RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Don't sweat the petty stuff. Don't pet the sweaty stuff. George Carlin -Original Message- From: Burns, Clyde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? One person's forgotten read receipt - FREE One persons opinion about it - 2 Cents 17 replies (and counting) on a normally low noise list server - Priceless? From what the email header info says your using Outlook 2002 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616. Rules Wizard - Subject contains Activedir AND Body contains Return Receipt - send to deleted items. Life is too short to sweat the small stuff Clyde Burns -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE snip List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Set up the Internet Authentication Service on one of your DCs and have the Linux box use RADIUS authentication against the IAS box. IAS is one of the services that can be installed in Win2k. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to be released in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this version and found it much better than Windows2000 version? Thanks in advance your advice and input! Cliff Airhart Answer Financial Inc. Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness [EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Good luck if you ever email anyone running Watch Your Back from Grinning Shark software. Ever see a read receipt request generate a mail storm? Its fun. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Man oh man...I really don't think this is 1) appropriate for the list and 2) appropriate for the list! =) Read receipts are a problem, a lot of people (including myself) request them for every email we send. I need it to track who has ready what message, etc. They are VERY handy. I know that I myself have forgotten to turn them off before posing once and have gotten HUNDREDS of replies. I think that we can just live with the one or two a week we get through the list and live our lives just as happily as ever!!! The signal to noise ratio is normally VERY high in this forum, and that, as Martha would say, is a good thing! So, try not to ruin it for everyone, Ok? Ok! Anyways, just my 1/50 of a dollar. Benton Chase Wink --- Benton Chase Wink, CCNA MCSE McCombs School of Business Enterprise Server Team ofc: 512-471-9938 cell: 512-619-9016 -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD ^^^ READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to be released in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this version and found it much better than Windows2000 version? Thanks in advance your advice and input! Cliff Airhart Answer Financial Inc. Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness [EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ:
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to be released in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this version and found it much better than Windows2000 version? Thanks in advance your advice and input! Cliff Airhart Answer Financial Inc. Senior Systems Administrator - Server
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
I didn't mean to direct it to Arron, just everyone that's requesting read recipts -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
lol -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? I didn't mean to direct it to Arron, just everyone that's requesting read recipts -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
You seriously need some anger management classes. And lessons on using appropriate language. And you may want to see about getting that caps lock key unstuck. Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:53:25 -0800 KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Writing with the caps lock key on and not using proper punctuation, tends to get the attention of those that haven't read the multiple turn off request read receipt replies that have been sent out over the past few months. Second off, I don't need anger management classes, people just need to pay attention and follow instructions. People have politely asked for others to make sure that read receipts to be turned off. Not once, not twice, not even three times but multiple times. How many more times do we have to ask? Appropriate language? When did you become the grammar police? Get off your high horse -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You seriously need some anger management classes. And lessons on using appropriate language. And you may want to see about getting that caps lock key unstuck. Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:53:25 -0800 KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
I have 'em set to never so they don't bug me ;p -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Hello Everyone! With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
It is annoying and I think he got his message across..sometimes CAPS LOCKS are completely necessary -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You seriously need some anger management classes. And lessons on using appropriate language. And you may want to see about getting that caps lock key unstuck. Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:53:25 -0800 KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path is fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting deployment of WS2K3 when it ships. -gil -Original Message- From
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Man oh man...I really don't think this is 1) appropriate for the list and 2) appropriate for the list! =) Read receipts are a problem, a lot of people (including myself) request them for every email we send. I need it to track who has ready what message, etc. They are VERY handy. I know that I myself have forgotten to turn them off before posing once and have gotten HUNDREDS of replies. I think that we can just live with the one or two a week we get through the list and live our lives just as happily as ever!!! The signal to noise ratio is normally VERY high in this forum, and that, as Martha would say, is a good thing! So, try not to ruin it for everyone, Ok? Ok! Anyways, just my 1/50 of a dollar. Benton Chase Wink --- Benton Chase Wink, CCNA MCSE McCombs School of Business Enterprise Server Team ofc: 512-471-9938 cell: 512-619-9016 -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD ^^^ READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD?
Me too - - - set to never as well -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Same here and if you don't... what's the big deal... not like hitting the delete key is a huge effort. -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? I have 'em set to never so they don't bug me ;p -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, Arron S. Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if your dialin server software would support it. We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many African countries and with this we have the issue of bad telecommunications to our foreign branches. We are using the feature called Replicate from Media. All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and then restore to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it will receive the updates which will be minimal. Other features include: DNS Stub Zones Conditional Forwarding Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all domains or certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on previously but will continue with a cache profile) DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. Domain Rename: also need .NET Native (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: Transitive trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one domain to the required one. One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous versions. Hope this info helps you. These are from the top of my head. Need anything else let me know. Yusuf -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 yes -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. The AD in WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable improvements in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as well. Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The upgrade path
RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? [list owner]
Ok, stop. Everyone. I just want to make three points here. 1. This list has always been very good at self-regulation. As someone else pointed out, the signal to noise ratio is generally very good. I'd like everyone to try and keep it that way. 2. Offensive language is not appropriate on any professional list. 3. If anyone has a gripe about someone else's behaviour on the list, contact me (off-list) and I will attempt to resolve it. Do not post your gripe to the whole list. Tony - list owner -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Writing with the caps lock key on and not using proper punctuation, tends to get the attention of those that haven't read the multiple turn off request read receipt replies that have been sent out over the past few months. Second off, I don't need anger management classes, people just need to pay attention and follow instructions. People have politely asked for others to make sure that read receipts to be turned off. Not once, not twice, not even three times but multiple times. How many more times do we have to ask? Appropriate language? When did you become the grammar police? Get off your high horse -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? You seriously need some anger management classes. And lessons on using appropriate language. And you may want to see about getting that caps lock key unstuck. Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:53:25 -0800 KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE READ RECEIPTS..HOW MANY TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS! List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
