Hi,
Although I have some negative-score rules, my ham mails never score too
much below zero. I've set auto learning for ham to -12 to be sure spam
never gets marked as ham and my bayes database doesn't get polluted- i
think it's quite bad if ham mail would be autolearned as spam (i guess
Hi all,
I'm using spamd/spamc software for mail scanning on my mail server... I'm
running spamassassin from (debian sarge 3.1 r1 dvd, it's I think spamassassin
3.0.3). My problem is that I have a mail firewall with 25 spamd proccesses
but when arriving this limit I have read that spamd queues
Duncan Findlay writes:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
thanks Duncan -- a great read, and looks promising!
Would it help btw if we came up with a spec for what a score-generation
tool needs to generate, in terms of score ranges and so on?
This would also
After much testing, we have decided to put the RBLs on Postfix for
performance reasons. Before checking with those RBLs, our system does
EHLO checks against a known-spammer blacklist database as well to filter
the most obvious cases. Then we use zen.spamhaus.org,
safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net, and
-Original Message-
From: Oenus Tech Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:33 AM
To: Luis Hernán Otegui
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RBL tests on MTA vs. RBL rules on SA
After much testing, we have decided to put the RBLs on Postfix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Although I have some negative-score rules, my ham mails never score
too much below zero. I've set auto learning for ham to -12 to be sure
spam never gets marked as ham and my bayes database doesn't get
polluted- i think it's quite bad if ham mail would be
-Original Message-
From: dbsanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 8:15 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Mail Lost? How can this happen?
Not sure this is an SA problem at all, but maybe you can give
me a clue. I seem to be losing
spam/virus mail had been blocking before this). We stopped
using bayesian at all since 1.-Many of our customers get
Ps, bayesian isn't just for manual training. Maybe set a high/low score in
auto learning, but it does help.
FUN PROJECT:
Help Rob McEwen test his new anti-spam tools!
As many already know... I'm one of a **small** handful of organizations with
authority to blacklist and whitelist at will on SURBL and I've provided
much administrative assistance to SURBL for years, particularly in
preventing false
...I wonder how to deal with the cases where there is a legitimate
internal mailserver behind dialup-IPs. There are quite a few small
companies that have a small home office network behind a dialup DSL
and run an internal mailserver which relays external mail to the mailserver
of their provider
Strange, I checked the log and there is no closing bracket in the message id.
Maybe this screwed with something in the SA/procmail process.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dbsanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 8:15 PM
To:
Dear SpamAssassin Users,
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange SpamAssassin
Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76
I'm using the above versions under Windows 2000 Server and as soon as someone
is sending us an e-mail with a name containing a comma + a french accent
Eric Beaurivage wrote:
Dear SpamAssassin Users,
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange SpamAssassin
Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76
I'm using the above versions under Windows 2000 Server and as soon as someone
is sending us an e-mail with a name containing a
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Eric Beaurivage wrote:
Dear SpamAssassin Users,
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange
SpamAssassin Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76
I'm using the above versions under Windows 2000 Server and as soon as
someone is sending us an
Oenus Tech Services wrote:
After much testing, we have decided to put the RBLs on Postfix for
performance reasons. Before checking with those RBLs, our system does
EHLO checks against a known-spammer blacklist database as well to filter
the most obvious cases. Then we use zen.spamhaus.org,
It won't be SA doing the deleting. SA does nothing with email except
scan and add the headers (if so set).
What happens to the mail before and after is entirely down to your
mail prog. You can't bounce a message from SA, nor can you delete a
message from SA; all you can do is scan it and add
Andy Spiegl wrote:
...I wonder how to deal with the cases where there is a legitimate
internal mailserver behind dialup-IPs. There are quite a few small
companies that have a small home office network behind a dialup DSL
and run an internal mailserver which relays external mail to the
Did the filters get me as spam, or are my questions to stupid to even
think about?
Cheers
Anton
ps. If there are docs out there that answer my questions, then please
stoop to providing a link or two...
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Anton Melser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am writing a programme which needs to parse the summary (_SUMMARY_)
returned by SA, and after combing the docs couldn't find relevant
specs. It appears that the lines are a fixed length, but I couldn't be
John Rudd wrote:
When you're just using the BOTNET rule directly, not as a meta-rule, the
BOTNET_SOHO code is called internally, so it should automatically kick in
an exempt a host from BOTNET if it appears to be a soho type mail server.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by using as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/25/07 11:15 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Andy Spiegl wrote:
But the score for SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE is pretty high:
1.723
How does that justify?
No doubt it is justified by the fact that the corpora used to
determine SpamAssassin scores
Andy Spiegl wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
When you're just using the BOTNET rule directly, not as a meta-rule, the
BOTNET_SOHO code is called internally, so it should automatically kick in
an exempt a host from BOTNET if it appears to be a soho type mail server.
I'm not sure I understand what you
Anton Melser wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a programme which needs to parse the summary (_SUMMARY_)
returned by SA, and after combing the docs couldn't find relevant
specs. It appears that the lines are a fixed length, but I couldn't be
sure... is there anywhere I can get the specs so my parser
23 matches
Mail list logo
