RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Question

2007-01-25 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
If you suspect it's the KerbTray tool, you may wish to use KList (part of the 
Reskit) to verify that both are showing the same output.

Ryan

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hogenauer
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:34 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Question

The Time is the same on the PDC emulator as my PC - no event logs I could find 
- I guess it might be a problem with the tool - I don't have any firewalls 
between my PC and the DC. The loss of the ticket information is what raised the 
flag for me.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:24 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Question

It could also mean you have a problem with the tool, right?

Are you seeing some other symptoms that caused you to look at this tool?
Time? you can check that pretty easily by checking the time on your machine and 
comparing to a DC in your environment.

What do you see in your system event log?
On 1/25/07, Mike Hogenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just curious -



I have the resource kit tool Kerbtray running on my taskbar - When I double 
click it; it list my tickets, etc...

Twice during the day yesterday it turned red and said there was no tickets 
available. It's already done this once today -



When it was showing information it had a ticket renewal until time up to 8 days 
and a start and end time offset of 10 minutes



Does this mean my ticket is getting renewed or that I could have a time 
problem, connecting to the PDC emulator problem, etc.



Thanks in advance for any insight on this.



Mike





Re: [ActiveDir] AD - What to monitor?

2006-03-06 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
You may want to start by looking at some commercial products and see what functions they perform and what they monitor. NetPro's Change Auditor is great, and the MOM AD MP (entire Technical Guide is available) would be two nice starting points. If I remember correctly, NetPro also has an AD Health product.


If you don't want to pay, then you can start scripting based upon what you see common among all of the commercial products available.

Ryan
On 3/6/06, Adeel Ansari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AD Gurus,Can you guys expand on the topic of what should be monitored in AD? and Why?I am talking in terms of Security events only to protect AD and also protect
from attacks of any kind.Obviously, one would monitor failed logon, too many accounts creations etc.What else should we monitor?Regards,AdeelList info : 
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


Re: [ActiveDir] NTLM Authentication Security Principal

2006-03-03 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
In the NTDS performance object there are two counters: NTLM Authentcations and Kerberos Authentications. They wouldn't be able to tell you who is authencating using those methods, but they would be able to provide a better idea. Both counters are in number of requests per second.


Ryan
On 3/3/06, Rachui, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an interest in finding out how many of the users in our primaryforest are authenticating via NTLM instead of Kerberos.I know that in
Windows 2003 there is a new well-known security principal called NTLMAuthentication which dynamically contains the list of people whoauthenticated via NTLM.My question is, does anyone know how to query this security principal so
I could get that list of people?Even if it's an ever-changing list, asnapshot at different times would be useful to see volumes.I wasthinking of comparing that list to the This Organization security
principal so I could tell what % of authentication were NTLM.If there's another way to do this, I'm open to suggestions as well.Thanks in advance for any comments.ScottList info : 
http://www.activedir.org/List.aspxList FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspxList archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


Re: [ActiveDir] Null values in adfind results

2006-02-17 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
adfind -default -f (objectcategory=organizationalperson)(!attributename=*) -csv should do the trick. 

Ryan
On 2/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I'm looking for null values in several attributes of user objects but the result only returns the attributes where a value is present. I'd like to have the output in some kind of delimited text file so I can import it into a spreadsheet.


Can adfind do that? I couldn't find a switch to specify returning null values.

Al Maurer Service Manager, Naming and Authentication Services 
IT | Information Technology Agilent Technologies (719) 590-2639; Telnet 590-2639
 http://activedirectory.it.agilent.com
 



[ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs

2006-02-14 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
Dean posted this comment in a recent post:


I have no concerns using Standard edition for DCs, I don't see it too often since the majority of my customers are licensed up the wazoo and use whatever ISO they stumble across first :o)



As ironic as it is, we have recently been prodded by our internal server support group to provide sufficient documentation (beyond saying because we want it) as to why we need W2K3 Ent. instead of W2K3 Std. Thus far the only thing official I've been able to come up with is the fact that we have multiple DFS roots. They seem to think that the license costs for Ent. being 3x that of Std. doesn't justify implementation. 


