RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Thornley, Dave H

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage the 
creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on the AD 
account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble then feel 
free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred server 
though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a specific server?

Thanks

Todd 

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Yes it can, once configured all info from AD populates Exchange and vice versa

 -Original Message-
From:   Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, July 12, 2002 9:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[ActiveDir] ADC Question

YI haven't had time to test this in our testbed, but wanted to see if anyone out there 
has done this yet. Can the ADC create mailboxes in a
Exchange 5.5 directory from information in the AD? Thanks Todd
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



[ActiveDir] browse AD with XP client

2002-07-16 Thread SEYBOLDT,VOLKER (HP-Germany,ex1)



Hi 
there,

I've a 
question regarding browsing the Active Directory with 
clients.
On a 
W2K client there's a folder in "My Network Places" where I can browse through 
the AD structur in order to find objects in AD.
I did 
not found this option on a XP client. Can someone tell me where this browsing 
feature is located in Windows XP or what has to be configured that it is 
available?
At the 
moment no policies are configured in the AD.

thanks 
for your help
Volker


Re: [ActiveDir] browse AD with XP client

2002-07-16 Thread Andy Grafton

Volker I don't know if there is the browse equivalent, but the XP search has
the option to look specifically in AD.

If you find out the answer to this let me know.

All the best,

Andy

- Original Message -
From: SEYBOLDT,VOLKER (HP-Germany,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:04 PM
Subject: [ActiveDir] browse AD with XP client


 Hi there,

 I've a question regarding browsing the Active Directory with clients.
 On a W2K client there's a folder in My Network Places where I can browse
 through the AD structur in order to find objects in AD.
 I did not found this option on a XP client. Can someone tell me where this
 browsing feature is located in Windows XP or what has to be configured
that
 it is available?
 At the moment no policies are configured in the AD.

 thanks for your help
 Volker

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



Re: [ActiveDir] browse AD with XP client

2002-07-16 Thread Tony Murray

Here's an answer to this question posted by a Microsoft employee in the Microsoft AD 
newsgroup yesterday.  It includes an (unsupported) method to get the functionality 
into XP.

*
This has been discussed at length in this forum already. It was removed from the 
Windows XP client. Without wishing to open up the whole discussion again - you can 
read it for yourself. There are lots of good reasons for not allowing users to 
randomly browse around the network and in particularly the directory. I suggest you 
read the rest of the discussions yourself - it gets a little bit heated at times. But 
since you asked :- The following process is TOTALLY UNSUPPORTED and provided AS IS 
with no warranties, and confers no rights. 

To re-enable the Directory folder on a Windows XP Professional client PC in a Domain 
Environment 
1. Copy the dsfolder.dll from a Windows 2000 (SP2 or later) machine to the Windows XP 
machines (It is in the SYSTEM32 folder under the WINNT folder on Windows 2000 (by 
default) and needs to go into the SYSTEM32 folder usually under WINDOWS on Windows XP 
(by default) 
2. Close all instances of Windows Explorer 
3. Run regsvr32 dsfolder.dll on the XP machines. 
4. Done 
The above process is TOTALLY UNSUPPORTED and provided AS IS with no warranties, and 
confers no rights. 
**

Tony
www.activedir.org
-- Original Message --
From: SEYBOLDT,VOLKER (HP-Germany,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:04:14 +0200

Hi there,
 
I've a question regarding browsing the Active Directory with clients.
On a W2K client there's a folder in My Network Places where I can browse
through the AD structur in order to find objects in AD.
I did not found this option on a XP client. Can someone tell me where this
browsing feature is located in Windows XP or what has to be configured that
it is available?
At the moment no policies are configured in the AD.
 
thanks for your help
Volker



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



[ActiveDir] Site Login

2002-07-16 Thread Rene Chakraborty

Hello Everyone

I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a Microsoft
Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a student
logs into the network.  He said you can do this by making the desktops sign
into the site they are apart of rather then the domain, any ideas on how to
do this?




Rene


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem.
Eventually I may have multiple servers that run exchange.  Thanks

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage
the creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on
the AD account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble
then feel free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred
server though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a specific server?

