Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing

2008-03-09 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Mar 9, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Aharon Robbins wrote:


capabilities.  Just looking at "binutils" and "bfd", without having
the slightest idea what their real intent might be and how to  
apply it

to P9GCC, then finding wonderful snippets such as


Binutils are the things for dealing with binaries: as, ld, nm are
the primary ones. They're built on top of BFD (Binary File Descriptor)
which is essentially an object-oriented way of looking at object
file formats; the tools can be configured to be cross platform
and even convert an object file in say, a.out format to COFF or
from COFF to ELF, and so on.


Just out of curiosity, what is the Plan 9 executable format?



Re: [9fans] Hi and, plan9-native abaco sources?

2008-03-07 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
You're going to the right place with contrib/fgb, but it's a bit  
trickier. Federico G. Benavento (fgb) created a system called  
contrib. contrib allows you to install and maintain /n/sources/ 
contrib systems based on replica(1).


To install contrib:
/n/sources/contrib/fgb/root/rc/bin/contrib/install fgb/contrib
When that is done, you get abaco and its sources with
contrib/install fgb/abaco
To invoke abaco:
abaco absolute-site
That is,
abaco plan9.bell-labs.com
won't work; you need
abaco http://plan9.bell-labs.com/
The source is in /sys/src/cmd/abaco after installation.

There's quite a bit of software on the contrib system so far. You  
find out what with

contrib/list username
To find which usernames have the contrib system, try this:
	du -a /n/sources/contrib | awk '{$1 = ""; print}' | grep '(replica| 
root)' | awk -F/ '{ print $3 }' | sort -u

or something like that.

Happy Plan 9-ing!

PS - Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] now, as we just changed today. You  
don't need to re-register.


On Mar 7, 2008, at 10:00 PM, Sean Caron wrote:


Hi all,

Just wanted to introduce myself as a new Plan 9 user; I have been  
wanting to play with it for years but always resisted polluting my  
network with x86 equipment.. but now that I took the plunge, I am  
really enjoying the hell out of it. The simplicity of Plan 9 makes  
getting my C chops back up to speed honestly a lot of fun; you can  
actually accomplish something without wasting a lot of time wading  
through a bunch of crap. That is cool.


Now that I have a supported wireless NIC in my laptop (Compaq Evo  
n410C - perfectly supported, btw) I have been browsing sources/ 
contrib and checking out some of the apps - abaco and ssh2 in  
particular. They work pretty well for my purposes (thanks for your  
work, guys!) I was wondering, though, if there was someplace where  
I could get the most recent (not plan9ports) abaco sources to peek  
at? The server,


plan9.kicks-ass.org

seems to always be down, and all I can find in contrib/fgb is the  
binary. I'm curious to see how it all goes together.


Regards,

-Sean Caron (scaron at umich.edu)




Re: [9fans] attention - new list address

2008-03-07 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

We sign up the usual way?

On Mar 7, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Scott Schwartz wrote:


Friends, the address for this mailing list is going to
be changing.  Thanks to Russ, we now have 9fans at 9fans.net
set up, and current subscriptions migrated.  Please give
it a try, and bear with us if there are any problems.
Thanks also to the psu computer science department
for hosting us these many years.




Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing

2008-03-07 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

There was a time when you said
template 
instead of
template 
(Was it TC++PL 2nd edition?) The former is still allowed.

It is also used when the context that a variable declaration is in is  
ambiguous, such as this: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ 
pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.xlcpp8a.doc/language/ref/ 
keyword_typename.htm



On Mar 7, 2008, at 5:21 AM, Russ Cox wrote:


PPS: Why is "typename" a G++ reserved word?


[now safely off-topic; sorry]

Because it is a C++ reserved word.
It gets used in contexts (templates, in particular)
where the parser needs extra help deciding that
a name is going to be used as a type.

Russ





Re: [9fans] New user question

2008-03-06 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Why are you running from a live CD?

On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:46 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:


or, you can try "-c 'srv -AWP fossil'" on the command line. change
'fossil' to something else (and as the argument to mount) if it
complains that 'fossil' is already used.




Re: [9fans] New user question

2008-03-06 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

You need to add yourself to the group sys.

1) Reboot:
fshalt -r
2) Log in as user sys.
3) Type
con -l /srv/fscons
4) There, type
uname sys +(your user name)
For example, if your user name is philo:
uname sys +philo
5) Hit ctrl+\ and type
q
6) Reboot and log in and try again.

On Mar 6, 2008, at 6:55 PM, philo wrote:




--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: "andrey mirtchovski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] New user question
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:45:12 -0700

the following should do it from the live cd:

fossil/fossil -c 'srv fossil' –f /dev/sdC0/fossil
mount /srv/fossil /n/fossil

if your fossil was configured correctly during install, you can skip
the '-c 'srv fossil'' part.

This is the exact error I rcvd when trying as you have suggested  
above;


attach main as glenda: connection not authenticated, not console

mount /n/fossil  cannot attach as none before authenticated


_
-. www.tuol.org .-




Re: [9fans] Another new user question

2008-03-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Mar 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Phil Kassner wrote:

I've been using Plan 9 for one week now and have gotten FTP  
working. Installed Abaco and gotten that working, plus have Inferno  
installed

but have more questions of course.

1) Is there a way one can write to a mounted filesystem?


You usually mount a filesystem to a folder in /n. Just use that  
folder as you would do the rest of the filesystem.




Just for example, if I wanted to put an executable in /bin ...how  
would that be done?


/bin is NOT a mounted directory. It is a bound directory. /bin would  
be bound to four places:

- /$objtype/bin - system executables
- /rc/bin - system shell scripts
- $home/bin/$objtype - user executables
- $home/bin/rc - user shell scripts
You choose. See bind(1) for details.



2) To mount a cdrom I know I can start 9660srv...
but how would I mount another HD? I did not see any other  
filesystem servers.




Depends on the filesystem. If it's fossil, see fossil(4). If it's FAT  
on USB, use usbfat: The choices are endless, if you know how.



Thanks


-. www.tuol.org .-




Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing

2008-03-01 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Caldera (now SCO) released the source code a while ago. It has since  
been mirrored. The direct links to the f77 and Ratfor are:


http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/V7/usr/src/cmd/f77
http://minnie.tuhs.org/UnixTree/V7/usr/src/cmd/ratfor

I can get started with it later today.

On Mar 1, 2008, at 10:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Why not just port Version 7 f77 and Version 7 Ratfor?


Sounds like an idea.  Where do I find the source code?  Mind you, it's
been tens of years since I programmed in Fortran IV, it's going to be
hard for me to do any testing.

++L





Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing

2008-03-01 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Why not just port Version 7 f77 and Version 7 Ratfor?

On Mar 1, 2008, at 9:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello,

At work, most of the users need a fortran compiler (although almost
none of them actually use gfortran, they prefer ifort) and some of  
them

do parallel computation so they need MPI. If I could have at least
those two items thanks to P9GCC, maybe I could convince some of  
them to

work on the plan9 servers I'm slowly setting up there.

As for me, I'd be pretty happy if I could have a bittorrent client
(especially libtorrent/rtorrent, written in c++) on plan9 so it'd be
rather nice if your P9GCC could achieve building that. But yeah, that
one relies on auto*, configure, etc..

Mathieu.

On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 06:55:06AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Before I apply some serious effort to bring P9GCC in line with the
latest release, I'd like to convince myself that the effort is worth
it.  I'm keen to catch two birds with one stone: (a) make sure that
version 3.0 is sufficiently functional and (b) determine how  
useful it

really is.

Please will anybody who has a Plan 9 objective that can only be
attained using GCC/G++ please drop me a line to let me know briefly
what it is?  If the whole exercise gets a lot of support, I'll  
happily
set up more infrastructure to deal with it (wiki, blog, remote  
access,

whatever Bell Labs would rather not do themselves).

++L

PS: I prefer if you use the 9fans list, I may miss your mail if I
haven't already have entered your sender address in my whitelist.   
Use

your discretion.



--
GPG key on subkeys.pgp.net:

KeyID:  | Fingerprint:
683DE5F3 | 4324 5818 39AA 9545 95C6 09AF B0A4 DFEA 683D E5F3
--




Re: [9fans] today's quiz

2008-02-26 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
The bleeding-edge, then, would be around 1095600 kilobytes. However,  
I don't have subversion on Plan 9, and I'm using my Mac OS X, so  
directory sizes may be different.


How could one stand to get the whole damn thing? I needed to modify  
one, in a zip, to get gcc built for ELF binaries so I could compile  
kernels on Mac OS X. I don't want to risk the nightmare of building  
GCC on Plan 9 anymore! :-P


On Feb 26, 2008, at 5:01 PM, ron minnich wrote:

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Pietro Gagliardi  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

And which repository - the trunk?


sure

ron




Re: [9fans] awk, not utf aware...

2008-02-26 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

(which I have sitting next to me)

On Feb 26, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


Yes. I'm too lazy to pick up my copy of the standard.

On Feb 26, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Steven Vormwald wrote:


On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:21 -0500, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
And it's wonderful that the C standard defines a character  
literal as

so:

char-literal:
' characters '
characters:
character
characters character

(or something like that)

Question, then: why do we need wchar_t/Rune?


The definitions are (<> used to indicate non-terminals in the
grammar...):

(6.4.4.4) character-constant:
'  '
L'  '

(6.4.4.4) c-char-sequence:

 

(6.4.4.4) c-char:
any member of the source character set except the single-quote ',
backslash \, or new-line character



Steven Vormwald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








Re: [9fans] awk, not utf aware...

2008-02-26 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Yes. I'm too lazy to pick up my copy of the standard.

On Feb 26, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Steven Vormwald wrote:


On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:21 -0500, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

And it's wonderful that the C standard defines a character literal as
so:

char-literal:
' characters '
characters:
character
characters character

(or something like that)

Question, then: why do we need wchar_t/Rune?


The definitions are (<> used to indicate non-terminals in the
grammar...):

(6.4.4.4) character-constant:
'  '
L'  '

(6.4.4.4) c-char-sequence:

 

(6.4.4.4) c-char:
any member of the source character set except the single-quote ',
backslash \, or new-line character



Steven Vormwald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [9fans] awk, not utf aware...

2008-02-26 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
And it's wonderful that the C standard defines a character literal as  
so:


char-literal:
' characters '
characters:
character
characters character

(or something like that)

Question, then: why do we need wchar_t/Rune?

On Feb 26, 2008, at 4:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Plan 9 awk is an APE program, so it uses the unpronounceable ANSI
mbtowc/wctomb functions to deal with UTF.  Thus it uses mblen rather
than utflen or utf8len.





Re: [9fans] today's quiz

2008-02-26 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

And which repository - the trunk?

On Feb 26, 2008, at 3:59 PM, ron minnich wrote:

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Pietro Gagliardi  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Explain what you mean by it - the source code, the binaries, or both?


source only.

ron




Re: [9fans] today's quiz

2008-02-26 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Explain what you mean by it - the source code, the binaries, or both?

On Feb 26, 2008, at 3:51 PM, ron minnich wrote:


well you all did very well on the 'why bash doesn't run with setuid
bit' so I thought some more fun was in order .