Can anyone point me to some documentation or specific reasons to stick with Ent.? Ultimately this is what we want for AD, but somehow our desires are not good enough when it comes to $$$ savings.


Thanks!

Ryan


Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs

2006-02-14 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
Thanks to all...

We've been aware of the ram justifications/limitations, but don't have a large enough DIT size (nor do we foresee one in the distant future) alone to justify the memory limitations.

If Susan's post is correct about just having the bits loaded properly and we establish a potential MIIS integration with a Ent. DC then I'll toss our ideas out the Window and succumb to the fact that we should save the co. $$$.


Ryan
On 2/14/06, Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes you could have a mix of DCs where some are std. and some are ent. AD does not care about that. and if you really wanna go nuts you could even throw in datacenter edition! ;-)
don't forget what neil said: think about CURRENT and possible FUTURE requirementsjorgeFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 on behalf of Ryan A. ConradSent: Tue 2006-02-14 17:15To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCsJorge,
Are you suggesting that some DCs an be Ent. Ed. and some Std.?I noticed in the matrix that MIIS integration/support was limited to Ent. Ed., as well as pieces of ADFS.We presently have an empty root (ignoring why we have it, as I don't want to spark any heated conversations), with several child domains that we are working on eliminating. Forest is at 2003 FFL.
Thanks again!RyanOn 2/14/06, Almeida Pinto, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I these are plain vanila DCs standard edition is OK. However it really depends on what additional features you want to use on your DCs. Compare the editions of W2K3 and see what you need for each DC.
 http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/features/comparefeatures.mspx jorge 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ryan A. Conrad Sent: Tue 2006-02-14 16:37 To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 Std. vs. Ent. for DCs Dean posted this comment in a recent post:  I have no concerns using Standard edition for DCs, I don't see it too often since the majority of my customers are licensed up the wazoo and use whatever ISO they stumble across first :o)
  As ironic as it is, we have recently been prodded by our internal server support group to provide sufficient documentation (beyond saying because we want it) as to why we need W2K3 Ent. instead of W2K3 Std.Thus far the only thing official I've been able to come up with is the fact that we have multiple DFS roots.They seem to think that the license costs for Ent. being 3x that of Std. doesn't justify implementation.
 Can anyone point me to some documentation or specific reasons to stick with Ent.? Ultimately this is what we want for AD, but somehow our desires are not good enough when it comes to $$$ savings. Thanks!
 Ryan This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.



RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Web Servers

2005-11-04 Thread Ryan A. Conrad








Use host headers in IIS for WSUS as an DNS
alias, then you can also advertise it on any port you wish. 



Servername.domain.com:8159

Alias: wsus.domain.com



You should be able to put both in your
GPO.





-Ryan











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A.
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005
9:47 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Web
Servers





I could install WSUS and elearning on the
same box though and not have to worry about it? If I change the port for
WSUS or SUS will that have a negative affect on my clients?



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005
9:09 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Web
Servers



Its likely Sharepoint thats messing
things up for you.



You can do a couple of things:



De-extend the default website in the sharepoint
site settings



Exclude all of the WSUS and elearning paths from
the managed paths setting in the WSS site (likely whats happening is WSS
is trapping the requests).





Thanks,
Brian
Desmond

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



c - 312.731.3132



















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A.
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005
8:37 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Web Servers





Has anyone been able to figure out
how to install multiple products to a single web server? I have noticed
that if I want to have MS SUS, SharePoint Services and Microsoft eLearning
Library all on the same server, they all want to install to the Default Web
Site and I cant get them to work. Besides buying a separate server
for each program, how can I get them all on the same webserver?