Thanks

Todd 

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Yes it can, once configured all info from AD populates Exchange and vice
versa

 -Original Message-
From:   Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, July 12, 2002 9:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[ActiveDir] ADC Question

YI haven't had time to test this in our testbed, but wanted to see if anyone
out there has done this yet. Can the ADC create mailboxes in a
Exchange 5.5 directory from information in the AD? Thanks Todd
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

I think you do that by setting subnets to sites and making sure that there
is a Global Catalog server in each site.   However, all down-level clients
can only login to the PDC Emulator, there is no other way for down-level
clients, unless someone has figured out a way.

 -Original Message-
From:   Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[ActiveDir] Site Login

Hello Everyone

I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a Microsoft
Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a student
logs into the network.  He said you can do this by making the desktops sign
into the site they are apart of rather then the domain, any ideas on how to
do this?




Rene


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

AD can hold millions of objects, there is however a limit to the OU
structure you can have, I think the OU Structure can only be 62 levels deep
and I believe after 40 levels the GPO's no longer travel down the levels.  I
heard this from a consultant that taught AD as a MCT.  He showed me the
level limit, but I have not seen the GPO limit.

 -Original Message-
From:   Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login

Comments Welcome:


I am considering the idea of merging all my child-domains back into the
parent domain but am not sure.  I've have 47,568 users in AD, 112 servers
and 3,200 workstations across 8 sites.  I've heard AD horror stories if you
try to have this many objects in 1 AD domain.  Comments?



Rene


- Original Message -
From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login


 I think you do that by setting subnets to sites and making sure that there
 is a Global Catalog server in each site.   However, all down-level clients
 can only login to the PDC Emulator, there is no other way for down-level
 clients, unless someone has figured out a way.

  -Original Message-
 From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:37 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [ActiveDir] Site Login

 Hello Everyone

 I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a Microsoft
 Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a student
 logs into the network.  He said you can do this by making the desktops
sign
 into the site they are apart of rather then the domain, any ideas on how
to
 do this?




 Rene


 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

Interesting, I have not heard of that, does anyone else here able to shed
some light on this?

 -Original Message-
From:   Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login

Well a associate of mine who has a similiar AD size at his place of work
told me while AD holds the objects, issues such as rights changes become a
problem.



Rene


- Original Message -
From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login


 AD can hold millions of objects, there is however a limit to the OU
 structure you can have, I think the OU Structure can only be 62 levels
deep
 and I believe after 40 levels the GPO's no longer travel down the levels.
I
 heard this from a consultant that taught AD as a MCT.  He showed me the
 level limit, but I have not seen the GPO limit.

  -Original Message-
 From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:23 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login

 Comments Welcome:


 I am considering the idea of merging all my child-domains back into
the
 parent domain but am not sure.  I've have 47,568 users in AD, 112 servers
 and 3,200 workstations across 8 sites.  I've heard AD horror stories if
you
 try to have this many objects in 1 AD domain.  Comments?



 Rene


 - Original Message -
 From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:16 AM
 Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login


  I think you do that by setting subnets to sites and making sure that
there
  is a Global Catalog server in each site.   However, all down-level
clients
  can only login to the PDC Emulator, there is no other way for down-level
  clients, unless someone has figured out a way.
 
   -Original Message-
  From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:37 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [ActiveDir] Site Login
 
  Hello Everyone
 
  I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a Microsoft
  Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a
student
  logs into the network.  He said you can do this by making the desktops
 sign
  into the site they are apart of rather then the domain, any ideas on how
 to
  do this?
 
 
 
 
  Rene
 
 
  List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
  List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
  List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
  List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
  List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
  List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



[ActiveDir] Software Distribution

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

One of my network administrators assigns Office XP Pro to all his users.
This is working, but now he is implementing a Terminal Server, and when
users login to Terminal Services, the GPO is not installing the App?  Any
Ideas?  Does he have to Publish it to the terminal server instead of
depending on the assign to the user.  The GPO that is assigned to the users
is deployed at the OU level. 

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Thornley, Dave H

More details then :-)

We've got four Exchange servers, and use a utility I wrote to generate Domain accounts 
and mailboxes for new users. It's been through
several revisions, orginally creating NT4 domain accounts and 5.5 mailboxes, but all 
it does now is to create the AD account, and set enough
for the ADC to pick it up and create an Exchange 5.5 mailbox.

It creates a normal account, then adds the following attrbutes to the object
mailNickname  (alias in Exchange 5.5)
msExchHomeServerName  (Server to hold the mailbox)
textEncodedORAddress  (the mailbox X400 address)

There's a list of attributes that will trigger ADC replication if set in Q253841. This 
gives a known set of mail addresses at the end, x400
is set directly and smtp is alias@.