I svn clone the gcc compiler tree. how big is it?

ron




Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer)

2008-02-24 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
A note: the Plan 9 philosophy is to subdivide all tasks into  
namespaces that are part of the file system. The mail system upas,  
the USB system usbd, the print sytem lp, the FTP system ftpfs, the  
web site access system webfs - all of them mount information to the  
file system. In fact, the /proc directory, where your processes are  
stored, made its way into other operating systems, and makes the who  
command very short...


On Feb 24, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


ftpfs -m /n/yourftp domain.com

You will be asked for a username and password.

cd /n/yourftp

Your files are now there.

On Feb 24, 2008, at 7:54 AM, philo wrote:




I just installed Plan 9 yesterday on a machine I've setup with  
removable drives.
My machine is setup simply to experiment with different OS's and  
I've got

drives
with several dozen different systems:
Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS/2, BeOs , Solaris, etc.

Plan 9 is now my latest experiment.

The main thing I wanted to do with Plan 9 was just use it to FTP  
data up to

my website.
Though I've got the network configured and can Ping out...
I was not able to find any FTP.   ( I did find  "ftpd" though)

If I get that working, about the only other question I have is if  
there is a

text-based news reader
available for accessing Usenet.

I read over the Wikipedia info but was not able to ascertain  
anything to

help me.

Thanks







Re: [9fans] New User (Experimentor only, non-programmer)

2008-02-24 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

ftpfs -m /n/yourftp domain.com

You will be asked for a username and password.

cd /n/yourftp

Your files are now there.

On Feb 24, 2008, at 7:54 AM, philo wrote:




I just installed Plan 9 yesterday on a machine I've setup with  
removable drives.
My machine is setup simply to experiment with different OS's and  
I've got

drives
with several dozen different systems:
Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS/2, BeOs , Solaris, etc.

Plan 9 is now my latest experiment.

The main thing I wanted to do with Plan 9 was just use it to FTP  
data up to

my website.
Though I've got the network configured and can Ping out...
I was not able to find any FTP.   ( I did find  "ftpd" though)

If I get that working, about the only other question I have is if  
there is a

text-based news reader
available for accessing Usenet.

I read over the Wikipedia info but was not able to ascertain  
anything to

help me.

Thanks





Re: [9fans] a challenge

2008-02-22 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Nope.

On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


I don't have Linux, but I'll see if Mac OS X has that vulnerability.

On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:53 PM, ron minnich wrote:


here is a challenge. I realize it's linux but I think this is the
right group to ask anyway; I think you'll appreciate the humor in it.
So far few I have talked to have gotten it.

There is a file, called /bin/bash.

You are allowed to do this as root.
cp this file to /tmp. Do something to it to make it so that, when you
are not root, you can run the file in /tmp and get a root shell.

Don't assume the obvious. And please don't post "that's trivial"  
until

you have actually done it.

ron






Re: [9fans] a challenge

2008-02-22 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

I don't have Linux, but I'll see if Mac OS X has that vulnerability.

On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:53 PM, ron minnich wrote:


here is a challenge. I realize it's linux but I think this is the
right group to ask anyway; I think you'll appreciate the humor in it.
So far few I have talked to have gotten it.

There is a file, called /bin/bash.

You are allowed to do this as root.
cp this file to /tmp. Do something to it to make it so that, when you
are not root, you can run the file in /tmp and get a root shell.

Don't assume the obvious. And please don't post "that's trivial" until
you have actually done it.

ron




Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next?

2008-02-20 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Okay, not the reaction I expected, and not one of my better ideas.  
Time to walk away and go improve pico...


On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Russ Cox wrote:


unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Or perhaps someone should write a book aimed at newbies on using Plan
9 from Bell Labs. It would be called "Using Plan 9 from Bell Labs,"
typeset in troff, and not go into technical details.






Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt

2008-02-20 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Yes, however try reading the C struct for FIB. It's confusing. What  
is FC? I expected a pure struct definition, like in Appendix A of the  
PowerPoint specification.


On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:55 AM, maht wrote:




Never mind. Don't try to convert a Microsoft specification to C!
That's odd because the binary formats are basically C structs in an  
FAT32 file system with some headers.



http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html


Next  time announce it when you've got it going :)


--
'Do you ever think anything you don't say?' -- Jessica Lovejoy






Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next?

2008-02-20 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Most of /sys/doc is technical and programmer-friendly. I was thinking  
something more like the Lomutos' "A UNIX Primer."


On Feb 20, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Kernel Panic wrote:


devrin talen wrote:


On Feb 19, 2008 7:40 PM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


have you finished it [rc, rio, acme] already?



I've learned what the intro tutorials offered. I still feel like
there's a lot to learn!

i would suggest you just to play arround and have fun... :-) all  
that reading is

for nothing if you dont USE it...

what you play depends on what you are interested in...

for me, one of the most interesting things about plan9 is the  
development enviroment...
so maybe start some hacking... find something that *YOU* actually  
need and is
missing on plan9 and program it yourself. (by stealing from similar  
code of course ;-))


good luck!

cinap





Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next?

2008-02-19 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Or perhaps someone should write a book aimed at newbies on using Plan  
9 from Bell Labs. It would be called "Using Plan 9 from Bell Labs,"  
typeset in troff, and not go into technical details.


On Feb 19, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente  
wrote:



Perhaps there could be an "autoanswer" mail account...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or something... :P

On Feb 20, 2008 4:44 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Feb 19, 2008 9:50 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Maybe somebody should set up a script that looks for emails with
subjects similar to "new to Plan 9", "Plan 9 newbie", etc. and
sends a message with links to the wiki.
I'm only half joking.

John




first that.

iru


We used to have FAQs in the good old days.  The Plan 9 one has been
deceased a while, maybe we should distil the wiki knowledge into it
for a shorter, more static document?  I'm not volunteering, but if
others think it's worthwhile I'll certainly be willing to assist.

++L






Re: [9fans] New to plan 9: what next?

2008-02-19 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
First off, finish learning to use rc, rio, and acme. You'll need both  
of them :-)


If you are using QEMU, I am assuming you already use another OS.  
Therefore, just a bit of translation: in your OS, you say "Copy." In  
Plan 9, you say "Snarf."


Next, to turn off Plan 9, issue the
fshalt
command. When it is done, turn off your computer - Plan 9 doesn't  
(yet) turn off itself. The -r option to fshalt reboots the system.


Next, log in as user glenda or boot the Live CD and read the rio and  
acme tutorials from that location.


Next, read the wiki (http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9) for more  
familiarization.


Next, go to http://www.troff.org/ to learn how to use troff, the word  
processor. troff.org is a (dead?) community-based website.


Finally, check back here if you have any questions.

On Feb 19, 2008, at 5:58 PM, devrin talen wrote:


I've been interested in Plan 9 for a little while now and finally got
around to setting up a virtual plan 9 installation via qemu. As
someone completely new to the operating system I've been reading the
man pages, getting familiar with sam and acme, randomly clicking
around, etc. What would you suggest for some next (baby) steps?




Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-18 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
So there is no definite answer to that question. Perhaps even I, who  
has not fully published anything well-programmed (my pico is still a  
mess), could be considered this way. Both "important" and "to date"  
are relative.


On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Michaelian Ennis wrote:

On Feb 18, 2008 10:18 PM, Michaelian Ennis  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Feb 18, 2008 8:06 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Name the most important person/people in the computer field to date.
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- Bill Gates
- Steve Jobs
CORRECT:
- Thompson & Ritchie, all the way! :-)
- Alan Turing
- The great Structured Programming trio: Hoare,  
Dijkstra, and Dahl

- Knuth


Oh and if you like using transistors for compution,  Pingala had an
interserting contribution.




Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-18 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 18, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Uriel wrote:


While we are at it... lets remember that young people don't know any
history.  Everyone knows that the first language with garbage
collection was Visual Basic.


When, in reality, it was Lisp. Who knew?

I actually know a bit more about the Bell Labs-rooted history of the  
computer than about 99% people my age.


Some more questions:
What was the first object-oriented language?
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- C++
- Java
CORRECT:
- Simula
What was the first high-level programming language?
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- BASIC
- Pascal
- C
CORRECT:
- FORTRAN I
First microprocessor?
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- 8086
- 68000
CORRECT:
- 4004
Microsoft's *other* operating system, besides OS/2:
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- I doubt there was one.
CORRECT:
- XENIX
Name the most important person/people in the computer field to date.
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- Bill Gates
- Steve Jobs
CORRECT:
- Thompson & Ritchie, all the way! :-)
- Alan Turing
- The great Structured Programming trio: Hoare, Dijkstra, and 
Dahl
- Knuth
Name the computer that started it all.
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- The first IBM PC
CORRECT:
- The DEC PDP-11
What other thing, besides Unix, was the PDP-11 famous for?
WHAT YOU MIGHT HEAR:
- ???
CORRECT:
- Tetris!



Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-18 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Sorry, intended that to be private.

On Feb 18, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


On Feb 18, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Federico G. Benavento wrote:


wtf is linus?


Vivete sotto una roccia?





Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-18 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 18, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Federico G. Benavento wrote:


wtf is linus?


Vivete sotto una roccia?



Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-18 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

It says here that setjmp can be used to make coroutines:

http://my.execpc.com/~geezer/osd/tasks/index.htm

On Feb 16, 2008, at 3:29 AM, Lluís Batlle wrote:


Talking about The Art of Computer Programming... this non-stack based
calling convention made me think of Knuth's Coroutines. I'm quite
interested on them, but although I've seen libraries for managing
them, I've never seen a real useful program based on them. I think
they could be used with advantages over the thread or normal function
call abstractions.

Maybe someone in this list can provide a good example of coroutines  
use?


2008/2/16, Paweł Lasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

I don't have latest version of fascicle one (MMIX processor
architecture and MMIXAL assembler language, from new version of The
Art of Computer Programming) at hand, so I can't confirm it, but I
remember that MMIX had a special register which implemented a
"border", shifting register numbers to use them for procedure data
separation.

And as in all RISC architectures, storing as many parameters in the
call stack is the way to go. Especially when you have 256 64-bit
general purpose registers :-) (Now if only someone implemented a sane
architecture using MMIX as main processor...)


On 2/16/08, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

- DOS interrupt function calls use the registers, not the stack.
- SPARC and MIPS registers are provided to pass parameters.

On Feb 15, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:



The calling conventions I have seen are the ccall, stdcall
(Windows' slightly modified version of the ccall), and pascal. All
of them push parameters on the stack.


Take a look at the R-call and S-call conventions used on the IBM
System 360 architecture. These machines didn't even have a stack.

--lyndon






--
Paul Lasek





Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-17 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
And if you're going to rebut and say that limbo needs dis, then check  
this out:


/n/sources/contrib/andrey/dis.tar.gz (or something)

Also works with the Plan 9 toolchain, but you may need to change some  
files now.


On Feb 17, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


One more thing:

On Feb 17, 2008, at 6:58 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


porting limbo to a new architecture requires porting ken's toolchain
and the inferno kernel.


/n/sources/contrib/pietro/limbo.tgz

The only thing ported was the source code and mkfiles.





Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-17 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

One more thing:

On Feb 17, 2008, at 6:58 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


porting limbo to a new architecture requires porting ken's toolchain
and the inferno kernel.


/n/sources/contrib/pietro/limbo.tgz

The only thing ported was the source code and mkfiles.



Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-17 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
New question: can Limbo be compiled to raw binary to run on native  
hardware? Yes. Will I do it? No.


Next question: can C be interpreted like Limbo? Yes. (10th edition  
Unix has such a program.) Will I do it? No.


Someone's ideas on a programming language should not be "forced" onto  
another's state of mind. I don't like some of the features of Limbo  
(sys := load Sys Sys->PATH) and I don't think Limbo can be used to  
write a system kernel without an abundant amount of reductions or  
compiler hacks (http://www.osdev.org/wiki/C_PlusPlus discusses enough  
of them for C++ to make one puke). If someone defies those odds, good  
for them. Also, C can be a pain in the neck at so many times (pointer  
arithmetic multiplies the difficulty of porting Assembly to C). C can  
be made to type-check at runtime, but will I do it to C itself? Not  
when I'm porting about 30 Assembly files to C. I fear I've fallen  
victim to the complications of Duff's device and the alt construct,  
so I'll stop.


Flame extinguished.

On Feb 17, 2008, at 11:31 PM, Bruce Ellis wrote:


you've changed your claims!

it says elephant!

1) no, limbo is not good for everything. my doorbell is better  
without it.

in the context of the original thread you just dismissed it because
you wanted to argue.

2) porting limbo does not require ken's tool chain. have you had
experience with this? anything "self-containted" can only blame
itself for its blemishes.

3) the performance gain of having a fixed tlb with no context switch
penalty is amazing. have you had experience with this?

4) if you are hacking the kernel then you aren't hacking limbo so
what is the point of #4.

after 41 messages in this thread you'll ask for references.

brucee

On Feb 18, 2008 2:43 PM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

how did this get past my erik filter?

wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

four out of four as expected.

brucee


100% whinage.  0 justification.   0 information.  par for the  
course. ☺


since you disagree, i assume you claim that limbo's the hammer and  
all

computing problems are nails.  i'd like to know why limbo's the right
thing to run, e.g., on a freescale hc08 microcontroller.  i'd also  
like to know

why there is no performance penalty for running dis code over c.  do
you claim the garbage collection doesn't take any appreciable time?
and the there is no overhead dealing with limbo's runtime  
typechecking?
the inferno kernel i know about is written in c.  where's the  
limbo version?
how does one run a limbo program on a new architecture without  
porting

the runtime or jit?

- erik






[9fans] Plan 9 featured in virtualizer review

2008-02-17 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

http://www.thinkmac.net/review/review-q-free-virtualizer

A review I wrote of Q, the open-source QEMU front-end for Mac OS X.  
The first screenshot contains games/sudoku and proof showing the  
words "Plan 9 from Bell Labs" in Lucida Sans.


Sorry for the noise.



Re: [9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt

2008-02-16 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Never mind. Don't try to convert a Microsoft specification to C!

On Feb 16, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:



On 2008-Feb-16, at 19:14 , Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

I'm planning to write ms2doc, a program to convert troff -ms  
to .doc files


I think you have the sign inverted, there.





[9fans] Improving programs like doc2txt

2008-02-16 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Microsoft just released the Word, Excel, and  
PowerPoint .doc/.xls/.ppt file format specifications:



http://www.microsoft.com/interop/docs/OfficeBinaryFormats.mspx


I'm planning to write ms2doc, a program to convert troff -ms to .doc  
files for easier collaboration between Plan 9 and Windows.




Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-16 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 16, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Eris Discordia wrote:


Using the stack there would create re-entry problems


Under very specific conditions you can do

PUSH Param1
PUSH Param2
PUSH Param3
INT 80h

What are those conditions?

- Pascal calling convention
- You save the registers before PUSHing the first argument

For now, my OS does this as a temporary method of avoiding the  
necessity of managing different numbers of registers. This will  
change in due time!




Re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling conventions

2008-02-15 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

- DOS interrupt function calls use the registers, not the stack.
- SPARC and MIPS registers are provided to pass parameters.

On Feb 15, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:



The calling conventions I have seen are the ccall, stdcall  
(Windows' slightly modified version of the ccall), and pascal. All  
of them push parameters on the stack.


Take a look at the R-call and S-call conventions used on the IBM  
System 360 architecture. These machines didn't even have a stack.


--lyndon




Re: [9fans] Google search of the day

2008-02-15 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Let's get back to humor. Here's from ReactOS 0.3.4's shutdown screen:

The End . Try the sequel, hit the reset button right now!

You can switch off your computer now




Re: [9fans] Google search of the day

2008-02-14 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Here's what I think is the best solution: statically allocate the  
maximum number of tasks per process:


	struct JobControlBlock { /* the name my OS uses for the info field  
of a process (job) */

Task *mainTask; /* task == thread */
		Task *jobTasks[400]; /* pointers to entry in an array of statically  
allocated tasks */

};

A Task runs a function; it does not continue executing at the current  
point. Returning from that function halts the task. Returning from  
the main task halts all tasks.


Now a SpawnTask() (fork()) can only be done to create up to 400 tasks  
with the exception of the main task.




Re: [9fans] Google search of the day

2008-02-13 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

That is exactly how that shell attack works.

At one point, however, I think that the number of dynamically  
allocated task objects should run out, and the program should just  
wind about in an infinite loop of erroneous calls to fork(). What a  
shame. I'm happy the OS I'm writing does so. It isn't a UNIX-like  
one, but the semantics are similar.


On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


In most /bin/sh variants (I'm not sure about original):

:(){:|:};:

Quick denial of service.



This just in: Repeated forks can bring down a system.
Story at 11.

#include 
#include 

int main() {
for (;;)
fork();
}

Look ma!

John





Re: [9fans] Google search of the day

2008-02-13 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

So I think only in bash.

How it works?

http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/understanding-bash-fork-bomb/

It does use :(){ :|: &};:, but I have tried :(){:|:};: and it worked.

On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:41 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


On Wed Feb 13 18:32:19 EST 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In most /bin/sh variants (I'm not sure about original):

:(){:|:};:

Quick denial of service.




iirc, there were not functions in the orginal.

- erik




Re: [9fans] Google search of the day

2008-02-13 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

In most /bin/sh variants (I'm not sure about original):

:(){:|:};:

Quick denial of service.

On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 13 Feb 2008, at 22:03, erik quanstrom wrote:


bootsplash: silent mode.


:-).

(In case anyone hasn't seen this yet ...)

In a different part of the that strange dimension known as
The Linux Zone, someone cryptically pointed me at a hideous exploit  
via:


http://www.google.com/search?q=jessica_biel_naked_in_my_bed.c

which I found amusing in a sick way.

DaveL





Re: [9fans] quote of the day

2008-02-13 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Freenode.net just netsplitted. Here is from the ##c chat room:

saparok
17:59
wow.  I didnt' realize that dd command could take down all of freenode.


On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:03 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


from the linux kernel:

bootsplash: silent mode.

- erik




Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash

2008-02-11 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

The only advantage to getflags is that we can say

rcsrcipt -xy

instead of

rcscript -x -y

which is why I use it in my 12 script.

On Feb 11, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Martin Neubauer wrote:


* erik quanstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

i would think that the reason to do this would be for consistency.  i
don't know that that's a compelling argument.  but i can see the
attraction of all or nothing; it would be nice if either none of the
scripts used getflags or all of them did.

- erik


That's actually quite compelling to me. I'd be just in favour of  
some kind
of `lazy evaluation' (if some script needs to be changed, put in  
getflags;
ditto for new ones.) And I admit that if one is really tght pressed  
on space
(which might still happen nowadays, if not nearly as often than a  
couple of
years ago) it won't really matter havin to put in some effort to  
customise
what's in /bin/rc. I'm still amused by the argument that getflags  
is faster,

though.

Martin





Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-11 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
It's also that x86 segments memory into code, data, and stack, so you  
can have


.code
OR EAX, EAX // produces less binary than CMP EAX, 0; JE X
JZ X
JMP Y
Y:
.data
str DB 'less\z'
.code
// ...
.data
.code
.stack
.code
.data

On Feb 11, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jon Snader wrote:


On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:43:08AM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:

I've always thought variables and such went at the bottom... or
is that just m68k asm?


you can put them anywhere.  there's no typechecking in assembly
and the linker doesn't care.



When I started programming (so long ago that assembly and Fortran
were basically the only games in town) we always put the data at
the end--it just seemed fitting somehow.  Later, the best
practice became to put them at the beginning on the grounds that
the data wouldn't move as changes where made to the program; in
those days, all manner of strange things happened like programs
that knew where the data portion of other programs lived.  If
nothing else, it made the (very crude) dumps easier to work with.

jcs




Re: [9fans] Can't find CD-ROM

2008-02-11 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

What are you doing when you attempt to find the CD-ROM?

On Feb 11, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Chris Saunders wrote:

I am attempting to install Plan9 on Virtual PC.  I boots fine but  
later when

I attempt to find the CD-ROM I cannot.  Could anyone help?

Regards
Chris Saunders




Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
One more thing. Does anyone know if, in raw x86 assembly, RET implies  
STI? Thanks.




Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Oh, and I can't wait to see those two have GUI support. When I finish  
making my OS C- and portability-friendly, I'm going to start with  
graphics.


On Feb 10, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Adrian Tritschler wrote:


Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


I am working on rewriting an operating system that avoids this
philosophy for the purpose of teaching assembly language. So far, I
have 2% of the code (I started a rewrite), and I don't know if my
code is 100% right.


There's an OS (complete with a Window Manager, IDE, Web Browser, and
even some games) written entirely in assembly: http:// 
www.menuetos.net/


Or, if you want something at the other end of the spectrum, there's an
OS "with modular microkernels using the C# programming language."

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080208-developers-create- 
open-source-os-kernels-using-net-tools.html



Everyone has 24 hours in a day, but some use it more than others ;)


Indeed


Anant

  Adrian




Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 10, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Adrian Tritschler wrote:


OS "with modular microkernels using the C# programming language."


Microsoft has too, and it outdates the other two. Unfortunately, it's  
only available in Microsoft and a select few universities.


http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/



Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

In C, it could look like

Write(char *filename, void *data, uvlong number_of_bytes);

so I don't think it has an Open syscall, or probably you read  
everything into memory, modify the memory, then write it back. 64-bit  
systems can store quite a bit, but this philosophy will get old  
almost immediately:


	$ sed2c '1s/^/@/' # given sed2c is a program that converts sed  
commands to C

char *buffer;
buffer = malloc(FileLen("f"));
Read("f", buffer, FileLen("f"));
b[0] = '@';
Write("f", buffer, strlen(buffer));

Does that seem like a bit much?

On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:01 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


There's an OS (complete with a Window Manager, IDE, Web Browser, and
even some games) written entirely in assembly: http:// 
www.menuetos.net/


Everyone has 24 hours in a day, but some use it more than others ;)



i can see from their documentation, that i have been using my time  
quite

a bit more effectively:

"Menuet has no roots within UNIX or the POSIX standards,
nor is it based on any particular operating system. The design
goal has been to remove the extra layers between different parts
of an OS, which normally complicate programming and create bugs.

here's their write system call:

  rbx - 1 Write

rcx - Ignored
rdx - Bytes to save
rex - Pointer to data
rfx - Filename pointer

!?

