Hello Martin,
Sorry, I wasn't too clear sir and apologies if I use the wrong words, I'm
not trained and so might stumble over my explanation.
In short I have two issues that I want to address.
1.
My bgp routers where I connect proividers feeds (ebgp i believe is the term
of the routers) are fine
John,
I need to ask. Why the requirement to do such drastic filtering? The v6 table
size is pretty small. Plus you stated, after adjusting your own configuration,
the /48 filter (the accepted common practice in v6-land) reduces cruft and
provides a pretty clean table.
Does the slightly less th
Will Hargrave wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 08:38, john huss wrote:
[...]
> Yes. There are lots of services only hosted in /48s - i.e. IPv6 PI,
> including many of the IPv6 root nameservers.
>
> You can probably look at RIR lists for which blocks they allocate
> which sizes of address from;
htt
On 31 Jan 2014, at 10:30, Gavin Henry wrote:
> Can anyone offer us some offsite storage that we can dump to via SSH/rsync?
> Preferably across LONAP.
You didn't say how much storage you needed, but sounds like a job for a VM or
dedicated server (if you need a lot of space)
http://www.bytemar
Amazon Web Services is at LoNAP.
http://aws.amazon.com/s3/
http://aws.amazon.com/glacier/
There is a popular tool called s3cmd which gives you a handy CLI interface:
http://s3tools.org/s3cmd
Aled
On 31 January 2014 10:30, Gavin Henry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone offer us some offsite st
How much storage you after?
How fast do you want access to it, 1G, 10G etc?
Cheers,
James.
Hi all,
Can anyone offer us some offsite storage that we can dump to via SSH/rsync?
Preferably across LONAP.
Thanks.
Gavin
Hello,
Thanks Daniel and Will, I appreciate your advice. Still learning about V6
so your help is gratefully received.
Think I'll have to filter on /32's and accept a default route for now while
sorting out alternative's.
Thanks once again everyone who has replied, have a great Friday :)
Cheers
On 31 Jan 2014, at 08:38, john huss wrote:
> From looking at the ipv6 route summary, filtering smaller than a /48 frees up
> a few hundred routes which isn't as many as I'd hoped.
>
> Would I cause problems for myself if I filtered on smaller than /32 for now,
> while I work on getting more m
Hi Johnny,
If you filter on /32, you would be unable to reach any of the PI
assignments (including my own) which are done on a /48 boundary.
Thanks,
Daniel.
On 31/01/2014 08:38, john huss wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the reply sir, appreciated.
From looking at the ipv6 route summary, fil
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the reply sir, appreciated.
>From looking at the ipv6 route summary, filtering smaller than a /48 frees
up a few hundred routes which isn't as many as I'd hoped.
Would I cause problems for myself if I filtered on smaller than /32 for
now, while I work on getting more memory s
11 matches
Mail list logo
