Hello,
I know this is not right place to ask but I want to try my last hope :)
We are developing one Enterprise Solution in Flex and AIR and in it we have
around 52 Total (Main, Sub and Library) projects with around 4300 .mxml &
.as files and more than 550,000+ lines of code without any library c
>From your blog post link:
"Adobe’s foresight is that *games on mobile/tablets will eventually move
away from the appstore and into the mobile browser…"*
*
*
*clearly, this must be the way forward or as developers, we will remain
beholden to the whims of the device makers and their OS standards. T
I need some help. This seems like it should be so simple, and maybe it is,
but I can't get it. Everything I try gives errors, either on the view I
push from or the view I push to.
Everything I google seems to only mention you can pass in the context
parameter or give an example like the one b
Going to add my 2cents to this.
I m one the guy behind Emitrom.
I created a Java API for the Flash platform called Flash4j(
http://emitrom.com/flex4j).
Which allows Java Devs to write Flash apps in Java.
Despite all the "Flash is dead" talk our experience has been the totally
opposite. Flash4j is
Adobe made a strategic decision...one that seriously pissed off lots of
people including myself. They were going to back to what makes them
money...creating tools for designers. Flex was never a money maker...if they
could go back and adopt the ExtJs model, things might be different (but that
is s
On 5/15/2013 2:17 PM, Timothy Jones wrote:
It makes perfect sense: otherwise you end up dependent on one vendor for stuff
that works.
Is that not the case with web development today? Browsers are
horribly inconsistent; and frameworks such as JQuery spent countless
hours making sure the fra
It makes perfect sense: otherwise you end up dependent on one vendor for stuff
that works. Case in point: Adobe didn't bother to make a 64-bit Linux build
for many years... When they finally did, it didn't support the GPU-related
stuff, it pegged the CPU at 100% and didn't support webcams, all
I guess two StageWebView on single screen may be impossible.
Am 15.05.2013 20:11 schrieb "Admin Billing App" :
> Hello all,
>
> I am a newbie to using Flex, and I am now creating a simple Flex app->
> this has a single screen having 2 StageWebViews –> both are used to display
> different web pages
Hello all,
I am a newbie to using Flex, and I am now creating a simple Flex app-> this has
a single screen having 2 StageWebViews –> both are used to display different
web pages within them.
( I am trying to create simple mobile apps that do this).
For some reason, both StageWebViews are showin
@Timothy
'"Standards-based" is criteria #0 of the open internet. No matter how
slick, non-standards-based technologies are not open, and __that_alone__
makes them inferior.'
I'm sorry, but this argument makes no sense. If there is a more feature
rich and capable technology that allows you to del
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Timothy Jones
wrote:
> "Standards-based" is criteria #0 of the open internet. No matter how
> slick, non-standards-based technologies are not open, and __that_alone__
> makes them inferior. Open-sourcing Flex under Apache was a great move, and
> that's why I moni
We could choose something other than HTML5, but so far nobody has stepped up to
execute on that. Personally, I think it is too much work for the community we
have at this time. But if you want to get started, please do.
Alex Harui
Apache Flex Team
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> -Origina
"Standards-based" is criteria #0 of the open internet. No matter how slick,
non-standards-based technologies are not open, and __that_alone__ makes them
inferior. Open-sourcing Flex under Apache was a great move, and that's why I
monitor this mailing list. I'm quite encouraged by the events h
It is expected to be faster, but I would not expect an order of magnitude
improvement. The hope was that non-incremental compiles would be 2x faster.
In any large project it is better to eliminate a complex network of
interdependencies. Proper use of modules and interfaces should make
develop
Hi,
I totally agree with Mike.
HTML 5 is a poor alternative.
Anyway, if we must deliver HTML 5, why choose Flex ?
It's better to choose true HTML 5 / js frameworks.
HTML 5 with Flex will have too much limitations.
Perhaps it would be better to have Java/C#/Objectice C outputs...
Le 15/05/201
EXCELLENT Work team !
Thank you so much for all your time and efforts.
*
Lionel *
I can understand that. I don't agree with it but I can understand it.
What I fail to understand is why so little on AIR. I'm creating
applications(not games but enterprise and consumer applications) on mobile
and desktop using Flex and AIR and it is just wonderful to work with.
There is no alterna
I thought it was very telling that the word "Flash" was avoided during
the Max keynote - it only got a single mention in passing as something
like "our aquisition of Macromedia". I predict zero Flash-based sessions
next year.
On 15/05/2013 14:10, mike_l_mcconn...@lamd.uscourts.gov wrote:
I wo
I worry less about the message than I do the motivation behind the push
towards HTML5. It still makes no sense to me from a developer's
perspective, though I've tried very hard to understand it. "Standards
based" or not, HTML5 is inferior technology when compared to what can be
delivered with Fla
Hi,
> it is a complex on, and therefore mxmlc takes forever to compile.
Might be worth a try changing he Java memory options inside mxmlc.bat/mcmlc (in
the bin directory).
> my interest in the Falcon compiler is really the promise for reasonable
> compiling time.
It may or may not give you any s
If you don't use link reports... try using the incremental compilation. It
will not recompile certain files that have not changed.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=compilers_20.html
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: yariv.gi...@gmail.com [mailto:yariv.gi...@gmail.co
Hi Justin, thank you for your answer
I need to develop a flex mxml app for the web
it is a complex on, and therefore mxmlc takes forever to compile.
my interest in the Falcon compiler is really the promise for reasonable
compiling time.
I'd sure appreciate any tips on faster compilation. up to now
Hi,
> - Is Falcon the default compiler used for mxml apps in 4.9.1 SDK?
No.
>- if not - what is needed to set it up as the default compiler?
For it to fully support compiling MXML and binding.
>- How close is it to be used in production?
It has made some progress but not sure how far it
Thanks Alex.
I appreciate your comments - with the 5 year commitment from Adobe, and
FlexJS on the horizon, i can relax (a bit).
I just worry about your employers sometimes. At Max 2011, the message
was "use HTML5 for RIAs", and shortly afterwards mobile Flash Player was
dropped. At Max 2013
Hi all
I want to ask, if I may a few questions about the current status of flex.
- Is Falcon the default compiler used for mxml apps in 4.9.1 SDK?
- if not - what is needed to set it up as the default compiler?
- is it production ready at all?
- How close is it to be used in productio
On 14/05/2013 18:41, Steve McLaughlin wrote:
How safe
Against what ?
Of course they can be decrypted - the operating system has to be able to
run them.
It sounds like you are worried either about art assets being stripped or
your business logic being stolen ?
There's not much you can do ab
26 matches
Mail list logo
