2017-12-03 4:05 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć :
>
> 1. As I currently understand it, nature reserve is _always_ a type of
> protected area, to begin with.
>
> We were talking on osm-carto ticket with some people about private
> reserves and even when someone told me "it's not about protection!" this
> term
I've just visited Alexa free stats on OSM website and here are some
interesting facts:
- Current Global Rank for OSM: 6988 (down 833)
- Most visitors come from USA, Germany, China, UK and France (in both
USA and China rank number is lower than global average, but probably
much more people liv
Hi
For me:
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets displays after a delay of ~5 seconds
http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map still gives me a grey screen
DaveF
On 11/12/2017 15:22, Jinal Foflia wrote:
Hey everyone,
OSMCha is back to normal now, there might be a slight delay in
processing the
Hey everyone,
OSMCha is back to normal now, there might be a slight delay in processing
the new changesets. We are working on it. Thank you!
Cheers,
Jinal Foflia
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Michael Andersen wrote:
> It's not just you. OSMcha stopped picking up new changesets friday.
>
>
W dniu 11.12.2017 o 14:43, Greg Troxel pisze:
The property that is denoted by leisure=nature_reserve is mostly
separate from the protected area information. It means that humans are
able to hike in a land wich is in a natural state.
In the meantime I've made a reality check with Poland lately
Daniel Koć writes:
> W dniu 07.12.2017 o 17:04, Greg Troxel pisze:
>> I also object to deprecating leisure=nature_reserve. The protected_area
>> scheme is too complicated for most people to deal with fully and
>> leisure=nature_reserve has proved itself to be useful.
>
> This way or another it
6 matches
Mail list logo
