Re: [yocto] How to extract files from wic.gz image?

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:21:40PM +1000, JH wrote: > Hi, > > What command and tools to extract files from Yocto / bitbake image > such as dev-image-20190528085324.rootfs.wic.gz? > > I am using IMX UUU to install dev-image-20190528085324.rootfs.wic.gz > to IMX, I was advised to extract the archiv

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > > The kernel does not have "upgrade foo to the latest upstream version" > > > commits. > > > > > > With the Automatic Upgrade Helper

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:24:51PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 4/2/19 12:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:45:16AM +, Jon Mason wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:41 AM Mark Hatle wrote: > >>> On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wr

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:45:16AM +, Jon Mason wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:41 AM Mark Hatle wrote: > > > > On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > >>> Hello, > > >>> >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:51:21AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:20:41PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I have noticed a large number of g

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:42:03PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus > > can't > > show up in your target image. > > > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" > > Sounds lik

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH V2] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:46:25PM +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li Reviewed-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ yocto mailing l

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 02:27:37PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 12:05 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > > > > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense wh

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:02:06PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 22:25, Jean-Christian de Rivaz > wrote: > > The project I work for need nodejs and chromium (and a >100MB database > > on some nodes), so space is not an issue. I need to deliver an useful > > distribution with

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >... > > > So as expected systemd is there and busybox is not. But there

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:31:15AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday, 28 February 2019 9:09:02 AM NZDT Tom Rini wrote: > > Somewhere on my (and other > > folks too) TODO list is a packagegroup that includes procps and psmisc > > and grep and tar and various network

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Thank you very much Tom for help. Here is my complete method: > > git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud > cd poky > cat << EOF > meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-ng.conf > require conf/distro/poky.conf > DISTRO = "pok

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:47:52PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 18:45, Tom Rini wrote: > > OK, so I've kicked things a bit harder again, and here's what I see as > > the (small) rub. > > $ git grep hddimg meta/conf/ > > meta/conf/machi

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:35:10PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:58, Tom Rini wrote: > > I'm not sure we can blacklist busybox from the build at this time > > (hddimg requires initramfs that requires busybox) but instead only force > > remove it

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:42:03PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus > > can't > > show up in your target image. > > > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" > > Sounds lik

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Hi all, > > After reading the thread "Removing busybox completely from the generated > image" I tested to reproduce the method but this doesn't work as expected. > > git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud > cd

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:38:10PM +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li > --- > recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb > b/recipes-

Re: [yocto] How to create a signed bootloader and Linux kernel on a UEFI BIOS

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:53:36PM +0100, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote: > Hello, > > Securing the full boot chain on a UEFI BIOS such as those provided on > Intel platforms is possible but not that simple. > Working, detailed documentation is not easy to find anywhere. > > Some of

Re: [yocto] : [meta]: [recipes-bsp]: u-boot: update commit id to the latest one of u-boot upstream

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 06:20:02PM +0800, meng...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Richard, > > Could you please help to merge this patch into meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot, > branch is master? > > There are 2 CVE issues fixing in latest u-boot upstream, so > update commit id to involve t

Re: [yocto] Building two initramfs images

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:21:18PM +, Amol Lad wrote: > Hi, > > I want to build two initramfs images when building core-image-minimal. First > initramfs gets bundled with kernel and available after build. This is all > good. > > Now, how to include second initramfs image also in core-image

Re: [yocto] Quick hack for compiling old and outdated YOCTO Jethro for Renesas iwg20m

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:38:47PM +0100, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > Hello, > > I have to do some job on the Renesas iwg20m platform. From this site: > https://elinux.org/RZ-G/Boards/Yocto_2.0 > > I found some explanation how to do YOCTO build, which I a bit modified > (conf/local.conf). > > I

[yocto] [PATCH] dev-manual, ref-manual: Update for vmdk/vdi/qcow2/u-boot image changes

is applied to wic images. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Please note that while the u-boot image changes are live the vmdk/vdi/qcow2 portions are not yet merged. But given that they are user visible changes I promised to provide documentation updates along with the implementation changes, so these

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 06:40:32PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to > be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version > 2017.05. > > Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner Not an objection, but, what's

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] apparmor: Additional runtime fixes

ff-by: Tom Rini --- recipes-security/AppArmor/apparmor_2.11.0.bb | 6 +- recipes-security/AppArmor/files/apparmor | 30 +--- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-security/AppArmor/apparmor_2.11.0.bb b/recipes-security/App

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:35:06PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:56:22PM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > >I did fix the latter of these (along with the perl problem),

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:56:22PM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Tom Rini wrote: > > > >I did fix the latter of these (along with the perl problem), but I'm > >using sysvinit and needed apache2 in my project anyhow. > >

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:01:09AM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > On 21 Jun 2017, at 23:46, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM Anders Montonen > > wrote: > > Has anyone tried using AppArmor with Yocto? The recipe in the > > meta-security layer is b

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:19:24PM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone tried using AppArmor with Yocto? The recipe in the > meta-security layer is broken, and when fixed so it actually builds, > it turns out the installed init script relies on functions not found > in Yocto's versi

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass: deploy vfat partition

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 06:05:07PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Matthew McClintock > wrote: > > This is useful to update the bootloader/vfat partition from u-boot when > > you don't want to update everything: > > > > U-Boot> tftpboot 0x100 tmp/0VXje > > Waiting fo

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] apparmor: Rework such that the utilities are functional by default

PACKAGECONFIG knobs as the majority of the userspace tools are python3 based, and the few that aren't that nor C based are perl based. - Because of the above we must drop the -python package because it's required for the utilities in the main package. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- This has b

