Re: SM update status...

On 10/12/2016 13:02, Richmond wrote: > Mason83 writes: > >> I'm not surprised you can't upgrade within SM, because you untarred >> as root, but run as regular user. So SM doesn't have permission to >> trash its installation folder. > > Is it a security hazard if Seamonkey has

Re: SM update status...

Mason83 writes: > I'm not surprised you can't upgrade within SM, because you untarred > as root, but run as regular user. So SM doesn't have permission to > trash its installation folder. > Is it a security hazard if Seamonkey has access to change itself?

Re: SM update status...

On 09/12/2016 15:31, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> One thing to watch out for is when Ubuntuzilla eventually >> puts out a new release. This is likely to overwrite your >> "custom" SM package. I don't have a good solution for that. > > Interesting you should mention that. When I

Re: SM update status...

Mason83 wrote: On 09/12/2016 02:17, David H. Durgee wrote: Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: Mason83 wrote: On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local

Re: SM update status...

On 09/12/2016 02:17, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: >>> Mason83 wrote: On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: > I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the > ubuntuzilla repository. I have a

Re: SM update status...

Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: Mason83 wrote: On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repository set up on my system and could install your unofficial

Re: SM update status...

On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: >> On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: >> >>> I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the >>> ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repository set up on my system >>> and could install your unofficial

Re: SM update status...

Mason83 wrote: On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repository set up on my system and could install your unofficial build from a .deb by adding it there and using the update

Re: SM update status...

On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: > I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the > ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local repository set up on my system > and could install your unofficial build from a .deb by adding it there > and using the update tools.

Re: SM update status...

Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 12/02/2016 o 09:43 PM, Mr. Ed pisze: If you want an unofficial 64 bit version of SM you can get it here: http://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download I'd recommend to never ever put links to that site anywhere. For many reasons: 1st, because they just

Re: SM update status...

Mr. Ed wrote: > On 12/03/16 10:24 AM, Gerd Schweizer wrote: >> Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: >>> Mr. Ed wrote: >>> This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). >>> >>> Really!? >>> >>> My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates,

Re: SM update status...

On 12/03/16 10:24 AM, Gerd Schweizer wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: >> Mr. Ed wrote: >> >>> This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and >>> installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). >> >> Really!? >> >> My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are >>

Re: SM update status...

Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Mr. Ed wrote: This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). Really!? My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are available. Mine too -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd Satelliten FAQ

Re: SM update status...

On 12/02/2016 02:21 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 12/02/2016 o 09:43 PM, Mr. Ed pisze: >> If you want an unofficial 64 bit version of SM you can get it here: >> http://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download > > > I'd recommend to never ever put links to that site anywhere. For many

Re: SM update status...

On 12/02/16 5:21 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 12/02/2016 o 09:43 PM, Mr. Ed pisze: >> If you want an unofficial 64 bit version of SM you can get it here: >> http://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download > > > I'd recommend to never ever put links to that site anywhere. For many >

Re: SM update status...

W dniu 12/02/2016 o 09:43 PM, Mr. Ed pisze: > If you want an unofficial 64 bit version of SM you can get it here: > http://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download I'd recommend to never ever put links to that site anywhere. For many reasons: 1st, because they just take my builds and

Re: SM update status...

Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/02/16 11:26 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Mr. Ed wrote: This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). Really!? My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are available. Running 2.47 (64 bit with

Re: SM update status...

Mr. Ed wrote: > On 12/01/16 9:31 PM, Mr. Ed wrote: >> On 12/01/16 8:44 PM, sean wrote: >>> Ant wrote: On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: >> https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( > > 2.40 needs patched. 

Re: SM update status...

On 12/02/16 1:15 PM, Lee wrote: > On 12/2/16, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> WaltS48 wrote: >>> On 12/02/2016 11:26 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Mr. Ed wrote: > This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and > installed the latest 2.47

Re: SM update status...

