On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Krunal Desai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My system is powered by an Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600) with 8GB of RAM.
> Running into some very heavy CPU usage.
The data below does not show heavy CPU usage. Do you have data that
does show heavy CPU usage? mpstat would be a good star
Thank you for the solid answer.
It now looks like I am now seeking a 32 bit SAS card that I can put into
a Netra T1 or a V120.
Jerry
On 02/08/11 09:38, Erik Trimble wrote:
STUFF DELETED HERE
Thomas is correct. This is a hardware issue, not an OS driver one. In
order to use a card with SP
On 2011-02-08 21:39, Brandon High wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:53 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Wait, are you saying that the handling of errors in RAIDZ and mirrors is
completely different? That it dumps the mirror disk immediately, but
keeps trying to get what it can from the RAIDZ disk?
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:53 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Wait, are you saying that the handling of errors in RAIDZ and mirrors is
> completely different? That it dumps the mirror disk immediately, but
> keeps trying to get what it can from the RAIDZ disk? Because otherwise,
> you assertion do
Yes, a full disclosure will be made once it's back to normal (hopefully that
event will happen).
The pool is mounted RO right now, and I can give some better stats; I had 10.3
TB of data in that pool, all a mix of dedup and compression.
Interesting enough, anything that wasn't being touched (i.
On Tue, February 8, 2011 13:03, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> Or you could stick strictly to mirrors; 4 pools 2x2T, 2x2T, 2x750G,
>> 2x1.5T. Mirrors are more flexible, give you more redundancy, and are
>> much easier to work with.
>
> Easier to work with, yes, but a RAIDz2 will statistically be s
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 11:31:59AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> > What is the status of ZFS support for TRIM?
> [...]
> My initial idea was to implement 100% reliable TRIM, so that I can
> implement secure delete using it,
> Or you could stick strictly to mirrors; 4 pools 2x2T, 2x2T, 2x750G,
> 2x1.5T. Mirrors are more flexible, give you more redundancy, and are
> much easier to work with.
Easier to work with, yes, but a RAIDz2 will statistically be safer than a set
of mirrors, since in many cases, you loose a drive
Quick update;
George has been very helpful, and there is progress with my zpool. I've got
partial read ability at this point, and some data is being copied off.
It was _way_ beyond my skillset to do anything.
Once we have things resolved to a better level, I'll post more details (with a
lot of
On 2/8/2011 8:41 AM, Krunal Desai wrote:
Hi all,
My system is powered by an Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600) with 8GB of RAM.
Running into some very heavy CPU usage.
First, a copy from one zpool to another (cp -aRv /oldtank/documents*
/tank/documents/*), both in the same system. Load averages are aroun
Hi all,
My system is powered by an Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600) with 8GB of RAM.
Running into some very heavy CPU usage.
First, a copy from one zpool to another (cp -aRv /oldtank/documents*
/tank/documents/*), both in the same system. Load averages are around
~4.8. I think I used lockstat correctly,
On 2/8/2011 2:17 AM, Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 08 February, 2011 - Robert Soubie sent me these 1,1K bytes:
Le 08/02/2011 07:10, Jerry Kemp a écrit :
As part of a small home project, I have purchased a SIL3124 hba in
hopes of attaching an external drive/drive enclosure via eSATA.
The host in quest
On Mon, February 7, 2011 14:59, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
> On Sat, February 5, 2011 11:54, Gaikokujin Kyofusho wrote:
>> Thank you kebabber. I will try out indiana and virtual box to play
>> around
>> with it a bit.
>>
>> Just to make sure I understand your example, if I say had a 4x2tb
>> drive
On 08 February, 2011 - Robert Soubie sent me these 1,1K bytes:
> Le 08/02/2011 07:10, Jerry Kemp a écrit :
>> As part of a small home project, I have purchased a SIL3124 hba in
>> hopes of attaching an external drive/drive enclosure via eSATA.
>>
>> The host in question is an old Sun Netra T1 cu
It is a 4k sector drive, but I thought zfs recognised those drives and didn't
need any special configuration...?
4k drives are a big problem for ZFS, much has been posted/written
about it. Basically, if the 4k drives report 512 byte blocks, as they
almost all do, then ZFS does not detect and
Le 08/02/2011 07:10, Jerry Kemp a écrit :
As part of a small home project, I have purchased a SIL3124 hba in
hopes of attaching an external drive/drive enclosure via eSATA.
The host in question is an old Sun Netra T1 currently running
OpenSolaris Nevada b130.
The card in question is this Sil
16 matches
Mail list logo