This worked very well for a while, then we started to see an intermittent problem 
affecting mailbox permissions. Some (a high percentage)
mailboxes were created OK, but the users rights to their mailbox were simply 'Custom' 
in Exchange 5.5 administrator. Accounts created via
ADUC were fine. We never got to the bottom of this, but it is worth mentioning that 
ADC has a very poor reputation, and is known to be
extremely buggy. I got around this by creating a security descriptor with the access 
mask ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MODIFY_USER_ATT | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_SEND_AS | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_RECEIVE_AS

then adding it to the msExchMailboxSecurityDescriptor attribute. This is basically 
User permissions as far as Exchange 5.5 is concerned, so
it accepts it, then when ADC replicates from Exchange to AD it updates this attribute 
to what it should be (Full mailbox access).

I hope this is some help!

Cheers
dave



-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 14:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem. Eventually I may 
have multiple servers that run exchange.  Thanks

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage the 
creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on the AD 
account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble then feel 
free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred server 
though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a specific server?

Thanks

Todd 

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Yes it can, once configured all info from AD populates Exchange and vice versa

 -Original Message-
From:   Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, July 12, 2002 9:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[ActiveDir] ADC Question

YI haven't had time to test this in our testbed, but wanted to see if anyone out there 
has done this yet. Can the ADC create mailboxes in a
Exchange 5.5 directory from information in the AD? Thanks Todd
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

What I want to eventually do is have my server running 5.5, upgrading to
2000 and then implementing several exchange 2000 servers at locations that
have more then 150 users, which ends up being three sites.  I will be making
all the domains at all facilities as child domains of my domain tree before
I do this.  What I want is that when a user is created via script or via
aduc to have the users mailbox created on the right mail server, namely the
server at their location.  I hope this helps in understanding what I want to
do.

 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

More details then :-)

We've got four Exchange servers, and use a utility I wrote to generate
Domain accounts and mailboxes for new users. It's been through
several revisions, orginally creating NT4 domain accounts and 5.5 mailboxes,
but all it does now is to create the AD account, and set enough
for the ADC to pick it up and create an Exchange 5.5 mailbox.

It creates a normal account, then adds the following attrbutes to the object
mailNickname  (alias in Exchange 5.5)
msExchHomeServerName  (Server to hold the mailbox)
textEncodedORAddress  (the mailbox X400 address)

There's a list of attributes that will trigger ADC replication if set in
Q253841. This gives a known set of mail addresses at the end, x400
is set directly and smtp is alias@.

This worked very well for a while, then we started to see an intermittent
problem affecting mailbox permissions. Some (a high percentage)
mailboxes were created OK, but the users rights to their mailbox were simply
'Custom' in Exchange 5.5 administrator. Accounts created via
ADUC were fine. We never got to the bottom of this, but it is worth
mentioning that ADC has a very poor reputation, and is known to be
extremely buggy. I got around this by creating a security descriptor with
the access mask ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MODIFY_USER_ATT | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_SEND_AS | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_RECEIVE_AS

then adding it to the msExchMailboxSecurityDescriptor attribute. This is
basically User permissions as far as Exchange 5.5 is concerned, so
it accepts it, then when ADC replicates from Exchange to AD it updates this
attribute to what it should be (Full mailbox access).

I hope this is some help!

Cheers
dave



-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 14:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem.
Eventually I may have multiple servers that run exchange.  Thanks

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage
the creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on
the AD account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble
then feel free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred
server though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a specific server?

Thanks

Todd 

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Yes it can, once configured all info from AD populates Exchange and vice
versa

 -Original Message-
From:   Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, July 12, 2002 9:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:[ActiveDir] ADC Question

YI haven't had time to test this in our testbed, but wanted to see if anyone
out there has done this yet. Can the ADC create mailboxes in a
Exchange 5.5 directory from information in the AD? Thanks Todd
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: 

Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login

2002-07-16 Thread Rene Chakraborty

Well, I have done some testing between NDS and AD and one thing I find
is for certain.  When you are dealing with a large number of users, NDS
handles rights allocation faster and with less problems.


Rene

- Original Message -
From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login


 Interesting, I have not heard of that, does anyone else here able to shed
 some light on this?

  -Original Message-
 From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:45 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login

 Well a associate of mine who has a similiar AD size at his place of work
 told me while AD holds the objects, issues such as rights changes become a
 problem.



