Re: (313) discogs?
"glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there!" Why is that? I routinely use the "save collection to Excel" option on the "My Discogs" page whenever I add something new to my collection. Discogs could disappear forever and I would still have my collection saved in Excel. yeah fair enough...Excel tho euww :) robin...
RE: (313) discogs?
"glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there!" Why is that? I routinely use the "save collection to Excel" option on the "My Discogs" page whenever I add something new to my collection. Discogs could disappear forever and I would still have my collection saved in Excel.
(313) baltimore
im headed to baltimore this weekend. does anyone know about any good house/techno stuff going on, or some baltimore club music nights? someone on dhp reccomended ultra nate's Sugar night but it seems kinda NYC flavoured for my taste. does brett dancer do anything in b-more? tom andythepooh.com
Re: (313) discogs?
-- Original Message -- From: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection >database hosted there! my collection database is in my head! ;) but seriously, it kills me not having it online. seriously, its worth the entire price of internet service just to have discogs. i cant even remember what its like not having such an invaluable resource at my fingertips. all i know is that since its been down ive tried visiting it about 20 different times at least. i use that site more than anything online aside from my email. if there was a "best website of all time" award, discogs would get my vote. tom andythepooh.com
Re: (313) discogs?
i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there! robin... On 30 Jun 2005, at 17:35, matt kane's brain wrote: Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.
(313) who wants nubreakzzz anyway (when you've got these flavaz)
Dear Sir or Madam, I want to inform you about the best mix recorded in the history of mankind. It was performed by dj cool synthesizer (me), dj techno maker and dj coldplaya (for a picture of us, look at http://www.morthenkiang.com/pics/no_nubreakzzz.jpg). This is a defining moment in the history of music making and western civilization. Download the mix now and win a trip to Ibiza (bed & breakfast included)! Autograph sessions to be announced... Between the tracks there are some interludes, which are only understandable to people who speak Maldegems fluently. The tracklisting is as follows: part one (feedback intro) 01) can - bel air [ lp: future days, 1973 ] 02) the beatles - blue jay way [ lp: magical mystery tour, 1967 ] 03) the seeds - girl i want you [ lp: the seeds, 1966 ] (interlude) 04) little richard - lucille [ compilation: the best of 50's jumpin' jive, 1953 ] 05) the wailers - road runner [ lp: the fabulous wailers, 1959 ] 06) the rolling stones - parachute woman [ lp: beggars banquet, 1968 ] 07) mississippi john hurt - nobody's dirty business [ lp: avalon blues: the complete 1928 okeh recordings, 1996 ] (interlude) 08) the cramps - i can't hardly stand it [ lp: ... off the bone, 1983 ] 09) the monks - i hate you [ lp: black monk time, 1966 ] 10) the velvet underground - venus in furs [ lp: the velvet underground & nico, 1967 ] 11) santana - hope you're feeling better [ lp: abraxas, 1970 ] (interlude) 12) the sonics - have love will travel [ lp: here are the sonics, 1965 ] 13) shuggie otis - island letter [ lp: inspiration information, 1974 ] 14) the congos - ark of the covenant [ lp: heart of the congos, 1977 ] 15) augustus pablo - brace's tower dub no. 2 [ lp: king tubbys meets rockers uptown, 1976 ] 16) the slits - spend, spend, spend [ lp: cut, 1979 ] (interlude) 17) dinosaur l - #7 [ lp: 24 24 music, 1981 ] 18) joy division - disorder [ lp: unknown pleasures, 1979 ] 19) liliput - do you mind my dream [ lp: liliput, 1982 ] 20) esg - dance [ lp: come away with esg, 1983 ] (interlude) part two 21) curtis mayfield - superfly [ lp: superfly, 1972 ] 22) black sabbath - hand of doom [ lp: paranoid, 1971 ] 23) napalm death - the kill [ lp: peel sessions, 1987] (interlude) 24) the beach boys - god only knows [ lp: pet sounds, 1966 ] 25) kenneth john and dimmed lights - no, baby, no [ label: top songs records, 7", ? (a maldegem band!) ] 26) the stooges - 1969 [ lp: the stooges, 1969 ] (interlude) 27) dj milton - suk the dik [ label: dance mania, 1995 ] 28) morthen kiang - i dance on guilded splinters [ (unreleased) ] 29) newworldaquarium - themefrom [ label: delsin, 2000 ] 30) fennesz - rivers of sand [ lp: venice, 2004 ] (interlude) 31) indean ocean - schoolbell / treehouse (walter gibbons mix) [ label: sleeping bag, 1986 ] 32) prince - the ballad of dorothy parker [ lp: sign 'o' the times, 1987 ] 33) the b-52's - party out of bounds [ lp: wild planet, 1980 ] (interlude) 34) agnostic front - power [ lp: victim in pain, 1984 ] 35) slant 6 - blue angel [ lp: soda pop rip off, 1994 ] 36) talking heads - the great curve [ lp: remain in light, 1980 ] 37) 69 - frequency finale [ label: planet e, 1991 ] (interlude) 38) hellhammer - massacra [ lp: apocalyptic raids, 1984 ] 39) burzum - war [ lp: burzum, 1992 ] (lou rawls interlude - featured in "shake - the fake left go right plan", frictional 2001) 40) rhythim is rhythim - strings of life [ label: transmat, 1987 ] (feedback outro - or: the best outro ever performed ... ever!) Download at: http://www.morthenkiang.com/soundcollage.html Just believe the hype. Cheers, Maarten a.k.a. dj cool synthesizer
RE: (313) discogs?
