Re: persist strategy

2009-04-05 Thread Scott Russell
Could you supply a download link for 0.0.2? I can't find one on your site, and maven still shows only 0.0.1 available. I'll take a look and see if it fixes the problem I was having. cheers, Scott On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:34:30 Kalle Korhonen wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Scott Russell

Re: persist strategy

2009-04-04 Thread Scott Russell
Hi Kalle, I tried your conversation module (v0.0.1) and it works quite well, except that I found a bug whereby the Conversation, upon being initially created, wasn't being activated properly. However, I patched it and found it to work quite well. Do you have a bug tracking site somewhere that

Re: Grid Pagination And onActivate()

2009-03-29 Thread Scott Russell
I think the problem is that you have persisted the category name, but not the list of news articles that the grid is using, so when the second page is requested, no data is available to display. Try either a) adding @Persist to your list of data items your grid is displaying, or b) load the

Re: Disabling onBlur field validation

2009-02-26 Thread Scott Russell
Ok, I created a JIRA improvement request for this - TAP5-538 - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-538 -Scott On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:52:25 Peter Stavrinides wrote: Thanks for this Russell, saves me some work! any Jira open for this? - Original Message - From: Scott Russell

Re: Disabling onBlur field validation

2009-02-24 Thread Scott Russell
I have implemented a band-aid fix for this problem. Thus far it's a little raw, and could do with some tidying up. It doesn't do anything clever - just override the existing functionality where possible while trying to keep all the rest relatively intact. It disables the validation on focus

RE: IPropertySelectionModel - what they don't write in the documentation

2007-02-12 Thread scott russell
Hi Murray, An int to a short is fine, but an Integer doesn't translate to a Short. You just need to change your methods in your selection model to return Short objects, rather than Integer objects. regards, Scott From: Murray Collingwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tapestry users

Re: Jasper Reports Help

2006-09-19 Thread Scott Russell
Have you tried this? textFieldExpression class=java.lang.String! [CDATA[$F{myBooleanField}.booleanValue() ? 1 : 2 ]]/textFieldExpression -Scott On Wednesday 20 September 2006 10:21, you wrote: guys, i am implementing jasper reports within my tapestry web app. and i am sorry i should

Re: Navigational Menu

2006-07-17 Thread Scott Russell
You know, you could always take the jscookmenu source code and modify it to be Tapestry 3 compatible. I doubt it would very difficult to do. -Scott On Tuesday 18 July 2006 09:23, Peter Dawn wrote: nay. too risky. its a bit too late in the process for me to upgrade, i might break something.

Re: Checkbox required validation not working

2006-06-24 Thread Scott Russell
Hi Adam, The required validator generates client-side javascript that calls the Tapestry.require_field function. This is the code of that function: Tapestry.require_field = function(event, fieldId, message) { var field = this.find(fieldId); if (field.value.length == 0)

Re: Tapestry 3 to 4.1 to 5

2006-06-24 Thread Scott Russell
I'm guessing you mean Hivemind, not Hibernate. Hibernate is an ORM that is completely independant of Tapestry. Some users (like myself) use it and thus seek out (or develop) solutions that integrate the two (eg. tapernate, honeycomb, cognition). You might see talk about that on the mail;ing

Re: Tapestry 3 to 4.1 to 5

2006-06-24 Thread Scott Russell
easier to plug in to Tapestry using HiveMind, since Tapestry itself is wired together using HiveMind. -Original Message- From: Scott Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:41 PM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Re: Tapestry 3 to 4.1 to 5 I'm

Re: Tapestry/Acegi Integration...

2006-06-17 Thread Scott Russell
Hi James, I took a look at the Tapestry-Acegi integration project at http://www.carmanconsulting.com/tapestry-acegi/ . It looks very nice, certainly a cleaner integration than what I have used before. I am just wondering how complete it is. Looking through the code, it appears that the

Re: Google Web Toolkit

2006-05-17 Thread Scott Russell
It looks pretty cool. I'd like to see how this could be integrated with the work being done on Tacos4 and/or Tapestry 4.1. Having said that, I think the licence is, like Java, free but not open source. -Scott On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:37, Peter Svensson wrote: OK, this is so sweet. Who will