2011/10/30 Daniel Greenhoe dgreen...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Andy Lin kir...@gmail.com wrote:
This is actually the reason I abandoned developing the map file
further. I had started based on the textipa replacements that I knew,
and then I discovered all the additional
2011/10/30 Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com:
It depends... In Linux you can define your own xkb map and thus have
all accents on your keyboard. It is possible to define macros in emacs ...
Thank you for your feedback. However, I was not referring to keyboard
input methods, I meant how do
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Paul Isambert zappathus...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/10/2011 06:25, Vafa Khalighi a écrit :
XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload
package offers and I guess that is why many users still like using
xetex instead luatex. I personally
The
problem is, it's easier to blame luaotfload for its uncertain status
than to sit down and write a replacement; so please let's not forget
that without luaotfload LuaTeX wouldn't be different from PDFTeX as far
as fonts are concerned.
That was not what I was trying to convey. What I
On 30/10/2011, at 8:11 PM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de wrote:
With COMBINING RING BELOW, U+0325?
Yes --- How do I in general put, for example, U+0325 below U+0062,
while still maintaining proper alignment (e.g. the bottom of
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au wrote:
With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want?
c\textsubring{b}c
On ctan at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/xunicode
there is no documentation about xunicode other than a brief readme. Is
there
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:25:21PM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload package
offers and I guess that is why many users still like using xetex instead
luatex. I personally believe that it is a bad practice that luaotfload just
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:25:21PM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload package
offers and I guess that is why many users still like using xetex instead
On 2011-10-28 21:02, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
2011/10/28msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William Adams wrote:
majority of documents are created using GUI tools. What use cases
are better served by batch mode, and in what cases is TeX used by
default because of available GUI tools
Le 30/10/2011 13:20, George N. White III a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org
wrote:
Writing an OpenType layout engine is not a simple task, and you can
judge from the many years it toke FOSS community to have a really good
one, HarfBuzz (the name
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:29:18PM +0100, Paul Isambert wrote:
Le 30/10/2011 13:20, George N. White III a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org
wrote:
Writing an OpenType layout engine is not a simple task, and you can
judge from the many years it
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:20:19AM -0300, George N. White III wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:25:21PM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
XeTeX font support is heaps better and stable than what luaotfload package
offers
Are you talking about TeX--XeT bidirectional typesetting algorithm?
No, It has several major bugs and it is not perfect for RTL typesetting (ok
but not perfect).
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Petr Tomasek toma...@etf.cuni.cz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:20:19AM -0300, George N. White
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 03:29:30AM +1100, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
Are you talking about TeX--XeT bidirectional typesetting algorithm?
Sorry that was a typo, am using a slow connection and a mutt on a server
over ssh...
No, It has several major bugs and it is not perfect for RTL typesetting (ok
Le 30/10/2011 17:20, Petr Tomasek a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 04:29:18PM +0100, Paul Isambert wrote:
Le 30/10/2011 13:20, George N. White III a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Khaled Hosnykhaledho...@eglug.org
wrote:
Writing an OpenType layout engine is not a simple task, and
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote:
Actually, I think little people need more then than what XeTTeX acctually
provides...
640kb ought to be enough for anybody.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote:
Actually, I think little people need more then than what XeTTeX acctually
provides...
640kb ought to be enough for anybody.
I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.
On Oct 30, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote:
Actually, I think little people need more then than what XeTTeX acctually
provides...
640kb ought to be enough for anybody.
I
Hello Daniel,
On 30/10/2011, at 21:41, Daniel Greenhoe dgreen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au wrote:
With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want?
c\textsubring{b}c
On ctan at
I second looking through xunicode.sty. Most of the tipa commands are
the same, although a couple were altered, as precedence was given to
the math symbols (I think). The comments in file explain why a
particular command was assign to a particular character in these
cases, and IIRC, tell you what
20 matches
Mail list logo
