-- Forwarded message --
From: antonio rosa
Date: 2011/9/2
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Problems with ADC to perform two consecutive
readings on IRIS Mote
To: Eric Decker
Hi to all,
I think that put parallel networks on different radio channels is better
because it avoids collisio
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, antonio rosa <
antoniorosarodrig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I think that put parallel networks on different radio channels is better
> because it avoids collisions , but if you only use the radio channel, it is
> not scalable (15 different networks) sol
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Eric Decker wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, antonio rosa
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I think that put parallel networks on different radio channels is better
>> because it avoids collisions , but if you only use the radio channel, it is
Well, we use it a lot, since there's only a limited number of
frequencies and you never know when someone's neighbours decide to buy
one of our systems as well. However, with an 8-bit group ID, we were
quickly running out of groups if we wanted to give every deployment its
own group, so we switched
I think that in a classroom or a building with several apartments per
florr( like a WPAN or BAN), if every apartments has a WSN maybe two o more
networks can share the same radio channel and this could be a problems for
the applications of the nodes.
2011/9/2 Miklos Maroti
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri
Ok, I have checked in a fix: isForMe now checks the group id, and now
it is compatible with 1.x. Miklos
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:52 AM, antonio rosa
wrote:
> I think that in a classroom or a building with several apartments per
> florr( like a WPAN or BAN), if every apartments has a WSN maybe tw
Miklos,
I think that also, you should include it in the command command bool
AMPacket.isForMe(message_t* msg) provides by ActiveMessageLayerP on library
/tos/chips/rf2xx/layers.
2011/9/2 Miklos Maroti
> Ok, I have checked in a fix: isForMe now checks the group id, and now
> it is compatible with
That is done automatically, since there we call Ieee154PacketLayerP. Miklos
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:32 AM, antonio rosa
wrote:
> Miklos,
> I think that also, you should include it in the command command bool
> AMPacket.isForMe(message_t* msg) provides by ActiveMessageLayerP on library
> /tos/ch
Ok, now I have a few hours over for this. My first thought is some kind of
timing issue. And this is maybe true considering that you are experiencing
the same problem but with larger packages. Maybe your mote is faster to
handle incoming packages but cant keep up when they get bigger than a
certain
Its not a problem with timing as I first expected. Instead is seems to be a
problem with acknowledgements. By listening to the channel I saw 3
retransmissions of all the ping packages. Strange because the smaller once
seem to be received by both ends. But looking in "event void
BareSend.sendDone(me
i am installing tinyos1.x in windows xp through cygwin
when i try to install tinyos-tools i get error like
$ rpm -ivh --force tinyos-tools-1.1.0-1.cygwin.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
1:tinyos-tools
i m new to tinyos.
i want to simulate a sensor network scenario
how to create cluster in tossim(not in hardware)
how to ecchange keys in a cluster..
where to start. no idea on creating scenario___
Tinyos-help mailing list
Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.
Hi Guys!
If there are problems with the ACKs, then try these steps":
1) Increase the software ack timeout in platform/iris/chips/rf230/RadioConfig.h
2) You can also enable hardware acks by defining RF230_HARDWARE_ACK
(see README in chips/rf230)
3) If neither of these work, then you should call Pa
Hello everyone,
I am doing some experiments with CTP and analyse the output of TestNetwork
application. However I found out in the output files at the serial port that
the msg_uid (I assume that's the sequence number of every packet) rolls back
after reaching a value of 255. msg_uid filed has
Hi Miklos,
We are both using RF212. And as I understand it there is no HARDWARE_ACK
option for the RF212. I used the old blip stack with RF230 and the
RF230_HARDWARE_ACK option, which worked nicely, and looked for the same
option for RF212. As I understand it hardware acks are supported in the
har
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Rizwan Mumtaz
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am doing some experiments with CTP and analyse the output of TestNetwork
> application. However I found out in the output files at the serial port that
> the msg_uid (I assume that's the sequence number of every packet)
16 matches
Mail list logo