RE: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-07 Thread Jason Martin
I honestly find difficult imagine him asking 100k for a gig

it was for NYE 2000, another popular techno luminary talked about often on 313 
was asking not much less to play in adelaide on the same night (he didn't play 
in the end).

its big business and dont be fooled.  I'm not sure that someone whos plays 
records (well or not) are worth that but its all in the wallet of the beholder 
i guess.

 as well
as asking 15k for a melbourne club.

apparently the sliding scale system works for a lot of these guys.  thursdays 
might be 8k, friday 12k and saturday nights might be 15k.

It's not really our business, unless this
is a forum for promoters.

I totally disagree! why should it be kept a secret?



j



Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-07 Thread David Gillies

do belive booking him is big venue = big pay affair. something around
5k-10k should be a right figure.


Just had a look, $5000 US to $1 US = $8,764.24 AUD to $17,528.48 AUD

That fits into my original quoting of $15K _Australian_ dollars

Also, for Sydney, the amount that the promoters here (fuzzy) paid also 
includes the extra commission on top that Richie Rich of Hardware Melbourne 
charges since he brought him out to Australia.



I honestly find difficult imagine him asking 100k for a gig as well


So do I, but that doesn't discount the fact that there may have been a major 
bidding war between promoters worldwide to get Mills to play at their party 
on NYE 2000.



as asking 15k for a melbourne club. (I've been in australia and
Rolando played in Sydney in a 600 people venue)


I was there. That was a small underground party. Jeff Mills filled home 
night club on a Wednesday night which has a capacity of 2000+ people.


oh well,
whatever,
dave.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-07 Thread Revaron
In a message dated 06/09/00 23:26:25 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

 OK, 100K was crazy speculation, but the figures that I was quoting was 
  Australian dollars, on US, so depending on the conversion rate at the 
time, 
  his asking price could appproach AU$15K. Also keep in mind that the 
  promoters who brought him to Sydney in April are in a position to give 
Mills 
 
  this kind of money anyhow.

If I remember correctly, the 100K quote was for nye2000, and in that case, 
its not crazy speculation at all.  I dont know if Mills was asking for that 
much, but I know that others were.  According to Radio 1, Carl Cox played two 
gigs that night, and for each one of them recieved 100,000 pounds, which is 
more like $160,000 in the US.  One of them was in Sydney, and I think the 
other was in Honolulu or something like that.  Not bad going really, 200,000 
pounds for playing records for 4 hours!

Aaron


Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-06 Thread Cyclone Wehner

I honestly find difficult imagine him asking 100k for a gig as well
as asking 15k for a melbourne club. (I've been in australia and
Rolando played in Sydney in a 600 people venue)

Sydney has a very small techno scene relative to Melbourne, say. And it's
winter here. So that underground gig, which was actually very well attended
in the circumstances, is not typical. In Melbourne it was a bigger venue.

Mills played 6000 here in Melbourne in April. What's more, he very kindly
did phone interviews with a few select writers in advance, which would have
taken up a day of his time. So I think such professionalism and courtesy
should be rewarded.

But honestly can we leave all this talk of booking to Mills, his
agent/manager and the promoters. It's not really our business, unless this
is a forum for promoters. The figures on this list were grossly exaggerated,
I have no doubt. In fact the figures seem to be growing each time the
speculation arises. It's kinda crazy.

Heard any good records lately anyone? What is the new Alton Miller like?? 





Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-06 Thread Testa U. Melons

I honestly find difficult imagine him asking 100k for a gig as well
as asking 15k for a melbourne club. (I've been in australia and
Rolando played in Sydney in a 600 people venue)


OK, 100K was crazy speculation, but the figures that I was quoting was 
Australian dollars, on US, so depending on the conversion rate at the time, 
his asking price could appproach AU$15K. Also keep in mind that the 
promoters who brought him to Sydney in April are in a position to give Mills 
this kind of money anyhow.


I'll just shut from now on

out.
d.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread darw_n
I don't know, but I can say He's a hell of a lot cheaper than I expected...


- Original Message -
From: .. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 4:02 PM
Subject: [313] mills vs .ca



http://www.coolboard.com/msgshow.cfm/msgboard=773266295701506msg=6815454797
5372page=1idDispSub=433266295712583

 what is the deal?
 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
 http://profiles.msn.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Cyclone Wehner
Like I always say, there is always two side to a story. Maybe if you read
Jeff's you will reconsider.  www.axisrecords.com

People, please.

Peace

I don't know, but I can say He's a hell of a lot cheaper than I expected...


http://www.coolboard.com/msgshow.cfm/msgboard=773266295701506msg=6815454797
5372page=1idDispSub=433266295712583


Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Fiveorange
excuse me, but what are you all talking about??? as far as Jeff Mills is 
concerned???


Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread darw_n
no, no.  I have no problem with Jeff, I'm just commenting on the amount that
the promoter paid for flight and deposit was rather slim, considering who we
are talking about...

I just always figured that Jeff is about a US$20,000 investment (or there
about)...

anyways, I looked all over the sight, and can't seem to locate anything
about this little mishap...


darw_n

create, demonstrate, toneshift...
http://www.mp3.com/darw_n
http://www.sphereproductions.com/topic/Darwin.html
http://www.mannequinodd.com

- Original Message -
From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Detroit 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [313] mills vs .ca


 Like I always say, there is always two side to a story. Maybe if you read
 Jeff's you will reconsider.  www.axisrecords.com

 People, please.

 Peace

 I don't know, but I can say He's a hell of a lot cheaper than I
expected...

 

http://www.coolboard.com/msgshow.cfm/msgboard=773266295701506msg=681545479
7
 5372page=1idDispSub=433266295712583

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread David Gillies

I just always figured that Jeff is about a US$20,000 investment (or there
about)...


I heard figures of around $100K for his performance in Melbourne this NYE 
just past. I think his non-NYE performance in April (?) was around AU$15000.


out.
d.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Joshua M. Hill
To answer your question: The promoter of the tour failed to apply for the
work visa properly by giving inaccurate information on the application. As
the result, when entering Canada through Toronto on Thursday, I was detained
for 1 hour, charged triple the amount for the visa and given a violation on
my passport. Which means, if I should ever come to Canada again for
work/whatever, I can expect to be pulled aside and detained!. And, this is
probably indefinite. To make the promoter accountable(which is next to
impossible to do), I double all the fees for the remainder of the tour(2
dates). He do not agree, I canceled.
Jeff Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3.Sep.2000 / 21:01 hrs


that does generate some sort of sympathy, but not much. at best it shifts
some of the blame to the promoters. how much does that visa cost compared to
how much he raised his fees? sure, the promoter didn't do what he was
supposed to (this isn't a new story, why aren't both sides more careful?).
but there is a question as to if this was intentional on the part of the
promoter or not, how did he end up putting down inaccurate information? an
invonvinience clause was probably not in the contract. and it wasn't just
mills that was inconvinienced.

i'm sure people remember mills (or the lack thereof) at st. andrews in
detroit. cancelled because not enough tickets were sold. like people in
detroit buy tickets in advance when they don't have to. mills, spinning to
an empty venue in detroit. ha. maybe his reputation had already preceeded
him and people were afraid to buy tickets presale (the case with my friends
and i). i really don't like it when big djs make it inconvinient for their
fans. we don't forget it. anyway, enough of that.

cheers.

--
Joshua Hill / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / icq: 3045997
www.hillhaus.com / www.ai-studio.com
University of Michigan - Philosophy
--
- Original Message -
From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Detroit 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [313] mills vs .ca


 Like I always say, there is always two side to a story. Maybe if you read
 Jeff's you will reconsider.  www.axisrecords.com

 People, please.

 Peace

 I don't know, but I can say He's a hell of a lot cheaper than I
expected...

 

http://www.coolboard.com/msgshow.cfm/msgboard=773266295701506msg=681545479
7
 5372page=1idDispSub=433266295712583

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Carissa Tintinalli



that does generate some sort of sympathy, but not much. at best it shifts 
some of the blame to the promoters. how much does that visa cost compared 
to how much he raised his fees? sure, the promoter didn't do what he was 
supposed to (this isn't a new story, why aren't both sides more careful?).
but there is a question as to if this was intentional on the part of the 
promoter or not, how did he end up putting down inaccurate information? 
an invonvinience clause was probably not in the contract. and it wasn't 
just mills that was inconvinienced.


I work for a club in Canada that regularly brings in American djs.
We've definitely learned the hard way that it is imperative that the 
artist's work visa is processed accurately and on time. When it wasn't, we 
accepted full responsibility.


Getting a work visa is not that difficult - if you know what you're doing. I 
believe the original post said that the booking was handled by 514 
Productions in Montreal. They have been bringing in international djs on a 
regular basis for awhile and have most likely applied for dozens of these 
visas - there's really no excuse for this kind of mistake. And if the 
inaccuracies on the application were made purposely, it seems a little 
shady. (maybe 514 covering up something else?)


Getting in trouble at the border is more than an inconvenience...when
Richie got in trouble at the border, he was banned from the U.S.! I
can understand Jeff being worried about the implications of this
incident.