- erik




Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash

2008-02-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Gorka Guardiola wrote:


On Feb 9, 2008 8:53 AM, Hongzheng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi all,

2. In non-interactive use (script programming), what's the main
advantages of rc over sh/bash?


Things I like of rc:

In both interactive and non-interactive, spaces do not bite you in rc.

in bash

if [ $bla -eq $otherbla ] ; fi endif... ahhh, I can´t remember the
syntax and get the spaces wrong,


The proper is

if [ $bla -eq $otherbla ]; then
:
fi

The advantage of rc is that that : is not necessary!

Oh, and let's not forget what happens when bla or otherbla is nil! In  
rc,

if (~ $bla $otherbla) { }
is all that is needed - no hooks.


Someone else said it, only one quoting simbol
(what does " bla \$e'o" do on bash?, I just invented it, but every  
time I see

double qoutes I start trembling)


It produces the string ' bla$e''o' in rc syntax. The one thing I like  
about two quoting styles  in the Bourne shell is that I can use  
escape sequences. The one thing I dislike about bash is that bash  
fucks up this quote system.




And here is my 2 cents:

- List objects are STANDARD (bash/kornshell arrays are not)
x=(a b c)
- The seq statement is standard
for (i in `{seq 1 10}) echo $i
- Removable functions
fn x { echo 4 }
fn x
x=4
- >[] piping syntax is much more intuitive
- |[2] to pipe arbitrary file descriptors. One time, to skim through  
errors from gcc to find out if I had mistyped a member of a struct, I  
had to do

gcc a_file_in_my_os.c 2>&1 | grep member
  In rc:
8c a_file_in_my_os.c |[2] grep member
- Empty condition bodies! while(){echo y} is the yes command. It's  
much more terse.

- aux/getflags is faster than while getopt (no loop involved)
	My next plan is to rewrite all of /rc/bin to use aux/getflags. Any  
objections?
- The trap statement is gone - goodbye confusing hooks and no way of  
telling signal 1 from a command/function called 1

Instead, you define functions sigterm and sigkill (I think)

And what I dislike:
- >[2=] is not the same as >[2]/dev/null (some programs crash with  
the former




Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 10, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Martin Neubauer wrote:


(Research) Unix was influential in that
regard and showed that those parts are really small (and should be).

Martin


I am working on rewriting an operating system that avoids this  
philosophy for the purpose of teaching assembly language. So far, I  
have 2% of the code (I started a rewrite), and I don't know if my  
code is 100% right.




Re: [9fans] Flash

2008-02-09 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Better yet, disconnect your Internet connection and go to Multics.

On Feb 9, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Paul Lalonde wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

If time is the constraint, then just uninstall all your web  
browsers, or just run native plan9.


Paul

On 9-Feb-08, at 2:08 PM, Richard Uhtenwoldt wrote:



Steve Simon writes:

I turn flash off on all the browsers I use, I find it irritating and
slows things down.


I go further.  I uninstall flash, as follows:

rm ~/.mozilla/plugins/{flashplayer.xpt,libflashplayer.so}

Why do I uninstall flash?  To remove the temptation to visit a
flash web site to play chess.  (I was unhappy with the amount of
time I wasted playing chess when I had flash installed.)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHrj92pJeHo/Fbu1wRAoPWAJ0VQpZ5Mfg4LKGhocgAvMx3hOeTygCfXmhU
oKSovEHHlmjv2Tyc363AMVw=
=YEYw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [9fans] Hello Assembly

2008-02-09 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Anant Narayanan wrote:


DATAstring<>+0(SB)/8, $"Hello\n\z\z"


Why are there two \zs? Shouldn't one be enough?



Re: [9fans] Questions on setting up CPU server

2008-02-08 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Okay, so if I do this right, it should be

something 255.255.255.0 12.0.2.2

However, the something - the regular IP address, is something that I  
don't know about. I use Q, a frontend to QEMU for Mac OS X.


On Feb 8, 2008, at 3:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

Hello. In CPU Warlock, it asks me for the following:

- enter ip netmask gateway as dotted quads i.e. 192.168.1.9  
255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1

- echo enter ip of dns for /lib/ndb/local
- enter ipnet and authdom i.e, zero zero.dom

What does all this mean and what values are best for QEMU? Thanks.



it means what is says

it's asking for the IP netmask & gateway as dotted quads i.e.  
192.168.1.9 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1


such that 192.168.1.9 is your desired ip, 255.255.255.0 is the  
netmask and 192.168.1.1 is the gateway


ip of dns for /lib/ndb/local  adds a dns=ip in to /lib/ndb/local

enter ipnet and authdom i.e, zero zero.domis asking you for the  
names of your ipnet and the authdom you wish to use

they are just names of your choosing

best for QEMU

by default QEMU issues IP addresses through DHCP from the QEMU  
instance and uses 10.0.2.2 as the gateway iirc


see http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.html

personally I use vdeq  http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/ 
vde/build/Using_VDE_with_QEMU_HOWTO.txt


In that way the running Plan 9 CPU server will be available to  
drawterm, otherwise you have to play games with QEMU command line  
options


My QEMU lives on 192.168.254.254

I run
# vde_switch -tap tap0
# ifconfig tap0 192.168.254.254
# chown root:maht /tmp/vde.ctl
# chmod g+w /tmp/vde.ctl

and then

vdeq qemu QEMUOPTIONS

and then I can assign IPs to Qemu running instances that get routed  
on their own subnet and I can ping 192.168.254.1 from 10.0.0.2











[9fans] Questions on setting up CPU server

2008-02-08 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Hello. In CPU Warlock, it asks me for the following:

	- enter ip netmask gateway as dotted quads i.e. 192.168.1.9  
255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1

- echo enter ip of dns for /lib/ndb/local
- enter ipnet and authdom i.e, zero zero.dom

What does all this mean and what values are best for QEMU? Thanks.



Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-06 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
The recent flame I mean, discussion on GCC was started with my  
futile attempts to compile that bloke. However, I no longer think we  
need anything POSIX, GNU, or X11, as Plan 9 already comes with most,  
if not all, of the libraries we need:

- rio(1) replaces readline (especially hold mode)
- libdraw, etc. replaces libX/liboldX/etc.
- libcontrol replaces GTK+
- libthread replaces pthreads
and countless more. However, I doubt other systems will want these  
libraries, or use plan9ports internally, so GCC will still be  
victorious in most situations.


The stab it with their steely knives,
But they just can’t kill the beast.
Either Don Henley, Glenn Frey or Don Felder

On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:32 PM, Uriel wrote:

On Feb 6, 2008 8:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

On Feb 6, 2008 4:53 AM, Greg Comeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

And my question remains about gcc, either there is or there
isn't a port for Plan 9, but it seems clear to me that there
is one, so why do people keep saying not?


There is a port of GCC, but it's not maintained much and reports vary
on how stable it is.  Also, 9c-produced 'object files' (basically
compressed assembler code) are incompatible with GCC's object files,
so any libraries that must be shared need to be recompiled.


I have yet to see that anyone (that is not dead) has ever got the GCC
port to work at all. (Fgb spent lots of time trying to get it to go,
but to no avail).

That it is (was?) linked from the website seems to add more confusion
than anything else.

uriel

P.S.: I want to make clear that I have a deep respect for dhog and his
work, it is quite impressive what he managed to do, specially having
in mind hideousness and painfulness of the task in question.




Re: [9fans] killer htmlfmt

2008-02-05 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
I added the vertical padding/spacing to bordered tables, and  
everything is up there (including a test page). Unbordered tables  
still do not have vertical spacing; I intend to fix that before  
sending it up to patch.


On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

In response to erik's killer faces, I have a killer htmlfmt. It  
fixes the bug in which htmlfmt doesn't have table support. Table  
support in htmlfmt is still extremely basic - no colspan/rowspan/ 
nested tables and the amount of border is ignored. I also only have  
horizontal cellpadding (no vertical cellpadding yet) and  
cellpadding/cellspacing is only horizontal if a border is  
specified. When all this is fixed, I'll submit to patch.


/n/sources/contrib/pietro/htmlfmt.tgz

- Pietro





[9fans] killer htmlfmt

2008-02-05 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
In response to erik's killer faces, I have a killer htmlfmt. It fixes  
the bug in which htmlfmt doesn't have table support. Table support in  
htmlfmt is still extremely basic - no colspan/rowspan/nested tables  
and the amount of border is ignored. I also only have horizontal  
cellpadding (no vertical cellpadding yet) and cellpadding/cellspacing  
is only horizontal if a border is specified. When all this is fixed,  
I'll submit to patch.


/n/sources/contrib/pietro/htmlfmt.tgz

- Pietro



Re: [9fans] pico

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Okay, I got everything fixed a few days ago and added some more  
features (simple arrays, r "long/file/name.1", etc.). The new pico is  
in the usual place.


I'm redesigning my website, so I'm going to have my software  
available from there too when that's done.


On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:41 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:


more debugging, please tell us about it.  yawn.

On Jan 31, 2008 10:55 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Well, I got the memory tampering bugs fixed, but a black and white  
image now
does not show correctly. Gonna go back and check and fix. Will  
report when I

put a new version up.



On Jan 30, 2008, at 6:42 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

What do you think I've been doing? :-)

The problem seems to be in run(), because after run() returns,  
poolcheck

fails. I'll go check it out.

On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:

work it out.  it's called debugging.

brucee






Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 4, 2008, at 9:38 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


Some other reasons:
- Some systems (read: Linux) do not have pthreads


incorrect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_POSIX_Thread_Library



Is that integrated into the Linux source code tree or an add-on?


- C99 is still new and although it's in POSIX, not many systems have
it (Plan 9 doesn't have complete C99)


c99 is 9 years old!



Yes, but do all compilers implement 100% of that standard?


- erik




Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Some other reasons:
- Some systems (read: Linux) do not have pthreads
- What if I said I'm running GCC on Microsoft Xenix? Is that POSIX- 
compliant?

- Curses is not POSIX. It's Single Unix Spec, though.
- C99 is still new and although it's in POSIX, not many systems have  
it (Plan 9 doesn't have complete C99)


On Feb 4, 2008, at 9:23 PM, David Arnold wrote:


On 03/02/2008, at 8:29 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:

Autoconf is nothing but a stinking rotten corpse that lives only  
because the cult of GNU adherents cannot (no, refuse to) grok the  
concept of POSIX.


the problem with POSIX is that it doesn't specify enough.

for instance, if you have to write some code to list the network  
interfaces on a (*nix) machine, you have some that provide a  
specific function to do so (getifaddrs), some where you should use  
SIOCGIFCONF, another where SIOCGLIFCONF is better and one where  
your best bet is to hope the /proc filesystem is mounted and read  
from that.


POSIX doesn't help for things like this.  and autoconf, for all its  
failings, does.




d





Re: [9fans] Plan 9 wireless how-to...