 Rene


 - Original Message -
 From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:34 AM
 Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login


  AD can hold millions of objects, there is however a limit to the OU
  structure you can have, I think the OU Structure can only be 62 levels
 deep
  and I believe after 40 levels the GPO's no longer travel down the
levels.
 I
  heard this from a consultant that taught AD as a MCT.  He showed me the
  level limit, but I have not seen the GPO limit.
 
   -Original Message-
  From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:23 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login
 
  Comments Welcome:
 
 
  I am considering the idea of merging all my child-domains back into
 the
  parent domain but am not sure.  I've have 47,568 users in AD, 112
servers
  and 3,200 workstations across 8 sites.  I've heard AD horror stories if
 you
  try to have this many objects in 1 AD domain.  Comments?
 
 
 
  Rene
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:16 AM
  Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login
 
 
   I think you do that by setting subnets to sites and making sure that
 there
   is a Global Catalog server in each site.   However, all down-level
 clients
   can only login to the PDC Emulator, there is no other way for
down-level
   clients, unless someone has figured out a way.
  
-Original Message-
   From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:37 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [ActiveDir] Site Login
  
   Hello Everyone
  
   I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a
Microsoft
   Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a
 student
   logs into the network.  He said you can do this by making the desktops
  sign
   into the site they are apart of rather then the domain, any ideas on
how
  to
   do this?
  
  
  
  
   Rene
  
  
   List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
   List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
   List archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
   List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
   List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
   List archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
 
  List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
  List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
  List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
  List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
  List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
  List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Software Distribution

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.








What is
loopback policy processing?



-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:36
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Software
Distribution




Is loopback policy processing enabled? 

Ben 

Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent by:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


From:Salandra, Justin A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mail.activedir.org


To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
cc: 

Subject:[ActiveDir] Software Distribution 


One of my
network administrators assigns Office XP Pro to all his users.
This is working, but now he is implementing a Terminal Server, and when
users login to Terminal Services, the GPO is not installing the App?
Any
Ideas? Does he have to Publish it to the terminal server instead of
depending on the assign to the user. The GPO that is assigned to the
users
is deployed at the OU level.

Justin A.
Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List info 
: http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ  : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ 







**
The
information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the 
person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and /
or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this
e-mail, the use of this information or any disclosure, 
copying
or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. 

If you
received this in error, please contact the sender 
and
delete the material from any computer. 

BAA,
the world's leading airport company - http://www.baa.com
**








RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Thornley, Dave H

Justin,

You can do this via ADUC. If you've installed the Exchange 2000 System Manager then 
when you choose to mailbox enable an account you should
see your Exchange 5.5 servers in the list you can use. If you use a script you need to 
set (at least) msExchHomeServerName when you create
the account to specify which server in the site to use. If each site only has a single 
server then I don't think you even need this as it
will use the only server available. ADC CAs are created per site, so a single server 
site will not have a decision to make about which
server to use, regardless of the structure of the Exchange directory.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 15:15
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


What I want to eventually do is have my server running 5.5, upgrading to 2000 and then 
implementing several exchange 2000 servers at
locations that have more then 150 users, which ends up being three sites.  I will be 
making all the domains at all facilities as child
domains of my domain tree before I do this.  What I want is that when a user is 
created via script or via aduc to have the users mailbox
created on the right mail server, namely the server at their location.  I hope this 
helps in understanding what I want to do.

 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

More details then :-)

We've got four Exchange servers, and use a utility I wrote to generate Domain accounts 
and mailboxes for new users. It's been through
several revisions, orginally creating NT4 domain accounts and 5.5 mailboxes, but all 
it does now is to create the AD account, and set enough
for the ADC to pick it up and create an Exchange 5.5 mailbox.

It creates a normal account, then adds the following attrbutes to the object
mailNickname  (alias in Exchange 5.5)
msExchHomeServerName  (Server to hold the mailbox) textEncodedORAddress  (the mailbox 
X400 address)

There's a list of attributes that will trigger ADC replication if set in Q253841. This 
gives a known set of mail addresses at the end, x400
is set directly and smtp is alias@.

