I searched for potato bake recipes without ham, and every recipe it
found had ham in it. The words with or without are quite important for
getting a search right. I hope they never get involved in AI for
futuristic police robots, because saying "don't shoot" is going to get
you shot.
You mig
w it up there if you are interested.
>
>
> billo
> ___
>
I'll add that if you use this, you have to hit return after entering a
search term -- because I don't know javascript, cobbled it together
from looking stuff up on search engi
Στις 19/12/20 12:18 π.μ., ο/η Tim via users έγραψε:
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 10:57 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I find that it's artificial intelligence is getting worse.
Well google's artificial intelligence is superb for one thing :
Having a great laugh ( in google translate try to translate
a s
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 10:57 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I think that Google has become nearly useless. If my search term
> includes a word that triggers their advertising I am overwhelmed
> with responses that have little relationship to my query, it amounts
> to being overwhelmed with commercials
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 10:57 -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I think that Google has become nearly useless. If my search term
> includes a word that triggers their advertising I am overwhelmed
> with
> responses that have little relationship to my query, it amounts to
> being
> overwhelmed with comme
On 2020-12-18 14:23, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I'll wait with bated breath for your report about incoming sausage
spam.
I will report if it is a problem.
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing li
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 2:20 PM Dave Stevens wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:10:29 -0500
> Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> > Either of those worked satisfactorily for me, Duckduck.com seemed
> > the best of the two for my test query about Italian Sausage Seasoning.
> >
> > Thank you for the help,
>
> I
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:10:29 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Either of those worked satisfactorily for me, Duckduck.com seemed
> the best of the two for my test query about Italian Sausage Seasoning.
>
> Thank you for the help,
I'll wait with bated breath for your report about incoming sausage
spam
On 2020-12-18 11:28, Dave Stevens wrote:
I've long abandoned google for largely the reasons you set out.I use
either duckduckgo or startpage with useful and much quieter results.
Google does have some comparative strengths but I can revert
temporarily if I need to.
Dave
__
.
Either of th
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 11:58, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I think that Google has become nearly useless. If my search term
> includes a word that triggers their advertising I am overwhelmed with
> responses that have little relationship to my query, it amounts to being
> overwhelmed with commercials.
>
I second duckduckgo as a better search engine. I've been using it for years
as default on my desktop and mobile devices. Occasionally I use google if
I'm having trouble finding what I'm looking for but rarely does it do a
better job.
Clifford
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:29 AM Dave Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:57:50 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Can anyone suggest an
> alternative?
I've long abandoned google for largely the reasons you set out.I use
either duckduckgo or startpage with useful and much quieter results.
Google does have some comparative strengths but I can revert
tem
I think that Google has become nearly useless. If my search term
includes a word that triggers their advertising I am overwhelmed with
responses that have little relationship to my query, it amounts to being
overwhelmed with commercials.
I understand that they are trying to accumulate viewings
On 08/12/2015 03:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/13/15 04:31, jd1008 wrote:
So, I want to drop this because it is not going anywhere that I want to go.
Because you want it to go where it cannot. You wan it to result in your
solution working when the underlying code prevents it.
I'm beginnin
t; and manipulate the various entries.
>
> You can't. And you're not meant to be able to.
>
> You can install the extension of T-Bird.
in one of my post to this thread, i made a statement about diff of my
version and jd1008's version.
in my version, 24.8.0, i changed sea
On 08/13/15 04:31, jd1008 wrote:
> So, I want to drop this because it is not going anywhere that I want to go.
Because you want it to go where it cannot. You wan it to result in your
solution working when the underlying code prevents it.
I'm beginning to think you aren't asking questions on thi
On 08/12/2015 02:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/13/15 00:16, jd1008 wrote:
On 08/12/2015 10:05 AM, g wrote:
On 08/12/15 10:48, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
Well, issue is with TB. Not with Google.
such is that i understand.
They have effectively rendered TB's about:config , at least wrt default
s
On 08/13/15 00:16, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2015 10:05 AM, g wrote:
>>
>> On 08/12/15 10:48, jd1008 wrote:
>> <<>>
>>
>>> Well, issue is with TB. Not with Google.
>> such is that i understand.
>>
>>> They have effectively rendered TB's about:config , at least wrt default
>>> search, a NOP.
>> h
On 08/12/15 11:16, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
> You and Ed missed the point - COMPLETELY!
> It is NOT FF I am talking bout, nor searchin via FF.
neither ED nor I missed the freaking point.
YOU have not looked at the freaking page which reads;
mozilla support
Home > Thunderbird > Tips and tric
On 08/12/2015 10:05 AM, g wrote:
On 08/12/15 10:48, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
Well, issue is with TB. Not with Google.
such is that i understand.