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Feb 4, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

For USB, add this to the TOP of /usr/$user/lib/profile, above the  
switch but below the other bind lines:


bind -a '#U' /dev
usbd


Scratch that. There is a line in /usr/$user/lib/profile that reads

switch($terminal){

Above that, add

bind -a '#U' /dev
usbstart

usbstart sets up everything, including USB-based audio and the mouse.



Re: [9fans] Plan 9 wireless how-to...

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

9fat:
cd /n/9fat
acme plan9.ini

For USB, add this to the TOP of /usr/$user/lib/profile, above the  
switch but below the other bind lines:


bind -a '#U' /dev
usbd

Type

man -t usb usbd usbdisk | page

for more information on all you can do with USB.

On Feb 4, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Thanks a lot! It's answering a lot of questions.
Now I have only to  find plan9.ini on my machine... :)

Another question is about USB... I have 'an old machine', where USB  
is provided as separate PCI card...
Unfortunately,  'man plan9.ini' does not provide too much 'options'/ 
examples about USB card drivers...

Any useful trick here?

Michael.


On Feb 4, 2008 7:14 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
man -P plan9.ini

and see if your wireless device is listed in the ETHERNET section.

On Feb 4, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:

> Hi,
> As I'm moving slowly via installing/configuring Plan 9 node...
> another question appeared:
>
> Can somebody navigate towards document describing installation/
> configuration of wireless card under Plan 9?
>
> (I guess I have seen something briefly why checking archives, but
> lost it
>  Network Configuration article provides some briefs on network
> installation itself, but not wireless in particular... )
>
> Thanks for your advice and kind attention to this matter.
>
> Michael.
>






Re: [9fans] Plan 9 wireless how-to...

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

man -P plan9.ini

and see if your wireless device is listed in the ETHERNET section.

On Feb 4, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Hi,
As I'm moving slowly via installing/configuring Plan 9 node...  
another question appeared:


Can somebody navigate towards document describing installation/ 
configuration of wireless card under Plan 9?


(I guess I have seen something briefly why checking archives, but  
lost it
 Network Configuration article provides some briefs on network  
installation itself, but not wireless in particular... )


Thanks for your advice and kind attention to this matter.

Michael.





Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-04 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
When I started Plan 9, I was actually happy that some of the tools I  
wanted (grap, prof) were already available. I wanted to try GCC to  
try to port a web browser, but Abaco is growing fast, and I'll stick  
with that. I'm already porting pico, and that's in my contrib directory.


On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


If you (not *we*) want to port something port it and let us know when
it's done.
sorry, it my mistake, i do not mean that all community should go  
and port GCC :)


The pattern of "I've just downloaded Plan9 and I want my old  
tools" is
very common and we just kind of ignore them :) except for the anti- 
GNU

troll responses.

Ok, i already figure out this. I was not right(?) when start this
discussion if there is no C++ in Plan9, that there are some reasons
for that :)

Thanks to all, i'm really sorry if i disturb anyone with this  
discasion ))



2008/2/4, Alf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Hi,

if we
couldn't port GCC because it very big job (any other reason?), maybe
we could port some other compiler with liberal enough licence?



If you (not *we*) want to port something port it and let us know when
it's done.
The process goes like this :
"I've done some working code for my  C++ port, it's in my
contrib directory if someone wants to have a go with it"


I'm asking because C++ is very popular language,

This is Plan 9, popularity isn't very high on the list.

The reason there is no native C++ compiler is because of it's  
*lack* of

popularity in the Plan 9 community, both historically and currently.

The pattern of "I've just downloaded Plan9 and I want my old  
tools" is
very common and we just kind of ignore them :) except for the anti- 
GNU

troll responses.

You'll (eventually) notice that *most* of the long time Plan 9 users
don't even join in the discussion, no doubt smiling a "seen it all
before" smile before pressing Del









Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

A perfect example: Windows security! :-)

On Feb 3, 2008, at 8:02 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:


* Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Autotools badness is way beyond most peoples wildest imagination...


Actually, It helped me enlarging my imagination capabilities ;-P

BTW: there are even far worse things out there ;-O


cu
--
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-




Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Okay, that's fine. What I'm saying is that you don't have to write  
something from scratch to get something else working. If you actually  
do get one of the other OpenGL implementations to work, then porting  
Gallium3D is a lot easier.


Either way, you won't need direct hardware manipulation on Plan 9.  
Just run it from a virtual machine and see where you go from there.


On Feb 3, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


There were many attempts to port OpenGL to Plan 9, none of which I
got to work. I started working on a ground-up 3D library but lost it
to a faulty Plan 9 partition.

I have no plan to start serious works about OpenGL porting. I just
want to play with Plan9, if i port Gallium3D if will be great success.

Actually i have no working Plan9 yet (!), so i just looking around,
reading documentation and asking about some questions that i have in
my mind :)

So my plans is not something serious, i just looking for somethings  
for fun :)


2008/2/3, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

There were many attempts to port OpenGL to Plan 9, none of which I
got to work. I started working on a ground-up 3D library but lost it
to a faulty Plan 9 partition.

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:

Some graphics chip, actually i want port OpenGL to Plan9, but DRI  
has
ugly architecture and Mesa with X11 are overload by unnecessary  
code,

as far as i know it is because of historical reasons.

I have experience with X11 and OpenGL specifications and device  
driver

development, so my plan was port general parts of mesa (not all of
course), but with out DRI on Intel graphics chip (i have that card)
with hardware acceleration.
When i start dig problem i have found DRI replacement known as
Gallium3D, it is completely new project (from Mesa community as  
far as

i know) and it small enough for try to port it. Intel chips has very
good documentation and linux driver what i know very well. So plan
was:
1. Port Gallium3D, pieces by piece
2. Port some features from Linux Intel driver to Plan9 if necessary
3. Try to port some pieces Mesa

Of course it is a very big work, and i know that, but it is
interesting enough to be fun. I have no target to create completely
OpenGL implementation or port of Mesa, i just want to play with  
Plan9

kernel, Mesa and Intel card :))

2008/2/3, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Out of curiosity, what hardware do you need to get working?

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


I'm not sure that "project fork" is a best way. Because hardware
problem is a little piece of work and it's lays it separate  
module.

The biggest part of application is a some computations and some
algorithms implementation...As far, as application was port in  
many

different Linux platforms, it's almost impossible to find some
function with out #ifdef :))

Ok, any way, it looks like "project fork" is simplest way to do
port,
so any other waysis not very interesting. I think that this
way is
most correct, because in that case i could redesign many parts of
this
application in "plan9 style", do some soft services like, files  
for

example  :)

Thanks to all for your help :)

2008/2/3, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You need to do direct hardware manipulation? Then "project  
fork" is

probably best.

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Heh, i try to "port" my program, and it's really not possible
in my
point of view :)

Actually, i don't have working Plan9 right now, reason is quite
simple, on my hardware plan9 does do not work (PC emulators
couldn't
help because my program should work with some special hardware),
so i
try to create PC  from "supported hardware" list, but it take  
some

time to get all pieces, put they together, install, configure
plan9
and so on ))
  Ok, i have no Plan9, but i have my application that i want to
port,
so i try to remove all autotools macros from it and try to do  
some

preparations, like new abstraction layer for threads
creation...and
i'm completely failed, just because too much autotools stuff in
sources. And it too complicated to figure out what exactly i
should
remove in every case...
And my application much smaller that mesa for example. Or X11  
(by

the
way, how X11 was ported?), and i do not touсh such problems  
like

different library, kernel interfaces and so, and so...

So it looks like "project fork" is only way :(

2008/2/3, Paweł Lasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On Feb 3, 2008 2:55 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Circular cause and consequence is funny. Let me add to this
list:
- jpg
- png
- tiff
- PostScript
- TeX (tpic)
- HTML
- Mahjongg, sokoban, sudoku, tetris (games/4s)
- SPARC, MIPS, x64
- MP3, PCM, OGG (PAC was made at Bell Labs)
- SoundBlaster 16

Let me put it this way:
GNU software is good, except

Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
There were many attempts to port OpenGL to Plan 9, none of which I  
got to work. I started working on a ground-up 3D library but lost it  
to a faulty Plan 9 partition.


On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Some graphics chip, actually i want port OpenGL to Plan9, but DRI has
ugly architecture and Mesa with X11 are overload by unnecessary code,
as far as i know it is because of historical reasons.

I have experience with X11 and OpenGL specifications and device driver
development, so my plan was port general parts of mesa (not all of
course), but with out DRI on Intel graphics chip (i have that card)
with hardware acceleration.
When i start dig problem i have found DRI replacement known as
Gallium3D, it is completely new project (from Mesa community as far as
i know) and it small enough for try to port it. Intel chips has very
good documentation and linux driver what i know very well. So plan
was:
1. Port Gallium3D, pieces by piece
2. Port some features from Linux Intel driver to Plan9 if necessary
3. Try to port some pieces Mesa

Of course it is a very big work, and i know that, but it is
interesting enough to be fun. I have no target to create completely
OpenGL implementation or port of Mesa, i just want to play with Plan9
kernel, Mesa and Intel card :))

2008/2/3, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Out of curiosity, what hardware do you need to get working?

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


I'm not sure that "project fork" is a best way. Because hardware
problem is a little piece of work and it's lays it separate module.
The biggest part of application is a some computations and some
algorithms implementation...As far, as application was port in many
different Linux platforms, it's almost impossible to find some
function with out #ifdef :))

Ok, any way, it looks like "project fork" is simplest way to do  
port,
so any other waysis not very interesting. I think that this  
way is
most correct, because in that case i could redesign many parts of  
this

application in "plan9 style", do some soft services like, files for
example  :)

Thanks to all for your help :)

2008/2/3, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

You need to do direct hardware manipulation? Then "project fork" is
probably best.

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:

Heh, i try to "port" my program, and it's really not possible  
in my

point of view :)

Actually, i don't have working Plan9 right now, reason is quite
simple, on my hardware plan9 does do not work (PC emulators  
couldn't

help because my program should work with some special hardware),
so i
try to create PC  from "supported hardware" list, but it take some
time to get all pieces, put they together, install, configure  
plan9

and so on ))
  Ok, i have no Plan9, but i have my application that i want to
port,
so i try to remove all autotools macros from it and try to do some
preparations, like new abstraction layer for threads  
creation...and

i'm completely failed, just because too much autotools stuff in
sources. And it too complicated to figure out what exactly i  
should

remove in every case...
And my application much smaller that mesa for example. Or X11 (by
the
way, how X11 was ported?), and i do not touсh such problems like
different library, kernel interfaces and so, and so...

So it looks like "project fork" is only way :(

2008/2/3, Paweł Lasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Feb 3, 2008 2:55 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:
Circular cause and consequence is funny. Let me add to this  
list:

- jpg
- png
- tiff
- PostScript
- TeX (tpic)
- HTML
- Mahjongg, sokoban, sudoku, tetris (games/4s)
- SPARC, MIPS, x64
- MP3, PCM, OGG (PAC was made at Bell Labs)
- SoundBlaster 16

Let me put it this way:
GNU software is good, except for GNU development tools,
which,
except for the gcc program itself, are mediocre and break
compatibility (try using a Bell Labs makefile with GNU make).



