The Subversion binary is embedded in Versions. A new release of Versions is
required to get the latest Subversion.
1.7 is backwards compatible with earlier versions, so there should be no
compatibility issues.
Release Notes:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html
/TheDO/
On
r box.
Push-pull between them. I used to be a die-hard Subversion fan.
/TheDO/
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Imaje wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am tasking myself to get into Versions in order to improve our
> workflow for our small two-man team however, I cannot get my head
> arou
arn the use the
tools of our trade without the fancy interfaces sometimes. A little Terminal
knowledge can let you continue to use these machines with equal power.
/TheDO/
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:17 PM, kiddailey wrote:
> I have the hardware. Eight machines to be exact. Three of which
Was Pico's involvement the cause of the long delays between updates to
Versions? Sofa claims they will be breathing renewed resources and
development into Versions. I'm happy to see _something_ happening.
Now, to deliver on that promise...
:-)
On Oct 7, 2:56 am, Dirk Stoop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
tem, rather than limiting itself to Subversion?
I feel it's important to communicate about products that we are
passionate about. I wholeheartedly hope that Versions gets the love it
needs from its developers. Three cheers for Sofa and company. You can
do it.
/TheDO/
--
You received this message
On May 5, 1:44 am, Cue wrote:
> On Apr 28, 5:50 pm, Ray wrote:
>
> > I've never seen this happen. What you describe is pretty basic use of SVN,
> > so I suspect something else is at play here. Versions successfully updates
> > my working copies.
>
> > When you did this, did you check what was
Two weeks. no response to this message, and it's still on the front
page of the Versions Google Group is Versions really that hurting
for a bustling user base?
On Apr 22, 8:11 pm, TheDO wrote:
> I'm not sure how well Versions is performing for the parent companies
&
I'm not sure how well Versions is performing for the parent companies
as a revenue-generating product, nor am I asking, but I do wonder if a
lack of revenue from licenses is resulting in the slow update
schedule. It seems to take weeks for simple little fixes to be
incorporated into the application
I find the Timeline great at monitoring the changes made to various
open-source projects. However, for newly-added files, clicking the
file doesn't do anything. Modified files open up in FileMerge since it
has something to compare against (the previous version). Versions
attempts to do something wi
The modal approach to the Update operation is somewhat restrictive,
yes. What it does allow is to see the verbose transcript of the update
operation as it happens. How do you see that working if multiple
repositories updated simultaneously.
It's important to remember that Versions is a GUI for Su
bar on the Mac.
/TheDO/
On Oct 30, 9:34 am, Marijn Huizendveld
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I really hate to ask this question again but I feel I have to. Is a
> new significant release to be expected anytime soon?
>
> The reason why I'm asking is I finally convinced some free
igh-profile customer.
(hope you don't mind the plug, Marc) :-)
/TheDO/
On Oct 21, 3:12 pm, Marc Liyanage wrote:
> I added some files to my working copy but didn't yet commit.
>
> When I run Show Local Changes, I get a file not found error message:
>
> Can
I'd really like to see a quicker release timeline for Versions.
There's little glitches that go weeks without being fixed, and yet
impact the efficiency of the application on a daily basis. For
example, there's a known bug with Versions running on Snow Leopard
where visible sheets fail to disappea
Thanks Jasper. I'm using the Dock preference that auto-hides all apps
except the current one. Keeps my workspace nice and clean and now I
realize that this issue with Versions cropped up as soon as I started
using that. Thanks for your quick attention to this.
/TheDO/
On Oct 8, 1:31 am,
etween repositories after collapsing the root folder.
(To the Versions team, I recommend that this behaviour be disabled...
honour the user's last change)
One tip you might find useful is option-clicking the disclosure
triangle. Click once and it collapses all folders. Click again and it
expand
fixed. I, too, want to
recommend Versions.
TheDO
On Oct 7, 2:19 pm, Kevin Powick wrote:
> On Oct 7, 1:23 pm, Jay wrote:
>
> > Well, it will quit now - that's good. However, the "Versions
> > unexpectedly quit" dialog is cropping up more than ever. And, since
This has happened to me twice now.
Snow Leopard, Versions 1.0.6
1. begin a commit
2. switch to another app
3. when returning to Versions, the "Committing..." sheet is still
open. The candy-cane progress bar is not moving and is grayed out.
4. The Cancel and Transcript buttons on the sheet are no
Just FYI, the problem hasn't affected me on any of my computers... 2
PowerPC (10.4 and 10.5) and I Intel (10.5).
