Hello Bat Group,
I could use some help.
I'm using Bat Version 1.35. I can not configure my Bat E-mail
Software to function within our network. Our Server has the WWW and
smtp and pop direct connection and I am trying to use the Bat on my
work-station. I have been attempting this for several m
begin 644 Happy99.exe
M35I0``($``\`__\``+@`0``:
M``$``+H0``X?M`G-(;@!3,TAD)!4:&ES('!R;V=R
M86T@;75S="!B92!R=6X@=6YD97(@5VEN,S(-"B0W
M
M```
I tried setting up two The BaT!s as server/client, and
found that I did not want to do that. There was several
problems.
1. When messages came in, the sound played on the
SERVER and not the CLIENT!
2. Through no fault of The Bat! I could not set up the
accounts like I want them.
So, I put the se
Just in case somebody doesn't know yet, DON'T RUN THAT PROG.
Mike, get rid of Happy99 please.
--
Zankoku na tenshi no Yoni, shonen yo Shinma ni nare..! :P~
|\ /| /\ \~~~/ \~~~/ \~~~/ WWW: http://maxxx.ii.com.pl
| \/ | / \ > < > < > < E-M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| /_
Hi Mike,
> I could use some help.
Indeed :-) You are sending the HAPPY99.EXE virus with every
mail. Please clean up your pc before sending other mails.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.38 Beta/5 under Windows 95 4.0 Build B
in Darmstadt, Ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mike,
Friday, December 03, 1999, 5:29:48 AM, you wrote:
> begin 644 Happy99.exe
Note that our Filter System detected and removed the Happy99.exe
e-mail WORM VIRUS from an e-mail sent by Mike
Mike's computer IS INFECTED.
Please do NOT ex
Hi Mike,
Your message from Donnerstag, 02. Dezember 1999:
Thanks for "Happy99"
--
Regards,
Werner Artsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a
Hi Mike,
On Thursday 02/12/1999 at 19:30, you wrote:
> Hello Bat Group,
> I could use some help.
> I'm using Bat Version 1.35. I can not configure my Bat E-mail
> Software to function within our network. Our Server has the WWW and
> smtp and pop direct connection and I am trying to use the B
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 4:15:06 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
>>> begin 644 Happy99.exe
CV>> Note that our Filter System detected and removed the Happy99.exe
CV>> e-mail WORM VIRUS from an e-mail sent by Mike
MDP> Yes indeed, and I'm beginning the inquest
äÏÂÒÙÊ ÄÅÎØ, Mike,
ÞÅÔ×ÅÒÇ, 2 ÄÅËÁÂÒÑ 1999 Ç., ÷Ù ÐÉÓÁÌÉ ÐÏ ÐÏ×ÏÄÕ
Network Problems:
Yes, you've got problems. You have HAPPY99 virus.
--
ó Õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍ,
ïÌÅÇ úÁÌÑÌÏ×. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mike,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 2:30:15 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
M> I'm using Bat Version 1.35. I can not configure my Bat E-mail
M> Software to function within our network. Our Server has the WWW and
M> smtp and pop direct connection and I am trying to use the Bat on my
M> wor
tracer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> del C:\Windows\Ska.exe
> del C:\Windows\Ska.dll
> del C:\Windows\System\WSOCK32.dll
> ren C:\Windows\System\WSOCK32.ska C:\Windows\System\WSOCK32.dll
This horse has about nine lives. It died many times before.
--
Ali Martin | Usin
Hallo Randy,
On Friday, December 10, 1999, 11:43:45 PM (GMT+0800), Randy Robinson wrote:
RR> So, I put the server back the way it was, as a
RR> stand-alone. But now, I open up The Bat! it
RR> makes me login! I can't seem to get rid of this prompt.
RR> Can someone help me with this?
Login to The
On 02 December 1999 at 20:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
>> begin 644 Happy99.exe
CV> Note that our Filter System detected and removed the Happy99.exe
CV> e-mail WORM VIRUS from an e-mail sent by Mike
Yes indeed, and I'm beginning the inquest to discover why our server
let it throug
Saturday, December 04, 1999
Hello Clemens,
Friday, Friday, December 03, 1999, you wrote:
Clemens> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Clemens> Hash: SHA1
Clemens> Hello Mike,
Clemens> Friday, December 03, 1999, 5:29:48 AM, you wrote:
>> begin 644 Happy99.exe
Clemens> Note that our Filter Sys
Saturday, December 04, 1999
Hello MaXxX,
Friday, Friday, December 03, 1999, you wrote:
MaXxX> Just in case somebody doesn't know yet, DON'T RUN THAT PROG.
MaXxX> Mike, get rid of Happy99 please.
make a boot floppy
if you have a standard installed system run
from DOS out:
del C:\Windows\Ska.ex
Sunday, December 05, 1999
Hello Ali,
Saturday, Saturday, December 04, 1999, you wrote:
Ali>tracer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> del C:\Windows\Ska.exe
>> del C:\Windows\Ska.dll
>> del C:\Windows\System\WSOCK32.dll
>> ren C:\Windows\System\WSOCK32.ska C:\Windows\System\WSOCK32.dll
Ali> Thi
Hello Thomas,
Friday, December 10, 1999, 1:17:19 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hallo Randy,
TF> On Friday, December 10, 1999, 11:43:45 PM (GMT+0800), Randy Robinson wrote:
RR>> So, I put the server back the way it was, as a
RR>> stand-alone. But now, I open up The Bat! it
RR>> makes me login! I can't see
On Friday, December 03, 1999 tracer wrote:
Clemens>> Please do NOT execute the Happy99.exe attachment.