you might be able to get away with using that internet archive site for label info. lrh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:41 PM To: matt kane's brain Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; TOKOMAK Subject: Re: (313) discogs? Either way it sucks - now I have no idea what records I have or want ;) seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk I appreciated the links to record label websites MEK "matt kane's brain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To "TOKOMAK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 06/30/05 11:35 AM <313@hyperreal.org> cc Subject Re: (313) discogs? Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: >same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
Either way it sucks - now I have no idea what records I have or want ;) seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk I appreciated the links to record label websites MEK "matt kane's brain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To "TOKOMAK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 06/30/05 11:35 AM <313@hyperreal.org> cc Subject Re: (313) discogs? Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: >same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?
Re: (313) discogs?
yeh!! and i found myself really missing it.. oh g0d, bring it back! ///Z Wojciech wrote: Has anyone else had trouble accessing discogs in the last couple of days?
(313) discogs?
Has anyone else had trouble accessing discogs in the last couple of days?
RE: SV: (313) UR - Amazon
I know what you mean. I always find 'Final Frontier' and 'Transition' to be slippery buggers to name but two. But then, I can't mix two records for toffee. TOFF-EE. Nik's 'Galloping Horses' Mix In Shops NOW! -Original Message- From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 14:01 To: "Güclüer, Hansi" Cc: robin; Odeluga, Ken; 313 Subject: Re: SV: (313) UR - Amazon UR records have to be among some of the hardest to mix don't you think... Martin On 30 Jun 2005, at 11:17, Güclüer, Hansi wrote: > sure! when i get to my record collection. probably saturday... > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: to 2005-06-30 12:01 > Till: Güclüer, Hansi; robin; 313 > Kopia: > Ämne: RE: (313) UR - Amazon > > > > Hey why don't you do that anyway? I believe you but I'd like to see > it! > > Maybe you could post up a url. > > Ken > > Ken Odeluga > Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk > Dow Jones Newswires > 10 Fleet Place > Limeburner Lane > LONDON EC4M 7QN > > 020 7842 9297 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: "Güclüer, Hansi" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 June 2005 10:55 > To: robin; 313 > Subject: SV: (313) UR - Amazon > > i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great > > but > > amazon is not one of those is it??? > > it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out > > i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if > you don't believe me!!! ;-) > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23 > Till: 313 > Kopia: > Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon > > > > Odeluga, Ken wrote: > >>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have > > > > missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they > > sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you > > have to know the records to mix them properly :) > > > > Fred > > > > *** > > > > ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... > it's all > > good, imo. > > yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as > time has > gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not > splicing tapes > etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give > character. > i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain > looseness is > nice on the ear. > > robin... > > > > > > __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __
Re: SV: (313) UR - Amazon
UR records have to be among some of the hardest to mix don't you think... Martin On 30 Jun 2005, at 11:17, Güclüer, Hansi wrote: sure! when i get to my record collection. probably saturday... -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 12:01 Till: Güclüer, Hansi; robin; 313 Kopia: Ämne: RE: (313) UR - Amazon Hey why don't you do that anyway? I believe you but I'd like to see it! Maybe you could post up a url. Ken Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: "Güclüer, Hansi" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:55 To: robin; 313 Subject: SV: (313) UR - Amazon i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great but amazon is not one of those is it??? it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if you don't believe me!!! ;-) -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23 Till: 313 Kopia: Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon Odeluga, Ken wrote: >>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have > > missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they > sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you > have to know the records to mix them properly :) > > Fred > > *** > > ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all > good, imo. yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as time has gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not splicing tapes etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give character. i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain looseness is nice on the ear. robin...