This worked very well for a while, then we started to see an intermittent problem 
affecting mailbox permissions. Some (a high percentage)
mailboxes were created OK, but the users rights to their mailbox were simply 'Custom' 
in Exchange 5.5 administrator. Accounts created via
ADUC were fine. We never got to the bottom of this, but it is worth mentioning that 
ADC has a very poor reputation, and is known to be
extremely buggy. I got around this by creating a security descriptor with the access 
mask ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MODIFY_USER_ATT | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_SEND_AS | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_RECEIVE_AS

then adding it to the msExchMailboxSecurityDescriptor attribute. This is basically 
User permissions as far as Exchange 5.5 is concerned, so
it accepts it, then when ADC replicates from Exchange to AD it updates this attribute 
to what it should be (Full mailbox access).

I hope this is some help!

Cheers
dave



-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 14:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem. Eventually I may 
have multiple servers that run exchange.  Thanks

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage the 
creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on the AD 
account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble then feel 
free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred server 
though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a specific server?

Thanks

Todd 

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Yes it can, once configured all info from AD populates Exchange and vice versa

 

Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login

2002-07-16 Thread Paul Sobey


Hi Rene,

I have a friend who administers a directory for a large university with
approximately double the number of users you mention and quite a few more
servers, across 15 sites. There are no scalability problems with doing
this, but its worth noting that your life will be easier the better you
plan the initial OU structure and associated right delegation/group
policies.

If you haven't read it, grab a copy of Mission Critical Active Directory (
Mickey Balladelli, Jan de Clercq, Butterworth-Heinemann; ISBN: 182400).
The authors, involved with Compaq, describe how they designed and built an
AD containing 100 million users (the entire US phone book), just to prove a
point. Makes interesting reading!

Cheers,
Paul




|-+--
| |   Rene Chakraborty |
| |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   Sent by:   |
| |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   tivedir.org|
| |  |
| |  |
| |   16/07/2002 14:22   |
| |   Please respond to  |
| |   ActiveDir  |
| |  |
|-+--
  
--|
  |
  |
  |   To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  |
  |   cc:  
  |
  |   Subject:  Re: [ActiveDir] Site Login 
  |
  
--|




Comments Welcome:


I am considering the idea of merging all my child-domains back into the
parent domain but am not sure.  I've have 47,568 users in AD, 112 servers
and 3,200 workstations across 8 sites.  I've heard AD horror stories if you
try to have this many objects in 1 AD domain.  Comments?



Rene


- Original Message -
From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Login


 I think you do that by setting subnets to sites and making sure that
there
 is a Global Catalog server in each site.   However, all down-level
clients
 can only login to the PDC Emulator, there is no other way for down-level
 clients, unless someone has figured out a way.

  -Original Message-
 From: Rene Chakraborty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:37 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [ActiveDir] Site Login

 Hello Everyone

 I was at Comdex in Toronto last week and got talking to a Microsoft
 Techie about how I want to eliminate the domain requirement when a
student
 logs into the network.  He said you can do this by making the desktops
sign
 into the site they are apart of rather then the domain, any ideas on how
to
 do this?




 Rene


 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
 List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
 List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/





List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

All of my exchange servers will be in the same organization but in different
domains and different AD Sites.

 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Justin,

You can do this via ADUC. If you've installed the Exchange 2000 System
Manager then when you choose to mailbox enable an account you should
see your Exchange 5.5 servers in the list you can use. If you use a script
you need to set (at least) msExchHomeServerName when you create
the account to specify which server in the site to use. If each site only
has a single server then I don't think you even need this as it
will use the only server available. ADC CAs are created per site, so a
single server site will not have a decision to make about which
server to use, regardless of the structure of the Exchange directory.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 15:15
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


What I want to eventually do is have my server running 5.5, upgrading to
2000 and then implementing several exchange 2000 servers at
locations that have more then 150 users, which ends up being three sites.  I
will be making all the domains at all facilities as child
domains of my domain tree before I do this.  What I want is that when a user
is created via script or via aduc to have the users mailbox
created on the right mail server, namely the server at their location.  I
hope this helps in understanding what I want to do.

 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

More details then :-)

We've got four Exchange servers, and use a utility I wrote to generate
Domain accounts and mailboxes for new users. It's been through
several revisions, orginally creating NT4 domain accounts and 5.5 mailboxes,
but all it does now is to create the AD account, and set enough
for the ADC to pick it up and create an Exchange 5.5 mailbox.

It creates a normal account, then adds the following attrbutes to the object
mailNickname  (alias in Exchange 5.5)
msExchHomeServerName  (Server to hold the mailbox) textEncodedORAddress
(the mailbox X400 address)

There's a list of attributes that will trigger ADC replication if set in
Q253841. This gives a known set of mail addresses at the end, x400
is set directly and smtp is alias@.

