[PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher H. Laco
OK, I'm a programmer, not a writer. Be gentle. Nothing major, just the a mention of cookie_jar and additional headers via the second param in GET (and probably others?). While I was at it, I made sure all of the need* examples were all the same; which meant removing \ and . The bare versions

[STATUS] (flood) Wed Dec 1 23:46:36 EST 2004

2004-12-02 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13,

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher H. Laco wrote: OK, I'm a programmer, not a writer. Be gentle. Nothing major, just the a mention of cookie_jar and additional headers via the second param in GET (and probably others?). While I was at it, I made sure all of the need* examples were all the same; which meant removing \

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: OK, I'm a programmer, not a writer. Be gentle. Nothing major, just the a mention of cookie_jar and additional headers via the second param in GET (and probably others?). While I was at it, I made sure all of the need*

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher H. Laco
Stas Bekman wrote: No, no, the root of A-T. An example will be more useful: --- lib/Apache/Test.pm(revision 109410) +++ lib/Apache/Test.pm(working copy) I can chdir into the root of the project and apply your patch immediately. Understood. Makes sense. Agreed, but dups are evil from the

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher H. Laco wrote: On that note, what else can I work on? Apparently I'm a glutton for punishment. Not sure, there are all kind of things in the ToDo file, but they all mostly obscure. I think all kind of refactoring would be great. One thing I wanted to do for tests again vhosts, is to

Re: need to require Cwd 2.06 for A-T

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: I know we tried to avoid external dependencies, but Cwd coming with 5.6.x is unusable under -T. At the moment this breaks some mp2 tests (the problem comes from A-T, which indirectly invokes Cwd::cwd via File::Spec's rel2abs. I've tried to code a workaround, but it doesn't

Re: need to require Cwd 2.06 for A-T

2004-12-02 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I know we tried to avoid external dependencies, but Cwd coming with 5.6.x is unusable under -T. At the moment this breaks some mp2 tests (the problem comes from A-T, which indirectly invokes Cwd::cwd via File::Spec's rel2abs. I've tried to code a

Re: need to require Cwd 2.06 for A-T

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I know we tried to avoid external dependencies, but Cwd coming with 5.6.x is unusable under -T. At the moment this breaks some mp2 tests (the problem comes from A-T, which indirectly invokes Cwd::cwd via File::Spec's rel2abs. I've tried

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: On that note, what else can I work on? Apparently I'm a glutton for punishment. Not sure, there are all kind of things in the ToDo file, but they all mostly obscure. I think all kind of refactoring would be great. One

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher H. Laco
Stas Bekman wrote: Still someone needs to do the work and verify that things are working. That will fun in and of itself. Right now, the only thing close to meeting the requirements of running the overall tests is my 5.6.1 install on my XP lappy. Both of my FreeBSD boxen are still 5.005_03.

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher H. Laco
Stas Bekman wrote: I think all kind of refactoring would be great. One thing I wanted to do for tests again vhosts, is to add this function next to module2path(): sub module2url { my $module = shift; my $scheme = shift || http; Apache::TestRequest::module($module); my

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I think all kind of refactoring would be great. One thing I wanted to do for tests again vhosts, is to add this function next to module2path(): sub module2url { my $module = shift; my $scheme = shift || http;

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher H. Laco
Stas Bekman wrote: Of course it should take the necessary precautions for when / is and isn't included, etc. What do you mean? Examples? Well, let's go with the running sample: sub module2url { my $module = shift; my $scheme = shift || http;

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Of course it should take the necessary precautions for when / is and isn't included, etc. What do you mean? Examples? Well, let's go with the running sample: sub module2url { my $module = shift; my $scheme = shift || http;

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher H. Laco
Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Still someone needs to do the work and verify that things are working. That will fun in and of itself. Right now, the only thing close to meeting the requirements of running the overall tests is my 5.6.1 install on my XP lappy. Both of my FreeBSD