On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:15 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I started to dig deeper the last few months and it became clear that most
> of the classic physics approaches are Kindergarten level physics based on
> wrong understanding of basic physics rules.
> On 25.04.2022 17:53, Andrew Me
> I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept in
> 1917.
> Therefore you might think that it is only possible in a quantum
theoretical
> context. However, subsequent mathematical work has shown that a form
Harry wrote:
> I had to look up those references. :-)
>
> Susquehanna Hat Co
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THZV5g1CNZM
> The Three Stooges - Slowly I Turned
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYP1OBZfFK0
>
>>
Clearly you have been too enveloped in your flaming youth to appreciate the
finer th
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:42 AM William Beaty wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
>
> > I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> > emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept
> in
> > 1917.
>
> "STIMULATED EMISSION!" Oh man don't even get
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:42 AM William Beaty wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, H LV wrote:
>
> > I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> > emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept
> in
> > 1917.
>
> "STIMULATED EMISSION!" Oh man don't even get
Jones,
I looked quickly at the patent by Haisch and Moddel but could not find
anything about cooling. However, the authors of this paper,
ttps://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5893
experimentally investigated the claims of Haisch and Moddel in section
2.3.2. They tried to find alternative explanations for the
6 matches
Mail list logo
