I am not blaming anybody. I am looking for a solution. Thank you for your hints.
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:29:12 +0100
> From: darkja...@darkjames.ath.cx
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 a
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:22:49AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
> > The problem is that Wireshark is launched by a script settings paths and
> > doing whatnot and finally starting Wireshark from some (hidden?!) subfolder.
>
> That's libtool at work. If the GNU project GDB and the GNU project libtool
discussions about whether the Wireshark setup is any good or
not either. All I wish to be is to be able to debug it using DDD.
> From: g...@alum.mit.edu
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:33:42 -0800
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshar
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:34 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
>> The problem is that Wireshark is launched by a script settings paths and
>> doing whatnot and finally starting Wireshark from some (hidden?!) subfolder.
>
> That's libtool at work. If the G
On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:34 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> The problem is that Wireshark is launched by a script settings paths and
> doing whatnot and finally starting Wireshark from some (hidden?!) subfolder.
That's libtool at work. If the GNU project GDB and the GNU project libtool
can't work tog
something to do
with how Wireshark is set up and launched.
> From: g...@alum.mit.edu
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:39:39 -0800
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
>
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:27 AM, Dietfrid Mali w
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:27 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> I know what DDD is.
I was just quoting the full section, which included the comment.
The key point is that it's just a front-end to gdb, and if gdb can find source
files that DDD can't, that's something wrong with DDD, *NOT* with Wireshark o
: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:02 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
> > I used the call given below, but replaced 'gdb' with 'ddd'. ddd doesn't
> > display any source code though, so there's still something
On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:02 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> I used the call given below, but replaced 'gdb' with 'ddd'. ddd doesn't
> display any source code though, so there's still something going wrong.
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Tips
"Using DDD for debugging
DDD is GNU's graphi
hasl...@spaml.de
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:55:46 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> Dietfrid Mali writes:
>
> >
> > On Linux?(Rhetorical question)
>
> You wrote on 20.01.11 22:26
>
> Btw, I would have happily used
Dietfrid Mali writes:
>
> On Linux?(Rhetorical question)
You wrote on 20.01.11 22:26
Btw, I would have happily used the Wireshark VS solution to see how to add
spandsp codecs, but to my horror I found out that it used some nmake hell just
as well ... and required bash (Cygwin/mingw?) which I
Thanks, but I don't want to use MSVC. I am on a Linux box at work, and I don't
want to do this at home.
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:40:16 +0100
From: a.bro...@bredband.net
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
Dietfrid Mali skrev 2011-01-25 14:36:
On Linux?
(Rhetorical question)
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> From: phasl...@spaml.de
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:18:46 +
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> Dietfrid Mali writes:
>
> >
&g
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:19:53 +0100
> From: balint.rec...@ericsson.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> ddd .libs/wireshark works for me (on Debian Squeeze).
>
> Learning new things sometimes involves PITA.
On Linux?
(Rhetorical question)
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> From: phasl...@spaml.de
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:18:46 +
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> Dietfrid Mali writes:
>
> >
> >
> > I used the call gi
though, so there's still something going wrong.
This stuff is a PITA. Can't I even use a graphical debugger frontend to
debug Wireshark?
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:57:41 -0700
> From: st...@stephen-fisher.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ecl
Dietfrid Mali writes:
>
>
> I used the call given below, but replaced 'gdb' with 'ddd'. ddd doesn't
display any source code though, so there's still something going wrong.This
stuff is a PITA. Can't I even use a graphical debugger frontend to debug
Wireshark?
I usually use Visual C++ 2008 E
24 Jan 2011 14:57:41 -0700
> From: st...@stephen-fisher.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:29:23PM +0100, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks. I tried that, and the files are indeed
Ok, thank you.
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:57:41 -0700
> From: st...@stephen-fisher.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:29:23PM +0100, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
>
> > Thank
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:29:23PM +0100, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> Thanks. I tried that, and the files are indeed compiled with -g -O0,
> but DDD (gdb) doesn't seem to find an program entry point (and
> complains about bash missing on my openSUSE 11.3 box ???).
When you debug Wireshark from the
@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> On 1/22/2011 4:14 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> >
> > I thought of having to add something like "--enable_debug=yes" or
> > "--with_debugging" to the configure call so that the
On 1/22/2011 4:14 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
I thought of having to add something like "--enable_debug=yes" or
"--with_debugging" to the configure call so that the make file being
built will call the compiler with options to make it create
unoptimized code and debug info.
If the stuff from the SV
le code by default I am happy
already though.
> From: g...@alum.mit.edu
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:25:01 -0800
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
>
On Jan 21, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> How do I configure the regular Linux make for debugging? With
> --enable_debug=yes, or how else please?
"For debugging" in what sense? If you're building from SVN, I think it
compiles with "-g" by default (it certainly does so on OS X, and I
all.nl
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> Hi,
>
> Your a bit on your own here, but lets get an bottom up approach going
>
> You'll need files from:
> /-codecs/
> -epan/
> -gtk
> -plugins/
On Jan 21, 2011, at 12:46 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> The reason that the windows build still uses other tools and nmake is that
> no-one has found the time and motivation to create, and most importantly
> maintain, a VS solution for Wireshark.
Note that "maintain" includes "allow developers us
On 20/01/2011 21:26, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
> I could as well analyze the automake hell Wireshark comes with. ^_^
> Btw, I would have happily used the Wireshark VS solution to see how to add
> spandsp codecs, but to my horror I found out that it used some nmake hell
> just as well ... and required
Jaap
On 01/20/2011 10:26 PM, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:32:44 -0700
> From: st...@stephen-fisher.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:45:23PM +0100, Dietfrid Mal
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:32:44 -0700
> From: st...@stephen-fisher.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Eclipse project for Wireshark
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:45:23PM +0100, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
>
> > I have been trying to bu
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:45:23PM +0100, Dietfrid Mali wrote:
> I have been trying to build Wireshark using Eclipse, but I am running
> into missing header and C files all the way (particularly with many of
> the decoders in the ASN1 source tree). The reason is that I want to
> add a few new c
Hi,
I have been trying to build Wireshark using Eclipse, but I am running into
missing header and C files all the way (particularly with many of the decoders
in the ASN1 source tree). The reason is that I want to add a few new codecs
using libspandsp, have failed in properly adding them so far
31 matches
Mail list logo