I'd add to it the fact that autotools source files are hard to
make, so
many people who are to lazy to do it properly just put the famous
(in)sanity check and checks for libs they use. The effect?

A simple C program that doesn't rely on anything except for
example libpng
will check for C, C++, FORTRAN 77 compilers, check if those are
from
GCC and various other things.

Imagine my surprise when I had seen a configure script (for
EmacsLisp
utility) that only checked for Emacs version
and few EmacsLisp files it used - a rare thing IMHO, when >80% of
configure running time is for checking for not used
software.

"CPU cycles are cheap, programmer time is expensive" <--- This
doesn't
mean that total laziness is appropriate.

The best thing about autotools is I think the scheme of running
configure - AFAIK mplayer doesn't even use configure for it's
script,
instead
they use their own, which looks the same to end user. And saves
a lot
of time :-)

--
Paul Lasek











Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Out of curiosity, what hardware do you need to get working?

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


I'm not sure that "project fork" is a best way. Because hardware
problem is a little piece of work and it's lays it separate module.
The biggest part of application is a some computations and some
algorithms implementation...As far, as application was port in many
different Linux platforms, it's almost impossible to find some
function with out #ifdef :))

Ok, any way, it looks like "project fork" is simplest way to do port,
so any other waysis not very interesting. I think that this way is
most correct, because in that case i could redesign many parts of this
application in "plan9 style", do some soft services like, files for
example  :)

Thanks to all for your help :)

2008/2/3, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

You need to do direct hardware manipulation? Then "project fork" is
probably best.

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Heh, i try to "port" my program, and it's really not possible in my
point of view :)

Actually, i don't have working Plan9 right now, reason is quite
simple, on my hardware plan9 does do not work (PC emulators couldn't
help because my program should work with some special hardware),  
so i

try to create PC  from "supported hardware" list, but it take some
time to get all pieces, put they together, install, configure plan9
and so on ))
  Ok, i have no Plan9, but i have my application that i want to  
port,

so i try to remove all autotools macros from it and try to do some
preparations, like new abstraction layer for threads creation...and
i'm completely failed, just because too much autotools stuff in
sources. And it too complicated to figure out what exactly i should
remove in every case...
And my application much smaller that mesa for example. Or X11 (by  
the

way, how X11 was ported?), and i do not touсh such problems like
different library, kernel interfaces and so, and so...

So it looks like "project fork" is only way :(

2008/2/3, Paweł Lasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On Feb 3, 2008 2:55 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Circular cause and consequence is funny. Let me add to this list:
- jpg
- png
- tiff
- PostScript
- TeX (tpic)
- HTML
- Mahjongg, sokoban, sudoku, tetris (games/4s)
- SPARC, MIPS, x64
- MP3, PCM, OGG (PAC was made at Bell Labs)
- SoundBlaster 16

Let me put it this way:
GNU software is good, except for GNU development tools,
which,
except for the gcc program itself, are mediocre and break
compatibility (try using a Bell Labs makefile with GNU make).



I'd add to it the fact that autotools source files are hard to
make, so
many people who are to lazy to do it properly just put the famous
(in)sanity check and checks for libs they use. The effect?

A simple C program that doesn't rely on anything except for
example libpng
will check for C, C++, FORTRAN 77 compilers, check if those are  
from

GCC and various other things.

Imagine my surprise when I had seen a configure script (for  
EmacsLisp

utility) that only checked for Emacs version
and few EmacsLisp files it used - a rare thing IMHO, when >80% of
configure running time is for checking for not used
software.

"CPU cycles are cheap, programmer time is expensive" <--- This
doesn't
mean that total laziness is appropriate.

The best thing about autotools is I think the scheme of running
configure - AFAIK mplayer doesn't even use configure for it's  
script,

instead
they use their own, which looks the same to end user. And saves  
a lot

of time :-)

--
Paul Lasek








Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
You need to do direct hardware manipulation? Then "project fork" is  
probably best.


On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Heh, i try to "port" my program, and it's really not possible in my
point of view :)

Actually, i don't have working Plan9 right now, reason is quite
simple, on my hardware plan9 does do not work (PC emulators couldn't
help because my program should work with some special hardware), so i
try to create PC  from "supported hardware" list, but it take some
time to get all pieces, put they together, install, configure plan9
and so on ))
  Ok, i have no Plan9, but i have my application that i want to port,
so i try to remove all autotools macros from it and try to do some
preparations, like new abstraction layer for threads creation...and
i'm completely failed, just because too much autotools stuff in
sources. And it too complicated to figure out what exactly i should
remove in every case...
And my application much smaller that mesa for example. Or X11 (by the
way, how X11 was ported?), and i do not touсh such problems like
different library, kernel interfaces and so, and so...

So it looks like "project fork" is only way :(

2008/2/3, Paweł Lasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On Feb 3, 2008 2:55 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Circular cause and consequence is funny. Let me add to this list:
- jpg
- png
- tiff
- PostScript
- TeX (tpic)
- HTML
- Mahjongg, sokoban, sudoku, tetris (games/4s)
- SPARC, MIPS, x64
- MP3, PCM, OGG (PAC was made at Bell Labs)
- SoundBlaster 16

Let me put it this way:
GNU software is good, except for GNU development tools,  
which,

except for the gcc program itself, are mediocre and break
compatibility (try using a Bell Labs makefile with GNU make).



I'd add to it the fact that autotools source files are hard to  
make, so

many people who are to lazy to do it properly just put the famous
(in)sanity check and checks for libs they use. The effect?

A simple C program that doesn't rely on anything except for  
example libpng

will check for C, C++, FORTRAN 77 compilers, check if those are from
GCC and various other things.

Imagine my surprise when I had seen a configure script (for EmacsLisp
utility) that only checked for Emacs version
and few EmacsLisp files it used - a rare thing IMHO, when >80% of
configure running time is for checking for not used
software.

"CPU cycles are cheap, programmer time is expensive" <--- This  
doesn't

mean that total laziness is appropriate.

The best thing about autotools is I think the scheme of running
configure - AFAIK mplayer doesn't even use configure for it's script,
instead
they use their own, which looks the same to end user. And saves a lot
of time :-)

--
Paul Lasek





Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

That someone had the time and the will to do something like this?

On Feb 3, 2008, at 10:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 3 Feb 2008, at 00:17, Robert William Fuller wrote:
An alternative interpretation is that the facts are skewed by the  
Bell Labs reality distortion field.  The syllogism goes something  
like this:


All things not made at Bell Labs are bad
GNU is not made at Bell Labs
Therefore, GNU is bad


Hello children.  Today's word is "ad hominem".  Can you say "ad  
hominem"?


"We are the knights who say 'NIH'".  Not.

Nobody's mentioned the antecedents of autoconf&co.
other than genealogically.

The criticism has been (IMO) well-reasoned.

If the appraisals appear somewhat vituperative at times,
that is probably because the writers thereof constitute some of the  
sorry
band of unfortunates (myself included) who have been persuaded by  
circumstance

to engage in bootless battle with the autoconf hydra.

We eagerly await ingenious and novel counter-arguments explicating the
intrinsic intellectual beauty and universal utility of a so-called  
portability system
consisting of 10K+SLOCs of convoluted, inscrutable and non-portable  
configuration scripts

intertwined with a twisty maze of twisted #ifdefs.

DaveL




Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

No one remembers the Windows development tools!

Actually, I have a clear memory of Visual Studio 2005 Express, as I  
used to develop in C#. That system was one of the (cough - only -  
cough) good things Microsoft made.


On Feb 3, 2008, at 7:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

So if i want port some big linux application to Plan9 i need start  
new

project and copy parts of code from original one. From one side it is
sad, because it's very ugly development model (for example if  
original
project will be update, i need update my project too, so there are  
two

"targets" for every update).  On another hand i could concentrate on
new Pla9 techniques and create more powerful analogous of linux
software.


Eventually, you'd think the autotools will fade, but reality sometimes
turns out illogical.  I think the "Plan 9 Way" will only become
dominant if there is a major change to the present status.

Strangely, no one criticises the Windows development tools...

++L





Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-03 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
You don't need to do all that if you know what libraries your program  
depends on. Libraries like pdcurses, libtiff, zlib, etc. have been  
ported to APE, so once you have them installed, all you need to do is  
run the configure file and then make from within ape/psh. However, if  
you need autoconf/automake before a configure file, you're out of luck.


On Feb 3, 2008, at 3:44 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Hmmm, my question was not about new ideological war "GNU vs Plan9". ))
I think that my bad English does not allow me to ask my question in
correct form, so i will show some sample :)

For example, in Linux i have some big application.
This application using autotools, so if a want to port it, for example
on different OS (of course if this OS has autotools) or hardware all i
need is go throw sources and put something like:
#ifdef RUN_IN_CYGWIN
 // some specific code
#endif
After that i need to add extra tests in configure and autotools will
do all magic for me :)
The main trouble is that all sources has really many pieces of #ifdef
code, so it could be very painful to drop out "portability in GNU
way".  But it's ok, until that is a only way.

Ok, for me "porting" to plan9 looks like:
1. Drop out autotools from project
2. Replace all OS specific code to Plan9 equivalent
3. Replace all libs to it's equivalent for plan9
4. and so on

Main trouble in 1 step. Because after that i couldn't post in project
mail list, "Hey gays, i have create Plan9 port of your application,
please check it out and put in CVS trunk". If i "port" some
application in that way, that mean that I've start new one, "from
scratch" and just copy & paste some code from original project :((

I hope that i have logical mistakes in my example, and you show me
that, because if not it could be very sad  :))



2008/2/3, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:30:38 -, Rob Pike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:


 An alternative interpretation is that the facts are skewed by  
the Bell
 Labs reality distortion field.  The syllogism goes something  
like this:


 All things not made at Bell Labs are bad
 GNU is not made at Bell Labs
 Therefore, GNU is bad



If you think about what the letters of GNU stand for, you might
appreciate
that the forms are in mutual opposition.  They provide completely
different
approaches to software.  "Good" and "Bad" are value judgments.  If
you think GNU is the right way to build things, Plan 9 is  
probably not

for you, and vice versa.

-rob


Is that "the" Rob Pike? "The R?"

If so, please accept me humble reverence, sire! Hallowed be thy  
practice

(of programming)!

P. S. Down here in my country, Iran, we have this tradition of  
inventing
sacred things out of thin air. A considerable proportion of "the  
divine
and the sacred" spilled all over the globe began with that frailty  
of ours

:-D

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/





Re: [9fans] Plan9 Trademark ?

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Plan 9 is an incomplete name. That company refers to themselves as  
PLAN9, which is not trademarked. "Plan 9 from Bell Labs" is the full  
name of the OS, and it is copyrighted. I don't know if "Plan 9 from  
Outer Space" is copyrighted.


