On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:08 PM, D. Michael McIntyre <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless the project is Emacs. I think it's always acceptable to be a dick
> toward Emacs.
But what would we do without SuperCollider? ;)
--
~holotone
http://holotone.net/
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ub
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> Make it $10. I've been working programming in QT in C++ for a company
> now, and I'm so glad in a month it's over and I'm moving to a better
> place. C++/QT programming... now that's hateful.
My C++ was so old I had no idea what the STL was
" > I bet $5 I hate GNOME more than you hate KDE. :p"
I used to use KDE, and I hated Gnome. So maybe you're right. :-)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Luis de Bethencourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Make it $10. I've been working programming in QT in C++ for a company
> now, and I'm so glad
Make it $10. I've been working programming in QT in C++ for a company
now, and I'm so glad in a month it's over and I'm moving to a better
place. C++/QT programming... now that's hateful.
Luis
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:29 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 March 20
On Tuesday 11 March 2008, Christopher Stamper wrote:
> BTW, thanks for reminding me why I hate KDE so much!
I bet $5 I hate GNOME more than you hate KDE. :p
--
D. Michael McIntyre
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
http
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:57:25 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: Oops, another brick in the
> wall...
> > > > This version doesn't make my subwoofer knock stuff off my> > > >
> > &
Wow. Nice take on mastering... :-)
BTW, thanks for reminding me why I hate KDE so much!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:47 PM, greg emond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > This version doesn't make my subwoofer knock stuff off my
> > > shelves any more, which is sort of a downside, but the advant
rotflmao
btw
I love ubuntu studio
ty 4 what u do
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:22 PM, D. Michael McIntyre <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Cory K. wrote:
> > "so the WHOLE array of frequencys hit the wall, not just one small
> > section of it."
> >
> > NO! NO! NO!
>
> Why don't
On Monday 10 March 2008, Cory K. wrote:
> "so the WHOLE array of frequencys hit the wall, not just one small
> section of it."
>
> NO! NO! NO!
Why don't you tell everybody how you really feel, Cory. :P
--
D. Michael McIntyre
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubunt
ditto
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> greg emond wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > This version doesn't make my subwoofer knock stuff off my
> > > > shelves any more, which is sort of a downside, but the advantage
> > is you can
> > > > hear every sound from the trumpet
greg emond wrote:
>
>
> > > This version doesn't make my subwoofer knock stuff off my
> > > shelves any more, which is sort of a downside, but the advantage
> is you can
> > > hear every sound from the trumpet in this mix (which is sort of a
> > > downside.)
> >
> > But seriously, I just listened t
> > This version doesn't make my subwoofer knock stuff off my> > shelves any
> > more, which is sort of a downside, but the advantage is you can> > hear
> > every sound from the trumpet in this mix (which is sort of a> > downside.)>
> > > But seriously, I just listened to the first one. I thoug
D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> I'm not an audiophile, and I barely (as in not at all) know what any of this
> technical gobbledeblabber is about, but I can definitely say the brick wall
> take sounds like shit. Pure, steaming shit. This third one is enormously
> better, though now I'm starting t
On Monday 10 March 2008, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> This version doesn't make my subwoofer knock stuff off my
> shelves any more, which is sort of a downside, but the advantage is you can
> hear every sound from the trumpet in this mix (which is sort of a
> downside.)
But seriously, I just list
On Monday 10 March 2008, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> Did I ever mention that I really suck at mastering?
We'll title this one "Learning Curve."
This list has been useful for teaching the teacher something for sure. I
never gave much thought to this whole issue until Cory started ranting about
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:12:02 -0500
"D. Michael McIntyre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>
> > For a tag-free world,
>
> I'm tagging mine no matter what you say.
>
> CATEGORY: Most Awesome Music Ever
>GENRE: Awesomeness Embodied in Music
>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:12 PM, D. Michael McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>
> > For a tag-free world,
>
> I'm tagging mine no matter what you say.
>
> CATEGORY: Most Awesome Music Ever
>GENRE: Awesomeness Embodied in Music
>STYL
On Monday 10 March 2008, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> For a tag-free world,
I'm tagging mine no matter what you say.
CATEGORY: Most Awesome Music Ever
GENRE: Awesomeness Embodied in Music
STYLE: Awesomeness Unleashed
ARTIST: World's Sexiest Linux Geek
But seriously, I guess you'd call t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:55 PM, NeLaS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Luis de Bethencourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Dance music? That name never maked sense... it's like saying "reading
> > literature". Or like easy listening, most of that stuff is harder fo
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Luis de Bethencourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dance music? That name never maked sense... it's like saying "reading
> literature". Or like easy listening, most of that stuff is harder for
> me to listen to that hard rock.
>
> Anyway, genres are for people that
Dance music? That name never maked sense... it's like saying "reading
literature". Or like easy listening, most of that stuff is harder for
me to listen to that hard rock.
Anyway, genres are for people that need tags. Every band/musician has
a different sound. It's good or bad. But just because pe
On Monday 10 March 2008, Kim Burgess wrote:
> Dance track? :)
Kind of, though I wouldn't really call it that, since I don't dance, and so I
don't write dance music.
> One of the best pieces of advice I've been given is that it isn't about the
> loudest volume possible, but the loudest perceived
Dance track? :)
One of the best pieces of advice I've been given is that it isn't about the
loudest volume possible, but the loudest perceived volume. If you end up
needing to brick wall it like that in the master the mix still needs some
tweaking.
On Monday 10 March 2008, greg emond wrote:
> at mastering, but at least it dosent look like toothpaste ;)
Toothpaste. :)
--
D. Michael McIntyre
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:23:23 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com> Subject: Re: Oops, another brick in the
> wall...> > D. Michael McIntyre wrote:> > Could this look any more bricky?
> Oops, there's a spot about h
D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> Could this look any more bricky? Oops, there's a spot about halfway through
> where it misses the wall by a tiny percentage on the left channel.
>
> Did I ever mention that I really suck at mastering?
Ouch. :P
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users
26 matches
Mail list logo
