On 3 March 2012 22:51, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hiyas,
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE chipsets
as well. We need to know if the none PAE system install actually will work.
We only have one with
On 16 March 2012 17:10, Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Just FYI - I downloaded burned Lubuntu 12.04 beta 1 x86-32 today. I
can't install it on my main Lubuntu box. Ubiquity crashes consistently
- 3 reboots, 3 times. It makes no odds if I choose an update, include
or exclude updates
On 16 March 2012 17:17, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2012 17:10, Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Just FYI - I downloaded burned Lubuntu 12.04 beta 1 x86-32 today. I
can't install it on my main Lubuntu box. Ubiquity crashes consistently
- 3 reboots, 3 times. It
On 16 March 2012 17:52, Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2012 17:17, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Did you do a check on the CD to make sure it was downloaded and burnt
correctly? Last time I had crashes during install I burned a new CD
and it was ok.
I let
Working beautifully now. Fast, smooth, looks good.
First reboot with kernel 3.2.0-18 caused it to reset but it's worked
fine since then.
All updates installed fine, as did lubuntu-restricted-extras -
although with much whinging about libavcodecs53 being removed. A whole
ton of packages were
Hi Liam,
The non-startup sound was following a discussion of getting rid of anything
not really required :)
Glad you're enjoying it.
Regards,
Phill.
On 16 March 2012 19:19, Liam Proven lpro...@gmail.com wrote:
Working beautifully now. Fast, smooth, looks good.
First reboot with kernel
On 16/03/12 17:52, Liam Proven wrote:
I let Brasero do a checksum it said no errors - but I didn't
download the separate MD5sum or whatever it's called, no.
with old machines and old CD drives, a CD self check (from the boot
menu) has the advantage of also implicitly checking the drive
On 16 March 2012 20:49, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
On 16/03/12 17:52, Liam Proven wrote:
I let Brasero do a checksum it said no errors - but I didn't
download the separate MD5sum or whatever it's called, no.
with old machines and old CD drives, a CD self check (from the boot
Hi,
I've no oblections to Gmane being added to lubuntu-qa.
on none-pae, there is an active email (on lubuntu-qa) and a live forum
thread ( http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1924455 ) Using the
mini-iso is the way that is being done, so you would be able to use the
steps to install any of
On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hiyas,
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE chipsets
as well. We need to know if the none PAE system install actually will work.
We only have one with actual hardware as yet,
- Mensaje original -
On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hiyas,
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE
chipsets as well. We need to know if the none PAE system install
actually will work. We
On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hiyas,
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE chipsets
as well. We need to know if the none PAE system install actually will work.
We only have one with actual hardware as yet, the
On 04/03/12 19:56, Jim Price wrote:
On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
I have some old machines. How do I tell if they are non PAE?
Try running this in a terminal
sudo dmidecode |grep PAE
If it has the PAE flag it'll show up I believe.
regards
piskie
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
On 04/03/12 20:18, Phill Whiteside wrote:
grep pae /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat pse36
mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
The above output shows a CPU that does have PAE support. If the command
returns nothing, then the CPU does
On 04/03/12 22:23, Jim Price wrote:
On 04/03/12 20:18, Phill Whiteside wrote:
grep pae /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat pse36
mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
The above output shows a CPU that does have PAE support. If the
Phill Whiteside wrote:
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
I have a Thinkpad X31 that is non pae. It does have over 1GB RAM
however so does not tick all your boxes. Anyhow, I download the latest
lubuntu beta-1 and created a bootable USB. Unfortunately, this failed
to boot with the same
Hiyas,
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE chipsets
as well. We need to know if the none PAE system install actually will work.
We only have one with actual hardware as yet, the others are doing it via
VM.
We are also
On 03/03/12 22:51, Phill Whiteside wrote:
Hiyas,
Yeah, for the testing of lubuntu [1] [2]
We need some 128Mb RAM machines [2] . These are needed for non PAE chipsets
as well. We need to know if the none PAE system install actually will work.
We only have one with actual hardware as yet,
18 matches
Mail list logo