On Feb 2, 2008, at 8:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Is "Plan 9" trademarked?
IANAL but there could be a problem

http://www.plan9software.com/




Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Circular cause and consequence is funny. Let me add to this list:
- jpg
- png
- tiff
- PostScript
- TeX (tpic)
- HTML
- Mahjongg, sokoban, sudoku, tetris (games/4s)
- SPARC, MIPS, x64
- MP3, PCM, OGG (PAC was made at Bell Labs)
- SoundBlaster 16

Let me put it this way:
	GNU software is good, except for GNU development tools, which,  
except for the gcc program itself, are mediocre and break  
compatibility (try using a Bell Labs makefile with GNU make).


On Feb 2, 2008, at 8:42 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:

An alternative interpretation is that the facts are skewed by the  
Bell
Labs reality distortion field.  The syllogism goes something like  
this:


All things not made at Bell Labs are bad
GNU is not made at Bell Labs
Therefore, GNU is bad


if this holds, then

plan 9 uses ip, smtp, dns, ntp, ethernet, x86, &c.
these were not invented at bell labs
thus using plan 9 is bad.

- erik




[9fans] Color change?

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Hello. I just went up from a 24-bit display to a 32-bit display in  
QEMU, and I noticed that rio, acme, and games/mahjongg had different  
colors. Is this normal/expected/in the source or images? Thanks.




Re: [9fans] CUPS printing

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Plan 9 uses neither CUPS nor CIFS (the protocol used by Samba).

1) Find your printer in Parallels. You might need it connected to USB.
2) Read http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Printer_configuration/ 
index.html

3) Once you have your device ID, set it to LPDEST by adding the line
LPDEST = 
   to the TOP of /usr/$user/lib/profile.
4) Test it out:
lp /sys/doc/title.ps

On Feb 2, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Keith Poole wrote:


Hi,

I've got a question that you might be able to answer - I've just  
installed Plan9 on Parallels and I've got the networking set up  
OK.  Now I want to set up a printer - I've got a HP deskjet printer  
attached to an OSX server (so I could connect to it via CUPS or  
SAMBA) - is there anyway to get Plan9 to print to it


Thanks

Keith




Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Autotools increases portability by 57%, but then decreases  
portability by 75% (mv -f, ls -i not available in Plan 9), decreases  
usability by 750%, and decreases sanity by 7500%. I wanted to  
contribute to AbIWord but it took me a long time before I got it  
built. :-( Then I discovered troff in the back of Kernighan/Pike and  
am much happier :-)


On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Martin Neubauer wrote:


* Uriel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Autotools badness is way beyond most peoples wildest imagination...


Unfortunately, you don't have to imagine.





Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
An implementation of Kaffe, a FOSS Java virtual machine, is available  
for Plan 9. I have never gotten it to work.


http://plan9.aichi-u.ac.jp/netlib/kaffe/

On Feb 2, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Thanks, it is great news. Actually i have been shocked, may first
point of view was that it is too much for me, try to port some
software without gnu autotools support.
But if autotools could "fly" under Plan9 it is not so bad as i  
think :))


I have forgot, another one question: what about Java under Plan9? Is
it possible to have JVM? Or no suitable package available? ))

2008/2/2, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

If the archive actually has a configure script, the best way to start
configuring is with:

% ape/psh
# ./configure --prefix=$home --build=i386 --bindir=$home/bin/
$objtype --lib=$home/lib

On Feb 2, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Thanks for a fast reply )
I'll check out documents about APE, if my questions will be actual
after that, i will post thous here.

2008/2/2, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Autotools is in the GCC package. However, there is a nice and clean
way to port alien software using APE:

page /sys/doc/ape.ps

On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Hello everyone :)
I'm newbie in Plan9 system, so i have a couple of questions about
it :)

And the first one looks like this: does GNU build system  
(autoconf,

automake, e.t.c) has been ported in Plan9?  Or maybe there is some
alternative?  :)

I want port some software from linux to Plan9, but couldn't  
find any

documentation about how i should do this in "plan9 style" )

PS: sorry for my horrible English :)

2008/2/2, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


And yes, gcc has been ported. I have never gotten it to work,
though.

On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Another question from newbie :

I have noticed some discussion(s) on Internet about C++ language
for  Plan9;
I'm wondering what is a bottom line of the story:
- is there a C++ compiler? Any plans for it?
 - has it been 'banned' from Plan9?
- has gcc been ported to Plan9? ( as was suggested in one of the
messages I
saw)...

Thank for your attention.
Michael.













Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
If the archive actually has a configure script, the best way to start  
configuring is with:


% ape/psh
	# ./configure --prefix=$home --build=i386 --bindir=$home/bin/ 
$objtype --lib=$home/lib


On Feb 2, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Thanks for a fast reply )
I'll check out documents about APE, if my questions will be actual
after that, i will post thous here.

2008/2/2, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Autotools is in the GCC package. However, there is a nice and clean
way to port alien software using APE:

page /sys/doc/ape.ps

On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Hello everyone :)
I'm newbie in Plan9 system, so i have a couple of questions about
it :)

And the first one looks like this: does GNU build system (autoconf,
automake, e.t.c) has been ported in Plan9?  Or maybe there is some
alternative?  :)

I want port some software from linux to Plan9, but couldn't find any
documentation about how i should do this in "plan9 style" )

PS: sorry for my horrible English :)

2008/2/2, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


And yes, gcc has been ported. I have never gotten it to work,  
though.


On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Another question from newbie :

I have noticed some discussion(s) on Internet about C++ language
for  Plan9;
I'm wondering what is a bottom line of the story:
- is there a C++ compiler? Any plans for it?
 - has it been 'banned' from Plan9?
- has gcc been ported to Plan9? ( as was suggested in one of the
messages I
saw)...

Thank for your attention.
Michael.










Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-02 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Autotools is in the GCC package. However, there is a nice and clean  
way to port alien software using APE:


page /sys/doc/ape.ps

On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Filipp Andronov wrote:


Hello everyone :)
I'm newbie in Plan9 system, so i have a couple of questions about  
it :)


And the first one looks like this: does GNU build system (autoconf,
automake, e.t.c) has been ported in Plan9?  Or maybe there is some
alternative?  :)

I want port some software from linux to Plan9, but couldn't find any
documentation about how i should do this in "plan9 style" )

PS: sorry for my horrible English :)

2008/2/2, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


And yes, gcc has been ported. I have never gotten it to work, though.

On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Another question from newbie :

I have noticed some discussion(s) on Internet about C++ language  
for  Plan9;

I'm wondering what is a bottom line of the story:
- is there a C++ compiler? Any plans for it?
 - has it been 'banned' from Plan9?
- has gcc been ported to Plan9? ( as was suggested in one of the  
messages I

saw)...

Thank for your attention.
Michael.







Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-01 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

And yes, gcc has been ported. I have never gotten it to work, though.

On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Another question from newbie :

I have noticed some discussion(s) on Internet about C++ language  
for  Plan9;

I'm wondering what is a bottom line of the story:
- is there a C++ compiler? Any plans for it?
- has it been 'banned' from Plan9?
- has gcc been ported to Plan9? ( as was suggested in one of the  
messages I saw)...


Thank for your attention.
Michael.





Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-02-01 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
C++ has not been included in Plan 9 since the third edition, but the  
source code is available, and Steve Simon has made some updates.


Once you have abaco the way I said to get it, you also have Federico  
Benavento's contrib system. With it, all you need is


contrib/install steve/cfront

Otherwise, get contrib with

/n/sources/contrib/fgb/root/rc/bin/contrib/install fgb/contrib

and then do the above. Then, to compile a C++ program:

c++/8c x.C # considering .C is the C++ extension
c++/8l -o x x.8

The one thing: don't use

#include 
using namespace std;

You will need

#include 

which does that for you.

On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Another question from newbie :

I have noticed some discussion(s) on Internet about C++ language  
for  Plan9;

I'm wondering what is a bottom line of the story:
- is there a C++ compiler? Any plans for it?
- has it been 'banned' from Plan9?
- has gcc been ported to Plan9? ( as was suggested in one of the  
messages I saw)...


Thank for your attention.
Michael.





Re: [9fans] (rstat 0x0)importb(0x000e): permission denied

2008-02-01 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Never mind that. I got it to work. Sorry for the noise.

On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

Hello. I repeatedly get this error every time I start up, then some  
other errors, then rio doesn't start. I got this the first time  
during a rio run when I asked for the plan9.ini man page. I don't  
know the source. Does anyone know what is going on? Thanks.






Re: [9fans] The $200 walmart "gPC"

2008-02-01 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Strange, I looked at the manufacturer's website - not a mention of  
Plan 9.


On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:47 AM, John Barham wrote:


Seems like a nice fast little machine for Plan 9.


Dirt cheap too.  Even w/ Fry's specials it would be hard to put
together a comparable machine for that amount.

Given that it has VIA's C7 chip which has extra instructions for
crypto, including SHA1
(http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/), it should make a nice
venti server--although you would probably need to upgrade the 80 GB
drive...  What would be involved in patching Plan 9's libsec to use
the C7's crypto instructions?

  John




[9fans] (rstat 0x0)importb(0x000e): permission denied

2008-01-31 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Hello. I repeatedly get this error every time I start up, then some  
other errors, then rio doesn't start. I got this the first time  
during a rio run when I asked for the plan9.ini man page. I don't  
know the source. Does anyone know what is going on? Thanks.




Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-01-31 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Do you know how to use the Acme editor? You use abaco in a similar  
fashion.


If you mean a full office suite like Microsoft Word/Excel/PowerPoint  
with a GUI interface, then no. But troff is easy to learn. Here's a  
rough tutorial for troff: troff documents are text files sent through  
the troff program and its preprocessors to get a document. For  
example, if you have a file named mydoc, the command

troff mydoc | page
lets you preview your document, and
troff mydoc | lp -dmyprinter
sends it to your printer, replacing myprinter with the device name,

troff is commonly used with a macro set, which defines formatting.  
The most common macro set is ms, created by Mike Lesk. To format a  
document with ms support:

troff -ms mydoc | [output command]
Here is the structure of an ms document:
.TL
Title
.AU
Author
.AB
Abstract
.AE
.NH
Numbered heading
.PP
Paragraph
.IP \(bu
Bulleted paragraph
.IP 1.
Numbered paragraph
.IP 2.
List item number 2
.LP
Left-aligned paragraph
.SH
Section heading
.NH 2
Level 2 numbered heading (1.1)
.PP
Text in
.B bold
and
.I italic .

Lines beginning with a . are troff/ms commands. If your document has  
no abstract, use


.AB no
.AE

A preprocessor is filtered through before troff. For example, a  
document with tables, equations, and pictures uses the command line

pic mydoc | tbl | eqn | troff -ms | [output program]
tbl, also by Mike Lesk, creates tables.
.TS
center, box;
c s
r l.
Title of table
_
A   B
C   D
E   F
.TE
The line
center, box;
is obvious - it affects the whole table.
c s
tells the first row to be centered and all columns spanned, and
r l.
tells the rest of the rows to have a right-adjusted column and a left- 
adjusted column. Column data is separated by tabs. If a line is

_
then a horizontal line is placed.

eqn formats equations.
.EQ
	sum from n=1 to infinity { x sup 2 } ~ -> ~ { infinity sub n sup 2 }  
over 4n

.EN
The ~ gives an explicit space, and { } perform grouping. Embedded  
equations are also supported:

.EQ
delim @@
.EN
.PP
... the conversion factor from radians to degrees is @180 / pi@

pic is a simple picture language.
.PS
box "hello"
arrow
box "how" "are you?"
box wid 2 "widths are" "in inches"
arrow <->
ellipse
.PE

pic and eqn are by Brian Kernighan, and eqn was co-written by Lorinda  
Cherry. The official documentation for many of these tools can be  
found at:

- http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cstr.html
- http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/papers.html
And again, see troff.org for more information:
abaco http://www.troff.org/

To download a paper from the above,
1) Snarf the link. Snarf is to Plan 9 as copy is to Windows/Mac OS X/ 
Linux.