On Sep 13, 5:16 am, Dirk Stoop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've tracked down the cause of the following issue that some of you
> are running into with Versions 1.0.5:
>
> - Really high CP
Just for clarification on my previous post... it was "relaunching"
itself... that was my interpretation of what my colleague was telling
it. The dialog says "Installing and relaunching...", which wouldn't go
away.
On Sep 3, 11:26 am, TheDO wrote:
> I have a c
FYI - the same problem happened when installing Versions on 10.4.11.
Had to force-quit to complete the install.
On Sep 3, 11:45 am, TheDO wrote:
> "Waiting for transactions to finish..."
>
> Like others, after installing the update and
"Waiting for transactions to finish..."
Like others, after installing the update and trying to relaunch, I was
told that Versions was waiting for transactions to finish, even
though there were none.
Zero GUI improvements
I
I have a colleague running 10.5.8 that updated and now Versions is re-
launching itself (the full gui) repeatedly. Here's what she said in
her email to me:
"I’ve just downloaded the new update for Versions. It has been
“installing and relaunching” for a long time now (almost an hour).
There is al
Versions supports that. The current stable release
gives you v1.4.6 or v1.5.4.
/TheDO/
On May 16, 2:49 pm, Shmaff wrote:
> Hi Versions Team,
>
> I'm very interested in your product. I've tried it as a Trial in the
> past and it seemed to work great! I've been away from
Exciting development, but should I assume this is only a stop-gap
measure to keep the v1.6 people at bay? It's been a long time for what
seems to be a minor upgrade for those of us not yet using 1.6. I'm
happy with Versions in its current state, but would like to see some
improvements to the inte
I agree. Did they hit a wall in terms of complexity with something? I
really hope Sofa can maintain open communication with its customers
with regards to updates to Versions. Stagnancy kills off applications.
/TheDO/
On Apr 16, 2:55 am, Eric wrote:
> When is the new version coming?
>
Another workaround is to just grab a file (or files) and drag them
from Versions onto the Dock icon for the application you want to open
them in.
Or, grab the file, Cmd-Tab to switch to Finder, hover over
Applications folder, and then drop onto the application you want to
open them with. Sounds l
It's been a while since Versions was last updated (4 months), so I
personally expect an update to come shortly. The fact that they
integrate Subversion into Versions and don't support external svn
installations does complicate matters. I, too, would like Versions to
use my external installation (f
Dimitri, I respectfully disagree with your conclusions.
1) I've had great support from MadeBySofa. They did take about 3 days
to respond soon after public beta release of Versions, so that was
understandable.
2) I've had no trouble registering Versions on 6 different computers,
4 different intern
On Apr 1, 8:40 am, Keenan wrote:
> I would like to:
> - reduce the size of the context menu. (add local differences, but
> remove most of the entries that are available in the toolbar.)
The toolbar is fully customizable, and can be hidden, so it wouldn't
make sense to remove items from the con
If you're looking for a quality GUI SVN client, Versions is your
thing. Just click the Buy button and enjoy. I'm a happy customer of 4
licenses.
On Mar 30, 8:58 am, "john.patrick.gal...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> It may have been previously installed as I inherited this Mac.
>
> Don't have the time/
It's great to hear 1.6 support is coming. I want to put out my concern
around the bundling of the subversion client into Versions.app, and
not supporting external subversion clients. I know this has been
discussed before, but can someone in the know remind me (and possibly
others) why Versions is
Disregard my comment about the standard menu items. Duh. I completely
missed the Bookmarks menu. LOL I never use it.
But the rest of the info is the same use the Edit Bookmark... menu
item.
On Mar 27, 5:34 pm, TheDO wrote:
> Unfortunately, Versions doesn't follow expected conve
Unfortunately, Versions doesn't follow expected convention by offering
standard menu items for editing bookmarks, but it's still easy. You
can either right- (or control-) click on the repository and choose
Edit Bookmark... or with the bookmark highlighted, you can click the
Action menu (has icon o
Can you tell us which application?
Subversion just treats OS X packages as folders, ignoring the flag
that makes OS X treat the folder as a package. While this looks ugly,
it should work fine most of the time. I commit OmniGraffle documents
to my repositories all of the time, and they come throug
Maybe the feature could be automatic. If a particular bookmark hasn't
been touched in a while, it goes into an "idle" state and no further
lookups are done with it until it is used again.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Thank you for responding with a detailed explanation, Dirk. I came
here looking for this exact information, and I'm glad to hear that
Versions will be updated again soon. It's working great, but like
anything, it needs ongoing love. :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
36 matches
Mail list logo