Christian Vest Hansen schreef:
> 2007/1/1, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>>> On 1/1/07, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A huge difference I'm noticing is that now my FPS actually comes above
25 on my laptop. Before using your patch I'd
2007/1/1, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> On 1/1/07, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A huge difference I'm noticing is that now my FPS actually comes above
25 on my laptop. Before using your patch I'd only have an FPS between
18-25
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> On 1/1/07, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When looking at the code I'm guessing that all you've changed is the
removal of all direct calls to the blockheap system throughout all
src/
files?
> All memory allocations now take place using
On 1/1/07, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When looking at the code I'm guessing that all you've changed is the
removal of all direct calls to the blockheap system throughout all src/
files?
All memory allocations now take place using ordinary malloc/free,
instead of inside fixed
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Giel van Schijndel schreef:
>
>> Giel van Schijndel schreef:
>>
>>> When looking at the code I'm guessing that all you've changed is the
>>> removal of all direct calls to the blockheap system throughout all src/
>>> files?
>>>
>>> Wen just scanning the diffs t
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Giel van Schijndel schreef:
>
>> Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>>
>>
>>> On 12/31/06, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
If you apply these patches to a clean repository it won't compile
because some source files still d
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>
>> On 12/31/06, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> If you apply these patches to a clean repository it won't compile
>>> because some source files still depend on the MALLOC and FREE macros.
>>>
>> The MALLO
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> On 12/31/06, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you apply these patches to a clean repository it won't compile
>> because some source files still depend on the MALLOC and FREE macros.
> The MALLOC and FREE macros are still there, in mem.h, just defined
On 12/31/06, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you apply these patches to a clean repository it won't compile
because some source files still depend on the MALLOC and FREE macros.
The MALLOC and FREE macros are still there, in mem.h, just defined differently.
Did you try it?
-
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> Updated memory cleanup patch. It is basically the same as the one
> posted last year. I could not find any problems with it from a very
> basic feature testing (starting campaign, multi, tutorial, loading and
> saving), but running it a bit in valgrind reports a huge am
On 12/30/06, Troman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you remember what exactly caused problems?
Alas, no. I think it was something to do with block memory allocation
while doing some script thing something... It has been a while.
- Per
___
Warzone-dev
- Original Message -
From: "Per Inge Mathisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Development list"
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Warzone-dev] [patch] MALLOC/FREE issues
Sorry, I've been offline for a week. I thought my memory cleanup
Sorry, I've been offline for a week. I thought my memory cleanup patch
had been permanently lost in my harddisk crash a while ago. Good thing
I have a habit of sending patches to the list frequently, even though
they don't really work quite yet ;-)
The problems I encountered were in the scripting
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2006 23:18 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>
>> Dennis Schridde schreef:
>>
>>> Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2006 16:12 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>>>
Well, I've done some cleaning up in the memory system, result is the
attached
Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2006 23:18 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> Dennis Schridde schreef:
> > Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2006 16:12 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> >> Well, I've done some cleaning up in the memory system, result is the
> >> attached patch.
> >>
> >> This patch does the following:
> >>
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2006 16:12 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>
>> Well, I've done some cleaning up in the memory system, result is the
>> attached patch.
>>
>> This patch does the following:
>> * remove lots of code that never gets executed (because of if(0),
>> #i
Am Freitag, 29. Dezember 2006 16:12 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> Well, I've done some cleaning up in the memory system, result is the
> attached patch.
>
> This patch does the following:
> * remove lots of code that never gets executed (because of if(0),
> #if(0), or by using other condition chec
Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Giel van Schijndel schreef:
>
>> Christian Ohm schreef:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 28 December 2006 at 20:06, Dennis Schridde wrote:
>>>
I think not too long ago Per said something like simply replacing MALLOC
was
not possible... Dunno if I re
18 matches
Mail list logo