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: fix for binutils-2.28

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:42:00PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On 17-03-08 18:28:21, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > > > > openembedded-core updated bintuils from 2.27 to 2.28 which causes u-boot > &

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: fix for binutils-2.28

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > openembedded-core updated bintuils from 2.27 to 2.28 which causes u-boot to > fail to compile: > > arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd: u-boot: Not enough room for program > headers, try linking with -N > > Building with -N does fi

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v4] u-boot: Simplify boot script

are from the device tree and boot the kernel with the command > line arguments and the loaded device tree. > > This allows things like MAC address, board revision and serial number > to be correctly configured and options in config.txt to be used. > > Signed-off-by: Jonath

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v3] u-boot: Simplify boot script

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:50:07PM +1100, Jonathan Liu wrote: [snip] > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/files/rpi-fdt-addr.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ > +From 0bb380da174f9372a706b5a4914a4c06ad7fbfdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Jonathan Liu > +Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:43:47 +1100 > +Subject: [PATCH] r

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:39:48AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just finished a first beta version of a meta layer for SBC pine64. > > You can find it in https://github.com/mont3z/meta-pine64 > > > > I'd appreciate if anyo

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:01:31PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:01:34AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > >> > > >> >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> thanks I think most of them come to these categories. So any help in > >&g

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > thanks I think most of them come to these categories. So any help in > fixing them is welcome. > > 1. kernel older than 4.4, backport needed fixed into these branches or > move to newer kernels. > 2. uboot dont have gcc6 compiler header f

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:01:34AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> > On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > > >> &

Re: [yocto] Location of U-Boot environment for BeagleBone Black

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:10:21PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote: > I'm building Yocto for BeagleBone using the meta-ti layer and the kernel and > U-Boot provided by that layer. > > I'm having some trouble understanding the location where U-Boot saves its > environment for BeagleBone Black. > > Af

Re: [yocto] denx.de site down?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:00:44PM +0400, Elvis Dowson wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > I noticed that your site has been down since > yesterday? I usually sync with your u-boot and eldk repositories, and during > the yocto build process, it failed because your site was un-reachab

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:08:44AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > On 04/03/2012 09:44 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:32:27AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > >> On 04/03/2012 09:25 A

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:32:27AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/03/2012 09:25 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:01:01AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Clear reproducible testing > >> re

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:27:16PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: [snip] > You've mentioned preferring to do this with set versions of bitbake and > oe-core. Do oe-core and bitbake maintain stable branches? I didn't think > they did. This makes it difficult to stabilize a release, and poky > serves thi

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:06:04PM +, Stewart, David C wrote: > Finally, Dr. Kooi has stated that he doesn't see YP as an upstream. In fact, > many > of the OSVs (like Wind River, Mentor Graphics and now ENEA - yeah!) absolutely > want to use YP as their upstream. So I'm hoping we could chan

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:09:37PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Stewart, David C > wrote: > >>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- > >>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie > >>Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:11 PM > >> > >>The criteri

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:18:06PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > >Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: > > > >>On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it i

Re: [yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH v2] ia32-base.inc: Use '=+' for IMAGE_FSTYPES

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:42:36PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > -IMAGE_FSTYPES += "ext3 cpio.gz live" > > +IMAGE_FSTYPES =+ "ext3 cpio.gz live" > > whats the difference ? Consistency. Or blam

[yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH v2] ia32-base.inc: Use '=+' for IMAGE_FSTYPES

As per http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/020053.html a machine conf file should use '=+' to set IMAGE_FSTYPES. Cc: Kishore Bodke Cc: Tom Zanussi Cc: Darren Hart Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc |2 +- 1 files

[yocto] [PATCH] ia32-base.inc: Use '=' for IMAGE_FSTYPES

As per http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/019772.html a machine conf file should use '=' to set IMAGE_FSTYPES. Cc: Kishore Bodke Cc: Tom Zanussi Cc: Darren Hart Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc |2 +- 1 files

Re: [yocto] Yocto usability questions

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2011-11-18 09:00, Philip Balister wrote: >> >> On 11/18/2011 10:56 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> >>> On 2011-11-18 08:02, Ourada, Paul wrote: Jack said: > > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org > [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoct

Re: [yocto] New ways of keeping up with the status of the build.

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 11/09/2011 08:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth >> wrote: >>> I've implemented two new ways of keeping up with the yocto >>> autobuilder's build statu

Re: [yocto] New ways of keeping up with the status of the build.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > I've implemented two new ways of keeping up with the yocto > autobuilder's build status (other than the obvious way of looking at > autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010 of course) > > First is through the yocto-bui...@yoctoproject.org email

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] beagleboard.conf: set DEFAULT_TUNE to cortexa8

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >    [YOCTO #1381] > >    lttng-ust generates an ICE when building for armv7, so change it to armv5 >    | vfprintf.c:956:1: error: unrecognizable insn: >    | (insn 3968 3967 3969 145 (set (subreg:SI (reg/v:DI 160 [ _umax ]) 0) >    |         (sig

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] beagleboard: enable hard floating point abi

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 08/23/2011 08:34 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> On 08/23/2011 05:38 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> >>>> Op 20 aug. 2011, om 00:23 heeft Darren Hart

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] beagleboard: enable hard floating point abi

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 08/23/2011 05:38 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 20 aug. 2011, om 00:23 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Fixes [YOCTO #1203] >>> >>> Using the hard floating point abi is incompatible with some binary >>> libaries and 3D suppor

Re: [yocto] way to get a package list?

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to >> be built? > > bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows which tasks > will run and the t

Re: [yocto] [oe] Collab Summit + ELC + TSC Meeting

how of hands, how many OE people can be in San Francisco over the weekend of April 9-10? TSC people, go ahead and chime in for completeness. I'm going just for the Sunday bit. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ yocto mailing lis