On 12/02/16 11:26 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Mr. Ed wrote: > >> This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and >> installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). > > Really!? > > My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are available. > Running 2.47 (64 bit with

Re: SM update status...

Felix Miata wrote: sean composed on 2016-12-01 18:44 (UTC-0700): fwiw, 2.49a2 is working perfectly for me... I'm sure our overworked and underpaid volunteers know there's no need to waste time with 2.40... I've almost never used chatzilla & never dom Inspector... so no tears will ever be

Re: SM update status...

On 12/2/16, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > WaltS48 wrote: >> On 12/02/2016 11:26 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> Mr. Ed wrote: >>> This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). >>> >>> Really!? >>> >>> My SM

Re: SM update status...

On 02/12/2016 17:26, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Mr. Ed wrote: This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). Really!? My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are available. Same for me here in the deep south west of

Re: SM update status...

W dniu 12/02/2016 o 06:05 PM, Paul B. Gallagher pisze: > WaltS48 wrote: >> On 12/02/2016 11:26 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> Mr. Ed wrote: >>> This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). >>> >>> Really!? >>> >>> My SM 2.40, when

Re: SM update status...

On 12/02/2016 11:26 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Mr. Ed wrote: This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). Really!? My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are available. Unless they haven't updated

Re: SM update status...

Mr. Ed wrote: This morning when opening SM it automatically downloaded and installed the latest 2.47 (12/01). Really!? My SM 2.40, when asked manually to check for updates, says none are available. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher

Re: SM update status...

Alex Beauroy wrote: On 02/12/2016 12:54, Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/01/16 9:31 PM, Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/01/16 8:44 PM, sean wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs

Re: SM update status...

On 02/12/2016 12:54, Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/01/16 9:31 PM, Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/01/16 8:44 PM, sean wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs patched.  Yep, badly!

Re: SM update status...

On 12/01/16 9:31 PM, Mr. Ed wrote: > On 12/01/16 8:44 PM, sean wrote: >> Ant wrote: >>> On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: > https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs patched.  >>> >>> Yep, badly! >> >> fwiw,

Re: SM update status...

On 12/01/2016 09:21 PM, Felix Miata wrote: sean composed on 2016-12-01 18:44 (UTC-0700): fwiw, 2.49a2 is working perfectly for me... I'm sure our overworked and underpaid volunteers know there's no need to waste time with 2.40... I've almost never used chatzilla & never dom Inspector... so

Re: SM update status...

On 12/01/16 8:44 PM, sean wrote: > Ant wrote: >> On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: >>> On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( >>> >>> 2.40 needs patched.  >> >> Yep, badly! > > fwiw, 2.49a2 is working perfectly for me... I'm

Re: SM update status...

sean composed on 2016-12-01 18:44 (UTC-0700): fwiw, 2.49a2 is working perfectly for me... I'm sure our overworked and underpaid volunteers know there's no need to waste time with 2.40... I've almost never used chatzilla & never dom Inspector... so no tears will ever be shed by me when ewong

Re: SM update status...

On 12/01/2016 08:44 PM, sean wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs patched.  Yep, badly! fwiw, 2.49a2 is working perfectly for me... I'm sure our overworked

Re: SM update status...

Ant wrote: On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs patched.  Yep, badly! fwiw, 2.49a2 is working perfectly for me... I'm sure our overworked and underpaid volunteers know there's

Re: SM update status...

On 12/1/2016 9:08 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs patched.  Yep, badly! -- "Ever watch ants just crawling around? They walk in that single straight line, a long, a long, long mile of ants.

Re: SM update status...

On 12/1/2016 11:59 AM, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( 2.40 needs patched.  ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM update status...

https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/01/face-the-music/ :( -- "They are like the ant... They start one way and turn around and go the other way... They look all the time at the ground and never see the sky." --Davi Kopenawa Yanomami, Amazonian Indian (Newsweek 117(17):5, 1991) Note: A