Just noticed in the logs for updating the SA tables the following
[15417] info: body_0: 1696 base strings extracted in 189 seconds
Illegal octal digit '9' ignored at /usr/local/bin/sa-compile line 631, $fh
line 1589.
Wide character in print at /usr/local/bin/sa-compile line 385, $fh line 1589.
Hi,
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:29 +0530, ganesh payelkar wrote:
As per your instruction i did same setting but it is not
working, Kindly let me know any other setting.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Daniel J McDonald
dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 17:49
On Thu, July 30, 2009 14:06, ganesh payelkar wrote:
Dear All,
thats not very dear
Kindly help me to disable ALL CAPS option in spamassassin
explain more in detail what CAPS is in spamassassin
--
xpoint
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk [2009-07-30 16:35]:
On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
SpamAssassin is running?
Tell your glue layer that messages originating on that server should not
be passed to SA at all.
If you describe how SA is glued to your MTA we might be
You can assing the value of that rule
in /path-spamassassin/local.cf. For example I have it
in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
score SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.2
Regards.
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 17:36 +0530, ganesh payelkar wrote:
Dear All,
Kindly help me to
* John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org [2009-07-30 17:24]:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
SpamAssassin is running?
Tell your glue layer that messages originating on that server should not
be passed to SA at all.
On Thu, July 30, 2009 16:46, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk [2009-07-30 16:35]:
On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
a bug apparently.
JFYI, I created a bugreport for this:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org [2009-07-30 17:24]:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
SpamAssassin is running?
Tell your glue layer that messages originating on
* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org [2009-07-30 17:37]:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
How do you get
From: Sebastian Wiesinger spamassassin.us...@ml.karotte.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:48:09 +0200
* John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org [2009-07-30 17:39]:
Sendmail - Procmail - SA (spamc)
Cool, that should be simple.
Can you send:
(1) the Received: headers from
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Sebastian Wiesinger spamassassin.us...@ml.karotte.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:48:09 +0200
* John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org [2009-07-30 17:39]:
Sendmail - Procmail - SA (spamc)
Cool, that should be simple.
Can you send:
Hi,
I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the
modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still).
I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand:
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in
check_mail:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:39 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
Processing locally generated email that contain spam URLs through
SpamAssassin is not a particularly good idea. If you have Bayes
enabled then you are training your Bayes that spam URLs and
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:41, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org [2009-07-30 17:37]:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:46 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk [2009-07-30 16:35]:
On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, MySQL Student wrote:
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in
check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility
(/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
4019.
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:41, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org [2009-07-30 17:37]:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 14:36 -0400, Alex wrote:
I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the
modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still).
I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand:
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]:
[sebast...@alita:~]$ host 220.231.127.15
15.127.231.220.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer localhost.
this is your dns error, it does not make sense
You are correct, but the problem is not in Sebastian's DNS - it is in
the rDNS of the IP that contacted his MTA.
Not quite the same thing,
I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part
it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are
hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages) and BAYES_99 is only
hitting about 1.7%. I have bayes autolearn on with ham being learned
at -1.0 and spam
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:28 -0500, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part
it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are
hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages) and BAYES_99 is only
hitting about 1.7%. I have
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
of the whole mailing list.
And I wonder, what has REALLY gotten better since the '80s? Google, cell
phones, and Priuses is all I can think of off the top of my head.
Powershell seems like Bash finally invented for
On Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:01 PM -0700 ktn j_engl...@kawasaki-tn.com
wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the
traffic of the whole mailing list.
Or you could use a news reader pointed at Gmane's news server and subscribe
to the SA newsgroups. A web
I am currently using the header_rewrite for the subject. Wondering if it is
possible to use header_rewrite to change the To: field to a sub-domain?
Example
Mail comes in for u...@domain.com
Spamassassin flags message as Spam, rewrites the subject to include ***SPAM***
then rewrites
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 14:01, ktnj_engl...@kawasaki-tn.com wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
of the whole mailing list.
If you're an RSS reader, I'd suggest getting an RSS feed from gmane.
You can pick 4 types of feed:
1) full articles, 1
On Jul 30, 2009, at 3:01 PM, ktn wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle
the traffic of the whole mailing list.
I dunno, I looked at Nabble once when i was away from my computer and
wanted to see quickly if there was a reply to a thread. The only word
that
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
Received: from alside.com (localhost [220.231.127.15] (may be forged))
by alita.karotte.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n6UBn1BJ021997
for webmas...@alita.karotte.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:49:05 +0200
That nonsense should
Gidday Peter,
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
this
1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and
this
list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
It's a bit like that when you're using Mailing lists, just another
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:28:49 -0500
Dennis B. Hopp dh...@coreps.com wrote:
I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part
it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are
hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages)
3.7% of all messages sounds far
Quoting RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com:
Bear in mind that autolearning uses it's own version of the score that
excludes whitelisting and Bayes, which means that very little ham will
reach the -1 threshold unless you've added your own site-specific rules
for identifying it.
Yeah I knew that.
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Bryan Haase wrote:
I am currently using the header_rewrite for the subject. Wondering if it is
possible to use header_rewrite to change the To: field to a sub-domain?
Example
Mail comes in for u...@domain.com
Spamassassin flags message as Spam, rewrites the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, ktnj_engl...@kawasaki-tn.com wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
of the whole mailing list.
This list generates less than 50 messages per day on average:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:50 -0500, Bryan Haase wrote:
I am currently using the header_rewrite for the subject. Wondering if
it is possible to use header_rewrite to change the To: field to a
sub-domain?
Nope. Which part of the docs [1] isn't clear? See rewrite_header, first
item in the Basic
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 19:12 -0500, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
Quoting RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com:
Bear in mind that autolearning uses it's own version of the score that
excludes whitelisting and Bayes, which means that very little ham will
reach the -1 threshold unless you've added your own
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 17:54, Aaron Wolfeaawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, ktnj_engl...@kawasaki-tn.com wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
of the whole mailing list.
This list generates less than 50 messages per day
Hello
Before I begin with my questions, here is a description of my setup: I
am using the latest version of SpamAssassin (3.2.5). My perl version
is perl-5.8.3-32.9 - the distribution (Suse 9.1) is rather old, most
of the packages I actually use are self-compiled. I use getmail 4.9.1
to fetch
Could we please schedule a desired date to release the next pre-release
of 3.3.0? Time based releases help us to stay on track.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:07 PM, John Ruddjr...@ucsc.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 17:54, Aaron Wolfeaawo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, ktnj_engl...@kawasaki-tn.com wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the
traffic
of the whole
Hi,
check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility
(/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
How's this a SA question?
Yes, my apologies. I don't know enough about amavis yet, and thought
it may be related to all the modules I upgraded, and not amavis
43 matches
Mail list logo