As for him doubling his fee to get back at the promoter, I do agree that 
it was unecessary...it really seems a bit childish. I'm sure there was a 
more professional way to deal with the promoter's mistake.

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




Re: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Cyclone Wehner

If you don't take a stand sometimes people will walk all over you in this
industry - I totally understand, I am having to put my foot down myself
after being crossed one too many times. People will use any excuse they can
not to pay you or to not to honour an agreement (not that I am saying this
is what happened in this case but it is an all too common scenario in this
industry) and I do know at least one very, very big name (not 313) who has
come to Australia and been exploited - just because you are an icon doesn't
guarantee you immunity.

Remember also that many people of colour cop bullshit from customs people
(it's called 'racial profiling') and if a person of colour has a violation
then they are gonna be put through the ringer more than someone who is of
West European extraction. Why should anyone put up with this? 

I think the value of money is insignificant - it's an issue of principle.

that does generate some sort of sympathy, but not much. at best it shifts 
some of the blame to the promoters. how much does that visa cost compared 
to how much he raised his fees? sure, the promoter didn't do what he was 
supposed to (this isn't a new story, why aren't both sides more careful?).
but there is a question as to if this was intentional on the part of the 
promoter or not, how did he end up putting down inaccurate information? 
an invonvinience clause was probably not in the contract. and it wasn't 
just mills that was inconvinienced.


RE: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Ryan Heard
Hello,

To speak of his behavior being childish I would say the US government does
it all the time, especially in civil cases where recovery is awarded to a
victim through Punitive (meant to punish) Damages.  I salute Jeff...

Ryan Heard

-Original Message-
From: Carissa Tintinalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] mills vs .ca




that does generate some sort of sympathy, but not much. at best it shifts
some of the blame to the promoters. how much does that visa cost compared
to how much he raised his fees? sure, the promoter didn't do what he was
supposed to (this isn't a new story, why aren't both sides more careful?).
but there is a question as to if this was intentional on the part of the
promoter or not, how did he end up putting down inaccurate information?
an invonvinience clause was probably not in the contract. and it wasn't
just mills that was inconvinienced.

I work for a club in Canada that regularly brings in American djs.
We've definitely learned the hard way that it is imperative that the
artist's work visa is processed accurately and on time. When it wasn't, we
accepted full responsibility.

Getting a work visa is not that difficult - if you know what you're doing. I
believe the original post said that the booking was handled by 514
Productions in Montreal. They have been bringing in international djs on a
regular basis for awhile and have most likely applied for dozens of these
visas - there's really no excuse for this kind of mistake. And if the
inaccuracies on the application were made purposely, it seems a little
shady. (maybe 514 covering up something else?)

Getting in trouble at the border is more than an inconvenience...when
Richie got in trouble at the border, he was banned from the U.S.! I
can understand Jeff being worried about the implications of this
incident.

As for him doubling his fee to get back at the promoter, I do agree that
it was unecessary...it really seems a bit childish. I'm sure there was a
more professional way to deal with the promoter's mistake.



RE: [313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-05 Thread Ryan Heard
Hello,

Interestingly enough I heard a news blip on NPR on a similar thing.  Asians
coming into Portland, Oregan are strip-searched and harrassed more by
Customs than any other place in the United States... So much so that they've
generally stopped flying into that area.  I'd imagine Customs anywhere is
not fun, and the thought of having to go through hell every time I entered a
certain country (esp. if I were an internationally-traveled and reknowned
DJ) would infuriate me to no end.  In this landscape of deceit, sometimes
rough strong-arm tactics are required where there is no oversight.  You have
to hit these people where it hurts... the pocketbook.

Ryan Heard

-Original Message-
From: Cyclone Wehner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 8:31 PM
To: 313 Detroit
Subject: Re: [313] mills vs .ca



If you don't take a stand sometimes people will walk all over you in this
industry - I totally understand, I am having to put my foot down myself
after being crossed one too many times. People will use any excuse they can
not to pay you or to not to honour an agreement (not that I am saying this
is what happened in this case but it is an all too common scenario in this
industry) and I do know at least one very, very big name (not 313) who has
come to Australia and been exploited - just because you are an icon doesn't
guarantee you immunity.

Remember also that many people of colour cop bullshit from customs people
(it's called 'racial profiling') and if a person of colour has a violation
then they are gonna be put through the ringer more than someone who is of
West European extraction. Why should anyone put up with this?

I think the value of money is insignificant - it's an issue of principle.



[313] mills vs .ca

2000-09-04 Thread .. -

http://www.coolboard.com/msgshow.cfm/msgboard=773266295701506msg=68154547975372page=1idDispSub=433266295712583

what is the deal?
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.