Justin A. Salandra

MCSE Windows 2000  2003

Network and Technology Services
Manager

Catholic Healthcare System

646.505.3681 - office

917.455.0110 - cell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]








BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Conrad;Ryan;A.;Mr.
FN:Ryan A. Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(609) 818-6135
ADR;WORK:;;311 Pennington-Rocky Hill Road;Pennington;NJ;08534
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:311 Pennington-Rocky Hill Road=0D=0APennington, NJ 08534
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20051028T001447Z
END:VCARD


RE: [ActiveDir] TS GPO and Citrix Settings

2005-10-10 Thread Ryan A. Conrad








HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows
NT\Terminal Services. Already have tried the deletion but you have to
keep on doing it if you want to make changes to Citrix. I was hoping
there was a Disable Secure RDP registry setting that wouldnt
gray anything out (as in W2K).





-Ryan











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Harris
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005
4:05 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] TS GPO
and Citrix Settings





If you just want to make a quick change,
go into the registry and delete the policy subtrees (from HKCU or HKLM, or
both). They'll come back on the next policy refresh, but it'll give you a
few minutes. I can't remember off the top of my head where those setting
are stored: [software\policies], [software\microsoft\windows\current
version\policies]









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan A. Conrad
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005
11:17 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] TS GPO and
Citrix Settings

We are experiencing what appears to be a strange problem (although
its probably expected for all I know) with Terminal Service settings on
W2K3 boxes. A GPO at our application server container sets various
settings (timeout values, encryption, etc) for all systems (regardless
of Admin/Application mode). The behavior is when any TS setting is set by
a GPO the setting is grayed out and even administrators cannot change the
settings.



This itself would not be an issue, however, the default behavior of
Citrix is to take the RDP settings and therefore we cannot change the ICA settings which
presents a problem. So aside from blocking policy inheritance on the OUs where
there are terminal servers does anyone know of a way to un-gray the settings
for W2K3? This was not an issue in W2K.



Hopefully Ive explained well enough. Thanks in advance,



Ryan 








RE: [ActiveDir] DC authentication

2005-08-31 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
echo %logonserver%

-Ryan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine Allen
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DC authentication

Sorry, I'm have a brain hiccup.  Does anyone know the command line utility
that tells you which dc authenticates you?

-Christine

Christine N. Allen
Systems Engineer
BMC HealthNet Plan
2 Copley Place
Boston, MA 02216

617-748-6034
617-293-4407
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] All

2005-05-09 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
CV in the UK is like Resume in the US.

-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All

Accenture?  Compucom? CSC?

I don't think MS would rank that high in the consulting arena.  


What's a Cv?  Pardon my ignorance, but that has me puzzled.  I mean, before
Tony comes back online I'd like to know. :)

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 12:15 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All

Unless you got clearance from Tony to post this prepare to be thumped. 



As an aside, who are the largest 5 IT specific companies now?

IBM, HP, Dell??, MS, Lockheed, Unisys, ??



joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Cooper
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:58 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] All
Importance: High

Dear All,

I am currently conducting a search for one of the top 5 largest IT companies
in the world. They are looking for a number of  Architects of varying levels
from Junior to Guru level. You will gain exposure to the worlds largest
programmes and Technical environments.

You should have excellent MS Environment experience, in particular Active
Directory. The client has numerous regional offices across the UK so
location not a problem. Salaries range from £40k to £105k base salary with
up to 40% bonuses.

Please email your Cv or contact me if of interest.