SV: (313) UR - Amazon
sure! when i get to my record collection. probably saturday... -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 12:01 Till: Güclüer, Hansi; robin; 313 Kopia: Ämne: RE: (313) UR - Amazon Hey why don't you do that anyway? I believe you but I'd like to see it! Maybe you could post up a url. Ken Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: "Güclüer, Hansi" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:55 To: robin; 313 Subject: SV: (313) UR - Amazon i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great but amazon is not one of those is it??? it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if you don't believe me!!! ;-) -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23 Till: 313 Kopia: Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon Odeluga, Ken wrote: >>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have > > missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they > sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you > have to know the records to mix them properly :) > > Fred > > *** > > ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all > good, imo. yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as time has gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not splicing tapes etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give character. i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain looseness is nice on the ear. robin...
RE: (313) UR - Amazon
Hey why don't you do that anyway? I believe you but I'd like to see it! Maybe you could post up a url. Ken Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: "Güclüer, Hansi" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:55 To: robin; 313 Subject: SV: (313) UR - Amazon i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great but amazon is not one of those is it??? it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if you don't believe me!!! ;-) -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23 Till: 313 Kopia: Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon Odeluga, Ken wrote: >>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have > > missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they > sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you > have to know the records to mix them properly :) > > Fred > > *** > > ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all > good, imo. yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as time has gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not splicing tapes etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give character. i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain looseness is nice on the ear. robin...
SV: (313) UR - Amazon
i agree that rough edits and "jazz"-type unexpected stuff is great but amazon is not one of those is it??? it's sounds like a proper (magnetic tape)drop-out i'm gonna record it to the computer and show you all the waveform if you don't believe me!!! ;-) -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2005-06-30 11:23 Till: 313 Kopia: Ämne: Re: (313) UR - Amazon Odeluga, Ken wrote: >>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have > > missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they > sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you > have to know the records to mix them properly :) > > Fred > > *** > > ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all > good, imo. yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as time has gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not splicing tapes etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give character. i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain looseness is nice on the ear. robin...
Re: (313) UR - Amazon
Odeluga, Ken wrote: Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you have to know the records to mix them properly :) Fred *** ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all good, imo. yeah i think a lot of the time this was sloppy edits but as time has gone on and the process has become more digital (ie. not splicing tapes etc for the edits) i think some roughness is left in to give character. i know if i'm ever editting something leaving a certain looseness is nice on the ear. robin...
RE: (313) UR - Amazon
>Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you have to know the records to mix them properly :) Fred *** ... break-downs which end too early or too late, et al ... it's all good, imo. k
Re: (313) UR - Amazon
Also, on UR 27 (Scan Seven Undetectable EP) there is a missing beat in the "breakdown". Isn't there also a missing beat in FireKeeper on RedPlanet? And one of the old Model 500 releases on Metroplex? Maybe technicolor? Have to check when I get home... Dennis On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jason Brunton wrote: I always thought this was just a single beat "missing" in the track- there are a couple of other MM productions that do this (can't for the life me think what they are at the moment!)and also at least one Derrick May track (possibly one of the Move It mixes). In other words I think it is deliberate production "trick" cheers Jason On 29 Jun 2005, at 13:53, Nik Stoltzman wrote: Hello, Just a quick question: Does everyone's copy of Amazon have a glitch in it? About three minutes in (sorry, don't have the exact timing). For years, I had always put it down to the pressing on my vinyl copy. I was listening to Depth Charge 1 (or whichever one it was) on CD the other day and heard the same thing. Just curious. N Nik Stoltzman Cabot Communications Ltd Complete The Digital Picture Tel: +44 117 943 0227 Fax: +44 117 958 4168
Re: (313) UR - Amazon
Quite a few releases from the Submerge labels have missing beats, reversed bars, etc., partly because they sound cool and partly, I think, because the idea is you have to know the records to mix them properly :) Fred
(313) test
hh