This worked very well for a while, then we started to see an intermittent
problem affecting mailbox permissions. Some (a high percentage)
mailboxes were created OK, but the users rights to their mailbox were simply
'Custom' in Exchange 5.5 administrator. Accounts created via
ADUC were fine. We never got to the bottom of this, but it is worth
mentioning that ADC has a very poor reputation, and is known to be
extremely buggy. I got around this by creating a security descriptor with
the access mask ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MODIFY_USER_ATT | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_SEND_AS | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_RECEIVE_AS

then adding it to the msExchMailboxSecurityDescriptor attribute. This is
basically User permissions as far as Exchange 5.5 is concerned, so
it accepts it, then when ADC replicates from Exchange to AD it updates this
attribute to what it should be (Full mailbox access).

I hope this is some help!

Cheers
dave



-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 14:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem.
Eventually I may have multiple servers that run exchange.  Thanks

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage
the creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on
the AD account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble
then feel free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred
server though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a specific server?


RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

2002-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.

Should I install the Exchange 2000 System manager in my current environment
of Exchange 5.5 and the Exchange 2000 ADC?

 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Justin,

You can do this via ADUC. If you've installed the Exchange 2000 System
Manager then when you choose to mailbox enable an account you should
see your Exchange 5.5 servers in the list you can use. If you use a script
you need to set (at least) msExchHomeServerName when you create
the account to specify which server in the site to use. If each site only
has a single server then I don't think you even need this as it
will use the only server available. ADC CAs are created per site, so a
single server site will not have a decision to make about which
server to use, regardless of the structure of the Exchange directory.

dave

-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 15:15
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


What I want to eventually do is have my server running 5.5, upgrading to
2000 and then implementing several exchange 2000 servers at
locations that have more then 150 users, which ends up being three sites.  I
will be making all the domains at all facilities as child
domains of my domain tree before I do this.  What I want is that when a user
is created via script or via aduc to have the users mailbox
created on the right mail server, namely the server at their location.  I
hope this helps in understanding what I want to do.

 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

More details then :-)

We've got four Exchange servers, and use a utility I wrote to generate
Domain accounts and mailboxes for new users. It's been through
several revisions, orginally creating NT4 domain accounts and 5.5 mailboxes,
but all it does now is to create the AD account, and set enough
for the ADC to pick it up and create an Exchange 5.5 mailbox.

It creates a normal account, then adds the following attrbutes to the object
mailNickname  (alias in Exchange 5.5)
msExchHomeServerName  (Server to hold the mailbox) textEncodedORAddress
(the mailbox X400 address)

There's a list of attributes that will trigger ADC replication if set in
Q253841. This gives a known set of mail addresses at the end, x400
is set directly and smtp is alias@.

This worked very well for a while, then we started to see an intermittent
problem affecting mailbox permissions. Some (a high percentage)
mailboxes were created OK, but the users rights to their mailbox were simply
'Custom' in Exchange 5.5 administrator. Accounts created via
ADUC were fine. We never got to the bottom of this, but it is worth
mentioning that ADC has a very poor reputation, and is known to be
extremely buggy. I got around this by creating a security descriptor with
the access mask ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MODIFY_USER_ATT | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_SEND_AS | 
ADS_RIGHT_EXCH_MAIL_RECEIVE_AS

then adding it to the msExchMailboxSecurityDescriptor attribute. This is
basically User permissions as far as Exchange 5.5 is concerned, so
it accepts it, then when ADC replicates from Exchange to AD it updates this
attribute to what it should be (Full mailbox access).

I hope this is some help!

Cheers
dave



-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 16 July 2002 14:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Dave I would be interested in knowing how you solved that problem.
Eventually I may have multiple servers that run exchange.  Thanks

Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
914.681.8117 office
646.483.3325 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
From:   Thornley, Dave H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question

Hi Todd,

We use ADC like this - creating accounts in AD, and allowing ADC to manage
the creation of 5.5 mailboxes across four Exchange servers. You
can specify the Exchange server to use by setting msExchHomeServerName on
the AD account. ADC then uses this to place the mailbox in
Exchange.

We ran into a number of little problems doing this - if you have trouble
then feel free to mail me offline for more information.

Cheers

dave 

-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 July 2002 17:44
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Question


Thanks Justin and all who replied.