Simon Cooper
IT Connect UK Ltd
5 Hampton Hill Business Park,
High Street,
Hampton Hill,
Middlesex,
TW12  1NP
Tel  Number +44 208 973 33 33
Fax Number +44 208 973 32 00
Mobile +44 7952 672 739
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.itconnect.co.uk


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] script to convert userID to first and lastname of users

2005-02-18 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
This should work:

strUserName = *INSERT NAME HERE*
Set objConnection = CreateObject(ADODB.Connection)
objConnection.Open Provider=ADsDSOObject;
Set objCommand = CreateObject(ADODB.Command)
objCommand.ActiveConnection = objConnection

objCommand.CommandText = _
LDAP://dc=bob,dc=foo,dc=com;((objectCategory=User)  _
(samAccountName=  strUserName  ));displayName;subtree  

Set objRecordSet = objCommand.Execute

Wscript.echo objRecordset(0)

Its definitely not as clean as ADFind, but it works.

-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marie-Therese Fahmy
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 1:38 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] script to convert userID to first and lastname of users

I need a script to search for userID for users and give me their full name. 
We have Active Directory 2003.

Thanks,
Marie 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required

2005-02-17 Thread Ryan A. Conrad
I agree with Neil.  I've seen good results with ERDisk from Aelita, which is
now called Recovery Manager for AD from Quest.

-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:17 AM
To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required

Have you considered a 3rd party tool which offers object level restores?
There
is no rule that states that MS must provide all the functionality that we
require, after all :)

Have you considered delayed replication sites, which only receive changes on
an infrequent basis? DCs in these sites can then be used to auth restore the
deleted object and thus re-animate it back into the environment, before they
have received the deletion event.

Of course, your most proactive measure is to ensure that only a minimal
number
of admins have the ability to delete objects. The removal of a group or OU
can
be catastrophic and should be mitigated against proactively.

HTH,
neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aramide Adebanjo
Sent: 17 February 2005 08:12
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required


Hi guys,

I have resolved the issue..it could have been worse however but the group
deleted was a distribution group. The painful fact was that it wasone that
had
700 member users and I did not know howi could repopulate that fast. However
I
had done a csvde export just the day beforeand I ran iquery to get all users
with the required attribute. Simply put, I recreated the distribution group
again. I just pasted all the members into a text file with all usenames
seperated by a semicolon and then pasted them all into the new group. The
names were all resolved.

My fear is this; what if it was a user or a security group that was
mistakenly
deleted. Micorsosft shld have a solution that enables u undelete..like a
Cntrl
Z.mistakes can be made by anyone...a mouse slip etc...no one is perfect. 

Thx all...

A restore is one option I don't ever want to take in a production
environment.!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required


Heh, I actually typoed that response. It should have been

 If you had K3 you would have at
 least 2 options, one painful, one really painful. Here you only have
 the really painful answer.


The really painful answer is obviously recovery from a backup. I have
never
really done this in production and I have no intention of ever doing it.
It
scares me. If something was deleted, I have faith that the person who
deleted something is someone who could be trusted to have made that
decision. If they made a bad decision, the trust was misplaced. This is
yet
another reason to not let people have native rights in the directory
like
that.

The painful answer is to recover the object from the deleted objects
container. Depending on the type of object and the schema mods made you
will
have various levels of frustration with this because not everything
comes
back the way you want. By default, very little comes back. However, I
much
prefer this solution to recovering from backup. This is something I
would
actually do.

  joe




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunter, Laura
E.
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:26 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required

Joe,

Out of curiousity, what do you define as the painful versus really
painful option in 2K3?  Now I'm curious.  :-)

Laura 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aramide 
 Adebanjo
 Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:54 PM
 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
 Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required
 
 Ah
 
 I need a miracle.a technical miracle.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
 Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:36 PM
 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
 Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required
 
 
 You aren't going to like the answer... If you had K3 you would have at

 least 2 options, one painful, one really painful. Here you only have 
 the painful answer.
 
 
joe
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aramide 
 Adebanjo
 Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:27 PM
 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
 Subject: [ActiveDir] HELP!!! Undelete required
 
 Hi guys,
 
 What is the fastest way of recovering a group object  deleted in AD 
 2000?? The changes have been replicated to all other DCs
 
 I want something precise, nothing fanciful, something tested and 
 proved working...pls don't let it involve restoring from