They have effectively rendered TB's about:config , at least wrt default
search, a NOP.
hey, when one chases one's ass to keep up with competition, on
On 08/12/15 10:48, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
> Well, issue is with TB. Not with Google.
such is that i understand.
> They have effectively rendered TB's about:config , at least wrt default
> search, a NOP.
hey, when one chases one's ass to keep up with competition, one tends
to run in a circle of c
t Mozilla.org, i need to run some new
searches at Mozilla.org to see where they now have what you
need to do to get your search engines "running on all 8".
comment:
i found a new page that tells about search engines and it appears
that there have been some changes. i believe y
On 08/11/15 21:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/12/15 03:10, jd1008 wrote:
>> The list of available search engines is limited,
>> and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
>
> Seems like you want to add google.
>
> Well, just use g
not important.
#3 because of changes at Mozilla.org, i need to run some new
searches at Mozilla.org to see where they now have what you
need to do to get your search engines "running on all 8".
comment:
i found a new page that tells about search engines and it appears
that the
On 08/12/15 03:10, jd1008 wrote:
> The list of available search engines is limited,
> and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
Seems like you want to add google.
Well, just use google to find
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/open-search#w_how-to-add-google-
On 08/11/2015 04:13 PM, g wrote:
On 08/11/15 16:01, jd1008 wrote:
On 08/11/2015 01:58 PM, g wrote:
On 08/11/15 14:10, jd1008 wrote:
TB 38.1.0:
The list of available search engines is limited,
and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
Edit -> Preferences -> Ad
On 08/11/15 16:01, jd1008 wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 01:58 PM, g wrote:
>> On 08/11/15 14:10, jd1008 wrote:
>>> TB 38.1.0:
>>> The list of available search engines is limited,
>>> and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
>>Edit
On 08/11/2015 01:58 PM, g wrote:
On 08/11/15 14:10, jd1008 wrote:
TB 38.1.0:
The list of available search engines is limited,
and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> General Tab -> [Config Editor]
in about:c
On 08/11/15 15:13, jd1008 wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 02:03 PM, g wrote:
>> On 08/11/15 14:57, jd1008 wrote:
>> <<>>
>>
>>> Forums??
>>> What a pain!!!
>>> TB and FF refuse to create a miling list such as this one.
>> wrong. mozilla has both 'email list' and 'news group' support.
>>
>> their is a pain
On 08/11/2015 02:03 PM, g wrote:
On 08/11/15 14:57, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
Forums??
What a pain!!!
TB and FF refuse to create a miling list such as this one.
wrong. mozilla has both 'email list' and 'news group' support.
their is a pain tho. his name is chris iliass. ;-)
Indeed I have run i
On 08/11/15 14:57, jd1008 wrote:
<<>>
> Forums??
> What a pain!!!
> TB and FF refuse to create a miling list such as this one.
wrong. mozilla has both 'email list' and 'news group' support.
their is a pain tho. his name is chris iliass. ;-)
--
If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Window
On 08/11/15 14:10, jd1008 wrote:
> TB 38.1.0:
> The list of available search engines is limited,
> and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> General Tab -> [Config Editor]
in about:config window;
Search: search
On 08/11/2015 01:50 PM, SternData wrote:
On 08/11/2015 02:22 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Edit -> Preferences -> General Tab
On 08/11/2015 01:12 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
On 08/11/15 15:10, jd1008 wrote:
TB 38.1.0:
The list of available search engines is limited,
and provides no way for the u
On 08/11/2015 02:22 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Edit -> Preferences -> General Tab
>
> On 08/11/2015 01:12 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>> On 08/11/15 15:10, jd1008 wrote:
>>> TB 38.1.0:
>>> The list of available search engines is limited,
>>> and provides
Edit -> Preferences -> General Tab
On 08/11/2015 01:12 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
On 08/11/15 15:10, jd1008 wrote:
TB 38.1.0:
The list of available search engines is limited,
and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
I wasn't aware that Thunderbird had *any* sea
On 08/11/2015 12:12 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
I wasn't aware that Thunderbird had*any* search engines
I didn't even know that an email client needed a search engine.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
On 08/11/15 15:10, jd1008 wrote:
> TB 38.1.0:
> The list of available search engines is limited,
> and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
I wasn't aware that Thunderbird had *any* search engines
--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjch
TB 38.1.0:
The list of available search engines is limited,
and provides no way for the user to add other search engines.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of
On 11/23/2013 03:09 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
<>
> That's one thing I don't like, actually. Google is now constantly
<>
i used to use 'gaagle' until i found "ixquick", which does not do all
the tracking and such that gaagle does.
i set a bookmark button in firefox 'menu bar' to open in
_advan
39 matches
Mail list logo