Hello,
According to the 0.22 documentation, the Java broker still supports the
virtualhost XML configuration file, but it doesn't state how to pass it to the
Java broker? Can anyone please shed some lights on this? Thanks.
Regards,
Jeremy
Sorry to have missed the .18 and .22 note from your original email.
Unfortunately the SSL items you list below aren't enough to help anyone figure
out the issue. All they indicate is that SSL prereqs are not detected (which we
could have guessed since the SSL components don't get built). Please
Hello Steve,
As previously mentioned, I am building 0.18 and 0.22.
I am only including the SSL part from the config log:
SSL_CFLAGS=''
SSL_FALSE=''
SSL_LDFLAGS=''
SSL_TRUE='#'
This holds true for both versions.
Regards,
Jeremy
Can you please post here:
- what qpid version you are trying to build
- the configure or cmake output
Thanks,
-Steve Huston
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Wagner [mailto:coolness_2...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:02 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Unable to
Hello,
I ran into the same issue as this thread:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Why-I-can-not-build-ssl-componet-td7591440.html
I do have the cyprus packages installed, but when I try to build 0.18 and 0.22,
it doesn't build the ssl subdirectory. So as a result, I cannot use the C++
clients
> On 07/15/2013 07:05 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
> > I'd have quite liked the option to be able to trigger message
> > delivery to the alternate exchange when being automatically removed
> > from a circular queue
>
> That would be a fairly easy change (see attached patch if interested).
>
> On 07/15
HA queue replication doesn't help you with load balancing. Clients are not
allowed to add or remove messages from replicas.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rothkin, Steve (NY81) [mailto:steve.roth...@honeywell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:45 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject
For what I'm trying to do, is using HA Queue replication between standalone
(NOT clustered) nodes a viable option (one that will give me the high
availability/reliability, load balancing, message grouping, and failover)? Or
is the clustering required for the message grouping feature to work?
At
> -Original Message-
> From: Rothkin, Steve (NY81) [mailto:steve.roth...@honeywell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:37 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Queue mirroring with message grouping and clustering on
> Windows
>
> > To fill in a little more about "clients can con
> To fill in a little more about "clients can connect to any of the brokers",
> in the active-
> passive mode, clients connect to a virtual IP address that gets moved around
> to the
> current primary broker (this is one of the things driven by the resource
> manager). If the
> primary crashes
To fill in a little more about "clients can connect to any of the brokers", in
the active-passive mode, clients connect to a virtual IP address that gets
moved around to the current primary broker (this is one of the things driven by
the resource manager). If the primary crashes (or its node g
Right, active-active is not available from 0.22 on. There's more info at
qpid/cpp/README-HA.txt
> -Original Message-
> From: Rothkin, Steve (NY81) [mailto:steve.roth...@honeywell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:25 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Queue mirroring with m
The section you mention below is for Active-Passive. I don't see anything about
Active-Active (clients can connect to any of the brokers) -- I thought I saw
that somewhere in the Qpid documentation, but its not in the manual you linked
to below. Is Active-Active not available?
> -Original M
> -Original Message-
> From: Rothkin, Steve (NY81) [mailto:steve.roth...@honeywell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:44 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Queue mirroring with message grouping and clustering on
> Windows
>
> > From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com
> From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com]
> > I'm considering a Qpid.22 implementation under MS Windows for message
> > queueing. In the future we might go to a mixed environment with both
> > Windows and Linux computers.
> > For fault tolerance, I want the queues to be mirrored across 2
Hi Steve,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rothkin, Steve (NY81) [mailto:steve.roth...@honeywell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:37 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Queue mirroring with message grouping and clustering on Windows
>
> I'm considering a Qpid.22 implementation unde
I'm considering a Qpid.22 implementation under MS Windows for message queueing.
In the future we might go to a mixed environment with both Windows and Linux
computers.
For fault tolerance, I want the queues to be mirrored across 2 to 3 computers
which are connected by high speed LAN. Each queue
On 07/15/2013 07:05 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
I'd have quite liked the option to be able to trigger message
delivery to the alternate exchange when being automatically removed
from a circular queue
That would be a fairly easy change (see attached patch if interested).
On 07/15/2013 08:21 PM, Jim
Ok, great - any idea what time-frame this might be implemented by ?
--
View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/JMS-API-incomplete-tp7595272p7595407.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Work on a complete JMS mapping is underway, in conjunction with the OASIS
AMQP Bindings and Mappings Technical Committee. There will be a way to
access all properties directly or indirectly once this is complete.
-- Rob
On 16 July 2013 12:57, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 07/15/2013 05:38 PM, Axel P
On 07/15/2013 07:05 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
This thread interests me somewhat, in particular with respect to the new
paging mechanism and also the backup engine in 0.24 (and I guess trunk).
Is there any info/examples on how to set these up and have a play? Are
they AMQP 0.10/1.0 neutral or do th
On 07/15/2013 05:38 PM, Axel Podehl wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to deploy the same mapping of AMQP to JMS properties
in the QPid API itself ?
I would agree.
[FWIW the c++ qpid::messaging API does something similar. I.e. all AMQP
1.0 properties etc that do not have direct accessors in the Me
22 matches
Mail list logo
