Does anyone know how to use a VB (VB express 2005) program to access a
webpage that requires HTTP Basic Authentication for access?
Below is the code I have so far. It obviously does not work because
there is no authentification info supplied (and I do not know how to
supply the info).
Public Cla
Hi there,
My VB knowledge is very old and very poor, and my .NET is only
slightly better. Take a look at:
request.PreAuthenticate = True
request.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(UserName, Password)
I could easily be wrong. Take a look at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system
The updated estimate I've just received from our ops guys is "more
than 15 minutes and less than 12 hours". They have to restore from a
nightly database backup. Said backups are quite large, and take some
time to get through. Thanks for your patience.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 18:39, Yu-Shan Fung
Yes indeed.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 19:00, Ed Finkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can we confirm that we will only ever get a 200 on success? No other
> code will ever indicate success?
>
> --
> Ed Finkler
> http://funkatron.com
> AIM: funka7ron
> ICQ: 3922133
> Skype: funka7ron
>
>
>
> On Tue,
Can we confirm that we will only ever get a 200 on success? No other
code will ever indicate success?
--
Ed Finkler
http://funkatron.com
AIM: funka7ron
ICQ: 3922133
Skype: funka7ron
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Alex Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As per http://code.google.com/p/twitte
Thanks for being so responsive. You guys rock!
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Alex Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just talked to our Operations team. It looks like some database
> maintenance inadvertently truncated our table of whitelisted users.
> We're restoring that as I type and ever
Just talked to our Operations team. It looks like some database
maintenance inadvertently truncated our table of whitelisted users.
We're restoring that as I type and everything will be back to normal
shortly.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 18:25, Alex Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, there's no c
No, there's no change in policy, but perhaps we have a bug. Yours is
the second report of a rate limit issue.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 18:23, Yu-Shan Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Our app (mrtweet.net), which has been whitelisted (@mrtweet) since a couple
> of weeks back, has suddenly be
Hi,
Our app (mrtweet.net), which has been whitelisted (@mrtweet) since a couple
of weeks back, has suddenly began seeing the "rate limit exceeded" error
since around 3:45pm (pacific) today. Was there a change in policy, or do I
have to reapply for whitelisting?
Thanks!
Yu-Shan.
As per http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=173 we'll
be changing the /account/verify_credentials method to return the
representation of the authenticated user. Because some applications
depend on the contents of this response, we're delaying this change
until December 10th, 2008
Thanks, I filed Issue 173:
http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=173
On Oct 30, 1:46 pm, "Alex Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, that's a thing we could do. Please request
> it:http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/entry
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:56 AM,LienTr
Hi,
Does anyone have a sample of what the HTTP Request POST body should
look like?
Thanks,
Lien
On Oct 23, 7:54 am, "Alex Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not any time soon, but we'll keep it in mind.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Richie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Cool.
>
>
On Dec 2, 1:38 pm, Amir Michail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 1:33 pm, Matt Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Amir,
>
> > This is something we've talked about internally for some time.
> > Please open a ticket athttp://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issuesso
> > we can t
Sure, I'll talk to the UX folks about writing some of that up. OAuth
is still in its early stages, and it seems most every organization
that implements it ends up taking some slightly different paths.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 13:03, Christopher St John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 2,
Hello Scott,
A few things come to mind. Make sure you're correctly setting the
Content-Type header like so:
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
and also make sure you URL encod the status text. My first guess
would be the URL encoding. If that does not work please try
m.twitter.com != sms ...
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:12 PM, fastest963 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is the difference between the mobile and sms source?
>
On 2 Dec 2008, at 21:12, fastest963 wrote:
What is the difference between the mobile and sms source?
Mobile means from m.twitter.com and SMS means, erm, SMS.
-Stut
--
http://stut.net/
What is the difference between the mobile and sms source?
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Alex Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Additionally, Matt has been working with our User Experience (UX) team
> on a beta of OAuth support. The UX component of this work is almost
> complete, and we should be ready for our first deploy in the next week
> or ten
We'll keep the current version running for a stretch (probably six
months tops) as developers transition over to the new version of the
API.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:33, Chad Etzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the update! For those of us doing current development with the
> API, will
I keep getting this response to my attempts to post a status update
from an app I'm writing.
/statuses/update.xml
Client must provide a 'status' parameter with a value.
Everything seems totally in order,
using:
http://twitter.com/statuses/update.xml
I set the content length in the heade
Thanks for the update! For those of us doing current development with the
API, will the current version be kept around for a while (as a legacy
version I guess) so that we may continue development as the new API is being
rolled out? Or will it be a cut-over situation when the new API is
released?
Hi all,
Just wanted to give you an update on what's going on Twitter API land.
Firstly, my colleague on the API Team, Matt Sanford (@mzsanford), is
in town from Seattle and working from the Twitter offices. We're
trying to make the most of this in-person time to clear out
administrivia and plan
On Dec 2, 1:33 pm, Matt Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Amir,
>
> This is something we've talked about internally for some time.
> Please open a ticket athttp://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issuesso
> we can track your request.
Done:
http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/
Hi Amir,
This is something we've talked about internally for some time.
Please open a ticket at http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues so
we can track your request.
Thanks;
— Matt Sanford (@mzsanford)
On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Amir Michail wrote:
Hi,
I would like to be a
Hi,
I would like to be able to issue queries like this:
web 2.0 follows:techcrunch
This would identify tweets containing web 2.0 posted by people
following techcrunch.
Amir
Hi Amir,
There are a bunch of factors in query speed that can eventually
cause a timeout. Please contact me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a
few of the queries causing trouble and I'll see what I can find out.
Thanks;
— Matt Sanford (@mzsanford)
On Dec 2, 10:18 am, Amir Michail <[EMA
On Dec 2, 1:11 pm, Amir Michail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 11:24 am, "Chad Etzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do OR queries through the search API all day long and they are always
> > blazingly fast from my perspective. Do you have some numbers you could
> > share regarding th
On Dec 2, 11:24 am, "Chad Etzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do OR queries through the search API all day long and they are always
> blazingly fast from my perspective. Do you have some numbers you could
> share regarding the time it takes to do the query?
Queries of this form can be very slo
I do OR queries through the search API all day long and they are always
blazingly fast from my perspective. Do you have some numbers you could
share regarding the time it takes to do the query?
Also, having the client do it in their browser through javascript is also a
very easy and viable altern
Maybe you can do it in Javascipt on the Browser?
Richard
On Dec 2, 3:24 am, "Andrew Badera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which reinforces my "it's a GAE problem" stance ... GAE needs to accept the
> reality of the demands that will be placed on that system. Long-running
> operations against fore
31 matches
Mail list logo
