-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luis Hernán Otegui schrieb:
>> In a spammail I found this rule :
>> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
> [..]
> good reputation (or a medium one, lithe the header says). IMHO, you
> should report this message to the admin of that server, to alert him
> about the
Well normally you tried to keep your spamtraps secret. You want to be
100% sure that all email coming true is really spams.
2007/9/20, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Or, better yet, just change the name on the email to lines when you
> complain to many isp's.
>
> They forward those to
Jeff,
> What I was hoping to do was write stuff to the log file for a week or
> two using the info() method. Then I could grep out my lines, get
> the data analyzed, and then finish the plugin.
>
> I am a fairly experienced programmer but I have not used object oriented
> Perl before. Thankfull
Bret,
Bret Miller wrote:
>
> Or perhaps I should just open a bug ticket to fix SA's "not understanding"
> problem...
>
(Also posted to CGP mailing list)
If you are receiving false-positives with CGP and the SpamAssassin 3.2.x
RDNS_NONE test ...
If SpamAssassin 3.1.x cannot identify RDNS da
> When SpamAssassin is invoked by amavisd, the SA debug log goes to
STDERR.
> There is currently no configurable way to let amavisd hook into SA
logging
> and capture its output, although it is doable and on a TODO list.
> For the moment you can redirect STDERR to a file and let it running
> for a
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Giampaolo,
>
> > Well, I have 3.2.1 and the excerpt from AsyncLoop.pm was from there.
> > But anyway, how is supposed to be set the timeout value of a non-DNS
> query?
>
> The current code in trunk is able to speci
Dave Addey wrote:
Hi all,
As part of an “Ensim” (Linux control panel) installation, I’m running
the Ensim-provided install of SpamAssassin 3.1.9. Unfortunately, I’m
finding that no emails are being caught as spam. Whilst I’m sure that
Ensim is doing some non-standard stufff around SpamAssas
Srilatha wrote:
Some Anti Spam Engines classify mails as : Clean, Spam or Bulk
What is this Bulk classification ?
In theory, "bulk" could refer to anything that's sent out to large
numbers of people, or automatically generated without human
intervention. That would include newsletters, mail
2007/9/21, Richard Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> In a spammail I found this rule :
> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
The DNSWL check went stock over sa-update some time ago. However, it
might happen that some spam could get passed through a server with a
good reputation (or a medium one, lithe the head
Hi,
In a spammail I found this rule :
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
But it is a spammail. I have never seen this rule before. Looks like a
DNS Whitelist ?
Greetings... Richard Smits
Occasionally I am seeing the following log lines, they don't seem to be
fatal, but I'd like to know what they are so I can decide if I need to
fix something:
Sep 21 07:24:07 spamd2 spamd[7749]: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"(no file)": x-train
Sep 21 07:24:07 spamd2 spamd[7749]: c
Hi all,
As part of an ³Ensim² (Linux control panel) installation, I¹m running the
Ensim-provided install of SpamAssassin 3.1.9. Unfortunately, I¹m finding
that no emails are being caught as spam. Whilst I¹m sure that Ensim is
doing some non-standard stufff around SpamAssassin, I¹m wondering if a
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> That Robtex is pretty nice. Saw other info that was
> interesting..
>
> ANYWAY, it doesn't look like my server is in the lists,
> BUT..The IP I send from (RR.COM) is blacklisted here :
>
If your mail-server is correctly set up, your IP should map to the name
of y
On 21.09.07 14:51, Srilatha wrote:
> For example, Commtouch AS engine classifies mails as Clean, Spam or Bulk.
>
> Some times i get unsolicited mails with subject decorated with [B-BULK]
>
> what is bulk classification ?
probbaly mass message which is not spam. search in Commtouch AS docs.
> Do
Do an sa-update without delay.
The rulesets were updated yesterday and the completewhois rules removed.
They were causing DNS timeouts.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Roman Serbski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list-
We have been facing with delays in message processing for a couple of
days already. It usually takes 7-12 seconds to check the message but
now it takes ~30 seconds with some spam messages passing through
(scored as SA:0(?/?) which means some checks were timed out).
SA 3.2.3, called by qm
Hi,
For example, Commtouch AS engine classifies mails as Clean, Spam or Bulk.
Some times i get unsolicited mails with subject decorated with [B-BULK]
what is bulk classification ?
Does SA too support this ?
regards,
Srilatha
At 12:22 PM 9/21/2007, Per Jessen wrote:
Srilatha wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
