Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs improvements to compression in Solaris 10?

2009-10-30 Thread Gaëtan Lehmann
Le 4 août 09 à 20:25, Prabahar Jeyaram a écrit : On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote: You seem to be hitting : http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6586537 The fix is available in OpenSolaris

Re: [zfs-discuss] CR6894234 -- improved sgid directory compatibility with non-Solaris NFS clients

2009-10-30 Thread Darren J Moffat
Paul B. Henson wrote: I posted a little while back about a problem we are having where when a new directory gets created over NFS on a Solaris NFS server from a Linux NFS client, the new directory group ownership is that of the primary group of the process, even if the parent directory has the

[zfs-discuss] ZFS - first steps

2009-10-30 Thread Erwin Panen
Hi folks, Just recently set-up my first OSOL box, have some Linux background but am TOTALLY new to OSOL, so please bear with me. I'm looking to expand usage of PM capable hardware (port multilier). This will allow to add extensive hd's. At the moment I'm using a Sil3132 based PCIe card, which

Re: [zfs-discuss] Difficulty testing an SSD as a ZIL

2009-10-30 Thread Victor Latushkin
On 30.10.09 02:13, Scott Meilicke wrote: Hi all, I received my SSD, and wanted to test it out using fake zpools with files as backing stores before attaching it to my production pool. However, when I exported the test pool and imported, I get an error. Here is what I did: I created a file to

Re: [zfs-discuss] Dumb idea?

2009-10-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org wrote: Miles Nordin wrote: pt == Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com writes: pt Does it make sense to fold this sort of intelligence into the pt filesystem, or is it really an application-level task? in general it seems all

Re: [zfs-discuss] FW: File level cloning

2009-10-30 Thread Jeffry Molanus
Yes but the number of nfs mounts/datastores for ESX is limited; so that would leave me with limited numer of clones. Jeff From: Robert Milkowski [mi...@task.gda.pl] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 2:31 AM To: Jeffry Molanus Cc:

Re: [zfs-discuss] Difficulty testing an SSD as a ZIL

2009-10-30 Thread Scott Meilicke
Excellent! That worked just fine. Thank you Victor. -Scott -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS/ZFS slow on parallel writes

2009-10-30 Thread Bernd Nies
Hi, Just for closing this topic. Two issues have been found which caused the slow write performance on our Sun Storage 7410 with RAIDZ2: (1) A Opensolaris bug when NFS mount option is set to wsize=32768. Reducing to wsize=16384 resulted in a performance gain of about factor 2.

[zfs-discuss] Can not stop zfs send...

2009-10-30 Thread Orvar Korvar
I am doing a large zfs send | zfs receive and suddenly, during the zfs send, one drive is faulted. I try to break this zfs send and examine the faulty drive so the zpool stops being DEGRADED mode. I can not stop this zfs send. I tried kill -9 PID CTRL-X CTRL-Z CTRL-D CTRL-C nothing can stop

Re: [zfs-discuss] Can not stop zfs send...

2009-10-30 Thread Orvar Korvar
Ok, ctrl-x or whatever combination killed the zfs send. It took some time,though. Solved problem. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] Can not stop zfs send...

2009-10-30 Thread Orvar Korvar
Ok, ctrl-x or whatever combination killed the zfs send. It took some time,though. Solved problem. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS - first steps

2009-10-30 Thread Richard Elling
On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Erwin Panen wrote: Hi folks, Just recently set-up my first OSOL box, have some Linux background but am TOTALLY new to OSOL, so please bear with me. I'm looking to expand usage of PM capable hardware (port multilier). This will allow to add extensive hd's. At the

Re: [zfs-discuss] [osol-help] Help! Bricked my 2009.06 OpenSolaris snv_111b NFS host (long)

2009-10-30 Thread Donald Murray, P.Eng.
Hi, On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Gopi Desaboyina gopidesaboy...@yahoo.com wrote: I think your system might be over heating. I observed this kind of behaviour in laptops when they get overheated. check if FAN is working or not. How frequent it gets rebooted. you could boot from

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs improvements to compression in Solaris 10?

2009-10-30 Thread Prabahar Jeyaram
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:48:39AM +0100, Ga?tan Lehmann wrote: Le 4 ao?t 09 ? 20:25, Prabahar Jeyaram a ?crit : On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote: You seem to be hitting :

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs improvements to compression in Solaris 10?

2009-10-30 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote: Yes. It is planned for S10U9. In the mean time, is there a patch available for Solaris 10? I can't find it on sunsolve. Notice that the fix for this requires adding a new kernel scheduling class with default lower priority than user processes,

Re: [zfs-discuss] CR6894234 -- improved sgid directory compatibility with non-Solaris NFS clients

2009-10-30 Thread Paul B. Henson
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Darren J Moffat wrote: Have you tried using different values for the per dataset aclinherit or aclmode properties ? We have aclmode set to passthrough and aclinherit to passthrough-x (thanks again Mark!). We haven't tried anything else. I'm not sure they will help you

[zfs-discuss] ARC cache and ls query

2009-10-30 Thread John
Hi, On an idle server, when I do a recursive '/usr/bin/ls' on a folder, I see a lot of disk activity. This makes sense because the results (metadata/data) may not have been cached. When I do a second ls on the same folder right after the first one finished, I do see disk activity again. Can

Re: [zfs-discuss] Can not stop zfs send...

2009-10-30 Thread deniz rende
Although ctrl-x might have stopped it, it may still be running at the background. Make sure to check there are no related processes running... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] ARC cache and ls query

2009-10-30 Thread Henrik Johansson
Hello John, On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:03 PM, John wrote: Hi, On an idle server, when I do a recursive '/usr/bin/ls' on a folder, I see a lot of disk activity. This makes sense because the results (metadata/data) may not have been cached. When I do a second ls on the same folder right after

[zfs-discuss] Does refreservation sit on top of usedbydataset?

2009-10-30 Thread Roman Naumenko
Hello, I'm curios how space is counted for this particular system (opensolaris b118) #zfs list NAME USED__AVAIL__REFER__MOUNTPOINT zsan03.10T__2.25T23K__/zsan0 zsan0/fs__ 3.10T__2.25T__6.90G___/zsan0/fs [b]zsan0/fs/bar-001__

Re: [zfs-discuss] ARC cache and ls query

2009-10-30 Thread John
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div Hello John,divbrdivdivdivOn Oct 30, 2009, at 9:03 PM, John wrote:/divbr class=Apple-interchange-newlineblockquote type=citedivHi,brbrOn an idle server, when I do a recursive '/usr/bin/ls' on a folder, I see a lot of disk activity. This makes sense because the

Re: [zfs-discuss] ARC cache and ls query

2009-10-30 Thread Henrik Johansson
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:20 PM, John wrote: thanks Henrik. This makes perfect sense. More questions. arc_meta_limit is set to a quarter of the ARC size. what is arc_meta_max ? On some systems, I have arc_meta_max arc_meta_limit. Example: arc_meta_used = 29427 MB arc_meta_limit

Re: [zfs-discuss] internal scrub keeps restarting resilvering?

2009-10-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Oct 29, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: After several days of trying to get a 1.5TB drive to resilver and it continually restarting, I eliminated all of the snapshot-taking facilities which were enabled and and last night the pool blew that second drive and apparently a third