Em Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:17:29 -0300, Angelo Turetta
escreveu:
I think what you ask is feasible: it's not that different from what is
done by BeanEditForm, just the source of the field list is not
determined by reflection but loaded from an external source.
I agree it would be a nice additi
It is 1:1 the text from the mailing list as far as I remember..just with a
formatted table on the Wiki.
So you mean it could work by extending BeanEdit Form?
Anyway, so I think, considering the time to do this, it was a good decision to
use Wicket for this part and T5 for the frontend part...s
superoverdr...@gmx.de wrote:
I have put it on the Wish List are there does not seem to be a solution yet?
It's not actually evident what you added to that page, given
superoverdrive <> Toby.
For others' reference, your addition is:
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/WishList?action=diff&rev
> Be sure it is well written. Sometimes there are some messages so badly
> written or so vague that people just don't take the time to even
> understand them.
I think this should be clearly written:
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/WishList?highlight=(wishlist)
I have put it on the Wish List
Em Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:15:11 -0300, Tobias Marx
escreveu:
Yes, but Screencasts only show you easy examples you can do those do
what you see in those screencasts and it works wonderfullybut then
you want to move on and change something, e.g.
additional columns in a table or dependin
Em Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:03:04 -0300, Tobias Marx
escreveu:
I know many people who have started with Tapestry, but reached a point
with "no solution" and resorted to another framework as they were in a
hurry to "get it done".
Did these people post their questions in the mailing list? Once
d, 21 Jan 2009 17:58:52 +0200 (EET)
> Von: Peter Stavrinides
> An: Tapestry users
> Betreff: Re: [T5] improve documentation
> > I know many people who have started with Tapestry, but reached a point
> with "no solution" and resorted to another framework
> I reac
om: "Tobias Marx"
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 21 January, 2009 17:03:04 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation
In the long-term it is better though if every developer provides an example to
the code he has done.
This w
ides
> An: Tapestry users
> Betreff: Re: [T5] improve documentation
> >Everyone can contribute by writing an improvement
> Absolutely!
>
> Tapestry is community driven with a small team of developers... they have
> limited time and simply can't do it all. The documen
orut Bolčina [mailto:borut.bolc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 January 2009 08:58
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation
>
> Hi,
>
> also a guide/recipes/good practices/tips/chapter for converting JSP
> applications to Tapestry 5 would be very welcome. At least
rk on it (I have no idea how it is
going. Does anyone know?)
Maybe a similar thing should be done w.r.t this current issue?
c.
-Original Message-
From: Borut Bolčina [mailto:borut.bolc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 January 2009 08:58
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentatio
idea how it is
going. Does anyone know?)
Maybe a similar thing should be done w.r.t this current issue?
c.
-Original Message-
From: Borut Bolčina [mailto:borut.bolc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 January 2009 08:58
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation
Hi,
also a guide
Hi,
also a guide/recipes/good practices/tips/chapter for converting JSP
applications to Tapestry 5 would be very welcome. At least a paragraph
clarifying questions like: "Can I have JSPs in my Tapestry 5 application or
do I have to have two web applications talking somehow to each other?", "How
to
Totally right in my opinion. Tapestry is not very newbie friendly at first,
but when you get a hang of it it beats every other framework I tried out by
a large margin. At least for me. But some totally artificial or useless
application which is just done to demonstrate all of the features won't hel
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Otho wrote:
> Jumpstart is great, especially for looking some techniques up and see how
> certain details are done. But does it really suit as a single Tutorial
> application where you go from nil to something useable?
I think both are very important: a cookbook
etc).
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Geoff Callender"
> To: "Tapestry users"
> Sent: Sunday, 18 January, 2009 17:16:48 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
> Bucharest, Istanbul
> Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation
>
> I completel
anything thats excess (EJB etc).
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Callender"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Sunday, 18 January, 2009 17:16:48 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation
I completely agree too. A se
I completely agree too. A search facility of the existing site would
be a huge leap forward.
On 16/01/2009, at 9:23 AM, Szemere Szemere wrote:
Completely agree with the sentiments expressed. Too often I've had
to use
Google or similar to find what I'm looking for in the Tapestry
documentati
I would prefer a prototypical community application to start the usual
webapp.
So user management, registration with email validation and capchas,
profiles, user groups, fine grained security, optionally simplistic blogs,
forums, pm's and a bit of content management etc. I tend to copy that stuff
I quite like the existing tutorial, I was just disappointed it ended so
abruptly. :)
I think whatever docs come around in the future, they need to cover more on
Encoders/Translators/Coercers - as that was one of the most difficult things
for me to learn. Honestly, I still barely understand when
Completely agree with the sentiments expressed. Too often I've had to use
Google or similar to find what I'm looking for in the Tapestry
documentation. Having it split across at least 4 different places and in
some places confused with Tapestry4 is awkward.
Szemere
bject: Re: RE: [T5] improve documentation
Jumpstart would also be a good idea
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:22:13 -
> Von: "Newham, Cameron"
> An: "Tapestry users"
> Betreff: RE: [T5] improve documentation
> I secon
Jumpstart would also be a good idea
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:22:13 -
> Von: "Newham, Cameron"
> An: "Tapestry users"
> Betreff: RE: [T5] improve documentation
> I second this.
>
> I much prefer the &q
ng solutions to
common problems, and a bit more filling out.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Pahne [mailto:andy.pa...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 13 January 2009 21:15
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation
I'd prefer if it were more like jumpstart than petstore.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I have an idea for an application that can demonstrate every bit of
Tapestry and be useful to boot.
This is great news!!! As a struggling newbie this is exactly what I've
been looking for. I will be eagerly awaiting it's development.
Here are
Just a few suggestions!
Toby
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:15:44 -0800
Von: Howard Lewis Ship
An: Tapestry users
Betreff: Re: [T5] improve documentation
I've been coming to the same conclusion.
I'm clearing time with my boss to pursue
ng like
this here:
http://www.interiders.com/2008/02/11/prototextboxlist-meets-autocompletion/
and stuff like progress bars (e.g. during a search)
Just a few suggestions!
Toby
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:15:44 -0800
> Von: Howard Lewis Ship
> An: Tapestry
I'd be happy to help and contribute.
Uli
Howard Lewis Ship schrieb:
I've been coming to the same conclusion.
I'm clearing time with my boss to pursue this, along with several
online articles.
I have an idea for an application that can demonstrate every bit of
Tapestry and be useful to boot.
I've been coming to the same conclusion.
I'm clearing time with my boss to pursue this, along with several
online articles.
I have an idea for an application that can demonstrate every bit of
Tapestry and be useful to boot.
So the "guide" is the reference, what I have planned is the "tour".
It w
29 matches
Mail list logo