2) In a command line, type "hget " without hitting Enter.
3) Middle-click and choose "paste".
4) If the file is .ps.gz, type "| gunzip > x.ps" replacing x with the  
document's intended name. Otherwise, just say "> x.ps" or "> x.pdf".

5) Run page on the ps/pdf file.

On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Hi,

I'm a new to Plan9, and I am trying to understand the current  
status of the system.

In particular, I am wondering about the list of application available=
- is there  email reader?
- Web browser?
- office like suite = document editor, spreadsheet?
- is it possible to run Linux software under plan9?

In other words, I am wondering if it is possible to switch to Plan  
9 system, and to use it as 'everyday machine'?


Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

have a great day,
Michael.





Re: [9fans] A newbie question...

2008-01-31 Thread Pietro Gagliardi


On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Michael Andronov wrote:


Hi,

I'm a new to Plan9, and I am trying to understand the current  
status of the system.

In particular, I am wondering about the list of application available=
- is there  email reader?


Several ways to do this, but to set up:
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Mail_configuration/index.html



- Web browser?


The most actively developed is abaco. Type, on the command line:
9fs sources
/n/sources/contrib/fgb/root/rc/contrib/install fgb/contrib
contrib/install fgb/abaco
Then type
abaco http://website.com/
You will need the http://.



- office like suite = document editor, spreadsheet?


Document editor is troff. There is no built-in spreadsheet, just  
maintain a text database. There are resources for learning troff;  
http://www.troff.org/ is a good place to start.




- is it possible to run Linux software under plan9?


Yes, there is an in-development program called linuxemu. I don't have  
much info on it, though.





In other words, I am wondering if it is possible to switch to Plan  
9 system, and to use it as 'everyday machine'?


Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

have a great day,
Michael.





Re: [9fans] pico

2008-01-30 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Well, I got the memory tampering bugs fixed, but a black and white  
image now does not show correctly. Gonna go back and check and fix.  
Will report when I put a new version up.


On Jan 30, 2008, at 6:42 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


What do you think I've been doing? :-)

The problem seems to be in run(), because after run() returns,  
poolcheck fails. I'll go check it out.


On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:


work it out.  it's called debugging.

brucee






Re: [9fans] pico

2008-01-30 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

What do you think I've been doing? :-)

The problem seems to be in run(), because after run() returns,  
poolcheck fails. I'll go check it out.


On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:53 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:


work it out.  it's called debugging.

brucee




Re: [9fans] pico

2008-01-29 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
In this case, it only told me where the program crashed, which told  
me nothing on why (because a different line or a color image worked).


On Jan 29, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Russ Cox wrote:


I get something that ends in "(double-free?)" and then the program
crashes, but something like


This usually means you have freed the same pointer twice
or you are passing a pointer to free that was not returned
by malloc.  If you run acid to get a stack trace to see the
context of the free, that is often enough to identify the
problem.

% acid pid
acid: stk()
...
^D
%

Russ





Re: [9fans] I like this one

2008-01-29 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

I don't get it... But why would you control how constructors are run?

On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:57 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:


the optional argument is obviously a text description of the desired
priority level (e.g., "superbad!", or "not in a big hurry, care for a
spot of  tea?") accompanied by an optional justification in 150 words
or less.

support for interpretive dance descriptions to follow in the next  
release :p




Re: [9fans] pico

2008-01-29 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
This only happens with black/white images, I ran a color image (boyd)  
through and it worked fine. I think it's with the run function...


On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

In the latest update, I tried adding differentiating between color  
and b/w images. However, I can't test anything because every time I  
try a line like


x new = dennis

I get something that ends in "(double-free?)" and then the program  
crashes, but something like


x new
x new =

do call the error() function. The lexer did not change since I  
started this update, but it did change when I improved symbol  
handling.


On Jan 29, 2008, at 12:30 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:


well i agree that russ did a good job but JITs are fun and often
make things 10 times faster.

brucee

On Jan 29, 2008 11:30 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Wow, that's very impressive!

   open: /tmp/something does not exist (2x)
   no image lerp
   no image doug

But you have a preview, which I was going to add soon.

I am sticking with my code interpreter because I know how to use one
(I toiled over hoc. and fossil ate my code up last December) and it
doesn't require hooking to a C compiler. I do like the preprocessor
idea though.


On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Russ Cox wrote:


Byron Rakitzis (of posix rc fame) produced a version popi with the
JIT
compiler, though sadly his where for cpus which are common cpus
these days.


Computers and compilers are fast enough now
that you can get away with just feeding code
into a C compiler instead of writing a full JIT.
And there's no porting to do!

I just put a pico on sources that does this - 738 lines,
not many of which are the "JIT".

9fs sources
cd /n/sources/contrib/rsc/pico
mk demo

Russ










Re: [9fans] pico

2008-01-29 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
In the latest update, I tried adding differentiating between color  
and b/w images. However, I can't test anything because every time I  
try a line like


x new = dennis

I get something that ends in "(double-free?)" and then the program  
crashes, but something like


x new
x new =

do call the error() function. The lexer did not change since I  
started this update, but it did change when I improved symbol handling.


On Jan 29, 2008, at 12:30 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote:


well i agree that russ did a good job but JITs are fun and often
make things 10 times faster.

brucee

On Jan 29, 2008 11:30 AM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Wow, that's very impressive!

   open: /tmp/something does not exist (2x)
   no image lerp
   no image doug

But you have a preview, which I was going to add soon.

I am sticking with my code interpreter because I know how to use one
(I toiled over hoc. and fossil ate my code up last December) and it
doesn't require hooking to a C compiler. I do like the preprocessor
idea though.


On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Russ Cox wrote:


Byron Rakitzis (of posix rc fame) produced a version popi with the
JIT
compiler, though sadly his where for cpus which are common cpus
these days.


Computers and compilers are fast enough now
that you can get away with just feeding code
into a C compiler instead of writing a full JIT.
And there's no porting to do!

I just put a pico on sources that does this - 738 lines,
not many of which are the "JIT".

9fs sources
cd /n/sources/contrib/rsc/pico
mk demo

Russ








Re: [9fans] pico

2008-01-28 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

Wow, that's very impressive!

open: /tmp/something does not exist (2x)
no image lerp
no image doug

But you have a preview, which I was going to add soon.

I am sticking with my code interpreter because I know how to use one  
(I toiled over hoc. and fossil ate my code up last December) and it  
doesn't require hooking to a C compiler. I do like the preprocessor  
idea though.


On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Russ Cox wrote:

Byron Rakitzis (of posix rc fame) produced a version popi with the  
JIT
compiler, though sadly his where for cpus which are common cpus  
these days.


Computers and compilers are fast enough now
that you can get away with just feeding code
into a C compiler instead of writing a full JIT.
And there's no porting to do!

I just put a pico on sources that does this - 738 lines,
not many of which are the "JIT".

9fs sources
cd /n/sources/contrib/rsc/pico
mk demo

Russ





Re: [9fans] I would like to use plan9, but...

2008-01-28 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

As for internet using ethernet,

1) Find out what type of Ethernet card you have
2) Look at plan9.ini(8) to see how to change plan9.ini to do so.
% man -P plan9.ini
   Use the arrow keys to go through pages and q to quit.
3) Type:
% 9fat:
% cd /n/9fat
% acme plan9.ini
4) Add the necessary line to the end of the file
	5) Hold down Shift and right-click the word Put at the top. Do the  
same with Exit. This saves and quits.

6) Type
% cd
% cd lib/
% acme profile
7) At the top, add the lines
ndb/dns -r
ip/ipconfig
   Save and quit as above.
8) Type
% fshalt -r
	   This will reboot your system safely, and when you get back up you  
should have your Internet configured.


Other places for tutorials:
- the Plan 9 wiki (http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/)
- type:
% cd /sys/doc
% lc
   Find a document you might like to read, and then
% page .ps
   For example,
- lp.ps Describes how to use the printer
- rc.ps Describes how to use rc, the Plan 9 shell
- comp.ps   Describes how to use the Plan 9 compilers
- troff.ps  Describes how to use troff, the text formatter
- ape.psDescribes how to port alien software to Plan 9 using APE
- type
man -P 1 
  to see info on a program

To compile C programs, it depends on how you wrote them:
	- Compiling programs written exclusively for Plan 9 in the Plan 9  
system:

8c file.c
8l -o programname file.8
- Compiling ANSI C/POSIX programs:
pcc -o programname file.c



On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I would like very much to use plan9, but there are some things i am
unsure of.
this is a list of things i need to know how to do:

1)write to newsgroups, and use internet using ethernet
2)use a c compiler
3)a good tutorial site for commands, programming etc.

Thanks

-nolan




Re: [9fans] How to read/write pixels from Memimage

2008-01-27 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:22 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:


(you likely want an alpha
channel in your image, so that each pixel is 4 bytes.)


Apparently, my RGB24 manipulation was wrong, and now it works like a  
charm. The next step is to support a construct like new.red and to  
eliminate the use of undocumented stuff (I peeked in /sys/include/ 
draw.h and /sys/src/libbio/brdstr.c for some hacks).




Re: [9fans] How to read/write pixels from Memimage

2008-01-27 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Another question: in RGB24, how are colors composited: 0x00RRGGBB or  
0xRRGGBB00? I can't seem to get a picture that is solid red; just a  
wacky line art picture.


On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:


It's up.

On Jan 27, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

Okay, I just found out that division by zero meant a black pixel  
would be placed, so I am going to add that and upload a new version.


On Jan 27, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:


The code led me to confusion, so I just decided to use wordaddr. It
works properly now,  and my Pico is now up at /n/sources/contrib/
pietro/pico9.tgz (note the 9). Details are in README.Plan9, test
files are in /lib/face/.


some book examples are failing:

cpu% 8.out
1:  new[x,y] = x % y
8.out 181613: suicide: sys: trap: divide error pc=0x23fd









Re: [9fans] How to read/write pixels from Memimage

2008-01-27 Thread Pietro Gagliardi

It's up.

On Jan 27, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

Okay, I just found out that division by zero meant a black pixel  
would be placed, so I am going to add that and upload a new version.


On Jan 27, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:


The code led me to confusion, so I just decided to use wordaddr. It
works properly now,  and my Pico is now up at /n/sources/contrib/
pietro/pico9.tgz (note the 9). Details are in README.Plan9, test
files are in /lib/face/.


some book examples are failing:

cpu% 8.out
1:  new[x,y] = x % y
8.out 181613: suicide: sys: trap: divide error pc=0x23fd







  1   2   3   4   >