> But I didnt get any attachment...
Oh, don't worry -- I didn't get it either. But if you really want it
-- I can send it to you (as well as other viruses from my collection).
Hey, does an
Hello Christopher J. Trybowski,
On Sunday, December 05, 1999, 19:37:33 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
CJT> On Friday, December 03, 1999 tracer wrote:
Clemens>>> Please do NOT execute the Happy99.exe attachment.
>> But I didnt get any attachment...
CJT> Oh, don't worry -- I didn't get it either. Bu
Tuesday, December 07, 1999
Hello Christopher,
Sunday, Sunday, December 05, 1999, you wrote:
Christopher> On Friday, December 03, 1999 tracer wrote:
Clemens>>> Please do NOT execute the Happy99.exe attachment.
>> But I didnt get any attachment...
No need, it is in my archive as well..
I lost th
Wednesday, December 08, 1999
Hello Syafril,
Monday, Monday, December 06, 1999, you wrote:
Syafril> Are you serious ?
Syafril> I was deleting all viruses that trapped on my Server, I have none now.
Syafril> I can arrange if any of my 5 Server trapped viruses automatically
Syafril> redirect
Mike,
Oh man...
Ok, if anybody ran the attachment to Mike's last post called
Happy99.exe, please read the below article I wrote for my e-zine when
Happy99/SKA first appeared. It explains what you need to do to get rid
of it.
If any of you did run the Happy99.exe attachment, shame on you. NE
Leif,
Thursday, Thursday, December 02, 1999, Leif wrote:
LG> Mike,
LG> Oh man...
Just to keep us on our toes, Norton has failed to identify
the Happy99/SKA attachment, even with up to date definitions.
I checked to be sure that the definitions contained the
information and then ra
John,
I think you are forgetting something though. The message sent to the
list had Happy99.exe UUencoded, therefore a separate file was not
saved to the attach directory. If you want to see NAV go red with
warnings, right click the Happy99.exe file in the e-mail and try to
save it (provided you
Hello Leif Gregory,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 17:55:43 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
LG> I think you are forgetting something though. The message sent to
LG> the list had Happy99.exe UUencoded, therefore a separate file was
LG> not saved to the attach directory. If you want to see NAV go r
John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to keep us on our toes, Norton has failed to identify
> the Happy99/SKA attachment, even with up to date definitions.
> I checked to be sure that the definitions contained the
> information and then ran NAV, which scanned right past the
> worm.
Hello Werner Hintze,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 19:28:22 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
>> AFAIK Happy99.exe is a Trojan Virus (Hoax ?), which infected to
>> mailer with MAPI capable such Outlook97/98/2000, Outlook Express 4/5,
>> Exchange Client.
WH> I think, that's not true. I have h
Hello Kevin Boylan,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 20:26:02 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
>> Sorry Leif, I have other opinion. AFAIK Happy99.exe is a Trojan
>> Virus (Hoax ?), which infected to mailer with MAPI capable such
>> Outlook97/98/2000, Outlook Express 4/5, Exchange Client. Luckyly
Hello Kevin Boylan,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 21:08:35 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
KB>>> NAV picked up on it as soon as I tried to save it out to a
KB>>> directory.
>> That's OK, because most people will save it before running it.
>> Question : what happen if you try to run
Hello Kevin Boylan,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 21:35:48 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
[ ... ]
KB> It was interesting too, because it was at work that I downloaded
KB> it and NAV caught it. At work I don't have messages deleted from
KB> the server so I can still download them from home.
> the message wasn't there, so Compuserve must have detected it in the mean
time
> and deleted it.
<100% OT>
without telling you ?! nice solution ... :-/
i would hope that if they scan mail for viruses (viri ?) they'd send on the
message without the attachment and a warning to tell the addresse
Hello Werner Hintze,
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 20:55:47 (GMT +07:00) you told us:
>> Means, Happy99 only active if the program using Winsock32.dll, right.
>> Outlook97/98 use this socket, that's why Outlook97/98 infected by this
>> viruses.
WH> Does this mean that The Bat doesn't use winso
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 12:47:19 PM Syafril Hermansyah ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> AFAIK Happy99.exe is a Trojan Virus (Hoax ?), which infected to
> mailer with MAPI capable such Outlook97/98/2000, Outlook Express 4/5,
> Exchange Client.
I think, that's not true. I have here a
Hi,
> Sorry Leif, I have other opinion. AFAIK Happy99.exe is a Trojan
> Virus (Hoax ?), which infected to mailer with MAPI capable such
> Outlook97/98/2000, Outlook Express 4/5, Exchange Client. Luckyly The
> Bat! not MAPI capable, yet; in the next version if The Bat! have MAPI
> capabil
Hi,
KB>> NAV picked up on it as soon as I tried to save it out to a
KB>> directory.
> That's OK, because most people will save it before running it.
> Question : what happen if you try to run it directly from mail
> attachment (without saving it first) ?
Still catches it because
Hi,
>>> That's OK, because most people will save it before running it.
>>> Question : what happen if you try to run it directly from mail
>>> attachment (without saving it first) ?
KB>> Still catches it because it has to be decoded first before it can
KB>> do anything.
> Good, you're l
On Friday, December 03, 1999, 2:24:13 PM Syafril Hermansyah ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Means, Happy99 only active if the program using Winsock32.dll, right.
> Outlook97/98 use this socket, that's why Outlook97/98 infected by this
> viruses.
Does this mean that The Bat doesn't use winsock32.d
38 matches
Mail list logo
