did not load. (I had just clicked randomly on a video from
>> the main page of the site previously.) However, I just whitelisted
>> that site in flashblock and the links you gave above play just fine
>>
just clicked randomly on a video from
the main page of the site previously.) However, I just whitelisted
that site in flashblock and the links you gave above play just fine
again.
Yeah, I had to do that but I don't want to see the Flash areas right
away until I say so, especially when I ha
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Ant wrote:
> On 7/28/2009 7:50 AM PT, Paul Hartman typed:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Ant wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Is anyone else not seeing videos when using FlashBlock v1.3.14 extension
>>>
On 7/28/2009 7:50 AM PT, Paul Hartman typed:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Ant wrote:
Hi!
Is anyone else not seeing videos when using FlashBlock v1.3.14 extension in
SeaMonkey v1.1.17 to not automatically show Flash parts/areas on redesigned
http://videosift.com/ (VS)? They do not show
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Ant wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is anyone else not seeing videos when using FlashBlock v1.3.14 extension in
> SeaMonkey v1.1.17 to not automatically show Flash parts/areas on redesigned
> http://videosift.com/ (VS)? They do not show after clicking on &qu
Hi!
Is anyone else not seeing videos when using FlashBlock v1.3.14 extension
in SeaMonkey v1.1.17 to not automatically show Flash parts/areas on
redesigned http://videosift.com/ (VS)? They do not show after clicking
on "F" and its play button.
I was able to reproduce it in
Philip Chee wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:54:02 -0500, Andrea wrote:
>
>> I'm using SM 1.1.14 and have been using Flashblock 1.3.8. I've been
>> having problems with it--not seeing the usual marker where flash
>> would go, so I decided to uninstall it and the
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:15:28 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
why don't you ask them?:
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/contact.html. They do
also have their own newsgroup: public.mozdev.flashblock
which is on the news.mozdev.org server. The username
and password
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:15:28 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
> why don't you ask them?:
> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/contact.html. They do
> also have their own newsgroup: public.mozdev.flashblock
> which is on the news.mozdev.org server. The username
> and password are: mozde
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:54:02 -0500, Andrea wrote:
> I'm using SM 1.1.14 and have been using Flashblock 1.3.8. I've been having
> problems with it--not seeing the usual marker where flash would go, so I
> decided to uninstall it and then reinstall it. I installed the Mnenhy
&
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
> Andrea wrote:
>> I'm using SM 1.1.14 and have been using Flashblock 1.3.8. I've been
>> having problems with it--not seeing the usual marker where flash
>> would go, so I decided to uninstall it and then reinstall it. I
>&g
Andrea wrote:
I'm using SM 1.1.14 and have been using Flashblock 1.3.8. I've been having
problems with it--not seeing the usual marker where flash would go, so I
decided to uninstall it and then reinstall it. I installed the Mnenhy
extension and then deleted Flashblock from the Chro
I'm using SM 1.1.14 and have been using Flashblock 1.3.8. I've been having
problems with it--not seeing the usual marker where flash would go, so I
decided to uninstall it and then reinstall it. I installed the Mnenhy
extension and then deleted Flashblock from the Chrome Manag
73 matches
Mail list logo