Someone said it did have issues though when it came to selecting a preferred
server though.  We have 12 Exchange mailbox servers.  Have any
of you attempted to create ADC accounts on a 

[ActiveDir] Educating users on proper AD use ;-)

2002-07-16 Thread Ken Rinehart
Title: Educating users on proper AD use ;-)







Hello


I understand that Microsoft wants users to get away from Network Neighborhood and start using features of Active Directory. In most of the books that I have there is mention of this and that eventually you won't have to use Network Neighborhood and broadcast based browsing will go away. But what will replace it? I want to turn it off across my officespace so I have no NBT broadcast browsing. 

I'm at a crossroads where I've just setup a native AD and want to use it properly and get users to make a behavioral change when accessing resources. So far I'm familiar with the standard My Network Places - Entire Network - Entire Contents - where there is then a choice for Microsoft Windows Network and Directory - AD Domain Double clicking this shows you all your OrgUnits but is this something you really want your users to see? Seems way to confusing and I'd rather not having them poking around looking at who my DCs are!. The alternative of course is to right click on your AD domain and choose Find which is better but most users will never figure this out. Is there a more direct way of acessing this utility? So I could use a GP to put it on all desktops or something. I'm so tired of browsing :-(

Ken-





[ActiveDir] OU Security

2002-07-16 Thread Rene Chakraborty
Title: Message



OK, so if I collapse the Child-domains into the 
parent and go with 1 domain with OUs seperating the users. Is there any 
way to contain the users and make 99% sure they cannot attack a server? 




Rene



[ActiveDir] unable to query a newly created attribute

2002-07-16 Thread pio eqbal

I just created a new attribute in AD and set a while
using ADSI Edit for the user class.
But I am unable to query it using VBScript. I get the
following error:

Error Type:
Provider (0x80004005)
Unspecified error
/ADSQuery.asp, line 52


I am using windows integrated authentication.

Can anyone give me somehints on what to look for while
debugging this?

Thanks

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



RE: [ActiveDir] Software Update Services:

2002-07-16 Thread james . blair
Title: Message









Dennis,



My apologies I must have been on a rant I stand corrected.



James



-Original
Message-
From: Dennis M. Depp
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 3:27
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Software
Update Services:



James,



I read
this white paper and I understand you can redirect Automatic updates to go to
your SUS server instead of Windows update. How do these changes ensure
the appropriate security patches have been applied to a particular
desktop? SUS is still a pull technology. I can setup a client to
automatically pull the informaiton, but it is still a pull technology. If
I want to ensure the hotfixes are installed, I still need to verify with an
applications such as HfNetChk.



Dennis

-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 7:58
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Software
Update Services:

Dennis,



Download the SUS Deployment White Paper approx.
2.3MB:



http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/windowsupdate/sus/susdeployment.asp



Page 55 of the White Paper starts explaining how to
utilise Group Policy and Administrative Templates in order to redirect
Automatic Updates to a server running SUS. You will have to install the client
on all PCs/ Servers as well approx. 1MB. It is an *.msi so you can roll it out
through Group Policy as wellany probs. send me an e-mail. 



James 





-Original
Message-
From: Dennis M. Depp
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 15 July 2002 9:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Software
Update Services:



While I
think the idea of SUS is good, I fail to see how this eliminates the need for
hfnetchk or the security baseline analyser. SUS is a pull technology.
You still need some method to ensure the clients are pulling the infromation
from the server.



Dennis

-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 2:24
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Software
Update Services:

All,



Havent contributed for a while but this will more
than make up for that. In a nut shell Software Update Services (SUS) allows you
to synchronise an internal server with the Microsoft Update servers and test
and approve updates to deploy...too good to be true, no more hfnetchk, qchain,
security baseline analyser seems not. Works on our test bed, give it a
godetails @:



http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/windowsupdate/sus/



James

List info :
http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ 






List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] OU Security

2002-07-16 Thread Ayers, Diane

I'm not sure what you mean by attack.  
 
If you mean attack in the hacking sense of the word, then IMHO, child
domains and OUs won't make any difference. Once you are on the wire, most
traditional techniques are independent of how you logon to what ever
network.
 
Diane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rene Chakraborty
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] OU Security


OK, so if I collapse the Child-domains into the parent and go with 1 domain
with OUs seperating the users.  Is there any way to contain the users and
make 99% sure they cannot attack a server? 
 
 
 
Rene
 

attachment: winmail.dat